Observational Platforms Vito Vitale, Lars-Otto Reiersen, Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space/GMES and Climate Change Mikko Strahlendorff, GMES Bureau.
Advertisements

GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
GMES Africa The perspective from the African Regional Economic Communities, ACP Secretariat and AUC/REA Presented by Gina Bonne, Indian Ocean Commission.
Adaptations to Climate Change in Africa’s Water Sector: Contributions of the World Meteorological Organization Datius Rutashobya Climate and Water Department.
1 State of play Robert Lowson EEA Kopernikus coordinator, GMES Bureau.
I- Nord, september 2008 i-Nord An Integrated System for Surveillance of the Arctic Oceans Olav Rune Godø (Havforskningsinstituttet)
FreshNor FreshNor The freshwater budget of the Nordic Seas A Nordic research network Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen Danish Meteorological Institute.
Context of compilation of the WWQA Thomas Chiramba Chair, UN-Water Thematic Priority Area on Water Quality Chief, UNEP Freshwater Ecosystems Unit.
SeaDataNet, pan-European infrastructure for ocean and marine data management A key component of EMODNet A possible building block for GEOSS By Dick M.A.
Washington, DC - Sunday, 7 February 2010 SAON Board Meeting :: January 2012 :: Tromsø, Norway United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries.
WP5 Strategy Domenico Giardini SED ETHZ. WP5 Objectives Harmonize national implementation Integrate the European scientific community Establish Centres.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Science in the Coming Decade Dr. Mark Myers Director USGS.
Nikolaj Bock EEA and the Arctic. *5 are member countries in the Arctic Council (DEN, SWE, FIN, ICE, NOR) 6 are permanent observes in the Arctic Council.
Marine knowledge Gijon, May Blue Book 10 October take steps in 2008 towards a European Marine Observation and Data Network, 2.and promote.
CEOS WGISS Preliminary Workshop on Data Access and Integration: Global and Regional SDI and Client Perspectives 8-9 May 2000, Canberra ESCAP Regional Space.
SEIS CV Norway November 2008 WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe with marine data (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web-site near you)
The SAON Networks Database Hugo Ahlenius, Nordpil, Sweden Jan René Larsen, AMAP Secretariat Simon Wilson, AMAP Secretariat SAON Board Meeting, 1-2 October.
Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks - SAON Data and Information Services for Arctic observational activities Jan René Larsen SAON Secretary Arctic Monitoring.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda item: 29 Adrian Simmons, Chair of the GCOS Steering Committee Update from the Global.
1 Arctic monitoring and research activities: As part of its ongoing work, AMAP will continue to coordinate, based largely on national programs, to provide.
The International Arctic Observing Summit C.M. Lee, M. Jakobsson, Maribeth Murray P. Schlosser, J. Zhao 1.AOS overview 2.AOS white paper process 3.General.
EGIDA PROJECT 1stJoint Workshop of the EGIDA Stakeholder Network and Advisory Board Connecting GEOSS and its Stakeholders in Science.
SAON Data Management Workshop Report June 7-8, 2010, Norway Recommendations (Extracted by Jan René Larsen, 25 September 2012),
Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Cold Region - Needs and Support Yubao Qiu GEO Secretariat Boarding Meeting,
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
1 PROPOSED GCOS DONOR FUND A Progress Report to SBSTA Intersessional Meeting 2 June 2003 S L Barrell Australia.
Status of the Global Framework for Climate Services Filipe D. F. Lúcio
Cooperation Strategy in Polar Regions, ITALY – KOREA workshop, Incheon, 6-8 September, 2011 SAON Board meeting Potsdam, 1 st -2 nd October, 2012 INGV 1.
Approaches and Mainstreaming of Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Europe International workshop “Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to climate change.
PARIS21 Steering Committee26 April 2006 PARIS21 Steering Committee, Paris, 26 April 2006 PARIS21 Work Programme for 2006.
Mounir BENHAMMOU Director of Administrative and Financial Department Secretariat General of the Arab Maghreb Union EN/CSC2/2014/Pres/05.
Expert meeting on “Environment, Climate Change and Security in the Artic” 28 February 2013 EEA activities on climate change impacts and adaptation in Europe.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 SI O S Svalbard Integrated Arctic.
Saghit Ibatullin - Chairman of the EC IFAS "Strengthening regional cooperation on water: role of the Executive Committee of the International Fund for.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
IPY International Polar Year Progress report to STG 2.
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.
SAON Data Policy, activities, services, and deliveries Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,
IPSentinel Portuguese Infrastructure for Storage and dissemination of Satellite Sentinel Images PT02_Aviso3_003.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
PEEX – Pan Eurasian Experiment Research initiative involving European, Russian and Chinese organisations and institues
Adrian Simmons, AOPC Chair WOAP-II, JRC Ispra, Italy Summary of GCOS AOPC annual meeting (April 2006) and ongoing activities.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems Malta, 27 January 2004 Alan Edwards EUROPEAN COMMISSION GMES – Implications.
SAON Operational Activities Draft proposal Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, January 2012, Tromsø,
MARITIME AFFAIRS Marine knowledge 2020 Iain Shepherd16 September 2010.
South Africa – European Union Science and Technology Cooperation Brussels 30 January 2006.
IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
1 Internal Integration Strategy - WP8 Gunnar Sand and Ragnhild Rønneberg The University Centre in Svalbard Kick-off meeting GRD
Daniel Deybe – Ewald Pertlik DG RTD – I-1 Brussels – Jan 20, 2005
Strategy 12.
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
ERA-Perspectives European Strategy Forum on
FARO Meeting Arctic Science Summit Week April 2010
The Arctic Observing Summit
SIOS (Svalbard Integrated
Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in the Republic of Uzbekistan Geneva, April 12, 2017.
SAON Committee on Observations and Networks (SAON CON)
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
LUCAS Task Force 30 September 2015 Item 4 – Update on the Knowledge Innovation Project on Accounting for Natural Capital and ecosystem services (KIP INCA)
Ocean Observations: the European landscape
United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries
  1-A) How would Arctic science benefit from an improved GIS?
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Sandy Starkweather (NOAA), U.S. AON Executive Director
Input to the SAON Roadmap work based on work done in INTAROS where observing systems are assessed according to scientific themes Stein Sandven, NERSC.
CEOS SIT Technical Workshop Perspective on Arctic Initiatives
Presentation transcript:

Observational Platforms Vito Vitale, Lars-Otto Reiersen, Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,

Observational Platforms  Needed to collect the requested data/variables for research and monitoring of the Arctic system components: atmosphere, terrestrial-, freshwater- and marine- ecosystems, cryosphere, humans (health, economy, social aspects)  Covers a wide range of infrastructures: satellites, fixed stations on land and at sea, ship- and flight-cruises, drones, drifting and fixed buoys, health care stations, etc.  Must measure very different data/variables: physical, chemical, biological, human health, social and economic

SAON and observational platforms SAON was established to secure the existing observation platforms and to improve the situation where needed. Historically, most land-based platforms have been operated and financed by the countries. Ships have been financed by the owners. Exception has been for some satellites where some countries have contributed to the launch of joint satellites/sensors, e.g. ESA (European Space Agency).

Status Present Arctic Observing sites not adequately cover the Arctic region. Moreover, observing data are often fragmentary and not easily available. Some of the gaps (current and future) in Arctic observing were identified during the initial SAON development workshops.

Status National owned platforms will most probably continue to be the core arrangement of observational platforms – especially health, social and economic areas. Over the last twenty years observation platforms have been closed down, and observations of variables have been terminated affecting trend observational work.

The need Develop an optimization plan/strategy for the Arctic observing system (coherent with modeling needs) A process to clarify what is the probable development (survival) regarding observation platforms in the North for the next decade or two An analysis on how to influence national plans, priorities and decisions regarding securing/improving research and observation platforms. Improve options and strategies that could be applied to achieve an extended use of joint funding of platforms – preparing for more long term joint funded international platforms. This may involve several countries, private funding and foundations.

Develop an optimal Observation Sys. to be completed with other examples of plans developed at the level of organizations, countries, research groups

Develop an optimal Observation Sys. white papers presented at AOS 2013 A prototype of a modelling system assisting the design of the Arctic Observing network A Model-inspired Sampling Network Design and Representativeness Metholodoly for the Arctic Observing system Simulation Experiment: Justifying new Arctic Observation Capabilities

Related initatives At a disciplinary level INTERACT: An EU funded network of terrestrial stations IASOA: mainly devoted to harmonize methodologies and standard At a multi-disciplinary level SIOS: Svalbard Integrated Arctic Earth Observing System in a limited region aiming to design and implement an optimal system to answer several key ESS questions

Proposed actions The SAON Secretariat in cooperation with National Coordination Committees and data users and providers, could prepare a first simple overview of some existing observing platforms and their financial situations and “life expectancy” An analyzes of this could set the stage for further work to achieve more secured/joint funding of some of the observation platforms. This could include accessibility for foreign scientists. If there is an interest for joint funding, a more detailed planning is needed.