The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From
Advertisements

Results and Discussion Logan Pedersen & Dr. Mei-Ching Lien School of Psychological Science, College of Liberal Arts Introduction A classic finding in Psychology.
Behavioral Theories of Motor Control
 This study examined the effect of run-up velocity on the peak height achieved by the athlete in the pole vault and on the corresponding changes in the.
Motor Control Theory Dynamic & Ecological Approaches (Large parts adapted from Wallace, 1993)
Fundamental Concepts of Motor Development Developmental Systems Theories.
Chapter 3 Motor Ability Concept: A variety of abilities underlie motor skill learning and performance success.
Kinetic Rules Underlying Multi-Joint Reaching Movements. Daniel M Corcos†, James S. Thomas*, and Ziaul Hasan†. School of Physical Therapy*, Ohio University,
Hansjörg Neth Stephen J. Payne School of Psychology, Cardiff University Digital Calculations Digit Addition as Interactive Problem Solving.
Complexity Leadership Academy of Management Professional Development Workshop August 4, 2007.
Decision Dynamics and Decision States: the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model Psychology 209 March 4, 2013.
Mining for High Complexity Regions Using Entropy and Box Counting Dimension Quad-Trees Rosanne Vetro, Wei Ding, Dan A. Simovici Computer Science Department.
QUASID – Measuring Interaction Techniques Karin Nieuwenhuizen.
Chapter 13 Forecasting.
DDMLab – September 27, ACT-R models of training Cleotilde Gonzalez and Brad Best Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory (DDMLab)
Laurent Itti: CS599 – Computational Architectures in Biological Vision, USC Lecture 7: Coding and Representation 1 Computational Architectures in.
Inference in Dynamic Environments Mark Steyvers Scott Brown UC Irvine This work is supported by a grant from the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Motor Control Theory Chapter 5 – slide set 4.
Trends in Motor Control
Motor Control Theories
Theory of Decision Time Dynamics, with Applications to Memory.
Human Control of Systems Tracking Tasks Human Performance Considerations Measuring Tracking & Controlling Performance System Behaviors Representing System.
A Shaft Sensorless Control for PMSM Using Direct Neural Network Adaptive Observer Authors: Guo Qingding Luo Ruifu Wang Limei IEEE IECON 22 nd International.
Descriptive and Causal Research Designs Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Single-Factor Experimental Designs
Issues in Experimental Design fMRI Graduate Course October 30, 2002.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Statistics. Statistical Methods Were developed to serve a purpose Were developed to serve a purpose The purpose for each statistical.
Development of Fundamental Movement:
Dr. Maarten L. Wijnants Prof. dr. Anna M.T. Bosman ( Department of Special Education Behavioural Science Institute Radboud.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 03 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION OF THE EMERGENCE OF A HEALTHY CHAOTIC WALKING PATTERN IN NORMAL INFANT DEVELOPMENT Harbourne, R.T. 1, Kurz, M. 2, and DeJong,
Introduction to: Motor Skills and Abilities.  1. A task with a specific goal to achieve  Fundamental  Sport related  Music applications 2. An indicator.
Chapter 15 Basic concepts of motor control: Cognitive science perspectives.
Motor Control. Beyond babbling Three problems with motor babbling: –Random exploration is slow –Error-based learning algorithms are faster but error signals.
Low-Dimensional Chaotic Signal Characterization Using Approximate Entropy Soundararajan Ezekiel Matthew Lang Computer Science Department Indiana University.
Some figures adapted from a 2004 Lecture by Larry Liebovitch, Ph.D. Chaos BIOL/CMSC 361: Emergence 1/29/08.
Introduction: Brain Dynamics Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Motor Control Theories.  1. The patterning of body and limb motions relative to the patterning of environmental objects and events.
Multivariate Analysis and Data Reduction. Multivariate Analysis Multivariate analysis tries to find patterns and relationships among multiple dependent.
Voluntary Movement I. Psychophysical principles & Neural control of reaching and grasping Claude Ghez, M.D.
REFERENCES Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit.
ECE-7000: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems 2. Linear tools and general considerations 2.1 Stationarity and sampling - In principle, the more a scientific measurement.
USER INTERFACE USER INTERFACE January 5, 2006 Intern 박지현 Information Theoretic Model of HCI : A Comparison of the Hick-Hyman Law and Fitts’ Law Steven.
Rhythmic Interlimb Coordination Lyapunov exponent (slope at  = 0° and 180°) The Variability of Rhythmic Interlimb Coordination * * * * ( 1, Q 1 )
Controlling Chaos Journal presentation by Vaibhav Madhok.
Chapter 4 Motor Control Theories Concept: Theories about how we control coordinated movement differ in terms of the roles of central and environmental.
CZ5211 Topics in Computational Biology Lecture 4: Clustering Analysis for Microarray Data II Prof. Chen Yu Zong Tel:
Network Models (2) LECTURE 7. I.Introduction − Basic concepts of neural networks II.Realistic neural networks − Homogeneous excitatory and inhibitory.
Eye Movements and Working Memory Marc Pomplun Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts at Boston Homepage:
What is development? Domains of development Questions about Development: Normative Development and Individual Differences Goals of developmental psychology.
Central limit theorem - go to web applet. Correlation maps vs. regression maps PNA is a time series of fluctuations in 500 mb heights PNA = 0.25 *
[Chaos in the Brain] Nonlinear dynamical analysis for neural signals Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
Robot Intelligence Technology Lab. Evolutionary Robotics Chapter 3. How to Evolve Robots Chi-Ho Lee.
1 Chapter 20 Motor Performance in Adults © Gallahue, D.L., & Ozmun, J.C.. Understanding Motor Development. McGraw-Hill.
It is believed that when inter-trial time is not controlled, the CI effect will occur (i.e., random practice will outperform blocked practice in retention),
Some Terminology experiment vs. correlational study IV vs. DV descriptive vs. inferential statistics sample vs. population statistic vs. parameter H 0.
Emilie Zamarripa & Joseph Latimer| Faculty Mentor: Jarrod Hines
Dimension Review Many of the geometric structures generated by chaotic map or differential dynamic systems are extremely complex. Fractal : hard to define.
M. Lewis, K. Muller, M. Dunn, R. T. Eakin, L. D. Abraham
Theoretical Perspectives in Motor Development
The Classification of Motor Skills
PSG College of Technology
Descriptive and Causal Research Designs
Oliver Sawi1,2, Hunter Johnson1, Kenneth Paap1;
The origins of motor noise
Motor Control Theories
The Organization and Planning of Movement Ch
Srinivas Neginhal Anantharaman Kalyanaraman CprE 585: Survey Project
Presentation transcript:

The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman 1 Anna Bosman 1 & Guy Van Orden 2 1 Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 2 University of Cincinnati, OH

Overview Introduction to Topics of Complexity Precision Aiming: –Non-Dominant Hand Practice –Kinematics –Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off Consequences for Theory and Modelling

1/f in complex systems Long-Range Dependence: –Every Data Points Exerts an Influence of Some Magnitude on Every Other Data Point Variation Increases Rather than Stabilizes with Larger Sample Sizes Runs Against Standard Statistical Intuitions –Data = Signal + Noise –Central Limit Theorem  Presence and Relative Change of 1/f scaling is Telling of System Dynamics

How structured is it?

1/f scaling and cognition: Two approaches Component-dominant dynamics –Traditional (information processing) approach in cognitive psychology –Independent components work at characteristic time scales –Summed effects of multiple time scale random processes can naturally yield 1/f spectra –E.g. Additive Factors (Sternberg) Word-naming: –Perception –Word recognition –Response selection –Action ADDITIVE + + e.g. Wagenmakers, Farell, & Ratcliff, 2004

1/f scaling and cognition: Two approaches Interaction-dominant dynamics –1/f emerges through coordinated interactions between components –Components at different scales change each others dynamics –No statistically independent components: A single process extends across all time scales of variation INTERACTIVE e.g. Holden, Van Orden & Turvey, 2008

Participant power spectrum plus 20 % noiseParticipant power spectrum plus 30 % noise How does it change, what does it mean? Participant power spectrumParticipant power spectrum plus 10 % noise

Hypothesis 1/f scaling reveals the intrinsic dynamics of coordinated self-organized systems 1/f Scaling Changes as a Function of Mechanical, Anatomical, Physiological, Neural, Environmental, and/or Task-Related Constraints Degree of Skill and Perturbation of Task Performance Task performances cannot be fully understood or described in terms of mean behavior, hence at single levels of analysis i.e. Average movement duration or accuracy

Motor Coordination: Key Ingredients Degrees-of-freedom problem: –“the problem of how to compress the movement system’s state space of very many dimensions into a control space of very few dimensions” (Turvey, 1990, p. 939) A Synergy is a (meta) stable organization whose components are always ready to participate in other stable organizations Complex systems minimize their entropy production and energy dissipation as they self-organize  1/f scaling, phase-space dynamics and entropy measures provide a sensitive metric for such cooperative interactions

Precision aiming Average Movement Time Function of target size and distance between targets MT = a + b (ID) ID = log2 (2D / W) What about fluctuations over time?

Purposely difficult (ID = 6.9) F(4, 56) = 4.65, p <.01 F(4,56) = 3.62, p <.02 F(4,56) < 1 D = 24 cm W = 0.8 cm 5 blocks x 1100 trials Non-dominant hand F(4,56) = 3.87, p <.05

RQA in Motor Learning Recurring sequences of data points Recurring data points Complexity of deterministic structureAttractor strength ~ Lyapunov exp Nonlinear technique Transform original series into its embedding matrix (EM) based on delays higher dimensional recurrences captured by single variables By creating “time”/”space” delayed versions of the signal Setting a radius

Purposely easy (ID = 3) D = 8 cm W = 2 cm 5 blocks x 1100 trials Non-dominant hand No change in 1/f scaling No change in RQA measures All F (4,56)’s < 1

All F (4,56)’s < 1 RQA Dynamics

Conclusion High-ID condition: motor learning –More 1/f scaling with practice –More confined, less random, and stronger underlying attractor –Less random, more patterned –  compression of degrees-of-freedom Low-ID condition: overlearning –No change in 1/f –No change in reconstructed phase space –  No further compression of degrees-of-freedom

Kinematics and long-range correlations Higher-Order MT Dynamics Relate to Movement Duration and Accuracy –Differently in two radically different ID conditions Another Level of Analysis: Individual Oscillatory Movements –Kinematic Patterns: Velocity Profile, Acceleration Profile, Hooke’s Plot

Harmonicity Simple Harmonic Oscillation vs. Damped Oscillation Self-Sustained Oscillation (Kugler & Turvey, 1987) Energy Dissipation Index of Harmonicity (Guiard, 1993; 1997) Between conditions: Index-of-Difficulty (Mottet & Bootsma, 1999) Between participants: Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off

MT SL Higher-order dynamics Constraints: ID = 6.9 Energy minimization Emergent coordination Speed Accuracy H : W D H : H : /f noiseSampEn Kinematics /f noiseSampEn 1/f noise SampEn -.45

MT SL Constraints: ID = 6.9 Energy minimization Emergent coordination Kinematics /f noise Higher-order dynamics Fast Not accurate

MT SL Constraints: ID = 6.9 Energy minimization Emergent coordination Kinematics /f noise Higher-order dynamics Slow Accurate

MT SL H : CEILING W D Kinematics.56 1/f noise Higher-order dynamics Constraints: ID = 3 Energy minimization Emergent coordination Accuracy : CEILING Speed: CEILING

Speed-accuracy trade-off and highly related levels of analysis High-ID condition: –More harmonious movements: faster and less accurate more 1/f in MT series, less 1/f in succesive line lengths More 1/f, lower dimensional attractor –speed-accuracy trade-off at three levels of analysis: Higher-order dynamics (fractal correlations, entropy) Movement time and terminal accuracy Kinematic patterns Low-ID condition –Kinematics show ceiling effect –Movement time and accuracy show ceiling effects –Fractal dynamics: win-win instead of trade-off Task constraints: –Win-win or trade-off

Comparing conditions ID = 6.9ID = 3 MT SL

Across-task differences Simple RT, Precision aiming: –Each trial is identical: same SIGNAL to respond and same RESPONSE –EXTERNAL sources of variation in Response Time are minimized  Variation must largely reflect INTERNAL sources Choice RT, Word-naming –Experimental trials differ: A different SIGNAL to respond and a different RESPONSE –EXTERNAL sources of variation in Response Time are introduced to the measured values  Variation must reflect INTERNAL sources to a lesser extent |  Discrete  |  Cyclic  | N responses 1 response 4 responses Data from: Van Orden, Holden, & Turvey, 2003; Kello, Beltz, Van Orden, & Turvey, 2007; Wijnants et al., 2009

Human Gait Old adults Parkinson disease (1) vs. Old adults (2) vs. Young adults (3) Repetition effects reduce RT and SD Facilitate WN performance Three blocks of 1100 same word stimuli Word-Naming

How does 1/f scaling change? Component-dominant dynamics –  The presence of specific processes affects the presence of 1/f scaling (AC or UC) –  Changing strategies Interaction-dominant dynamics –Adaptive basis of coordinated behavior –Scaling relations track the efficiency of the coordination of perception and action  Perturbations reduce the presence of 1/f scaling  Unsystematic variation, e.g. less coordinated behavior, whitens the data signal  More coordinated behaviors reveal more 1/f ADDITIVE INTERACTIVE

Variation increases with sample size –Longer data series pick up more 1/f scaling ( Van Orden, Holden, & Turvey, 2005)

Cue Predictability in CRT (Kello, Beltz, Van Orden, & Turvey, 2007)

These results follow naturally from predictions of an interaction-dominant approach Component-dominant approaches should post- hoc explain: –New components for longer data series –New components for every independent stream of 1/f –Consistent changes in 1/f scaling with changes in task performance (at multiple levels of analysis) Modular or interactive dynamics?

Sum up Long-range dependence can be manipulated in predictable ways –Practice or more stable and coordinated behaviors shows more 1/f scaling –Stronger task constraints (external variation) perturb performances, fewer 1/f –More 1/f scaling goes with less random and stronger underlying attractors –1/f scaling is to some extent present in any repeated behaviors

Any Questions?...