May 14 th 2010, CCAC Christian Demers and Geneviève Lauzon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Advertisements

The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
USC Laboratory Animal Training Annual Refresher Courtesy of Department of Animal Resources and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee CHP 234.
Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,
Preparation for AAALAC Sylvia J. Singletary, DVM DACLAM.
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF RESEARCH LINDA M. GARDINER, Ph.D. DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES.
1 The aim…. ‘to enable assessors to objectively assess a laboratory’s compliance with the new standards’
Health and Safety - an update Ian Gillett Safety Director.
IACUC and Compliance Overview and Updates
Public and Private Interests in Animal Research LAT Chapter 1.
POST APPROVAL MONITORING AND EDUCATION PROGRAM Jane Lehmbeck 1, Sarah Blackman 1, Karen Davenport 2, Karen Parks 1 Office of the Vice President for Research.
The University of New Mexico & The Office of Animal Research, Ethics, Care, and Compliance present New Researcher Training A learning module developed.
Office of the Campus Veterinarian Preparing Your Lab for an IACUC or AAALAC Inspection.
Post Approval Monitoring Program Presented by Carolyn Malinowski Manager, Quality Assurance and Training.
Northwestern University Post Approval Monitoring ____________________________________________________ Policy for Post-Approval Monitoring Program, Northwestern.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
ERIKA BARRETT TECHNICIAN, BIOLOGICAL SAFETY OFFICE OF RADIATION, CHEMICAL & BIOLOGICAL SAFETY FRIDAY, OCTOBER 3.
Responsible Conduct of Animal Research at UTHSCH Meredith L. Moore, Ph.D. Assistant Director, IACUC Office
A Review of the Public Health Service (PHS) Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Created by Marc S. Hulin, DVM, Dipl. ACLAM.
Network security policy: best practices
MANDY FAIR, IACUC ADMINISTRATOR ANIMAL CARE AND USE.
An Introduction to Conducting Animal Research: Oversight and the IACUC Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee
Bodil Mose Pedersen, DHI Status for implementering af ”Quality Manual”
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY AWARENESS.
The Use of Animals in Research Is a Privilege We Wish to Retain Animal Welfare Versus Animal Rights How are Animal Welfare Concerns Reported?
MATTHEW MATKOVICH MINE EQUIPMENT COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST QUALITY ASSURANCE & MATERIALS TESTING DIVISION MSHA – APPROVAL & CERTIFICATION CENTER 30CFR, PART.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. IACUC  Required by AWA, PHS, AAALAC  Is appointed by the President of the UA  The Institutional Official.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Chinook’s Edge School Division No. 73 General Safety Orientation.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Ross University Bernard Grevemeyer.
Animals in Research Donald B. Casebolt, DVM, MPVM, DACLAM.
Animal Care Committee responsibilities CCAC ACC CCAC National Workshop, May 13, 2010.
Use of Animals in Research: IACUC's, Animal Care Requirements and More Panel members: William Ray Stricklin, PhD IACUC Chair Douglas Powell, DVM, ACLAM.
Post-Approval Monitoring: What does a program look like? Elaine N Joseph, PhD Regulatory Compliance Manager University of Michigan.
Welcome to Food Safety Plan Documentation and Record Keeping Heidi Dupuis, RD, SFNS ODE – Child Nutrition Ode.state.or.us/services/nutrition.
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
IACUC Procedures James Weiland, PhD Professor of Ophthalmology/BME IACUC Chair
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Schools Animal Ethics Committee (SAEC) Western Australia Julie Hitchens Category B  BSocSci Anthropology (Hons)(Curtin)  PGradDipOccHlthSfty (Curtin)
An Introduction to Conducting Animal Research at TNPRC: Oversight and the IACUC Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics September 29 - October 2, 2013.
HIPAA PRACTICAL APPLICATION WORKSHOP Orientation Module 1B Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc.
The Research Subject Advocate (RSA). Pictured, left to right: Andrea Saltzman, RN; Enrico Cagliero, MD; Debi Dunkless.
Who Monitors the Use of Animals in Research? United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture -Animal and Plant Health Inspection.
Office of Research & Development (ORD) Local Accountability of Research 2009 Baltimore, Maryland January 13-14, 2009 “Meeting the Current Challenges of.
Animals in Research: Navigating the Animal Protocol Approval Process Summer Seminar Series Susan Warren IACUC Chair.
A Retrospective/Prospective Evaluation of KUMC’s Post-Approval Monitoring Program Michael D. Taylor, PhD Office of Animal Welfare.
Regulations. PHS and USDA PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals NIH - OLAW oversees animal welfare for vertebrates Guide for The Care.
Ethics and Resources in Animal-Based Research. Division of Comparative Medicine Dr. Kate Banks MSB 1236 (416)
Animals in Research Donald B. Casebolt Director, Department of Animal Resources.
Post-Approval Monitoring (PAM) Program November 17, 2015.
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER NEW ORLEANS.
2012 State of the IRB Boston University Charles River Campus (CRC) Cynthia J. Monahan, MBA, CIP Director, Institutional Review Board.
Date CCAC National Workshop Tri-Agency Financial Monitoring Review and Research with Animals May 8, 2009 Presented by: Carole Crête-Robidoux, Manager,
COMPETENCY AND PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF ANIMAL CARE TRAINING PROGRAMS IN ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS Elizabeth Dodemaide B.V.Sc., M.A. Associate Director, Laboratory.
Responsible Conduct of Animal Research at UTHSCH Meredith L. Moore, Ph.D. Assistant Director, IACUC Office
Kaplan University LS 516 Unit Six Town Hall Welcome! Are there any questions? Tonight our subject concerns two basic questions: 1.When sponsoring faculty.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
Department of Animal Resources
TCP LIMS – Animal Use Protocol Management
A Guide for Managers for Professional Staff
Renewal Animal Training
A Guide for Professional Staff
A Guide for Professional Staff
Student Animal Care Training
Montclair.edu/iacuc IACUC at MSU montclair.edu/iacuc
Training Continuing Reviews and Amendments for General AUPs.
Care of Research Animals
Presentation transcript:

May 14 th 2010, CCAC Christian Demers and Geneviève Lauzon

Overview 1.CRCHUM; 2.PAM program: A.Which protocols are monitored; B.Who visits; C.What happens with the results; D.Categories of non-compliance.

Animal Care Committee CRCHUM

Number of protocols per category of invasiveness (April 2010)

Number of protocols per researcher (04/2010)

Animals used at CRCHUM in 2009

Objectives of PAM Monitoring one third of AUPs each year. Reducing concerns, problems or complaints received from members of the research center community. Establishing a confident relationship between animals users and ACC.

WHY? ACC is responsible for identifying and correcting gaps in relation to compliance with approved protocols and SOPs so that procedures with animals are done efficiently and in the best conditions possible.

Which protocols are monitored ? All E protocols are monitored; All protocols that raise concerns, problems or complaints are monitored; For all breeding protocols, checking the number of animals produced and reported by the animal care staff and / or users against the number approved in the protocol; All other protocols are monitored randomly (protocol number drawn and put back in pool) at the ACC monthly meeting; It should be noted that Category C and D protocols are more likely to be the subject of post-approval monitoring.

USERS Animal facilities Animal health Technicians Veterinarian Animal Care Committee Research Center Monitoring before and after implementation of post-approval monitoring program PAM officer

Who? All members of the ACC can visit, including researchers using animals or not, community reps. and coordinators. At CRCHUM, the ACC assistant-coordinator is the PAM officer. Exceptions: Members of the animal facilities and the veterinarian can’t do PAM visits. A minimum of two people are required for a visit. In addition, one of them must be a researcher. Exception : Terminal procedures ex.: tissue harvesting (in this case, PAM officer is enough).

Items to be evaluated during a visit Training of users, the safe and proper handling of animals and products used (drugs, radiation, biohazard); Procedures as described in AUP, or in a SOP; Aseptic surgery; Proper use of analgesia and anesthesia; The number of animals used; The endpoints and the method of euthanasia; Issues raised by team members.

What happens with the results? For each visit, a report is issued to the committee (post-approval monitoring form); The user(s) and researcher are acknowledged by for the visit; A copy of the report with the recommendations, if any, is sent to user(s) and the researcher before ACC meeting.

Categories of non-compliance Problems most frequently observed Minor: –Animal users have no idea of the endpoints indicated on the protocol; –Users have never read the protocol; –Changes in protocol w/o ACC approved amendment; –Name of mouse strains.

Major: –Incorrect analgesia or anesthesia; –Incorrect aseptic conditions during surgeries. Categories of non-compliance

Actions taken According to the problems noted, an amendment to the protocol may be required; If the number of animals produced in breeding is different from what has been referred to in the protocol, the principal researcher / applicant is contacted and a justification is requested; If necessary, there will be a requirement to attend laboratory animal training; Any deviations must be corrected; the corrective action for the major problems will be decided by the committee.

How to obtain success in a PAM program The officer knows the users; Presence of a researcher; PAM officer may help to apply 3R principles; Visit must be performed in a positive way; In case of non-compliance, the PAM officer must quickly find ways in collaboration with the users for them to comply.

New CRCHUM Expected opening: 2013