Fk. Bordry AB/PO Ability of the converter s to follow the reference function (static, dynamics) I1 I2 I3 Static part is covered by the static definition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Objectives Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Signals
Advertisements

Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
Instrumentation and Measurements
Magnetic Behavior of LHC Correctors: Issues for Machine Operation W. Venturini Delsolaro AT-MTM; Inputs from A. Lombardi, M. Giovannozzi, S. Fartoukh,
Accuracy and Precision
Part 1: Basic Principle of Measurements
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
E. Todesco FIELD MODEL AT 7 TEV N. Aquilina, E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland On behalf of the FiDeL team CERN, 17 th June.
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
Instrumentation and Measurements Class 3 Instrument Performance Characteristics.
Lecture 3 Mechanical Measurement and Instrumentation MECN 4600 Department of Mechanical Engineering Inter American University of Puerto Rico Bayamon Campus.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
CERN Accelerator School Power converter requirements 2 Jean-Paul Burnet CERN CAS, Baden, 7-14 May 2014.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Fk. Bordry AB/PO Academic Training - 27th March 2003 Technological Challenges for the LHC Power converters for the LHC Frédérick BORDRY AB-PO ? I(A) t.
LHC online modeling Mark IV LHC online modeling Mark IV Piotr Skowroński Tobias Persson Agnieszka Szczotka Jaime Coello de Portugal Lukas Malina Mattias.
L. Serio COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
BME 353 – BIOMEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES.
Measurements Measurements and errors : - Here, the goal is to have some understanding of the operation and behavior of electrical test instruments. Also,
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
TC 25th October1 LHC Real-time requirements What is real-time? What is latency? The time between asking for something to be done and it being done The.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
7 th March 2008 Magnet Modelling N. Sammut On behalf of the FIDEL Working Group.
Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
Measurement of LHC Superconducting Dipole and Quadrupole Magnets in Ramp Rate Conditions G.Deferne, CERN Aknowledgements: M. Di Castro, S. Sanfilippo,
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
1 LHC Beam Energy J. Wenninger CERN Beams Department Operation group / LHC Acknowledgments: E. Todesco.
Primary Design Parameters July 13,2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Besides design specifications driven by physics and Main Injector beam parameters, significant.
17 th April 2007 Nicholas J. Sammut Decay Prediction and Minimisation During LHC Operation University of Malta Field Quality Working Group with several.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
High precision specification and test of power converters at CERN
Accuracy Significance in Measurement.
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
LHC Commissioning with Beam
ELECTRICAL MEASURMENT AND INSTRUMENTS
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
(tracking between sectors)
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Powering the LHC Magnets
Results of the LHC Prototype Chromaticity Measurement
Accuracy and Precision
Status of Magnet Setup Cycling for LHC
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York , USA
Draft Dyno requirements for GTR (proposal broadly as per CFR § )
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
Bubble Chamber – Beam Requirements
Limits on damping times
LHC OPERATION AND SUPPORT
Planning at 5 o’clock meeting Friday
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Beam dynamics requirements on MQT
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Feedbacks & Stabilization Getting them going
HL-LHC power converter requirements Thermal settling drift
Presentation transcript:

Fk. Bordry AB/PO Ability of the converter s to follow the reference function (static, dynamics) I1 I2 I3 Static part is covered by the static definition : accuracy, reproducibility (see session 7) Dynamic part comes from : - timing error - lagging error in the regulation Tracking error between I1 and I2 Iref Tracking 11th Chamonix workshop - 18th January 2001

Fk. Bordry AB/PO I I ref Dynamics : - Measurement and command must be synchronised : timing (1ms) - Lagging error : # Iref => I : regulation loop are designed with no lagging error independent of the load time constant Dynamics : - Measurement and command must be synchronised : timing (1ms) - Lagging error : # Iref => I : regulation loop are designed with no lagging error independent of the load time constant Power Converter + Circuit T1/S R Ts ADC Digital controller DAC Ts B Magnet F(s) = 1/(1+Ts) # I => B : time constant (T : vacuum chamber, beam screen…) must be known (could be corrected by control) Measurement campaign : test benches and String 2. Tracking : dynamics

Fk. Bordry AB/PO The curve marked feed-forward uses the knowledge of the transfer functions as established on the test benches. This correction compensates well the difference in the high field saturation, but leaves a substantial deviation at low and intermediate field. This deviation is mostly due to a systematic measurement artefact. Irrespective of its nature however, and because this is a systematic effect, the deviation is well corrected by iteration on the measured B2/B1 ratio as shown by the curves marked feed-back. In this case the tracking error on the B2/B1 ratio is definitely inside the range to be achieved for the tune feed-back system to lock, and in fact quite close to the range necessary to maintain the maximum allowed tune variation to within 3 × as dictated by the nominal LHC performance. The optimised current ramp was sent unchanged in a second cycle, with the aim to verify the reproducibility of the ramp. The result demonstrates that the reproducibility is excellent. The ratio B2/B1 for the focussing quadrupole plotted as a function of the dipole field along the reference current ramp. Tracking at String 2

20 ppm Accuracy after calibration  B/B ultimate =  I/I ultimate = 20ppm  B = 9 * = T  B/B o = Orbit excursion :  X = D x.  B/B o = ~ 0.7 mm Tracking between the 8 main dipole converters Could be corrected with a pilot run and new cycle => reproducibility 10 ppm reproducibility Orbit excursion :  X = D x.  B/B o = ~ 0.35 mm ”It would be better with 5 ppm ” Oliver Brüning (  X < 180  m) Could be corrected with a pilot run and new cycle => reproducibility 10 ppm reproducibility Orbit excursion :  X = D x.  B/B o = ~ 0.35 mm ”It would be better with 5 ppm ” Oliver Brüning (  X < 180  m) 11th Chamonix workshop - 18th January 2001

Fk. Bordry AB/PO Power Converter Tolerances for LHC Precision Control

Tracking between the dipole and quadrupole converters 20 ppm Accuracy  B/B ultimate =  I/I ultimate = 20ppm  B = 9 * = T  B/B o = Energy error in the machine leads to a tune change :  Q =  nat.  p/p o =  nat.  B/B o = 100 * = Tuning quadrupoles can correct up to  Q = ppm Accuracy  B/B ultimate =  I/I ultimate = 20ppm  B = 9 * = T  B/B o = Energy error in the machine leads to a tune change :  Q =  nat.  p/p o =  nat.  B/B o = 100 * = Tuning quadrupoles can correct up to  Q = 0.3 Tracking between the main quadrupole converters small  beating : no problem

Fk. Bordry AB/PO –Accuracy Long term setting or measuring uncertainty taking into consideration the full range of permissible changes* of operating and environmental conditions. * requires definition –Reproducibility Uncertainty in returning to a set of previous working values from cycle to cycle of the machine. –Stability Maximum deviation over a period with no changes in operating conditions. Accuracy, reproducibility and stability are defined for a given period –Accuracy Long term setting or measuring uncertainty taking into consideration the full range of permissible changes* of operating and environmental conditions. * requires definition –Reproducibility Uncertainty in returning to a set of previous working values from cycle to cycle of the machine. –Stability Maximum deviation over a period with no changes in operating conditions. Accuracy, reproducibility and stability are defined for a given period Glossary Precision Precision is qualitative. Accuracy is quantitative. I Nominal I Meas. ± Accuracy ppm * I Nominal half an hour Cycle 1 Cycle 2Cycle 3 One day max I B1 I B2 I B3 11th Chamonix workshop - 18th January 2001

Fk. Bordry AB/PO Accuracy Long term setting or measuring uncertainty taking into consideration the full range of permissible changes* of operating and environmental conditions. LHC : The accuracy is defined by default for a period of one year. The accuracy is expressed in ppm of I Nominal. If the one year accuracy is too large, a calibration process should be executed more often (e.g every month) LHC : The accuracy is defined by default for a period of one year. The accuracy is expressed in ppm of I Nominal. If the one year accuracy is too large, a calibration process should be executed more often (e.g every month) * For LHC :Engineering Specifications General parameters for equipment installed in the LHC (e.g.  T = ±2 o C in UAs) (LHC-PM-ES ) Main parameters of the LHC 400/230 V distribution system (LHC-EM-ES-0001) I Nominal I Meas. ± Accuracy ppm * I Nominal

Fk. Bordry AB/PO Reproducibility LHC : The reproducibility is defined by default for a period of one day without any intervention affecting the calibrated parts (e.g. DCCT, ADC) The reproducibility is expressed in ppm of I Nominal. Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 One day max I B1 I B2 I B3 I B2 = I B1 ± (Reproducibility pmm. I nominal ) I B3 = I B2 ± (Reproducibility pmm. I nominal ) Uncertainty in returning to a set of previous working values from cycle to cycle of the machine.

Fk. Bordry AB/PO Stability Maximum deviation over a period with no changes in operating conditions. LHC : The stability is defined by default for a period of half an hour The stability is expressed in ppm of I Nominal. ± Stability ppm. I Nominal half an hour Time in Minutes Current offset in Milliamps Current offset in ppm of 20 kA I 0 = Amps