Energy Efficiency Design Index – An Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy efficiency – Including measures to limit GHG emissions Arsenio A. Dominguez Vice-Chairman, Marine Environment Protection Committee, IMO Panamas.
Advertisements

MARINTEK 1 Assessment of CO 2 emission performance of individual ships: The IMO CO 2 index Øyvind Buhaug MARINTEK.
IMO Symposium on a Sustainable Maritime
EEDI/EEOI/SEEMP Initiatives for driving down CO2 emissions reduction of from world shipping Insert Customer Name Insert Date.
REDUCING GHG FROM SHIPS INTERTANKO Latin American Panel Cancun October 28/29, 2008.
Virtual Arrival means reduced emission Greening Logistics European Parliament Brussels 28 April 2010 Manager Research and Projects.
Adam Larsson, Project Manager, DNV 26 May 2011 Oshima ECO-ship 2020 The open hatch bulk carrier of the future.
GHG Indexing of Ships and its updates Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
WAVESPEC Limited A Braemar Seascope Plc. Group Company October 2005 Factors involved in selecting a propulsion system for your LNG shipping project Presentation.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES FOR IMO
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
Dr Alan J Murphy School of Marine Science and Technology.
Study on future fuels for cargo vessels in the Baltic Sea
How the IMO is meeting the challenges of dealing with maritime safety and security – an overview Neil Frank R. Ferrer Ocean Concerns Office Department.
Environmental Landscape A burden or opportunity? Tony Field South East Europe Marine Business Manager.
IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships Eivind S. Vagslid Head, Chemical and Air Pollution.
Lloyd’s Register Marine - Classification & Marine Technology Tim Kent Technical Director, Marine August 2013.
Protection of knowledge in the shipbuilding industry Leading expertise for a safer world A Classification Society perspective Vaughan Pomeroy, Technical.
IMO GHG REGULATIONS Latin American Panel Cartagena, Columbia November 1, 2011.
Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization
ROAD TRANSPORT RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION (2003 Call)
ASIAN PANEL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS ASIAN PANEL March 2, 2010 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Client Name is.... Dr Lynda Speed
Attracting Green Ships May About RightShip The Current Environment The Existing Vessel Design Index Accuracy of data Factoring in relative CO 2.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.
BIMCO driving – Maritime Environmental & Efficiency Management BIMCO seminar – in association with Fathom 2 June , Nor Shipping, Norway.
Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO Council November 15, 2012 UPDATE ON GHG MARKET BASED MEASURES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 11, 2010 INTERTANKO’S APPROACH TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
GL – Your competitive edge Take the lead through innovation Fuel Cells in maritime Applications - Challanges, Chances and Experiences
Leading the way; making a difference Sustainability of the Oil Transportation Industry China Oil Transportation Safety Conference Nanjing September 2012.
1 Green Ship Technologies Kazuyoshi HIROTA Universal Shipbuilding Corporation A member of The Shipbuilder’s Association of Japan (SAJ)
2.6 Reduction of GHG emissions Energy Efficiency Design Index Tripartite – 8-9 November 2008 Pierre C. Sames Chairman IACS SG/ENV.
Carbon Emissions and the Need for Improved Energy Efficiency.
2.1 Reduction of GHG emissions Energy Efficiency Design Index Tripartite – September 2009 Pierre C. Sames Chairman IACS EG/ENV.
North American Panel 4 November 2010 Houston Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
IFLOS SUMMER ACADEMY 2008 Panel Discussion “SHIP AIR EMISSIONS” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO.
Leading the way; making a difference GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires.
Leading the way; making a difference MONITORING REPORTING & VERIFICATION (MRV) OF DATA TO ASSESS THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF SHIPS IN OPERATIONS (FUEL CONSUMPTION.
Tripartite Meeting Tokyo, September 2007 Ship Recycling An Overview of Regulatory and Industry Developments Presented by INTERTANKO and ICS on behalf of.
Leading the way; making a difference EXPONAVAL – TRANSPORT 2014 December 3, 2014 Environmental Regulatory Challenges Facing the Maritime Industry JOSEPH.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
23. November 2015 – Skibsteknisk Selskab
Asian Panel 3 December 2010 Hong Kong Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
Climate Challenge and the Tanker Industry Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental Manager Image Courtesy of NORDEN AS Maritime Cyprus 2009.
Module 2: Ship Energy Efficiency Regulations and Related Guidelines
GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS - UPDATE - INTERTANKO Council 10 May 2011 Athens.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS.
Reduction of harmful emissions from ships by Manager Research and Projects Lausanne 12 September 2008
2 Reduction of GHG emissions Energy Efficiency Design Index – Minimum power to ensure safe manoeuvring in adverse conditions Tripartite – Tokyo,
Vessel classification Current issues and developments within IACS Tom Boardley Lloyd’s Register Marine Director IACS Chairman 18 March 2013.
Maritime Environmental Issues and Regulatory Status Seog Tae, KANG Marketing Manager, Global Marketing & Customer Support, DNV Maritime KNECC, 20 October.
EU Shipping MRV Regulation MRV Regulation Implementation
1 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Management An introduction Tim Holmes, P.E. Kenwood Energy Energy Consulting Services Kenwood Energy P.O.Box 692 Kenwood, CA
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
The Shipboard Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP)
The Impact of the Panama Canal Expansion on Ship design and trade Elizabeth Lindstad Sintef Ocean AS Sintef Ocean AS: The merger of Norwegian Marine.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 14, 2008
Energy Efficiency Design Index for Challenge Emissions (EEDI)
2.1 – GHG Emission Reductions
Implementation of Marpol Annex VI
Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization
MARPOL ANNEX VI AND THE NEED TO RATIFY
Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI Convention
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Energy Efficiency Design Index – An Update Dr Zabi Bazari Ship Energy Services Manager Lloyd’s Register, London, UK. zabi.bazari@lr.org RINA Lecture, 2 February 2012, London, UK.

Content Introduction EEDI formula and Attained EEDI Reference lines and Required EEDI EEDI verification IMO workplan and outcome of January 2012 meeting Likely impacts Conclusions

Introduction Detail 3

IMO initiatives for GHG emissions control EEDI IMO Initiatives MBMs EEOI SEEMP Ship owner / operator Owners / Charterers Shipyard Regulatory status: EEDI / SEEMP: Mandatory from 1st January 2013 EEOI: Voluntary MBMs: Early discussions Detail 4 4

New Chapter 4 of MARPOL Annex VI IMO MEPC 62 in July 2011 agreed to a new Chapter 4 in MARPOL Annex VI entitled “Regulations on Energy Efficiency of Ships”. This includes addition of new Regulations 19 to 23 Regulation 19 is on Application domain of Chapter 4 Regulations 20 is on “Attained EEDI” Regulations 21 is on “Required EEDI” Regulation 22 is on SEEMP Regulation 23 is on “Technical co-operation and technology transfer” There are quite a number of Guidelines in support of the above regulations. 5

Attained EEDI and Required EEDI Detail 6

Attained EEDI: Calculation formula (MEPC Circ.681) Main Engine Aux Engine (s) Innovative Energy Eff. Power Gen. Technologies Innovative Energy Eff. Prop. Technologies fc. EEDI = [gCO2/(tonne.nm)] Detail Boilers are excluded from EEDI! 7

EEDI parameters EEDI = Capacity: Main power: PME=0.75MCR Carbon factor Ice class factor Auxiliary power: PME >=10000KW: PAE=0.025Me+250 PME < 10000KW: PAE=0.05Me Capacity factor Wave factor Capacity: DWT: Bulk carriers,Containers, Tankers,Gas carriers,cargo ships,etc. GTR: Passenger Ship Shaft Motor Waste Heat Energy Saving Main power: PME=0.75MCR EEDI = Attained Speed fc [gCO2/(tonne.nm)]

Reference lines Reference lines are ship specific. They are part of Regulation 22 (in equation form). All new ship types, for inclusion in regulation, require a new reference line.

Required EEDI Required EEDI: The regulatory limit for EEDI. Cut Off Reference Line Linear range Required EEDI: The regulatory limit for EEDI. Required EEDI = (1 – X/100)*Reference Value Where: X is the Reduction Rate. Reference Value is calculated from Reference Line. Attained EEDI ≤ Required EEDI

Implementation stages and reduction rates EEDI implementation phases are: Phase 0 2013 – 2014 Phase 1 2015 – 2019 Phase 2 2020 – 2024 Phase 3 2025 – …… Reduction rate for the above phases are as in diagram.

Ship types subject of current EEDI regulations Attained EEDI: Following ships over 400 GT*: Bulk carrier Gas carrier Tanker Container ship General cargo ship Refrigerated cargo carrier Combination carrier Passenger ships Ro-ro cargo ship (vehicle carrier) Ro-ro cargo ship Ro-ro passenger ship Required EEDI: Following ships above cut off limits: * excluding ships with diesel-electric, turbine or hybrid propulsion

Start of ship construction EEDI Verification process Shipowner Shipbuilder Verifier Pre-Verification Basic Design , Tank Test*, EEDI Calculation Development of EEDI Technical File Application for EEDI pre-verification Submission of EEDI Technical File Verification: - EEDI Technical File - additional information Issuance of Statement of Compliance Submission of additional information Start of ship construction Final Verification Application for EEDI verification Verification: - sea trial condition - ship speed - revised EEDI Technical File Issuance of IEEC (International Energy efficiency Certificate) Sea Trial Modification and Resubmission of EEDI Technical File Delivery of ship * To be conducted by a test organisation or a shipbuilder itself.

Major aspects of verification Verification of speed-power curve for Vref: Tank test observation Speed trial observation Scaling method from “trial conditions” to “EEDI conditions” Correction for environmental conditions. Verification of “energy saving technologies” Availability factors (feff) Power levels Verification of various correction factors: Ice-class (fj) Weather factor (fw) Design capacity factor (fi) Cubic capacity factor (fc)

Some other major verification challenges Exact model? Numerical tools for calculation, scaling, pre-verification, etc.? Shipyards’ and tank test facilities’ proprietary data? Uncertainly levels and if there is a need for formal uncertainty analysis? How to ensure consistency amongst various organisations: ROs Shipyards Tank test organisations

List of the EEDI-related Guidelines Guideline for calculation of EEDI Guidelines for survey and verification of EEDI Guidelines for minimum power of ship for safe operation. Guidelines for validation of ship electric power table (EPT). Guidelines for verification of innovative technologies

EEDI Reduction Methods Detail 17

EEDI reduction methods Capacity (deadweight) increase Advanced technologies: Existing/proven technologies Emerging technologies Renewable energy technologies Alternative fuels: LNG Speed reduction Reduction rate DWT EEDI Baseline (3) Application of new technology (1) DWT enlargement Average EEDI of current ships (no effort for efficiency improvement) (2) Speed reduction Efficiency improvement by design change A: efficiency improvement MEPC60/4/35 Japan, Norway, US Detail 18

EEDI reduction likely options – Average VLCC

IMO GHG Future Work Plan Detail 20

Work still to be done by the IMO

Progress in Inter-sessional WG meeting (9-13 January 2012) Detail 22

Changes to EEDI formula Cubic Capacity Factors for Chemical Tankers (fc): Based on the ratio of summer deadweight to volumetric capacity (R) To be calculated according to the formula fc = R^(-0.7) – 0.014, where fc = 1 when R = 0.98 Cubic Capacity Factor for LNG (fc) To be calculated from Fc = R^(-0.56) Design Capacity Factor for Voluntary Structural Enhancement (fiVSE). Design Capacity Correction Factor for ships built to Common Structural Rules (fiCSR). Detail 23

New guidelines, non-conventional ships, etc New guidelines for verification of innovative technologies: Japan presented draft guidelines Dealing with wind, solar, heat recovery, etc. For each of the above technologies, there will be guidelines for calculation and verification. EEDI for Non-Conventional Ships Reference line for cruise ships Reference line for RoRo ships Reference line for RoPax ships Shaft generator: Incorporation of a new formulation for shaft generator. Also, cases where propulsion shaft power is limited and can be verified, there will be no need to use main engine power. Detail 24

Impact of EEDI on Industry Detail 25

Likely impacts More energy efficient ships and ship technologies Slower speed ships More use of alternative fuels More expensive ships/marine transport (excluding fuel) More optimised and complex designs with likely impacts on: Reliability/safety Maintainability Likely modal shift of freight transport to land and air EEDI will become commercially sensitive if used for: Existing ships Fuel efficiency-based chartering Reward-based marine MBMs or financial incentives 26

Concluding Remarks The EEDI regulations are now in place and will come into force from 1st January 2013. A number of guidelines are under development and will be finalised in 2012 in support of the above. Verification of EEDI pauses a number of major issues. There are a number of solutions to reduce EEDI including alternative fuels, alternative technologies and reduced ship speed. The EEDI impacts on shipping economics, safety and transportation competitiveness are still being investigated. Overall, it is anticipated that the EEDI will have a big impact on future of shipping industry.

Any questions?