Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 5 Reviewing and Establishing a Summative Score May 21,

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) 2 Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit

Acknowledgements 3

Objective: To gain knowledge about implementing Student Learning Objective Goals into the Summative Score 4

5 13% Student Growth (Federal) Measure Student Progress Over Time Arizona Department of Education Educator Evaluation Model With Student Academic Progress Surveys Student Survey Parent Survey Peer Review Self-Reflection Teaching Performance: Planning and Preparation The Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities Teaching Performance: Planning and Preparation The Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities

ESEA Waiver Federal Requirements At least 20% of a teacher’s total summative evaluation must include Student Academic Growth At least 33% of a teacher’s total summative evaluation must include Student Academic Progress The 33% includes both the growth and achievement requirements 6 AZ Framework for Measuring Educator Effectiveness

SLO Process-ADE Model 1. Determining Students’ Preparedness 2. Choosing Quality Assessments 3. Setting SLO Goals 4. Monitoring and Adjusting Instruction 5. Establishing Summative Score 7 What do we expect students to learn? How will we know if students have learned it? What will we do if they don’t learn it? What will we do if they already know it?

SLO Process-ADE Model 1. Determining Students’ Preparedness 2. Choosing Quality Assessments 3. Setting SLO Goals 4. Monitoring and Adjusting Instruction 5. Establishing Summative Score 8

9

End-of-Course Assessment 10

SLO Goals Achievement Goal: By May 2015, at least 90% of the students will achieve an achievement score of 75% on the end-of-course assessment. Growth Goal: By May 2015, all students will demonstrate 50% growth from the baseline assessment score to the end-of-course assessment score. 11

Growth Formula Averaged baseline score + (Total possible points – Baseline score) multiplied by.50 = Cut score Let’s say the Low Level of Preparedness students averaged 40 points on the U.S. History Baseline Assessment ( [100 – 40] x.50 ) = Cut Score 40 + ( 60 x.50 ) = Cut Score = points is the cut score (-5%) 65 – 100 points is the growth range The students in the Low Level of Preparedness Group will need to score a minimum of 65 points on the Post- Test Exam to reach the growth score. 12

13 Student Baseline Points Mid-Point Check In Pts End of Course Pts Growth (50%+) Y/N Achievement (75%+) Y/N Riley Y Y Nora Y Y Hannah N Y Hunter84 91 Y Y Landon Y Y Average /5 5/5 High Level of Preparedness = Cut Score Range High Level of Preparedness 84 + (100-84) x.50 = 92 Range = 87 Range =

14 Adequate Level of Preparedness = Cut Score Range Adequate Level of Preparedness 71 + (100-71) x.50 = 86 Range = 81 Range = Student Baseline Points Mid-Point Check In Pts End of Course Pts Growth (50%+) Y/N Achievement (75%+) Y/N Owen627479N Y Zoey728295Y Y Grace788692YY Garrett828895YY Dylan768587YY Carter645345NN Victoria668372NN Liam718293YY Average /86/8

15 Low Level of Preparedness = Cut Score Range Low Level of Preparedness 50 + (100-50) x.50 = 75 Range = 70 Range = Student Baseline Points Mid-Point Check In Pts End of Course Pts Growth (50%+) Y/N Achievement (75%+) Y/N Aiden436573YN Ellie527578YY Harper516369NN Daniel587680YY Abigail485762NN Wyatt578187YY Eli454765NN Average /7

16 Determining the percentage of students who meet their goal Achievement Number of students who met the achievement goal 5 High + 6 Adequate + 4 Low = 15 Total number of students tested 5 High + 8 Adequate + 7 Low = 20 15/20 = 75% of students meet the achievement goal Growth Number of students who met the growth goal 4 High + 5 Adequate + 7 Low = 16 Total number of students tested 5 High + 8 Adequate + 7 Low = 20 16/20 = 80% of students meet the growth goal

17 SLO Summative Rubric Achievement and Growth Score % - 100% of the students met the SLO 80% - 89% of the students met the SLO 79% - 60% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO 75% of the students meet their achievement goal = 2 points 80% of the students meet their growth goal = 3 points

TEACHING PERFORMANCE General comments on teaching performance Possible Points Teaching Performance Score Weighting of points Points Domain 1: Planning and Preparation 18 X1 Domain 2: Classroom Environment 15 X1 Domain 3: Instruction 15 X1 Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 18 x STUDENT ACADEMIC PROGRESS DATA Possible Points Points Earned & MultiplierPoints SLO Achievement Goal 12x 3 SLO Growth Goal 24x 6 College and Career Ready 4x 1 SURVEY DATA Possible PointsResultsPoints Student Survey15 Parent Survey2 Self-Review1 Peer Survey2 Teacher Performance Based Summative Evaluation Form Grades 3-12 Subtotal ______/40 Subtotal _____/20 Teacher ____________________________School _____________________________Date _______________ Subtotal ______ /60

TEACHING PERFORMANCE General comments on teaching performance Possible Points Teaching Performance Score Weighting of points Points Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Ms. S demonstrates strong content knowledge and pedagogy. She plans coherent instruction s and assessments. 18 X1 18 Domain 2: Classroom Environment Ms. S has high expectations and encourages student interactions. She is inconsistent with student discipline X1 10 Domain 3: Instruction Ms. S uses engaging activities and is able to provide clear instructions. Her level of questioning remains at a low level X111 Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Ms. S is involved in many extracurricular activities and keeps the parents informed. She needs to keep her records current x STUDENT ACADEMIC PROGRESS DATA Possible Points Points Earned & MultiplierPoints SLO Achievement Goal 122 x 3 6 SLO Growth Goal 243 x 6 18 College and Career Ready 44 x 1 4 SURVEY DATA Possible PointsResultsPoints Student Survey15 Overall, students expressed that they are please with Ms. S 13 Parent Survey2 Overall, parents are satisfied with the school climate. 2 Self-Review1 Ms. S completed her self-review 1 Peer Survey2 Peer survey’s have been completed 2 Teacher Performance Based Summative Evaluation Form Grades 3-12 Subtotal 28/40 Subtotal 18/20 Teacher ____________________________School _____________________________Date _______________ Subtotal 49/60

20 Teacher Performance Based Summative Evaluation Form Grades 3-12 Areas of Strength: Ms. S is very knowledgeable in her content area. She develops lessons that promote higher level thinking and are engaging. Her directions and explanations are clear and understandable for the students. Areas Targeted for Improvement: Ms. S has decent classroom management, but her consequences are inconsistent. She needs to be more consistent when dealing with student discipline. She creates thought provoking lessons, but needs to develop higher level questions that correlate with the lesson. Suggestions for Professional Learning: Ms. S should participate in the district wide professional development session in discussion and questioning techniques being offered this summer. Next year, Ms. S will observe and meet with selected teachers to enhance her classroom management skills. Teacher ___________________________School _______________________ Date ___________ _____________________________________ _____________ _____________________________ Teacher Signature Date Evaluator Signature The signature may not constitute agreement; only acknowledgment of the teaching review and receipt of the evaluation. Performance Classification: Component Summary

21 STUDENT ACADEMIC PROGRESS DATA Possible Points Points Earned & MultiplierPoints SLO Achievement Goal 122 x 3 6 SLO Growth Goal 243 x 6 18 College and Career Ready 4 4 x 1 4 Subtotal 28/40 SLO Summative Rubric Achievement and Growth Score % - 100% of the students met the SLO 80% - 89% of the students met the SLO 60% - 79% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO 75% of the students meet their achievement goal = 2 points 80% of the students meet their growth goal = 3 points

SLO Secondary Music Goals Growth Goal: By May 2015, all students will move up one level based on the performance rubric in music for a concert recital. Achievement Goal: By May 2015, at least 90% of the students will achieve an proficiency score of 3 based on the performance rubric in music for a concert recital. 22

Secondary Music (Band)

24 Determining the percentage of students who meet their goal Achievement Number of students who met the achievement goal 5 High + 7 Adequate + 2 Low = 14 Total number of students tested 5 High + 8 Adequate + 7 Low = 20 14/20 = 70% of students meet the achievement goal Growth Number of students who met the growth goal 5 High + 7 Adequate + 5 Low = 17 Total number of students tested 5 High + 8 Adequate + 7 Low = 20 17/20 = 85% of students meet the growth goal High5/5 Adequate7/8 Low2/7

25 SLO Summative Rubric Achievement and Growth Score % - 100% of the students met the SLO 80% - 89% of the students met the SLO 79% - 60% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO 70% of the students meet their achievement goal = 2 points 85% of the students meet their growth goal = 3 points

26 STUDENT ACADEMIC PROGRESS DATA Possible Points Points Earned & MultiplierPoints SLO Achievement Goal 122 x 3 6 SLO Growth Goal 243 x 6 18 College and Career Ready 4 4 x 1 4 Subtotal 28/40 SLO Summative Rubric Achievement and Growth Score % - 100% of the students met the SLO 80% - 89% of the students met the SLO 60% - 79% of the students met the SLO Less than 60% of students met the SLO 70% of the students meet their achievement goal = 2 points 85% of the students meet their growth goal = 3 points

SLO Process-ADE Model 1. Determining Students’ Preparedness 2. Choosing Quality Assessments 3. Setting SLO Goals 4. Monitoring and Adjusting Instruction 5. Establishing Summative Score 27 What do we expect students to learn? How will we know if students have learned it? What will we do if they don’t learn it? What will we do if they already know it?

Follow Through  What are two ideas you will take back to share with a colleague at your site?  Are you interested in joining our SLO Consortium?  Technical Assistance in SLO Implementation  Networking Support 28

SLOs Across the Nation Arizona Dept. of Education Student Learning Objectives link on right side of screen Center on Great Teachers & Leaders Community Training and Assistance Center Reform Support Network 29

Upcoming SLO Webinars SLO Challenges and Solutions June 9, 10:00 MST Using SLOs to Measure Student Growth and Achievement June 3, 2015 from 9:00 am ADE Jefferson Bldg. Leading Change – Unleash the Potential of SLOs June 23, 2015 from 10:30 am – 12:00 in Tucson (dates and times subject to change) 30 Upcoming SLO Professional Learning

Questions? Feedback Virginia Stodola Effective Teachers and Leaders Arizona Department of Education David Gauch Effective Teachers and Leaders Arizona Department of Education