Convective Parameterization Options

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Numerical Weather Prediction Parametrization of diabatic processes Convection II The parametrization of convection Peter Bechtold, Christian Jakob, David.
Advertisements

ECMWF Training Course Peter Bechtold and Christian Jakob
1 Numerical Weather Prediction Parameterization of diabatic processes Convection III The ECMWF convection scheme Christian Jakob and Peter Bechtold.
Hirlam Physics Developments Sander Tijm Hirlam Project leader for physics.
Impact of cumulus parameterization on motion, structure, intensity: preliminary results Robert Fovell and Yizhe Peggy Bu University of California, Los.
Sensitivity of the HWRF model prediction for Hurricane Ophelia (2005) to the choice of the cloud and precipitation scheme Yuqing Wang and Qingqing Li International.
Evaluating parameterized variables in the Community Atmospheric Model along the GCSS Pacific cross-section during YOTC Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
Convective Parameterization
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
GFDL Geophysical Fluid Dynamics GFDL Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey AM2 cloud sensitivity to details of convection and cloud.
1 Numerical Weather Prediction Parametrization of diabatic processes Convection II The parametrization of convection Peter Bechtold, Christian Jakob, David.
Evaluating mass flux closures using cloud resolving model simulations of deep convection Jennifer Fletcher and Chris Bretherton COGS talk May 7, 2009 Evaluating.
Multiscale Kain-Fritsch Scheme: Formulations and Tests
GFS Deep and Shallow Cumulus Convection Schemes
WG on role of PBL in deep convection Thanks to all WG participants for a fine discussion and Steve Klein for note-taking.
Current issues in GFS moist physics Hua-Lu Pan, Stephen Lord, and Bill Lapenta.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
A new Convection Parameterization: Some Achievements and Some Challenges Hans-F Graf, Cambridge Till M Wagner, Oxford (was Cambridge ) IPAM, UCLA, May.
Georg Grell NOAA / Earth Systems Research Laboratory Parameterizing Convection on “Almost” Cloud-Resolving Scales (“Gray Scales”)
Climate model grid meshes are too coarse to explicitly simulate storm system winds and therefore must rely on simplified models referred to as parameterizations.
The parameterization of moist convection
1 Numerical Weather Prediction Parameterization of diabatic processes Convection III The ECMWF convection scheme Christian Jakob and Peter Bechtold.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Summary of Boundary Layer, Microphysics and Cumulus Options Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
WRF Physics Options Part 2
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
ICTP Regional Climate, 2-6 June Sensitivity to convective parameterization in regional climate models Raymond W. Arritt Iowa State University, Ames,
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
CONVECTIVE PARAMETERIZATION For the Lesson: Precipitation Processes December 1998.
Improvements of WRF Simulation Skills of Southeast United States Summer Rainfall: Focus on Physical Parameterization and Horizontal Resolution Laifang.
Vertical Structure of the Tropical Troposphere (including the TTL) Ian Folkins Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science Dalhousie University.
Earth&Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Tech Modeling the impacts of convective transport and lightning NOx production over North America: Dependence on cumulus.
Yanjun Jiao and Colin Jones University of Quebec at Montreal September 20, 2006 The Performance of the Canadian Regional Climate Model in the Pacific Ocean.
Forecast simulations of Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus with CAM3 and CAM3-UW. Cécile Hannay (1), Jeffrey Kiehl (1), Dave Williamson (1), Jerry Olson (1),
WRF Problems: Some Solutions, Some Mysteries Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Parameterization of the effects of Moist Convection in GCMs Mass flux schemes –Basic concepts and quantities –Quasi-steady Entraining/detraining plumes.
Sensitivity to the PBL and convective schemes in forecasts with CAM along the Pacific Cross-section Cécile Hannay, Jeff Kiehl, Dave Williamson, Jerry Olson,
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
Model Parameterizations: Issues important for heavy rainfall forecasting Mike Baldwin NSSL SPC CIMMS.
Georg A. Grell (NOAA / ESRL/GSD) and Saulo R. Freitas (INPE/CPTEC) A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air.
1 Making upgrades to an operational model : An example Jongil Han and Hua-Lu Pan NCEP/EMC GRAPES-WRF Joint Workshop.
Yuqing Wang and Chunxi Zhang International Pacific Research Center University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
The Tropics: Convective Processes
Continuous treatment of convection: from dry thermals to deep precipitating convection J.F. Guérémy CNRM/GMGEC.
Yuqing Wang Department of Meteorology, University of Hawaii The 65 th IHC, February 28-March 3, 2011.
Overview of Microphysics in NCEP Models Brad Ferrier 1,2 (Thanks to Eric Aligo 1,2 ) 1 NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC 2 I.M. Systems Group, Inc (IMSG) “Quick Hits”
11 Implementing a New Shallow Convection Scheme into WRF Aijun Deng and Brian Gaudet Penn State University Jimy Dudhia National Center for Atmospheric.
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
Convective Parameterization in NWP Models Jack Kain And Mike Baldwin.
African easterly wave dynamics in a full-physics numerical model. Gareth Berry and Chris Thorncroft. University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, NY,USA.
A simple parameterization for detrainment in shallow cumulus Hirlam results for RICO Wim de Rooy & Pier Siebesma Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
1 Convection parameterization for Weather and Climate models Hua-Lu Pan and Jongil Han NCEP/EMC With help from EMC physics team Myong-In Lee and Sieg Schubert.
Convective Parameterization Jack Kainand Mike Baldwin OAR/NSSL/CIMMS.
Lessons learned from JMA global and regional model development Junichi Ishida and colleagues at JMA WGNE-31, April 2016 CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa.
A modeling study of cloud microphysics: Part I: Effects of Hydrometeor Convergence on Precipitation Efficiency. C.-H. Sui and Xiaofan Li.
A Deficiency In the Grell- Dévényi Cumulus Parameterization Department Seminar Nick P. Bassill December 12 th, 2012.
Performance of ALARO0 baseline in pre-operational testing
Convective Parameterization
Shifting the diurnal cycle of parameterized deep convection over land
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
Application Of KF-Convection Scheme In 3-D Chemical Transport Model
Updates of convection scheme in the 5km resolution operational system
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
BRETTS-MILLER-JANJIC SCHEME
April 12, 2018 Hing Ong ATM 419/563 Cumulus parameterization: Kain-Fritsch scheme and other mass-flux schemes This lecture is designed for students who.
Han, J. , W. Wang, Y. C. Kwon, S. -Y. Hong, V. Tallapragada, and F
Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
Convective Parameterization in NWP Models
Presentation transcript:

Convective Parameterization Options in WRF V3.4 Jimy Dudhia NCAR/NESL/MMM with help from Ming Chen

Cumulus schemes in V3.4 cu_physics Scheme Cores Moisture Tendencies Momentum Tendencies Shallow Convection 1 Kain-Fritsch Eta ARW NMM Qc Qr Qi Qs no yes 2 Betts-Miller-Janjic - 3 Grell-Devenyi Qc Qi 4 Old Simplified Arakawa-Schubert ARW NMM yes (NMM) yes (ARW) 5 Grell-3 ARW 6 Tiedtke 7 Zhang-McFarlane 14 New SAS 84 New SAS (HWRF) 99 Old Kain-Fritsch

Kain-Fritsch (KF) As in MM5 and Eta/NMM ensemble version Includes shallow convection Low-level vertical motion in trigger function Also new Ma-Tan trigger option with perturbation based on local average moisture advection (kfeta_trigger=2) CAPE removal time scale closure Mass flux type with updrafts and downdrafts, entrainment and detrainment Includes cloud, rain, ice, snow detrainment Clouds persist over convective time scale (recalculated every convective step in NMM) Old KF is also an option in WRF

Betts-Miller-Janjic (BMJ) As in NMM (NAM) operational model (Janjic 1994) Adjustment type scheme Deep and shallow profiles BM saturated profile modified by cloud efficiency, so post-convective profile can be unsaturated in BMJ No explicit updraft or downdraft No cloud detrainment Scheme changed significantly since V2.1

Grell-Devenyi Ensemble (GD) Used in Rapid-Refresh operational model (NOAA/ESRL) Multiple-closure (CAPE removal, quasi-equilibrium, moisture convergence, cloud-base ascent) - 16 mass flux closures Multi-parameter (maximum cap, precipitation efficiency) - e.g. 3 cap strengths, 3 efficiencies Explicit updrafts/downdrafts Includes cloud and ice detrainment Mean feedback of ensemble is applied Weights can be tuned (spatially, temporally) to optimize scheme (training)

Simplified Arakawa-Schubert (SAS) Used in operational HWRF hurricane model Quasi-equilibrium scheme Related to Grell scheme in MM5 Random cloud top Includes cloud and ice detrainment Downdrafts and single, simple cloud Shallow convection is by enhanced mixing (in ARW only) Part of HWRF physics in NMM up to V3.3 Momentum transport in NMM only

Grell-3d (G3) As GD, but slightly different ensemble (for RR model) Includes cloud and ice detrainment Subsidence is spread to neighboring columns This makes it more suitable for < 10 km grid size than other options cugd_avgdx=1 (default), 3(spread subsidence) ishallow=1 option for shallow convection Mean feedback of ensemble is applied Weights can be tuned (spatially, temporally) to optimize scheme (training)

Tiedtke (TDK) U. Hawaii version Mass-flux scheme CAPE-removal time scale closure Includes cloud and ice detrainment Includes shallow convection Includes momentum transport New in V3.3 V3.4 changes entrainment/detrainment adds trigger choice (moisture convergence or dilute parcel testing)

Zhang-McFarlane (ZM) CAMZM scheme Mass-flux scheme CAPE-removal time-scale closure From current CESM 1.0 climate model physics Includes cloud and ice detrainment Includes momentum transport with pressure term New in V3.3

New SAS (NSAS) Quasi-equilibrium scheme Updated from SAS for current NCEP GFS global operational model Includes cloud and ice detrainment Downdrafts and single, simple cloud (no random top) New mass-flux type shallow convection (changed from SAS) Momentum transport with pressure-gradient term New in V3.3 In V3.4 there is also an HWRF version of this

Bretherton-Park Shallow Cu CAM UW shallow convection (Bretherton and Park, U. Washington) To be used with a TKE PBL scheme and a deep scheme with no shallow convection (e.g. CESM Zhang-McFarlane) From current CESM climate model physics Shallow convection driver added in V3.3 Other options such as Grell ishallow to be moved here in the future

Cumulus schemes in V3.4 cu_physics Scheme Cores Moisture Tendencies Momentum Tendencies Shallow Convection 1 Kain-Fritsch Eta ARW NMM Qc Qr Qi Qs no yes 2 Betts-Miller-Janjic - 3 Grell-Devenyi ARW Qc Qi 4 Old Simplified Arakawa-Schubert ARW NMM yes (NMM) yes (ARW) 5 Grell-3 6 Tiedtke 7 Zhang-McFarlane 14 New SAS 84 New SAS (HWRF) 99 Old Kain-Fritsch

Tests with V3.3 (April 2011) A mid-latitude US continental convection case for 11-12 June 2011 at 12 km grid size, 24 h run plus a 3 km explicit-only simulation Tropical TWP-ICE mostly oceanic active monsoon case for January 22-25 2006 at 27 km, 72 h run Compare heating and precipitation characteristics Heating profile (convective and total) Precipitation (convective, non-convective fractions) Precipitation bin histograms (convective, non-convective)

12 hour Total Precipitation Obs (ST4) KF BMJ G3 Tiedtke NSAS SAS ZM

Domain-Averaged Precipitation Forecasts Ratio of conv / total precip 3 h precip NSAS KF ZM Tiedtke

Ratios of Convective / Total Precip Over Precip Bins NSAS ZM

Domain- and Time-Averaged Heating and Moistening Profiles T, convective T, total Qv NSAS BMJ ZM NSAS G3

12 h total precipitation Obs (ST4) observed 3 km explicit KF KF-trig with CPS

Domain-Averaged Heating Profiles From Various CPS and Cloud-Resolving Runs G3 NSAS explicit

conv/total 3 h precip Mid-latitude at 12 km 1-day Tropical/ NSAS KF ZM Tiedtke 1-day Tropical/ Sub-tropical at 27 km SAS G3 3-days ZM

Precipitation Intensity Areas Mid-lat 12 km conv non-conv total 24 hr precip bins Tropical / sub tropical 27 km conv non-conv total 24 hr precip bins

Ratios of Convective / Total Precip Over Precip Bins Mid-Latitude Tropical / Sub-tropical KF SAS NSAS ZM ZM

Convective / Total Precip Over Precip Bins Mid-Latitude Tropical / Sub-tropical convective G3 total ZM

Domain-Averaged Heating Profiles Mid-lat NSAS SAS BMJ ZM conv total Tropical / sub tropical G3 SAS BMJ BMJ ZM G3+shallow conv total ZM + shallow

Summary Wide distribution of convective versus non-convective rainfall fractions Despite this, similar total rainfalls, patterns, and heating profiles Some outliers evident seen in both US and TWP ZM, Tiedtke: low convective fraction and heating rate ZM: no intense convective precip (all non-convective) G3, NSAS: high convective fraction and heating top G3: high precip and heating rate (tropical)[reduced in V3.3.1] NSAS: high convective heating and drying rate (mid-lat) SAS, BMJ: high upper total heating rate BMJ: effect of no detrained cloud seen in heating profile