Staff Evaluation Data Reporting September 30, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Advertisements

NYSED Teacher Student Data Linkage (TSDL) Overview.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Circle Survey Training November
FY2015 Classified Merit Process Rev January 2015.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Date:March 26, 2013 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
TEACHER-STUDENT DATA LINKAGES (TSDL) A FOLLOW-UP ON THE NEW YORK STATE DATA MODEL APPROACH FOR TEACHER/LEADER EVALUATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT.
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Data Collection. 1. Review of data collection and time lines 2. Template review and handout discussion 3. Preview of data collection.
What’s left to be done before June! What we need to know! What we already know! 1.
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
CIO / DDC State Reporting Meeting June 10,
Date:July 20, 2015 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting VAM Update.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
Introducing A New Process For Reporting Financial Data to DPI A Revised Format For The PI-1505 AC.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Current Issues for the District Data Coordinator DATAG Friday, December 7, 2012 Presented by Lisa Pullaro Alexis Campione Mid-Hudson Regional Information.
Date:April 10, 2012 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
General Unit Meeting June 1 st NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 1.
FY 2010 Data Collections Workshop Follow Up Q & A Session.
Date:February 24, 2012 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
BOCES Data Collection & Reporting October 10, 2013 Lisa Pullaro Mid-Hudson Regional Information Center.
Date:August 22, 2012 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
LAUSD BTSA Induction WELCOMES Early Completion Option Participants ECO Advisement Fall 2011.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
Date:June 4, 2013 Time:11:00 AM – 1:00 PM Phone: Pass code: # Webinar:
Certifying Your Data The Annual Performance Report (APR) is due each fall. Data collected in APlus will be used to generate sections of the APR for each.
Technical Support Webinar May 8, 2012 Presented by: Broome-Tioga BOCES RTTT Network Team.
Research Protections Office University of Vermont Change to Procedures for Committee Review of Resubmissions of Grant Applications.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
January 2016 Slides updated Emergency Action At their December 2015 meeting, the Board of Regents [again] took emergency action Introduced APPR.
Title III Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Grantee Performance Reporting June 19, 2014 Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
ELECTRONIC TEACHER AND PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM eTPES Evaluation Updates and Requirements August/ September 2015.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Educator Effectiveness Liaison Network Informational Webinar October 17, 2014.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
OPT STEM Extensions For F-1 Students University of Oklahoma International Student Services 729 Elm Ave., Room # 144 Norman, OK
SchoolSuccess for Coordinators
Payments Report Verification and Request March 2017
Spring 2017 DDC Meeting April 2017 Mary McGeoch,
Impact Aid Training September 25, 2017.
Dissemination Training
The TAA System ePMF Overview
Agenda 3:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
DEAC MEETING AGENDA: AchieveNJ Updates Formal Observations
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Valley Central School District
Special Education Child Count
Submitting your APPR plan using the required online SED portal
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Texas Education Agency Standards and Engagement Performance Reporting
Student Growth Measures
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Presentation transcript:

Staff Evaluation Data Reporting September 30, 2014

Background APPR Implementation Certification Form – signed by superintendent/DS and school board president by August 30, 2013 – assured that “all data will be submitted to the Commissioner by August 27, 2013 to the extent practicable and no later than October 18, 2013” – assured that submitted data would be a “complete and accurate representation of the information requested and includes the State Growth subcomponent, locally selected subcomponent, Other Comparable measures subcomponent, and final composite rating for all teachers and principals employed by the district or BOCES, for the school year”

Timeline October 18, 2013 Final Submission of Staff Evaluation Data 1.evaluation composite ratings; 2.composite scores; and 3.subcomponent scores. October 25, 2013 Certification of Staff Evaluation Data – signed by certifying official – verifies that the data provided for review in the Staff Evaluation Rating Verification Report(s) generated by L2RPT are complete and accurate – Incomplete data will need to be identified for each teacher

Certification Form For an educator who was subject to evaluation under Education 3012-c but for whom there are no staff evaluation data: Educator’s Teach ID Name of the Educator Select “No Staff Evaluation Data Reported” from drop-down options

Various Scenarios in District Data Submission These slides walk through 6 possible scenarios, but please note there are others variations that may be possible.

Teacher/Principal has all 3 subcomponents complete/accurate as per the district/BOCES’ approved APPR plan. (i.e., all procedures described for growth, local, and other measures have been followed through and completed as per the district’s approved APPR plan) Action= district/BOCES reports all subcomponents, composite, and overall rating in SIRS template StateLocalOtherOther Rating CompositeOverall Rating * District Determined 84E *zeros only used if actually earned Scenario #1

Teacher/Principal is missing 1 or 2 subcomponents. (e.g., educator was out on maternity leave and did not have required # of observations so “Other measures of effectiveness” subcomponent score and Rating and Composite score and Rating should not be reported) Action = district reports the subcomponents that are complete/accurate but does not report a composite or overall rating in SIRS template StateLocalOtherOther Rating CompositeOverall Rating *zeros only used if actually earned Scenario #2

Teacher/Principal was subject to evaluation under Education Law 3012-c but does not have any subcomponent scores. (i.e. SLOs were not implemented, local assessments not administered, and only 1 observation was conducted) Action = district must report Teach ID, educator name and indicate no available data on the “ Statement of Confirmation of Staff Evaluation Rating Certification Report form” Scenario #3 StateLocalOtherOther Rating CompositeOverall Rating

Teacher has complete evaluation data to be reported but the state-provided growth score was modified. (i.e. the score represented less than 50% of the students they were responsible for and was therefore used in a calculation with SLOs) Action = district reports all subcomponents, composite and rating reflecting this modification on template AND indicates this person on the “ Statement of Confirmation of Staff Evaluation Rating Certification Report form” StateLocalOtherOther Rating CompositeOverall Rating *District Determined 84E *zeros only used if actually earned Scenario #4 – N/A for BOCES

Teacher/Principal has all subcomponent data available to report. The state-provided growth score had been modified as a result of an appeals process that was finalized prior to Oct. 18th Action = district reports all subcomponent, composite, overall rating on template AND indicates this person on the “ Statement of Confirmation of Staff Evaluation Rating Certification Report form” StateLocalOtherOther Rating CompositeOverall Rating *District Determined 84E *zeros only used if actually earned Scenario #5 – N/A for BOCES

Teacher/Principal has all subcomponent data available to report, however, they are involved in an appeals process that has not been finalized as of Oct 18th Action = district reports all subcomponent, composite and overall rating as they stand on Oct 18 th. If a change to one or more of these data are made after Oct 18 th district will correct through historical processes. StateLocalOtherOther Rating CompositeOverall Rating *District Determined 84E *zeros only used if actually earned Scenario #6

PUT IN SCREEN SHOT OF 10/25 CERT Data Certification Form

Before submitting data… 1.Does it include all educators employed in covered under 3012-c? 2.Did you report the score and rating category for Other and Composite? 3.Does the overall composite score and rating category match? (e.g., 100 = HE not E) 4.A zero has only been used when the score is truly a zero and NOT to represent no score, which should be left as a blank field 5.If any subcomponent is blank then there cannot be a composite score or rating provided General Reminders

Monday Files on IRSP Memo and FAQ Webinar RICs Available Resources

Consequences for Not Submitting Data If the final data are not submitted by October 18 – District may not be eligible to receive an increase in State Aid for school year – Districts, BOCES, or charter schools who do not submit their data and who receive, or are applying for, certain grants that require demonstration of full implementation of APPR will be unable to meet the requirements of their grants and risk loss of funding