Principle 17 Assessment. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principle 13 Community Engagement/ Game Environment.
Advertisements

Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
November 2011 Rules Education Abilene Christian University.
Principle 21 Fundraising. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program provides for an individual whose primary assignment is athletics fundraising.
Review of 2015 NCAA Convention Proposals Southeast Region Compliance Seminar November 2014.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (QAIP)
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
Student-Athletes & Concussions: Getting Your Head OUT of the Game VSBA School Law Conference – 2011 Joel S. Brenner, MD, MPH Children's Hospital of The.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
Principle 3 AD Management. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full-time administrator that takes responsibility for the.
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
NADIIIAA Summer Forum June 6, 2006 Integration – Education & Athletics, A Model for Success Debbie Lazorik Bob Malekoff Ronda Seagraves Integration, the.
EBS Survey Vermont PBS “Bringing out the BEST in all of us.”
State of the Department ABET 2000 Update Presentation to External Review Board October 19, 2001.
External Quality Assessments
Principle 14 Finances and Sports Sponsorship. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be administered with prudent management and fiscal.
Principle 10 Diversity and Inclusion. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the principle of diversity and inclusion.
Principle 16 Life Skills. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the total development of a student-athlete’s life.
Principle 20 Strategic Plan for Intercollegiate Athletics.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009.
© File copyright Colin Purrington. You may use for making your poster, of course, but please do not plagiarize, adapt, or put on your own site. Also, do.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit – Phase I.
Principle 15 Continuing Education and Professional Development.
Principle 8 Athletic Trainers. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an adequate number of certified athletic trainers (per.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Serving Student-Athletes with Disabilities Rehab Act.
NCAA Division III Bylaw 15 – Financial Aid Brandy Hataway Jeff Myers.
Innovative Strategies for Conducting Career Center Assessment Presented by Marian Higgins, Nicole Lechene & Penny Benton The University of Georgia.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support School-wide Evaluation Tool January 2007.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
Rules Education Camps/Clinics May 20, 2009 Three types of camps and clinics regulated by NCAA legislation: 1. Developmental – Bylaw Institutional.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program 2015 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Supplement.
A model Division II athletics program shall encourage all student-athletes, coaches and fans to respect each other, practice civility, encourage teamwork.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
Michigan State University Athletic Council Report January 27, 2015.
Principle 9 Academic Success. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be committed to the academic success of its student-athletes,
Principle 1 Integration and Institutional Control.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
Principle 7 SAAC Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns.
Reach all of your Team Goals…. Develop Your Senior Leaders! HOW THE CARMEL GREYHOUNDS DEVELOPED LEADERS IN
The NCAA, its Conferences, and the Economics of Athletics.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
UNCW Compliance 3/9/2015. Sports Wagering NCAA Bylaw 10.3 Sports Wagering Activities The following individuals shall not knowingly participate in sports.
Evaluation Task Force Evaluation Task Force Goals Establish broad criteria for all evaluations Provide opportunity for input – self evaluation Establish.
Principle 5 SWA Involvement or Fifth Representative to the Governance Structure.
1 Faculty Athletics Task Force: Subcommittee of Student Life Bruce Oppenheimer Stokes Peebles, chair Doug Perkins Virginia Shepherd Sharon Shields Marshall.
Kellianne Milliner, Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance, Academic and Student Services Terry Beattie, Associate Athletics Director for Facilities.
University of Utah.  Allegations of psychological and physical abuse of student-athletes by a head coach  Allegations of alcohol abuse by a head coach.
CSUSM Softball Digs Community Service. Topics Goal 1  Graduating Our Student- Athletes NCAA Eligibility Requirements NCAA Progress toward Degree Academic.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
Principle 11 Compliance. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full- time compliance coordinator whose primary responsibility.
INITIAL TEAM TRAINING Presented by the MBI Consultants MODULE 7: Establishing Procedures for Data Collection.
WIPO’s Rewards and Recognition Program (RRP) Geneva January 29, 2016 Cornelia Moussa Director, Human Resources Management Department (HRMD) With respect.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an active institutional SAAC that represents the concerns and ideas of the institution’s student-athletes.
The Faculty Athletics Committee Update Friday, December 7, 2012.
Principle 3: AD Management A model Division II athletics program shall feature a full-time administrator that takes responsibility for the academic and.
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
Brian Minikin Development Manager: Oceania National Olympic Committees.
Division I Academic Misconduct Emily Capehart Andy Cardamone Azure Davey.
Principle 19 Communication/ Campus Relationships.
Risk Assessment ABOR Audit Committee April 5, 2017
Principle 2: CEO Oversight
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
10 year review self study A. Chair invites two external and two campus representatives for review team. B. Preliminary Report for Team includes: 1. Dept.
Comprehensive evaluation of data and assessment plan
Presentation transcript:

Principle 17 Assessment

January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure the student-athletes’ experience. In addition, the athletics department should feature annual written evaluations by managers (e.g., AD, SWA) regarding the performance of coaches and administrators. (Learning, Service, Resourcefulness, Balance) 17

January, 2009 Assessment Conducts frequent external audits (e.g., Blue print reviews) Engaged a firm called “Student Voice” for on-line campus survey Exit interviews conducted by AD and SWA with every team each year Exit interviews conducted by FAR Exit interviews are conducted by administrative staff on random student-athletes 17

January, 2009 Assessment Exit interviews conducted on one senior per program Assessment is a process all year through communication with coaches AD and SWA meet with every coach each year in evaluation process All student-athletes complete an evaluation of coach Coaches evaluation includes their involvement and support outside athletics 17

January, 2009 Assessment AD completes an evaluation form and meets with coach over breakfast or lunch each year Administrative staff does a self- evaluation and discuss goals with AD A current SAAC member serves on search committees for administrators A student-athlete who has exhausted eligibility serves on a coaching search committee 17