UNSTEADY FLOW MODEL OF LOWER SNAKE RIVER USING HEC-RAS v. 3.1.2 JOHN HEITSTUMAN, PE CE 502 AND CE 504C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hurricane Storm Surge Forecasting for Coastal Rivers David Welch, Senior Hydrologist Dave Ramirez, P.E., Senior Hydrologist National Weather Service Lower.
Advertisements

Flood Profile Modeling with Split Flows and Weirs
Hydrological information systems Svein Taksdal Head of section, Section for Hydroinformatics Hydrology department Norwegian Water Resources and Energy.
WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
SECONDARY VALIDATION OF WATER LEVEL DATA (1) PRIMARY VALIDATION: –BASED ON KNOWLEDGE OF INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS OF MEASUREMENT WITH ASSOCIATED ERRORS.
Application of the Continuous Slope-Area Method for Determining Stream Discharge and Development of Rating Curves in Ephemeral Channels Navajo Nation Hydroclimate.
Use of a hydrodynamic model to
Reinaldo Garcia, PhD A proposal for testing two-dimensional models to use in the National Flood Insurance Program.
HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC MODELING Hydrologic Precipitation & Basin Parameters, Flood Frequency Analysis Hydraulic Energy & Momentum Relationships.
CHAPTER FOUR Stream flow measurement
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Alluvial Fan Flood Hazard Mapping and Dam Failure Analysis using USGS Diffusion Hydrodynamic Model by Neil M. Jordan, P.E. September 11, 2003.
Temperature and Flow Dynamics of the Klamath River Technical Memorandum 7 Leon Basdekas Mike Deas Watercourse Engineering, Inc nd Street, Suite B.
Reading: Applied Hydrology, Sec 15-1 to 15-5
Cracow Grid Workshop November 5-6 Support System of Virtual Organization for Flood Forecasting L. Hluchy, J. Astalos, V.D. Tran, M. Dobrucky and G.T. Nguyen.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS.
HEC-RAS.
Modeling River Ice and River Ice Jams with HEC-RAS
Evaluating river cross section for SPRINT: Guadalupe and San Antonio River Basins Alfredo Hijar Flood Forecasting.
CE 397 Flood Forecasting Lecture 3: Review of Concepts and Definitions.
BUILDING STRONG ® South Platte CWMS Model Missouri Basin Forecasters Meeting January 29, 2014 South Platte CWMS Model Missouri Basin Forecasters Meeting.
GIS for Faster Analysis of Dam-Break Flows Steve Pitman GIS in Water Resources – Fall 2003 Dr. David Maidment – UT Austin.
DAVE REED HYDROLOGIST IN CHARGE NOAA/NWS LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER FORECAST CENTER Datums and Stages - Importance to the NOAA/NWS Hydrologic Services Program.
Evaluation of Potential Performance Measures for the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory On Rotational.
1 Real Time Flood Forecasting for the Willamette Basin using HEC-CWMS / ResSim Modeling Real Time Flood Forecasting for the Willamette.
Water Supply Forecast using the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction Model Kevin Berghoff, Senior Hydrologist Northwest River Forecast Center Portland, OR.
CE 397 Midterm Slides Review Slides for the Midterm Exam David Maidment Spring 2015.
Data-assimilation in flood forecasting for the river Rhine between Andernach and Düsseldorf COR-JAN VERMEULEN.
WinTR-20 Project Formulation Hydrology Computer Program Basic Input and Output Presented by: WinTR-20 Development Team.
WinTR-20 Project Formulation Hydrology Computer Program Basic Input and Output Presented by: WinTR-20 Development Team.
David Ramirez, P.E. Senior Hydrologist Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center Slidell, LA Real-Time Operation of HEC-RAS at the Lower Mississippi River.
Feb 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.11 Slides adapted from HEC Unsteady Flow Course Unsteady Flow Course.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
MVS Mainstem Forecast Model Update: NETMISS2 by Joel Asunskis, P.E. Hydraulic Engineer, St. Louis District Water Control U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers October.
FLASH FLOOD PREDICTION James McDonald 4/29/08. Introduction - Relevance  90% of all national disasters are weather and flood related  Central Texas.
Corps Water Management System Hydrologic Engineering Center USACE Hydrologic Engineering Center Davis, CA Davis, CA.
A JOINT PROJECT OF MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY AND the Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center PROJECT FUNDED BY NOAA/OAR THROUGH THE NORTHERN GULF INSTITUTE.
NWS FLDWAV ANALYSIS TOOL
March 2009WinTR-20 Course1 Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
__________________________ SITES INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT for WATER RESOURCE SITE ANALYSIS COMPLEX WATERSHEDS SITES IN SERIES.
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Basic Input Lecture 3 Presented by:
Outline of the training. 6 October 2005, TNMC, Bangkok.
Formulating a Simulation Project Proposal Chapter3.
Prepared by: Burnham – Floodplain Study October 23, 2009 Presented by: Marty Spongberg, PhD, PE, PG AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.
1 Overview of Unsteady Flow Modeling With HEC-RAS Gary W. Brunner, P.E.
6-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. April 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 6 Day 1 Review and Tips Introduction to CFX.
James VanShaar Riverside Technology, inc
Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme. Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme unconditionally stable for  >=0.5 second-order accurate if 
Mathematical Background
Multiple Purpose Dam & Reservoir
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Our River Forecasting is in Hydraulics Team Members Evaluation of Hydraulic Models July 2007 Office of Hydrologic Development Hydraulics Group.
National Weather Service Water Predictions for Life Decisions Hydraulics Group Reggina Cabrera Office of Hydrologic Development Hydrologic Science and.
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 21: Groundwater Hydrology Concepts – Part 1 1.
From Fread, D.L., Flood routing models and the Manning n.
April 2002HEC-RAS Version 3.0 FY02Slide 1 of 12 HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Troubleshooting.
Models Platform for Danube Forecasting PROJECT DANUBE WATER INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT.
River Mechanics Activities River Mechanics Group Hydrology Laboratory Office of Hydrologic Development National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Experience ∙ Innovation · Results CALCASIEU PARISH – SABINE RIVER AND BAYOU LACASSINE BASINS STORMWATER MASTER PLAN Engineers ∙ Surveyors · Environmental.
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Glenn E. Moglen Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Virginia Tech End-of-semester wrap-up CEE 4324/5984 –Open Channel Flow – Lecture 27.
Introduction to the PRISM Weather and Climate Mapping System
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
A Comparative Study of the National Water Model Forecast to Observed Streamflow Data By leah Huling.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Presentation transcript:

UNSTEADY FLOW MODEL OF LOWER SNAKE RIVER USING HEC-RAS v JOHN HEITSTUMAN, PE CE 502 AND CE 504C

PROJECT PURPOSE LEARN TO USE HEC-RAS UNSTEADY FLOW MODEL DEVELOP UNSTEADY FLOW MODEL OF LOWER SNAKE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES FOR REAL TIME MODELING AND PLANNING STUDIES

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS LATEST AVAILABLE GEOMETRIC DATA FOR APPROXIMATELY 257 MILES OF THE SNAKE RIVER COLLECTED, MODIFIED, AND INTERPOLATED. GEOMETRIC DATA FOR TRIBUTARIES, OTHER THAN LOWER CLEARWATER RIVER ADAPTED FROM FLDWAV MODEL DEVELOPED BY GENE R. SPANGUDE, PE GEOMETRIC DATA FOR SNAKE RIVER UPSTREAM OF ASOTIN, WA, PROVIDED BY IDAHO POWER DISTANCE DISCRETIZATION OR CROSS-SECTION SPACING OF APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET USED FOR ALL REACHES DUE TO STEEP SLOPES AND VARIABLE CHANNEL GEOMETRY STAGE AND DISCHARGE DATA COLLECTED, FILTERED, AND FORMATTED FOR FIFTEEN SITES FOR WATER YEARS 1996 THROUGH 2002 ALL STAGE AND DISCHARGE DATA CONVERTED TO HOURLY DATA LOWER SNAKE RIVER DAMS’ GATE AND TURBINE DISCHARGES APPROXIMATED BY TAINTER GATE AND SLUICE GATE EQUATIONS AVAILABLE IN HEC-RAS TIME DISCRETIZATION FOR ALL MODELING RANGED FROM ONE TO FIVE MINUTES; THREE MINUTES WAS FOUND TO BE OPTIMUM MODEL CALIBRATED FOR THE PERIOD APRIL THROUGH JULY 1996 MODEL VALIDATED FOR JANUARY 1997, FEBRUARY THROUGH JULY 1997, AND MAY THROUGH JULY 2002

PENDING ANALYSIS TIME SERIES GATE OPENINGS FOR LOWER SNAKE RIVER DAMS BECAUSE FULL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ARE NOT SUPPORTED IN HEC-RAS v REAL TIME VALIDATION OF MODEL

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE HEC-RAS DEVELOPED TO REPLACE HEC-2, HEC-6, AND HEC-UNET HEC-RAS IS PART OF THE CORPS WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CWMS) SUITE OF PROGRAMS CWMS DEVELOPED TO UNITE CORPS DATA BASES AND STANDARDIZE MODELS AS A RESULT OF LESSONS LEARNED FROM 1993 MIDWEST FLOODS VERY ABREVIATED HISTORY OF UNSTEADY FLOW MODELING LEADING TO HEC-RAS….

If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. Isaac Newton, Letter to Robert Hooke, February 5, 1675

Dr. Danny L. Fread Dr. Danny L. Fread received his BS in Civil Engineering in 1961 from the Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy where he ranked first in the graduating class. He worked six years for Texaco Inc. where he was promoted to Senior Engineer and specialized in the design of gravity and pressurized piping systems. In 1971 after completing four years of graduate studies at the University of Missouri - Rolla, he received a PhD. His studies focused on hydraulics / hydrology / mathematics, and his research was centered on unsteady flow and numerical / experimental simulation of breached dams. Dr. Fread retired recently from the National Weather Service (NWS) after 29 years of service, where he progressed during from Research Hydrologist (GS-12, 13, and 14) to Senior Research Hydrologist (GS-15) to Director of Hydrologic Research (SES-4) from to Director of the Office of Hydrology (SES-4) from During the 70’s and 80’s he personally formulated, coded and tested the following mathematical simulation programs (computer models): DWOPER, DAMBRK, SMPDBK, BREACH, and FLDWAV. The DWOPER model simulates unsteady flows from rainfallrunoff in river systems; the DAMBRK and SMPDBK models simulate unsteady flows from breached dams in a single river; BREACH simulates the erosive formation of breaches in earthen dams; and FLDWAV is an improved simulation model of unsteady flows from rainfall-runoff and from breached dams in a single river or network of rivers. Currently and for over 20 years, these models have been extensively used for unsteady river flow modeling by Federal and State Agencies, consulting firms, mining and hydropower firms, and for educational purposes in universities; these agencies, firms and universities are located in the United States and Canada and in more than 20 other nations worldwide. Since 1976, Dr. Fread has provided over 120 training workshops on the models, each consisting of 24 hours of training, to over 3000 engineers. He has authored 50 and co-authored 42 professional scientific papers, and contributed chapters on modeling unsteady flows to four books including the Handbook of Hydrology. His last decade with the National Weather Service consisted of directing for six years a highly trained staff of 35 who were engaged in hydrologic research and development of the NWS River Forecasting System, and for four years a staff of 85 who were involved in hydrologic research / development and policy / support services for the NWS mission of providing real-time river forecasting services to the Nation. Dr. Fread received national awards for his work including the Department of Commerce Gold Medal, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Huber Research Prize and J.C. Stevens Award, the Federal Laboratory Consortium Award for Technology Transfer, the Association of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO) National Award of Merit, and the American Meteorological Society Award of Fellow. Since his retirement from the National Weather Service in 2000, Dr. Fread has engaged in consulting work which includes: enhancing the FLDWAV model and extending it for unsteady flows in storm sewers, serving as an expert witness in dam breach arbitration cases, providing several dam breach analyses for private firms and State Agencies, and providing training workshops on the FLDWAV, DAMBRK and BREACH models.

BREIF ORIENTATION TO RIVER REACHES MODELED LOCATION MAP SELECTED PHOTOS HEC-RAS SCHEMATIC INVERT PROFILES

GAGE DATA USED FOR MODEL INPUT, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATION

MODEL CALIBRATION INCLUDING STATISTICAL ANALYSIS STATISTICS COMPUTED WITH HEC-DSS CORRELATION AND LAG COMPUTED USING ITSM 2000 PROFESSIONAL BY PETER J. BROCKWELL AND RICHARD A. DAVIS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY

================== ITSM::Multivariate(CCF) ================== # of Lags = 3 Sample Cross-correlations: Cor[X_1(t+h),X_1(t)] Cor[X_1(t+h),X_2(t)] Cor[X_2(t+h),X_1(t)] Cor[X_2(t+h),X_2(t)]

MODEL RESULTS FOR RAPIDLY VARYING DISCHARGE AND STAGE VALIDATION JANUARY 1997

MODEL RESULTS VALIDATION FEBUARY THROUGH JULY 1997

MODEL RESULTS VALIDATION MAY THROUGH JULY 2002 (AVERAGE TO LOW FLOW YEAR)

HEC-RAS VISUALIZATION TOOLS PROFILE ANIMATION PSEUDO 3D VIEWER

LESSONS LEARNED GEOMETRIC DATA –CROSS-SECTION EFFECTIVE FLOW AREAS MUST BE WELL DEFINED TO AVOID TRANSCRITICAL FLOW –USE ONLY ENOUGH POINTS TO DEFINE CROSS SECTION; EXCESS POINTS USE MORE MEMORY AND SLOW PROGRAM EXECUTION –FIND OPTIMUM CROSS-SECTION SPACING BY TRIAL AND ERROR MODIFYING ONLY ONE RIVER REACH AT A TIME –AT JUNCTIONS CROSS-SECTION INVERTS SHOULD BE MADE TO BE EQUAL CROSS-SECTIONS SHOULD BE REGULAR IN SHAPE AND CONSITST OF ONLY A FEW POINTS –CHECK ALL REACH LENGTHS RELATIVE TO STRUCTURES, GAGES, AND JUNCTIONS CAREFULLY –THERE IS A PRACTICAL LIMIT (MEMORY) TO THE NUMBER OF CROSS-SECTIONS IN A MODEL; ABOUT 3,500 –SPECIFY ENOUGH VERTICAL ‘SLICES’ FOR CROSS-SECTIONS TO DEFINE CONVEYANCE OVER ENTIRE RANGE OF FLOWS –CHECK THE SHAPE OF ALL CONVEYANCE CURVES FOR DISCONTINUITIES

LESSONS LEARNED (CONTINUED) TIME SERIES DATA –INPUT HYDROGRAPHS ALL STAGES AND FLOWS MUST BE SCREENED CAREFULLY FOR VERY LARGE OR SMALL VALUES (UNREASONABLE OR OUT OF POSSIBLE RANGE) MISSING DATA CAN BE LINEARLY INTERPOLATED USING HEC DSS VUE, HOWEVER MINIMUM FLOWS MUST BE SPECIFIED WELL ABOVE ZERO FLOW OR STAGE. –SCREENING OF HYDROGRAPHS IS CRITICAL FOR REAL-TIME OPERATIONS, AND DIFFICULT TO IMPLEMENT CORRECTLY –MOST OF THE TIME, WHEN UNET MATRIX FAILS TO CONVERGE; IT IS DUE TO UNREASONABLE HYDROGRAPHS (PROVIDING TIME AND DISTANCE DISCRETIZATION IS OK) –GATE OPENINGS FOR NOW, GATE OPENINGS MUST BE SPECIFIED BY FITTING RATING CURVES TO EQUATIONS FOR NOW TURBINE FLOW IS BEST MODELED BY SLUICE GATE CURRENTLY STAGE AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS CANNOT BE SPECIFIED IN CONJUCTION WITH IN LINE STRUCTURES (HEC IS WORKING ON THIS NOW) –TIME DISCRETIZATION TIME DISCRETIZATION IS CRITICAL TO MODEL OPERATION AND ACCURACY OF RESULTS –REFER TO THE HEC-RAS FOR UNSTEADY FLOW FOR FIRST TRY –USUALLY SUGGESTED VALUE IS TOO SMALL AND A SLIGHTLY LARGER VALUE MAY BE USED –MONITOR OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPHS CLOSELY FOR RESOLUTION WHEN INCREASING TIME STEP –THE TIME STEP THAT IS ‘JUST RIGHT’ USUALLY CAUSES THE MODEL TO RUN WITH FEWEST ITERATIONS

LESSONS LEARNED (CONTINUED) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF HEC-RAS –MODEL SHOULD SUPPORT AUTOMATIC VARIABLE TIME STEPS AS DOES FLDWAV –RATING CURVES FOR TAINTER GATES AND TURBINES, AND HYDROPOWER OUTPUT SHOULD BE ADDED (SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE THIS FALL?) –ONCE PROGRAM IS ‘MATURE’ RELEASE THE SOURCE CODE TO FACILITATE DEBUGGING (THE SOONER THE BETTER)

HEC-RAS DATA INPUT FORMATS TEXT FILES –GEOMETRY =.G01 –UNSTEADY FLOW =.U01 –PROJECT FILE =.PRJ –PLAN FILE =.P01 DSS FILES –TIME SERIES DATA

VIEW TEXT FILES WITH ULTRAEDIT

DEMONSTRATE HEC-DSS VUE

DEMONSTRATE HEC-RAS INTERFACE