Vicki Powers Bristol Royal Infirmary CYP2B6 G516T genotyping in patients with HIV: A pharmacogenetics study of the antiretroviral, efavirenz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1) ) -Image taken from: hochschule.de/fileadmin/Fachbereiche/ac/Neubearbeitung_der_Homepage/Fachgebiete/Biochemie/Bilder/LightCycler.jpg.
Advertisements

Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Prostacyclin Promoter Polymorphism is Associated with Severity of Infant Respiratory Viral Infection S Van Driest 1, T Gebretsadik 3, P Moore 2, S Reiss.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT-1 and HIV Coinfection NIAID ERADICATE Trial Phase 2a Treatment Naïve and Treatment.
Salvage Antiretroviral Therapy Guiding Principles, Strategies and the Role of Resistance Testing.
Protective HLA Class I alleles are associated with reduced immune activation in Primary HIV infection Elizabeth Hamlyn 1, Stephen Hickling 2, Abdel Babiker.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT1 or GT4 and HIV Coinfection ION-4 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir in HCV-HIV Coinfection & HCV GT 1,2,3 PHOTON-1 Trial Phase 3 Sulkowski MS, et al. JAMA. 2014;312:
Can dose-optimization trials be conducted ethically in low-income countries? Dr Andrew Hill World AIDS Conference, Melbourne, Australia July 2014 [TUWS1104]
Cell- and Tissue-based Measures of Viral Persistence Are Associated with Immune Activation and PD-1-Expressing CD4+ T cells H Hatano 1, V Jain 1, PW Hunt.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
How to optimize the treatment of HCV-4 patients? Nabil Antaki MD, FRCPC Aleppo, Syria Paris, January 30, 2012.
Autopsies in HIV: still finding missed diagnoses after 20 years Background Mortality has significantly fallen with the advent of HAART and chemoprophylaxis.
Is monitoring for CD4 counts still needed for the management of patients with long- term HIV RNA suppression? Andrew Hill, Liverpool University, UK.
Overview Pediatric HIV Program & IMPAACT/ PACTG Vaccine Research Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC Dr.Hans ML Spiegel Director Special.
BHIVA Clinical Audit Management of patients who switch therapy; re-audit of patients starting therapy from naïve.
Concept Sheet Development: Developing the Question Kara Wools-Kaloustian M.D. M.S.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT1 or GT4 and HIV Coinfection ION-4 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
BHIVA Audit Survey of patient assessment and monitoring Set-up phase of cohort audit of patients starting ART from naïve.
BHIVA Clinical Audit Management of patients who switch therapy; re-audit of patients starting therapy from naïve.
Predicting NNRTI Resistance – do polymorphisms matter? Nicola E Mackie 1, Lucy Garvey 1, Anna Maria Geretti 2, Linda Harrison 3, Peter Tilston 4, Andrew.
A single nucleotide polymorphism in CYP2B6 leads to >3-fold increases in efavirenz concentrations in intensive pharmacokinetic curves and hair samples.
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES AT THE BOTSWANA- BAYLOR CHILDREN’S CLINICAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE: A REPORT TO THE WHO TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP ON PEDIATRIC CARE.
Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV-Infected Subjects on HAART: Prevalence and Associations Kevin Robertson *1, Kunling Wu 2, Thomas Parsons 1, Ron Ellis.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Genetic Repositories Australia BACKGROUND GRA supported by an NHMRC Enabling Facility Grant awarded in  GRA supported by an NHMRC Enabling Facility.
The Effectiveness of generic Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy for the treatment of HIV infected Ugandan children Presenter: Linda Barlow-Mosha MD,
Results Compliance with Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines in the HIV Clinic: A Quality Improvement Tool E. Patrozou M.D., E. Christaki M.D., L. Hicks.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
NIAID ERADICATE Open-label W12 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment naïve HIV infection on stable ART ≥ 8 weeks and HIV RNA < 50 c/ml.
Maintenance therapy with Trizivir® after 6 months induction with Trizivir® plus either efavirenz or lopinavir/r in naïve patients. Trizefal study J. Mallolas*
INTRODUCTION A previous cohort study from our unit suggested a benefit for the use of efavirenz compared to nevirapine in a group of patients initiating.
Agenda  Update on Darunavir: Perry Mohammed  Update on Etravirine: Rekha Sinha  Update on TMC278: Peter Williams  Update on TMC207: Karel De Beule.
Atazanavir Use in Pregnancy : a report of 33 cases St George’s Hospital South West London HIV & GUM Clinical Services Network Macky Natha 1, Phillip Hay.
1 Antiretroviral Regimen and Pharmacogenetic Determinants of Tenofovir-associated Change in Creatinine Clearance in ACTG Protocol A5142 (NWCS 291) Miguel.
The Impact of Darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) & Raltegravir (RAL) in the Clinic: A New Era for Treatment-Experienced Patients? M. Mugavero 1, H. Lin 1, J.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon+ Ribavirin in HCV-HIV GT 1-4 Phase 2 Rodriguez-Torres M, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic.
A HIGH FREQUENCY OF APOBEC3G POLYMORPHISM IN HIV+ SOUTH AFRICAN POPULATION Dr Nyasha Chin’ombe, UCT, South Africa AIDS restriction genes in Africans.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Neurologic Effects Associated With Efavirenz Generally Mild, Transient Slideset on: Clifford DB, Evans S, Yang Y, et al. Impact of efavirenz on neuropsychological.
Efavirenz Use Not Associated With Depressive Episodes, According to Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes Slideset on: Journot V, Chene G, De.
HIV co-receptor tropism in treatment-naïve patients: impact on CD4 decline and subsequent response to HAART Laura Waters, Sundhiya Mandalia, Adrian Wildfire,
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Expression Analysis of α4 integrin and related genetic polymorphisms in HIV acquisition and disease progression OF infected individuals Livia R. GóeS 1,
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Genotype-directed dosing for Efavirenz
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Seroprevalence, prevalence, type and factors associated with HPV infection at multiple sites in young HIV-positive MSM On behalf of the HPV MAPS Research.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced HIV Coinfection
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Presentation transcript:

Vicki Powers Bristol Royal Infirmary CYP2B6 G516T genotyping in patients with HIV: A pharmacogenetics study of the antiretroviral, efavirenz

HIV replication cycle Weiss RA. EMBO reports 4, Supp1, S10–S14 (2003) X efavirenz

Efavirenz (EFV) metabolism Phase I CYP2B6 Phase II Glucuronidation NNRTI 600/800 mg od Therapeutic range 1-4  g/mL Excreted

Literature Background Haas DW Aids 2004 Tsuchiya K Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004 Rodriguez-Novoa S Clin Infect Dis 2005 Ribuado HJ Clin Infect Dis 2006  Inter-patient variability in response to EFV  Differences seen between ethnic groups  CNS side effects and rash development reported in ~1/2 of patients  EFV discontinued in ~10% of patients due to side effects  Many studies looked at establishing a genetic cause CYP2B6 G516T  G516T homozygotes – elevated (> 4  g/mL) EFV levels  Wildtype homozygotes – subtherapeutic (< 1  g/mL) EFV levels

1 1 1 CYP2B6 G516T CYP2B6CYP2B7 Gln172His  Polymorphism frequency? ~ 3% ‘European Americans’ ~ 20% ‘African Americans’ 1

Project aims 1. To develop a PCR based genotyping method to test for the CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism 2. To establish the frequency of the CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism in a UK cohort of HIV patients 3. To correlate genotype with phenotype - side effect questionnaire 4. To look at EFV discontinuation and compare with CYP2B6 G516T genotypes

Patient recruitment  Ethical approval obtained (September 06)  Patients personally recruited at clinic  3 afternoon clinics per week (~ 50 patients seen)  30 per week  Patients were asked: 1. Consent for spare blood sample (CD4 count) to be used 2. To complete a questionnaire on side effects experienced (ACTG A5097s trial: Clifford et al. Ann Intern Med, 2001)

Questionnaire  34 questions  Questions relate to side effects reported with EFV use  Patients asked to grade how much of each experience they get: Not at all (0) A little (1) Moderately (2) Quite a bit (3) Extremely (4) Symptom score (out of 136)

Sample collection  232 patients recruited (208 analysed)  Genomic DNA was extracted from CD4 count samples using versaGene Genomic DNA purification kits (Gentra) within 5 days of blood being taken  Samples stored at –40 ºC until analysis

Patient Cohort MalesFemales Number14959 Age (years)22-82 (42)23-67 (39) Weight (kg) (73.8)43.2 – (71.9) CD4 count (x10 9 cells/L) (0.416) (0.436) Viral load (copies/mL)<40–193,528 (<40)62-741,218 (<40) HCV coinfection6 (3 unknown)3 (5 unknown) ALT (U/L) (27)9-456 (20)

Patient Ethnicity MalesFemales Caucasian12815 Black-African1836 Black-Caribbean25 Black-South American11 Asian02

HAART Regimen MalesFemales Including EFV47 (46%)27 (32%) Excluding EFV85 (49%)29 (57%) None17 (5%)3 (11%)

PCR Methodology Jacob RM Clin Chem 2004; 50:8, Step 1: Routine PCR control

Step 2: Allele specific PCR (asPCR) Rxn 1 Rxn 2 PCR Methodology GG GT TT CON asPCR prod G T

DNA Sequencing GG GT TT

Study samples  44 samples per batch, 3 +ve controls (GG, GT, TT), 1 –ve control (dH 2 O) GG GT TT -ve  3 batches (136 samples) OK…

CYP2B6 G516T Frequency TT 6% TT 16% P<0.05 (  2 )

Questionnaire Analysis (1)

Questionnaire Analysis (2) P = 0.67  Questionnaire score vs HAART regimen (1)  No significant difference in QS between HAART regimen groups

Questionnaire Analysis (3) P = 0.19P = 0.06P = 0.10  Questionnaire score vs HAART regimen (2) ON EFVOTHERNONE  No significant difference in QS between genotype groups when analysed according to HAART regimen

Discontinuation Study  Distribution of genotypes between individuals which had stopped taking EFV as part of their HAART regimen (n = 31) were compared with those who had remained on EFV (n = 74) GGGTTT Stopped EFV12145 Remained on EFV35318  No significant difference (P = 0.63) found

Conclusions & Further Work  CYP2B6 G516T genotyping method was developed study participants were genotyped - However…  Genotype-phenotype associations did not show this test would be useful in pre-treatment screening - Further work is required to investigate this

Acknowledgements Dr Mark Gompels John Ward Ann Bowron Dr Paul Thomas Immunology dept, Southmead Clinic staff and patients