Vicki Powers Bristol Royal Infirmary CYP2B6 G516T genotyping in patients with HIV: A pharmacogenetics study of the antiretroviral, efavirenz
HIV replication cycle Weiss RA. EMBO reports 4, Supp1, S10–S14 (2003) X efavirenz
Efavirenz (EFV) metabolism Phase I CYP2B6 Phase II Glucuronidation NNRTI 600/800 mg od Therapeutic range 1-4 g/mL Excreted
Literature Background Haas DW Aids 2004 Tsuchiya K Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004 Rodriguez-Novoa S Clin Infect Dis 2005 Ribuado HJ Clin Infect Dis 2006 Inter-patient variability in response to EFV Differences seen between ethnic groups CNS side effects and rash development reported in ~1/2 of patients EFV discontinued in ~10% of patients due to side effects Many studies looked at establishing a genetic cause CYP2B6 G516T G516T homozygotes – elevated (> 4 g/mL) EFV levels Wildtype homozygotes – subtherapeutic (< 1 g/mL) EFV levels
1 1 1 CYP2B6 G516T CYP2B6CYP2B7 Gln172His Polymorphism frequency? ~ 3% ‘European Americans’ ~ 20% ‘African Americans’ 1
Project aims 1. To develop a PCR based genotyping method to test for the CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism 2. To establish the frequency of the CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism in a UK cohort of HIV patients 3. To correlate genotype with phenotype - side effect questionnaire 4. To look at EFV discontinuation and compare with CYP2B6 G516T genotypes
Patient recruitment Ethical approval obtained (September 06) Patients personally recruited at clinic 3 afternoon clinics per week (~ 50 patients seen) 30 per week Patients were asked: 1. Consent for spare blood sample (CD4 count) to be used 2. To complete a questionnaire on side effects experienced (ACTG A5097s trial: Clifford et al. Ann Intern Med, 2001)
Questionnaire 34 questions Questions relate to side effects reported with EFV use Patients asked to grade how much of each experience they get: Not at all (0) A little (1) Moderately (2) Quite a bit (3) Extremely (4) Symptom score (out of 136)
Sample collection 232 patients recruited (208 analysed) Genomic DNA was extracted from CD4 count samples using versaGene Genomic DNA purification kits (Gentra) within 5 days of blood being taken Samples stored at –40 ºC until analysis
Patient Cohort MalesFemales Number14959 Age (years)22-82 (42)23-67 (39) Weight (kg) (73.8)43.2 – (71.9) CD4 count (x10 9 cells/L) (0.416) (0.436) Viral load (copies/mL)<40–193,528 (<40)62-741,218 (<40) HCV coinfection6 (3 unknown)3 (5 unknown) ALT (U/L) (27)9-456 (20)
Patient Ethnicity MalesFemales Caucasian12815 Black-African1836 Black-Caribbean25 Black-South American11 Asian02
HAART Regimen MalesFemales Including EFV47 (46%)27 (32%) Excluding EFV85 (49%)29 (57%) None17 (5%)3 (11%)
PCR Methodology Jacob RM Clin Chem 2004; 50:8, Step 1: Routine PCR control
Step 2: Allele specific PCR (asPCR) Rxn 1 Rxn 2 PCR Methodology GG GT TT CON asPCR prod G T
DNA Sequencing GG GT TT
Study samples 44 samples per batch, 3 +ve controls (GG, GT, TT), 1 –ve control (dH 2 O) GG GT TT -ve 3 batches (136 samples) OK…
CYP2B6 G516T Frequency TT 6% TT 16% P<0.05 ( 2 )
Questionnaire Analysis (1)
Questionnaire Analysis (2) P = 0.67 Questionnaire score vs HAART regimen (1) No significant difference in QS between HAART regimen groups
Questionnaire Analysis (3) P = 0.19P = 0.06P = 0.10 Questionnaire score vs HAART regimen (2) ON EFVOTHERNONE No significant difference in QS between genotype groups when analysed according to HAART regimen
Discontinuation Study Distribution of genotypes between individuals which had stopped taking EFV as part of their HAART regimen (n = 31) were compared with those who had remained on EFV (n = 74) GGGTTT Stopped EFV12145 Remained on EFV35318 No significant difference (P = 0.63) found
Conclusions & Further Work CYP2B6 G516T genotyping method was developed study participants were genotyped - However… Genotype-phenotype associations did not show this test would be useful in pre-treatment screening - Further work is required to investigate this
Acknowledgements Dr Mark Gompels John Ward Ann Bowron Dr Paul Thomas Immunology dept, Southmead Clinic staff and patients