First Hungarian Carbon management Ltd. „Agricultural Emission Reduction by Partial Replacement of N Fertilizer and Change of Soil Tillage” The elaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project and Workshop on inventories and projections of GHG and NH 3 emissions from agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe Ispra, Juni 2005 National.
Advertisements

Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
New developments and insights on the effects of kitchen & garden waste processing and the structural positive contribution to reduce global warming The.
Renewable Biomass Fuel As “Green Power” Alternative for Sugarcane Milling in the Philippines T.C. Mendoza, University of the Philippines at Los Baños,
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Facts and data Peasants are part of the solution for the climate change 1st session of the intergovernmental working group on the rights of peasants and.
By Dr. Thongchai Tangpremsri by Dr. Thongchai Tangpremsri Thailand Country Report on Conservation Agriculture.
Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases Jill Heemstra, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Building Environmental Leaders in Animal Agriculture (BELAA)
Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Land in Wisconsin Christopher Kucharik Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE)
Sino-German Technical Cooperation Program Environmental Strategies of Intensive Agriculture in the North of China (ESIA)
Side Event COP 14 Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Agriculture Poznan, Wednesday 3 December 2008 Fox Room 13:00 – 15:00. Agenda 1.Welcome and Introduction.
“5F” Ayurvet Research Foundation
Biomass for Biofuel.
1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people.
1 Soil Carbon Sequestration: Long-term Effect of Tillage and Rotations Charles W. Rice and Karina Fabrizzi October 28-30, 2008 Kansas State University.
Dansk Landbrugsrådgivning Landscentret More than biogas production Biogas Envi- ron- ment Agri- cul- ture Energy.
Innovations in natural fertilizers in agriculture Jaap Uenk, chairman Section manure distribution CUMELA.
CONTENTS Introduction Introduction Changes in Forest Cover Changes in Forest Cover Reforestation Reforestation Community Forestry Community Forestry Forest.
The Benefits and Costs of Zero Tillage RD&E on the Canadian Prairies Lana Awada 19 th ICABR Conference June 17, 2015 Department of Bioresource PBE University.
Pro's and con's of reduced tillage in maize with respect to weeds Rommie van der Weide Hilfred Huiting, Piet Bleeker en Marleen Riemens.
Opportunities for Methane Capture in the Intensive Livestock Industry.
Climate Change Mitigation Policy for Agriculture in Canada: Horizontal Policy Integration June 19, 2004 UNFCCC Workshop, Bonn, Germany Dr. Robert J. MacGregor.
LAKE OHRID MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA Experiences with Nutrient Management and Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control.
STATE WATER EFFICIENCY AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Jenny Lester Moffitt Deputy Secretary.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
Organic agriculture – a option for mitigation and adaptation Urs Niggli.
Pakistan’s Increasing Vulnerability to Climate Change: Policy Response Pakistan’s Increasing Vulnerability to Climate Change: Policy Response Dr. Qamar-uz-Zaman.
Energy to and from agriculture View to future Based on article H. Mikkola and J. Ahokas.
Hungarian green and clean technological innovations Science vs. Practice ROUND TABLE „ Mitigation of agricultural emissions with partial change of nitrogen.
The Norwegian Research Council Project: Strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norwegian agriculture Erling Vårdal University of Bergen and Institute.
Presentation by Sangeetha.N.Kumar X Std. Embassy Public School.
Introduction System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is special method of rice cultivation originally developed at Madagascar in SRI is a combination.
Biofuels – EU policy context Funding and Legislation Workshops Glasgow, 26 May 2011 Francesca Giannini Scotland Europa.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
CAPRI 3 rd CAP-STRAT Workshop, 24./ , Bologna CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact Abatement cost curves for global warming gases.
GIS bioenergy Options for GIS bioenergy projects Andreas Türk 25. April 2008.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
R. A. Zakhidov Application of Kyoto mechanisms in attraction of carbon investments for implementation of projects on thermal utilization of solar energy.
Climate Change and Energy Impacts on Water and Food Scarcity Mark W. Rosegrant Director Environment and Production Technology Division High-level Panel.
What factors might affect ELBs businesses? What will these do to my chances of getting a job?
Environmental Benefits of Re-evaluating Molybdenum Standard for Biosolids and Residual Utilization MWRA Advisory Board Manuel Irujo, VP of Operations,
Global Change Impacts on Rice- Wheat Provision and the Environmental Consequences Peter Grace SKM - Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse.
Mitigation of climate change in Finnish agriculture – help from FAO is needed! Marja-Liisa Tapio-Bistrom NRD
Organic Manures as a Component of INM in Potato NextEnd.
Recent techniques in Precision Agriculture in Asia  Byungkyun Chung.
John Walsh Determining the real value of on-farm Anaerobic Digestion Penderfynu gwir werth Treuliad Anaerobig (Anaerobic Digestion)
1 Protection of soil carbon content as a climate change mitigation tool Peter Wehrheim Head of Unit, DG CLIMA Unit A2: Climate finance and deforestation.
The impact of concentrated pig production in Flanders: a spatial analysis G. Willeghems, L. De Clercq, E. Michels, E. Meers, and J. Buysse Juan Tur.
What are the pros and cons of pesticide use? Pros- Cons- 1. kills insects 1. Threaten human health 2. kills weeds 2. Pollute ecosystems 3. kills other.
FOOD GROWING DEMAND GLOBAL SOIL PARTNERSHIP SESSION Berlín, GERMANY - Thu 31 October How to promote sustainable soil management? Crucial.
Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan, R.O.C Southeast Asia International Joint-Research and Training Program 『 To Promote Sustainable Protection.
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) European Commission expert group on forest fires Antalya, 26 April 2012 Ernst Schulte, DG ENV on behalf.
Type of N balances in Germany Calculation and use of the results Frauke Godlinski Institute for Crop and Soil Science Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) Federal.
Ch 14: Agricultural Methods and Pest Management. Outline 14.1 The Development of Agriculture 14.2 Fertilizer and Agriculture 14.3 Agricultural Chemical.
PRODUCER GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE AGRICULTURE OF HUNGARY Marton Bittsanszky Deputy Head of Department.
Terrisha Wilson Bio Dr. Lang University of Houston- Downtown.
Global Impact of Biotech Crops: economic & environmental effects Graham Brookes PG Economics Ltd UK ©PG Economics Ltd 2016.
PRODUCER GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE AGRICULTURE OF IN HUNGARY.
Low-Carbon Emission Agriculture Plan
Process of conversion from inputs to outputs
Department of Environmental Organic Chemistry and Technology (EnVOC)
Jean-Mari Peltier Counselor to the Administrator on Agriculture Policy
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data
Content Need for Sustainability Criteria Development of Methodology
Content Need for Sustainability Criteria Development of Methodology
CGE Greenhouse Gas Inventory Hands-on Training Workshop
DOE 1605(b) Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Registry and
Crop Production and Principles
Technical Press Briefing LIFE Sub-programme for Climate Action Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) 12 December 2011.
AD at the centre of the energy and food waste nexus
Presentation transcript:

First Hungarian Carbon management Ltd. „Agricultural Emission Reduction by Partial Replacement of N Fertilizer and Change of Soil Tillage” The elaboration and implementation of this project has been done in close cooperation with the SZIE and based on the results of Prof. Márta Birkás T

The challange The total CO2 emission of Hungary is 79 million tons The agriculture contributes by 11 % to the total emission Agriculture is the second largest issuer after the energy sector This proportion did not change in the last decade

Aim of the project  Reduction of the GHG emission of the soils  Generation of additional income for farmers by sustainable technological change  Yield growth  Improvement of the quality of the cultivated soils  Cost savings The project has received the Approval of the Ministry of National Development

Scedule of project implementation Preparation, counceling, consultations: April, 2011 Investment start: September 2011 Period of crediting: Sept Aug (5 years) Project duration: (8 years) JI support statement: July 20, 2011 Project approval issued: May, 2012 Place of implementation: North Hungarian and Trans Danubian regions at ha

Emission Sources of the agricultural activity  CO2 and N2O emission of the soils  N2O and CH4 emission of the manure treatment  CH4 emission deriving from the ruminants’ digestion

Measures for reduction of GHG emissions  Partial replecement of fossil N fertilizer  (proposed: 50 kg N acive substance equivalent/ha )  Usage of biological nutrient instead of fossil N (Complex bacterial fertilizer and algal leaf fertilizer)  Introduction of carbon saving soil tillage system Central principles of the project are in line with the IPPC (2011) recommendation: increasing adaptability of arable crops related to climate change

Calculated Sources of GHG Reduction CO2 equivalent of fossil fuels that would be necessary for the production and usage of the unused fertilizer Direct and indirect N2O emissions of the agricultural activity Increased amount of soil carbon related to the change in the soil tillage system The difference between the conventional and proposed tillage system on soil carbon storage takes about 2,235 t of carbon, which is equivalent to 8,18 t/ha GHG emission reduction in CO2 equivalent

Carbon losses at different tillage methods in summer

Biological effects Bacterial fertilizer : About 50 kg N/ha Increased cellulose degradation N fixation, P mobilising Algal leaf fertilizer Improved germination and growth Stimulated growth of roots and plants Earlier flowering, better fruit setting, shorter growing period Improves the taste and flavour formation of the friuts Improves storabiltiy, lowered nitrate content Higher pest and desease resitance and drought tolerance

Monitoring Planned emission reduction is 1 mill. tonnes in 5 years ( tonnes/year on ha) The CO2 emission reduction commitment means the difference between the baseline emission and the emissions occuring after technological change. Meeting of the commitments require an internal strong monitoring control and external, international validation

Baseline calculation SourceGas/Carbon storageStatus of project calculation Explanation Direct soil emissionCO2CalculatedCO2 emissons related to soil tillage CCalculatedCarbon from plant residues recycled into the soil N2OCalculatedDirect N2O emissions related to the use of fertilizers N2OCalculatedN2O emissions related to the use of manure N2OCalculatedDirect N2O emissions of nitrogen fixing plants N2OCalculatedDirect N2O emissions of plant residues recycled into the soil Indirect soil emissionN2OCalculatedIndirect N2O emissions related to the use of fertilizers N2ONon calculatedIndirect N2O emissions related to the use of manure Calculations related to the production of fertilizers CO2CalculatedProduction related CO2 emissions calculated by type of fertilizer

Data subject to monitoring  The amount of nutrients used both from organic and synthetic fertilizer  The composition of nutrients used (quantity and quality control)  Follow the soil tillage technique used in the soil preparation period  Follow the soil tillage technique used in the after harvest period  Changes in the amount of plant residues  Inventory of the own and hired soil tillage machines, which are suitable for the implementation of the new technology both in quality and capacity.

Monitoring Use of GN program Completion of the log book Provision of nitrate data On the spot control including sampling Parcell identification based on GPS

Advantages for farmers Receive organic fertilizers in a value of Ft. ( 20 l/h/year (a: 600 FT+ VAT /l) Receive support for tillage machinery in a value of 3400 Ft/ha

Farmers’ obligations in relation to the project Statement on the right of land use Follow the technology determined Meeting administrative obligations (supplying data by crops) on a contracted bases

Summary  The indicator number one of the program implementation is the volume of GHG emission reduction. The planned 1 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent emission reduction is considered to be an outstanding magnitude among agricultural projects.  Based on the the changes in farming technology and the use of complex bio fertilizers it may be clearly stated that the program implementation is an extra voluntary environmental performance.  Farmers implement environment friendly farming management that is beyond the requirements formulated in the EU's common agricultural policy and strenthgen adaptation to the climat change ahead of us.

Thank you for your attention