Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, 2007 18 th January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Advertisements

Biofuels: Environmental Friend or Foe? Presentation to 1 st Year Environmental Engineering Students Deniz Karman.
Land use for bioenergy production – assessing the production potentials and the assumptions of EU bioenergy policy Trends and Future of Sustainable Development.
1 Antonio Soria Head of Unit Economics of Energy, Climate Change and Transport Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Joint Research Centre European.
Dr. Niels Jungbluth ESU-services Ltd., Uster, Switzerland Life Cycle Assessment of BTL-fuels, Conversion Concepts and Comparison with Fossil Fuels 16 th.
Enough for all? Bernd Möller, Ph.D. Sustainable Energy Planning & Management Group Department of Development and Planning Aalborg University, Denmark Biomass.
Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change The use of the Life Cycle Analysis tool WRATE Dr Peter Olsen Scottish Environment Protection Agency UCCCfS:
Don Scott Director of Sustainability National Biodiesel Board Biodiesel Liquid Solar Energy.
1 Co-Product Function Expansion A Methodology for Incrementally Considering the Effects of Co-Products in Multi-Product Systems Paul Worhach, Ph.D. InLCA/LCM.
The impact of the rebound effect of first generation biofuel use in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions 17 th ICABR Conference, 19 June 2013 Edward Smeets,
Margaret K. Mann National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado USA A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power from Biomass, Coal,
Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases Jill Heemstra, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Building Environmental Leaders in Animal Agriculture (BELAA)
AGRICULTURE, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING OF PRODUCTS: a New Zealand perspective Stewart Ledgard AgResearch Ruakura, Hamilton, NZ &
Environmental Sustainability of Biofuel Crops Bill Chism David Widawsky Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation.
Experimental Evaluation of Various Biofuel-Diesel Blends as Diesel Engine Fuels Georgios Fontaras and Zissis Samaras Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics.
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark Biofuels for transport – environmental effects and costs From Agenda to Action.
THINK OUTSIDE THE BARREL …
ENFA European Non-Food Agriculture – WP 32 Energy and Greenhouse Gas Balances Hannes Schwaiger, Gerfried Jungmeier Kick-Off Meeting 10 th May 2005 Geomatikum,
WELFARE TRADEOFFS OF BIOFUELS INVESTMENTS: A RAPID DECISION SUPPORT TOOL. Preliminary results from a case study in Tanzania. Giacomo Branca 1, Luca Cacchiarelli.
Fossil Fuels, Ethanol, and Biodiesel By: Emma Wellman, Vishal Garg, and Tom Barch Seeking a responsible solution to global warming by decreasing greenhouse.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.
Biomass Electricity Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009.
ENERGY FROM BIOMASS. Biomass Biomass energy is energy produced from burning wood or plant residue, or from organic wastes (manure, dung). Algae is most.
Production of Renewable Diesel from Domestick Feedstocks and Palm Oil in the EU: Market Equilibrium, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Biofuel policy Presenter:
GRPE_djrndt_ ppt Slide 1 Transport Fuels for the Future Neville Thompson, David Rickeard CONCAWE Inland Transport Committee Round Table, 20 February.
Biofuels and Sustainability: An Industry Perspective Geoff Cooper Renewable Fuels Association October 27, 2009.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Opportunities and Constraints on Possible Options for Transport Sector CDM Projects – Brazilian Case Studies Suzana Kahn Ribeiro Importance of Transport.
Life Cycle Assessment of Organic Waste: Application and Relevance to New Zealand Simon Love.
UK Renewable Energy Policy with particular reference to bioenergy
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
Bio-energy Initiatives and Collaboration in New Brunswick Climate Change Hub Advisory Committee Meeting February 5, 2009 By: Bryan Pelkey Department of.
PAS 2050 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services Nigel Carter, En-Venture Chair, BSI GHG Committee.
Chapter 10 - Biofuels. Introduction Existing standards for carbon accounting Forestry schemes as carbon offsets Biomass energy in place of fossil fuels.
Life cycle GHG emissions of biofuels: Results from review of studies Emanuela Menichetti UNEP-DTIE, Energy Branch European Environment Agency Expert workshop.
UNESCO Desire – Net project Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment, a sustainability decision-supporting tool Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (PROT.
European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
Examples of results of LCA of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) UNESCO Rome, th January.
‹#› of [total number of slides] This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Euroforenet Conference 20/11/2007 Brussels European Commission Kyriakos MANIATIS Biofuels & Industry DG TREN.
The Norwegian Research Council Project: Strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norwegian agriculture Erling Vårdal University of Bergen and Institute.
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
CO2 tool for electricity, heat and biogas Ella Lammers 10 june 2008.
EEA expert meeting Copenhagen 10 June 08 GHG methodologies for bioenergy beyond biofuels 1 ifeu – Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg.
Defra’s Research in Sustainable Agriculture Dr Sue Popple.
The impact of concentrated pig production in Flanders: a spatial analysis G. Willeghems, L. De Clercq, E. Michels, E. Meers, and J. Buysse Juan Tur.
Grain & Sugar Ethanol Fact Sheet Grain-to-Ethanol Production The grain-to-ethanol process starts by separating, cleaning, and milling.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA). As corporations seek to improve their environmental performance they require new methods and tools. LCA is one such tool.
Life Cycle Analysis (LCA). Overview Purpose Definitions.
Climate Action Team CIWMB Update CIWMB Board Meeting November 15, 2005.
Biomass/Biofuel/Biogas
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES – Austrian Results in an International Context Gerfried Jungmeier.
Biofuels CENV 110. Topics The Technology Current status around the world – Supply and trends in production Impact Benefits Costs – Carbon balance – Net.
Kristīne Kozlova DG TREN, European Commission 2 April 2009 The Renewable energy directive: final agreement and next steps EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
LCA of Biomethane – Main challenges in the EU RED context Katja Oehmichen, Stefan Majer © Anklam Bioethanol GmbH Workshop for the Promotion of BIOSURF.
Charlotte Hatto NORTH ENERGY ASSOCIATES LTD Life Cycle Assessment for Project Kade Wetland Biomass to Bioenergy AMW.
Jeremy Rix NORTH ENERGY ASSOCIATES LTD Life Cycle Assessment for AB Systems Wetland Biomass to Bioenergy.
Jeremy Rix NORTH ENERGY ASSOCIATES LTD Life Cycle Assessment for AB Systems Wetland Biomass to Bioenergy.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
„Carbon footprinting for biomethane in BIOSURF“
WP 5: GHG emission reduction (&) certification Stefan Majer, Maik Budzinski BIOSURF Kick-off, Palais Liechtenstein, Vienna,
Content Need for Sustainability Criteria Development of Methodology
Content Need for Sustainability Criteria Development of Methodology
Carbon Reporting under the RTFO
BIOSURF inter-association workshop Stefan Majer, DBFZ
Meeting with Member State experts on Life Cycle Assessment of fuel in relation to Article 7a of proposal COM 2007(18) 17 July 2007 European Commission.
Agriculture’s contribution to a carbon neutral Europe
Comparison of GHG methodologies: UK, NL, Germany, JRC
Presentation transcript:

Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January

Table of Contents Why LCA of biofuels? –Positive and negative effects on the environment –Key impacts Key methodological issues Conclusions

Purpose of the lesson Explain why it is necessary to carry out LCA study of biofuels Give an overview of the LCA methodological problems to be addressed Provide a list of main conclusions from existing LCA studies Give some examples of results from LCA of biofuels

Why LCA of biofuels? Starting question: Are biofuels positive for the environment? Annex to Communication from the Commission “An EU Strategy for Biofuels” IMPACT ASSESSMENT: –“Extending the use of biofuels can reduce net greenhouse gas emissions… “  Positive –“The cultivation of energy crops can also impact on biodiversity, soil and water resources.”  Negative –“The positive and negative effects of biofuels on exhaust emissions must be carefully monitored”  Uncertain

LCA confirmed as appropriate tool Public consultation from EC on biofuel directive: –“Stakeholders generally agree that a well to wheel environmental evaluation from a broad, macro perspective is the most appropriate view to these issues, including also for example byproducts and their use, and the net demand for external resources such as clean water and fertilizers” –“It is suggested that an international CO 2 calculation tool should be developed”

Biofuel life cycle Fertiliser FuelPesticides Agriculture Residues from other life cycles Processing Use Competitive land use Co-products Distribution Alternative use of residues

Alternative use of residues Key impacts: GHG emissions Fertiliser FuelPesticides Agriculture Residues from other life cycles Processing Use Competitive land use Co-products N 2 O emissions from use of fertilisers in crops cultivation Attention! Biofuels are NOT carbon neutral Distribution “recycling” of CO 2 emitted when biofuels are consumed Relevant GHG gases: CO 2 (GWP =1) CH 4 (GWP =23) N 2 O (GWP =296) CO 2 CH 4 emissions from use of fossile fuels CO 2 CH 4 avoided emissions for production of co- products

Key impacts: feedstock cultivation Land use: –Biodiversity –Soil quality –Avoiding land abandonment Change in crops –Water quantity –Improve in rotation –Social aspects (from food to energy) Chemicals –Soil and water quality

Key impacts: using biofuels Need of monitoring High EU vehicle emission standards: the impact of existing biofuels on exhaust emissions is expected low Biodiesel: reduction of CO emissions, NOx, HC and PM negative effects BTL: expected lower pollutant emissions (no S, no aromatics)

Main methodological issues for LCA of biofuels Attributional or consequential study System boundaries Complexity of feedstock production stage –N 2 O emissions: crucial but very difficult to quantify –Land use –Effect on biodiversity –Alternative uses of feedstock Time and scale effects Allocation of co-products

Attributional or consequential study? Attributional study: describes the environmental properties of a system. –Goal: optimize a system in an existing technological environment –Use of average data Consequential LCA: describes the effects of changes within the life cycle. –Large-scale changes in technological systems –Use of marginal data –Decision makers want to be informed on consequences of their choices –Difficulties on completeness, accuracy and relevance

Difficulties for consequential LCA Completeness –Future uncertain –Data gaps Accuracy –The effects of changes depend on economic mechanisms: dynamic and equilibrium models might help –Rebound effects Relevance

Feedstock production Energy crops –Different agricultural systems –Comparison with alternative use of land Functional unit Include soil within the system boundary –Inventory Emissions quantification: NH3 to air from chemical fertiliser and animal manure NO3, PO4, K+ to water, N2, N2O, NOx to air and N, P, K balance in soil, Allocation Residues from other life cycles –Comparison with alternative use of the residues

Different agricultural reference systems Source: IFEU 2001

Effects of different agricultural systems Source: IFEU 2001

Time and scale effects Time frame gives room for technical development –Functional unit –Choice of performance data –Selection of technologies under study Background systems as heat and power production change over time –Major effects on GHG emissions and agricultural land use Allocation of environmental impact between product and co-products depends on markets for co-products –Example: current key markets for ethanol co-products in EU-15 correspond to an ethanol production of 2% of liquid fuels, well below the 2010 target

Process energy: C = coal M = mixed W = wood Transport fuel: D = diesel B = biofuel N2ON2O Adapted from: Jonasson, Sanden, 2004 Background systems

Adapted from: Jonasson, Sanden, 2004 Market limit for soya meal Substitution of soya meal Heat production replacing natural gas Co-product allocation

Effects of co-product allocation Adapted from: Jonasson, Sanden, 2004 Avoided production of soya meal Heat production

Conclusions LCA is a necessary tool to assess the potential benefits and problems of biofuels The results depend on the specific realisation of the system The nature of the problem requires to address several methodological problems