We work with you to create the change you envision, planning progress through knowledge and action.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness

Advertisements

“Strategic Plan ( ) and Agency Accreditation”

IV-E Waiver June 2006 Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services.

Linkages between CalWORKs and Child Welfare – A CalWIN Approach Raul Aldana, Decision Support & Research Manager, CalWIN Division, County of Santa Clara.

California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan

California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.

Head Start A to Z Communication This product was prepared under Grant #90HC0006 for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for.

Linking administrative data sets for self- evaluation: Preliminary results from the Annie E. Casey Foundation Family to Family Initiative in California.

Self Evaluation and Reporting using TDM CA Anne Abramson Center for Social Services Research UC Berkeley Jana Rickerson Technical Assistant (TDM) Annie.

1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.

Team Decision Making (TDM) Database Anne Abramson Bill Dawson Center for Social Services Research UC Berkeley

Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan

1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.

The View from the Agency Perspective. Jefferson County State supervised, county administered child welfare system 180 employees in the Division Serving.

Introducing the SAMHSA ToolKIT on Permanent Supportive Housing

Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute

The New Data Frontier Central California Area Social Services Consortium (CCASSC) and the Fresno County Experience The Administrative Use of Data to Promote.

Investing in Change: Funding Collective Impact

Listening, Learning, and Leading Emmanuel Caulk August 24, 2015.

Children’s Health Insurance Matters: Findings from Surveys of Healthy Kids Participants Grantmakers in Health Site Visit Meeting Christopher Trenholm Mathematica.

Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013.

1 Data Revolution: National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Children’s.

1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.

Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.

Drilling down to the nitty gritty details: Developing an Evaluation Work Plan to identify who will do what, and when Amy D’Andrade San Jose State University.

Linkages: CalWORKs and Child Welfare Collaboration to Improve Outcomes.

Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®

Pinellas Safe Start Evaluation Prepared by Sandra Ortega For the 2004 Cross-Site Meeting Baltimore, MD November 2004.

The New York City Experience: Working Toward Better Family Outcomes NCSACW Annual Conference July 14-15, 2004 Lisa Lite-Rottmann, Regional Coordinator,

JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION Beyond Data Collection: Using the Tracking System to Measure Progress THP-Plus Institute July 27, 2009.

An examination of Strategies and Practices in Selected Maine Schools David L. Silvernail Erika Stump Maine Education Policy Research Institute University.

Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.

Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.

JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION Statewide THP-Plus Data Collection and Outcomes: Results from the First Year California Connected by 25 Initiative Convening May.

Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.

Belinda Benassi Child Welfare Services Program Manager CalWORKs and Child Welfare Services Linkages Coordinator Julie Lemen Information Technology Team.

Stanislaus County Children and Family Services Families In Partnership After Care Program A Parent Mentor Program.

Welcome to the ER/CalWORKs Webinar! You should have a panel on the right of your screen that shows other attendees and has a box at the bottom to write.

A NEW RESOURCE FOR RECONNECTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX AND ENDURING NEEDS Residentially Based Services.

FDM data and Research December 12, Alpine Butte Del Norte Fresno Humboldt Lake Los Angeles Mendocino/ Sonoma Orange San Francisco San Joaquin San.

Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

PCIT Training Contractor Information Session Bill Gould, Program Officer Jennifer Eckhart, Contract Compliance Manager April 18, :30pm-5:00pm.

Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II.

Day One Introduction Review: Foundations of Independent Living Continuum of Services – Phase I Continuum of Services – Phase II Continuum of Services –

Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.

Linkages: CalWORKs and Child Welfare Collaboration To Improve Outcomes Child Welfare Conference 2008 Monterey, California.

WASHINGTON, DC NOVEMBER 14, 2011 NASCCA Annual Business Meeting.

Community Plan Implementation Training 2-1 Community Plan Implementation Training 2-1.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

FACE Symposium Michele P Brooks M.Ed Assistant Superintendent, Office of Family & Student Engagement Boston Public Schools.

The Institutional Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Examining Racial Disproportionality and Disparity The Institutional Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology.

NOVEMBER 19 TH, AM – 12PM Resource Family Approval Project Management Team Welcome.

Accountability & Effectiveness Innovation Network, Inc. January 22, 2003.

The CalWORKs System and Linkages in a C-IV County Sandra Wakcher, Statistical Analyst San Bernardino County’s Legislation and Research Unit.

Presented at the Leadership Symposium on Evidence-Based Practice in Child Welfare Services June 28, 2007 Davis, CA It Can Work! Lessons Learned from a.

NSW Smarter Schools National Partnerships Evaluating literacy and numeracy improvements: Securing rewards for demonstrating improvement 1.

Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.

Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.

Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.

SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK FIELD INSTRUCTION INITIATIVE PARTNERED RESEARCH PROJECT Laurie Drabble, Ph.D., MSW, MPH Kathy Lemon Osterling,

Public Health for Dummies Kristin McCartney, MPH, RD, LD Extension Specialist-Public Health Family Nutrition Program.

1 RBS Implementation Preparation Forum Wednesday  March 4, 2009 The RBS Evaluation: Reviewing the Basics.

Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.

Continuous Quality Improvement: Our Desired State The Vision for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)

CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.

No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting

QIC-AG Logic Model Template

Linkages: CalWORKs and Child Welfare Collaboration to Improve Outcomes

Using Early Care and Education Administrative Data

Presentation transcript:

We work with you to create the change you envision, planning progress through knowledge and action

2 Federal Evaluation of Linkages: Supporting Sustainability Prepared For CFPIC October 16, 2007

3 Sustainability Starts with a Theory of Change

4 Linkages Participation Linkages v1 Linkages v2 Linkages v3 No linked services Service Coordinatio n (TDM) Outcomes Organizational Change Family to Family or similar Alternative Impact Local CBO assistanc e programs CFPIC support Privatel y- funded change s Child Welfare policy changes Other policy change s CalWORKs policy changes Economic changes Linkages Theory of Change Precursors Implementation Outputs Outcomes External FactorsImplementation to Implementation

5

6 Sustainability Built in to Evaluation Design

7 Three-Pronged Design  Retrospective Evaluation  Outcome-focused for existing programs Provides justification for sustainability  Prospective Evaluation  Links rigorous process evaluation with outcomes Supports sustainability by investigating what org change and implementation elements are needed for maintaining successful outcomes over time  Case Studies  Detailed description of three county Linkages programs Elaborates on sustainability process of existing programs

8 Retrospective Design  Timeframe  Historical data from  Sample  Del Norte, Calaveras, Merced, Orange, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, Stanislaus  “Historical” comparison group  Measures  Organizational change  Implementation  Outcomes  External factors  Data Sources  State and County databases: CWSCMS, ISAWS, Leader, C-IV, CalWIN, EDD  Historical documents describing program development and implementation

9 Prospective Design  Timeframe   Sample  Selected Pioneer, Phase II, and Phase III Counties  Comparison counties with no Linkages-like programs  Measures  Rigorous process and implementation evaluation  Outcomes  External factors  Data Sources  State and County databases: CWSCMS, ISAWS, Leader, C-IV, CalWIN, EDD  Surveys of Linkages staff

10 Case Studies  Timeframe   Sample (proposed)  Stanislaus, Los Angeles, Santa Clara  Research Questions  How is Linkages implemented?  How do Linkages activities produce outcomes?  Data Sources  Interviews with Linkages staff  Focus groups with Linkages clients

11 Contact Paul Harder Erika Lehmann, Ph.D harderco.com

12 Organizational Change Elements Culture Leadership Policy Administration **

13 Implementation Elements Confidentiality Data Sharing Coordinated Services Co-location Training Accountability Staff Support **

14 Outcomes Children experience less abuse Children safe in their homes Parents have resources to support their children Children in foster care achieve permanency **