Growth Curve Models Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS David A. Kenny January 23, 2014

Presumed Background Multilevel Modeling Nested

Used to examine linear and nonlinear changes over time Time the key predictor variable in growth models Need at least three time points to model growth 3

Picture of Linear Growth Curve Model for One Person 4

Levels – Level 1: Times – Level 2: Persons Spacing of time points – Each individual need not have the same number of time points – Difference between time points need be the same – Time points can be different for each person 5

A person period dataset Each record is one time for each person Sometimes called a “narrow” format as opposed to a “wide” format which has all the person’s times on one record. 6

Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J. G., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of Conflict and Support in Romantic Relationships: The Role of Attachment Anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, Dating Couples completing a 14-day daily diary study Consider only the males 7

Download  Data  Syntax  Output 8

satisf: Satisfaction with the Relationship, measured on a 1 to 7 scale day: Day of survey from 1 to 14 time: measured in weeks and centered; equals (day – 7.5)/7 avoidc: attachment avoidance centered (grand mean across both men and women subtracted) Missing cases – One person and his partner is missing the Attachment measure – There are 11 missing satisfaction scores. – Total number of cases: 103 x 14 – 25 =

The intercept refers to the predicted score when time equals zero. Thus, the scaling of time affects the intercept’s meaning. Some common options for modeling the intercept – Initial measurement (the usual option) – Study midpoint – Time of intervention – Study endpoint In the Kashy data set, 7.5 is subtracted off of each time since there are 14 time points 11

satisfaction = intercept + b(time) + c(avoidc) + d(time*avoidc) + error Intercept = predicted satisfaction score at the study midpoint (when time = 0) b = the predicted change in satisfaction as time for a week If the main effect of time is positive then satisfaction is increasing over time and if it is negative then satisfaction is decreasing. c = effect of avoidance attachment on satisfaction d = Does the effect of time on satisfaction change as a function of avoidance attachment? Error = the part of satisfaction that is not predicted by time and avoidant attachment. 12

Random Effects Variance of the intercepts – based on the variance of how much men vary in satisfaction at study midpoint Variance of the slopes – How much men vary in their rate of linear change in satisfaction Covariance between the intercept and slope – Do individuals who have higher satisfaction scores at the study midpoint change more rapidly (or slowly) than those with lower satisfaction scores at midpoint? 13

MIXED satisf WITH time avoidc /FIXED=time avoidc time*avoidc /PRINT=SOLUTION TESTCOV /RANDOM=INTERCEPT time | SUBJECT(personid) COVTYPE(UNR). “RANDOM INTERCEPT time” Estimates a random intercept and slope variance. UNR provides a correlation between slope and intercept. 18

Satisfaction = (Time) (Avoid) (Time*Avoid) Intercept = 6.26 – The average level of satisfaction at time = 0 Coefficient for Time = – Over time, satisfaction increases.134 units a week – The slope is small, although it is statistically significant. There is some evidence of an average increase in satisfaction over time for men. Coefficient for Avoidance = – More Avoidance less satisfaction No interaction of Time and Avoidance 20

21

SPSS Output Random Effects Random Effects Variance of Intercepts: Var(1) =.460* Variance of Slopes:Var(2) =.124* Correlation Inter./Slope:Corr(2,1) = /RANDOM INTERCEPT time | SUBJECT(personid) COVTYPE(UNR). With SPSS, p values for variances (not correlations) must be divided by two to make the p values one-sided. 22

Random Effects Random effects: – Variance in the intercepts some men were more satisfied than others at the midpoint. – Variance in the slopes some men are changing in satisfaction more than others. – Slope-intercept covariance Men with higher values at time 0 change more slowly than those with lower values, but this correlation is not significant and small. 23

Autoregressive Errors Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press. They suggest having errors that affect one another: e 1  e 2  e 3 autoregressive errors 24

MIXED satisf WITH time avoidc /FIXED=time avoidc time*avoidc /PRINT=SOLUTION TESTCOV /RANDOM=INTERCEPT time | SUBJECT(personid) COVTYPE(UNR) /REPEATED day | SUBJECT(personid) COVTYPE(AR1). 25

26

Changes 27 Half as much slope variance

Convergence Issues: SPSS Sometimes run will not converge and you get the message: What to do? – Theoretical Solutions – Computational Solutions 28

Theoretical Possibilities – A variance component you want to estimate is very small. – Two variance components are too highly correlated. Solution: Drop or combine component. Note if a variance component is estimated as zero, you always get this warning. 29

Computational SPSS is poor at finding a solution: Use another program. SPSS changes – Change UNR to UN. – If a predictor is random (e.g., time) increase the size of its variance by decreasing the variance of a predictor. That was why the units for “time” is weeks not “days.” – Make the following changes on the “Estimation” screen: 30

31 Increase These are things that work for me. There may well be better options.

Thanks! Debby Kashy Tessa West 32

33 More Webinars References (pdf) Programs Repeated Measures Two-Intercept Model Crossed Design Other Topics