1 TSP Update NATF Review July 8, 2010. 2 Today’s Objectives Goal: Successful Implementation of Go-Live Ensure there are no “Show Stoppers” Ensure there.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Facilitated by Joanne Fraser RiverSystems
Advertisements

Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
June 26, 2008 TAC Texas Nodal Market Implementation: Program Update Jerry Sullivan.
Note: See the text itself for full citations. Information Technology Project Management, Seventh Edition.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Implementation Scope Change Control Process Modifications March 7th, 2007.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Project Risk Management. The Importance of Project Risk Management Project risk management is the art and science of identifying, analyzing, and responding.
1 TSP Nodal Engagement Market Participant Call ERCOT August 04, 2010.
Presented to: SBAS Technical Interoperability Working Group Date: 21 June 2005 Federal Aviation Administration Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation.
ERCOT and Utilicast Public Document ERCOT Board of Directors Meeting April 22, 2009 Nodal Program Oversight Report 10 – Infrastructure.
1 ERCOT True-Up Resettlement Restart Criteria Discussion Retail Market Subcommittee Meeting, February 24, 2003.
Chapter 11: Project Risk Management
TEXAS NODAL Board Review and Approval August 19, 2003.
July 2008 CPS2 Waiver SDT Technical Workshop for Draft BAL-001-TRE-01 Judith A. James Reliability Standards Manager TRE.
July 9, 2007 TPTF Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Jerry Sullivan.
1 Business Integration Update to PRS September 20, 2012.
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
NPRR 219 & Outage Scheduler Enhancement Workshop April 28, 2014.
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
A Strawman for Discussion by Dottie Stockstill & Greg Ramon Special ERCOT Board Meeting June 24, 2003.
PMO Update to RMS Troy Anderson Program Management Office September 14, 2005.
ERCOT Strategic Plan H.B. “Trip” Doggett President and Chief Executive Officer Technical Advisory Committee ERCOT Public December 3, 2013.
OIRM Business Process Planning Overview for Business & Operations Advisory Committee May 27 – 28, 2015.
TAC Update Credit Aspects of Mass Transition March 9, 2006.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
2 nd Knowledge Area : Project Scope Management. Importance of Good Project Scope Management 1995 CHAOS study cited user involvement, a clear project mission,
1 TSP Nodal Engagement Market Participant Call ERCOT July 14, 2010.
TEXAS NODAL: THE BASICS Presentation to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup June 25, 2003.
Reconfiguring Nodal Stakeholder Participation Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee Texas Nodal Transition Planning Task Force February.
Project Risk Management Planning Stage
1 TSP Nodal Engagement Market Participant Call ERCOT September 15, 2010.
1 TDTWG Scope and Goals 2015 Wednesday January 8, 2014.
Impact Analysis and Feasibility Study Review – NPRR164, NPRR169 and SCR752 Troy Anderson ERCOT Program Management Office January 15, 2009.
Outage Scheduler Transition Plan Kenneth Ragsdale NATF.
1 Single Entry Model (SEM) Go-Live Update Special TAC Meeting (Updated) August 18, 2009.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2010.
1 RMS Update By Don Bender January 9, RMS Approved Resolution Upon TAC approval, suspend further True-up settlements for True-up resettlement.
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC April 4, 2008.
Change Request TUNE IT! Hi! My name is Ed Dubrawski, PMP and a member of the Program Management Center of Excellence Advisory Council. The purpose of.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Oct 20, 2010.
CMWG NATF 11/02/2010- CCT/DME update + Outages in the CRR Model follow-up Steve Reedy – Market Design and Analysis 1.
1 Texas Data Transport & MarkeTrak Systems (TDTMS) Update to RMS February 2, 2016 Jim Lee (AEP) – Chair Monica Jones (NRG) – Vice Chair.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
Model load frequency Discussion John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
1 Next Steps to Reduce the RTM Settlement Timeline COPS Workshop August 29, 2013.
RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.
July 7, 2008 TPTF Texas Nodal Market Implementation: Metrics Revisions Jerry Sullivan.
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Project Control n How do I spot problems? n What do I do once I find them? n How do I stay on track? n What happened to my plan? n How do I stay flexible?
Retail Workshop ERCOT Nodal Update October 06, 2010.
1 SCR756 – Enhancements to the MarkeTrak application –Fondly called - MarkeTrak Phase 3 –ERCOT CEO determined that SCR756 is not necessary prior to the.
Network Operations Model Go-Live Decision Kenneth Ragsdale TAC July 1, 2010.
UNIT III. A managerial problem can be described as the gap between a given current state of affairs and a future desired state. Problem solving may then.
June 5, 2008 TAC Texas Nodal Market Implementation Program Update Jerry Sullivan.
TPTF Update Trip Doggett TAC March 9, TPTF Update Meetings February 6 & 7, February 20 Attendance approximately 40 Completed review of ERCOT’s clarification.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
1 Single Entry Model (SEM) Go-Live Update TAC Update August 6, 2009.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2009.
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
The Texas Nodal Market Trip Doggett ERCOT Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Mike Cleary ERCOT Chief Technology Officer Executive Briefing 28.
Managing Project Risk – A simplified approach Presented by : Damian Leonard.
Special Language Characters in EDI Transactions Options and Considerations July 20, 2016.
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
Initial ERCOT Parking Deck Prioritization Recommendation
2011 Prioritization Update to Market Subcommittees
Initial ERCOT Parking Deck Prioritization Recommendation
September Protocol Transition Plan
RST processes Session 5 Presentation 2.
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Presentation transcript:

1 TSP Update NATF Review July 8, 2010

2 Today’s Objectives Goal: Successful Implementation of Go-Live Ensure there are no “Show Stoppers” Ensure there are no “Show Stoppers” Create a clear implementation plan to resolve TSP issues for Go-live including mitigation such as work-arounds and process changes Create a clear implementation plan to resolve TSP issues for Go-live including mitigation such as work-arounds and process changes 1. High level review of the issues list - effort by TSPs (IOUs, Municipals, Coops) identifying issues and potential solutions which reduce the likelihood of consequences during Go-Live for the benefit of all Market Participants and ERCOT. 2. Provide documentation to NATF of those issues and potential solutions which we believe need to be implemented. 3. Reduce the Anxiety shared by Market Participants that there is a workable solution 4. Provide NATF, TAC, and the Board some basis for issues related to certifying moving forward with the Nodal market.

July 8, Today’s Situation Metrics reflect progress. However the substantive functionality and practical application are really tested in the field. Metrics reflect progress. However the substantive functionality and practical application are really tested in the field. Concern among TSPs and other Market Participants on the growing number of issues that have functional daily impacts and have serious consequences that have been characterized as “Market Participant Expectations” Concern among TSPs and other Market Participants on the growing number of issues that have functional daily impacts and have serious consequences that have been characterized as “Market Participant Expectations” TAC wants more assurance to move forward with Nodal Certification. TAC wants more assurance to move forward with Nodal Certification.

July 8, TSP Issues List 47 Identified Issues Rated as: 47 Identified Issues Rated as: 1 = Show stopper; Needs resolution before Go-live can be accomplished. (0 issues) 2 = High priority issue that should be resolved by Go-live. Issues needed to be resolved to properly run the ERCOT systems and provide the most accurate market data. (18 issues) 3 = Needed but can be implement post Go-live with work-around or alternative business practices by TSPs. (11 issues) 4 = Needed for Planning Go-Live (roughly 3/1/11). ( 15 issues) Issues in 8 Different Categories Issues in 8 Different Categories 1. Priority Issues for a Successful Go-Live 2. Documentation Needs 3. Modeling Issues 4. Reports 5. Issues being Tracked by other Stakeholder Groups 6. Planning Model Issues 7. Grey Box Issues 8. Parking Lot

July 8, Available Options Joint effort between ERCOT and TSPs to develop alternative solutions and an action plan to meet deadlines. Joint effort between ERCOT and TSPs to develop alternative solutions and an action plan to meet deadlines. Work autonomously and risk developing solutions that fail to acknowledge ERCOT and TSP limitations. Work autonomously and risk developing solutions that fail to acknowledge ERCOT and TSP limitations. Do Nothing – Accept the Consequences Do Nothing – Accept the Consequences

July 8, Recommendation 1. TSPs and ERCOT work together 1. Review list and proposed solutions 2. Develop a plan to resolve the issues 3. Work the Plan 2. ERCOT share any Business Process issues with other systems (Outage Scheduler, State Estimator, ….) to help resolve these issues at the time issues are discovered.

July 8, Key Takeaways 1. Progress on the TSP Issues List will reduce concerns related to Go-Live and provide support for Nodal Certification. Issues identified and categorized with proposed solutions. Issues identified and categorized with proposed solutions. No Show Stoppers at this point. No Show Stoppers at this point. 2. ERCOT doesn’t need to carry the ball by themselves this is a team effort. If there are other system issues, share them.