Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012 - 2013 Ratio and Proportional Relationships April 30, 2013 Common.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence
Advertisements

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Multiplication and Division Arrays and Strategies.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Using the Relationship Between Addition and Subtraction.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 1 January 29, 2013 Common.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Building Capacity as a Presenter Presenter Skills November.
Looking Deeper Into Ratios Tuesday March 20, 2012 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University.
Comparison Situations and Tape Diagrams
Assessment Items: Then and Now. OLD 2008 Grade 6 Item, Fractions 2 6.N21 Find multiple representations of rational numbers.
Auditorium Problem 6.RP - Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems. 7.RP - Analyze proportional relationships and use them.
Division of Fractions: Balancing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge Part 2 January 15, 2013 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics2 (CCLM) This material.
CCLM Class January 31, 2012 Connie Laughlin, Hank Kepner & Melissa Hedges.
The Importance of SMP5 Use appropriate tools strategically Double Number Lines Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Tuesday January 21, 2014 This.
December 14, 2010 Proportionality Through Similarity and Geometry.
Team Task Choose 1 Progression to READ: Number and Operations--Fractions Ratios and Proportional Relationships Develop “Content” Knowledge.
Multiplication & Division Problem Situations Something New?
HOW MIGHT WE SUPPORT TEACHERS AS THEY DEEPEN THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLORE STUDENT THINKING RELATED TO THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION? GINI STIMPSON.
7.RP - Analyze proportional relationships and use them to solve real-world and mathematical problems. 1. Compute unit rates associated with ratios of.
ADAPTED FROM A WORKSHOP PREPARED FOR THE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BY KRISTINA SPARFVEN The Rigors of Ratio and Proportional Reasoning in the.
6th Grade Ratios & Proportions
Ratios and proportional thinking – grade 6
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 1 Class 3 October.
7 th Grade Pre-Algebra Focus 1: Proportional Reasoning Standards: 7.RP.1, 7.RP2a, 7.RP.2d Resource: Connected Math Program 2 Common Core Investigation.
2010 New Math Standards. Mathematical Practices 1. Attend to precision 2. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others 3. Make sense.
The Empty Number Line: A Model For Thinking Math Alliance DeAnn Huinker & Beth Schefelker April 27, 2010.
November 2013 Network Team Institute
Common Core Math Professional Development
Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Apply across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically proficient student.
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
FOCUS 1: PROPORTIONAL REASONING STANDARDS: 7.RP.1, 7.NS.2D, 7.NS.3, 7.EE.4A, 7.G.1 RESOURCE: CONNECTED MATH PROGRAM 2 COMPARING AND SCALING: INVESTIGATION.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Laying the Foundation for Single-Digit Addition.
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Transitioning to the Common Core State Standards – Mathematics Pam Hutchison
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Paraphrases and Wait Time Learning Focused Conversations April.
Division of Fractions Balancing Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge Tuesday December 6, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Common Core Leadership.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Ratio and Proportional Relationships April 30, 2013 Common.
Introduction to the K-8 mathematics standards in Washington State Seattle University September, 2015 Dr. Mark Roddy - Seattle University.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
Concepts that use Proportional Reasoning Grade 8.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 2 February 12, 2013 Common.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Division Common Core Leadership in Mathematics.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 What are Fractions? Part 1 Common Core Leadership.
Addition and Subtraction of Fractions Part 2
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Word problems…. No problem! Class 5 November 13, 2012 This.
6.RP - Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems. 1. Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Fractions: Teaching with Understanding Part 2 This.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplication of Fractions Part 3.5 March 5, 2013 Common.
Learning Target Cycles Chris Coombes
Revisiting MP2 What actions did you take in the last 2 weeks to be more conscious of MP2 Reason Abstractly and Quantitatively? Common Core Leadership in.
The Empty Number Line: A Model For Thinking Math Alliance Originally: April 27, 2010.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Ratio and Proportional Relationships April 23, 2013 Common.
Project 2 CCSSM Interpretation Guide Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Summer Institute 2012 This material.
Ratio and Proportion Part 1 Tuesday January 17, 2012 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University.
Part 2: Division of Fractions Balancing Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge Tuesday December 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Common.
November 9, Bell Work Write 3 equivalent fractions for each: 1. 4/5 2. 5/ /15 Be ready to use math language to explain your thinking.
6 th Grade Math Ms. Crow’s Class Back to School 2015.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2012 Getting to know the CCSSM CCLM June 20, 2011 Melissa Hedges.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM) Friday June 29, 2012
Single-Digit Addition Fluency Grades K-2
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
Progression Expression & Equation (with a focus on grade 6-8)
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard: 6.RP.1
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Understanding Ratios as Percents
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard: 6.RP.1
3rd – 6th Grade Multiplication Progression
X+1+4≤9 5k-2k> Agenda Ticket in the Door
X+1+4≤10 5k-2k> Ticket in the Door Agenda
Single-Digit Addition Fluency: Part 2 Grades K-2
Presentation transcript:

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Ratio and Proportional Relationships April 30, 2013 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics2 (CCLM) This material was developed for use by participants in the Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM^2) project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Use by school district personnel to support learning of its teachers and staff is permitted provided appropriate acknowledgement of its source. Use by others is prohibited except by prior written permission.

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, RP.1 Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems. 1. Understand the concept of a ratio and use ratio language to describe a ratio relationship between two quantities. For example, “The ratio of wings to beaks in the bird house at the zoo was 2:1, because for every 2 wings there was 1 beak.” “For every vote candidate A received, candidate C received nearly three votes.”

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Strategies to Reason About Proportions

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Learning Intentions We Are Learning To…. Analyze student thinking strategies to reason proportionally Examine a progression of those strategies Study and summarize the CCSS related to Proportional Reasoning

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Building Understanding of Proportional Relationships Press Students Conceptually Take Students Ideas Seriously Encourage Multiple Strategies/Models Focus on the Structure of the Mathematics Address Misconceptions

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Learning Intentions Analyze student reasoning in proportional situations Examine a progression of student strategies Summarize the CCSS related to reasoning about Proportions

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Anticipating Student Strategies What we did last class Solve the four problems as though you are a 7th grader who does not yet know the cross multiplication algorithm. Represent at least one of your solutions visually.

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Ellie estimates that it takes her 5 hours to walk 8 miles. How many hours would she walk if she walked 48 miles? Jane estimates that she takes 8 hours to go 12 miles. How many miles would she walk in 42 hours? Quinten is an extreme trail runner and estimates that he takes 3 hours to run 9 miles. How many hours would it take for him to run 24 miles? Sierra is also a trail runner. She estimates that she runs 8 miles in 3 hours. If she runs for 2 miles, how long has she run?

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Examining Student Work What is similar or different about the way the students solved the problems? What in the context or number choice of the problem might have led students to use a particular strategy or model? From the student work, what can you say about each student’s depth of understanding about pro portional relationships? How would you sort them?

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,

Learning Intentions Analyze student reasoning in proportional situations Examine a progression of student strategies Summarize the CCSS related to reasoning about Proportions

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Composed Unit View How many blue for 9 orange?

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Composed Unit View How many blue for 9 orange? 6 x 4.5 =

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Student Work – Composed Unit Which student work shows a Composed Unit point of view? Student A, Student B, Student C, Student D

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Multiplicative Comparison (within relationship) How many orange for 9 blue? x3

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Student Work Multiplicative Comparison Which student work shows Multiplicative Comparison? Student F and Student I

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Shift 3 – From Composed-unit Strategies to Multiplicative Comparisons Read Shift 3 pp in Developing Essential Understanding of Ratios, Proportions and Proportional Reasoning. Share 2 big ideas from this reading that relate to the gear problems or the exploration of student work.

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Graphs and Equations Where do you see… Unit rate? Composed Unit Thinking? Multiplicative Comparison Thinking ? Jane estimates that it takes 8 hours to go 12 miles. d = distance (miles) t = time (hours) d = 1.5t t = What is the relationship b- between -Miles to hours? -Hours to miles? How do ratio tables emphasize both composed unit and multiplicative thinking?

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Learning Intentions Analyze student reasoning in proportional situations Examine a progression of student strategies Summarize the CCSS related to reasoning about Proportions

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Additive Scaling Up Scaling Up and Down Multiplicative Comparison Linear Relationships Composed Unit View of Rate rd through 5 th grade 6 th grade 7 th grade 8 th grade 6th Grade “Understand ratio concepts and use ratio r easoning to solve problems” Tools: Ratio table Unit Rates Coordinate plane Bar model or number line Equations Progression in the CCSS

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Additive Scaling Up Scaling Up and Down Multiplicative Comparison Linear Relationships Composed Unit View of Rate rd through 5 th grade 6 th grade 7 th grade 8 th grade 7th Grade “Analyze proportional relationships and use them to solve real-world and mathematical problems.” Tools: Ratio table Unit rate Coordinate plane Equations Diagrams Progression in the CCSS

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Additive Scaling Up Scaling Up and Down Multiplicative Comparison Linear Relationships Composed Unit View of Rate rd through 5 th grade 6 th grade 7 th grade 8 th grade 8th Grade ““Understand the connection between proportional relationships, lines and linear equations” Tools: Tables Coordinate plane Equations/Functions Progression in the CCSS

Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Success Criteria We will know we are successful when we can  Use various strategies to solve ratio and proportion problems.  Justify our thinking when solving problems involving ratio and proportion.  Clearly explain and provide examples for specific CCSS standards