Superresolution Imaging with Resonance Scatterring Gerard Schuster, Yunsong Huang, and Abdullah AlTheyab King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multisource Full Waveform Inversion of Marine Streamer Data with Frequency Selection Multisource Full Waveform Inversion of Marine Streamer Data with Frequency.
Advertisements

Warping for Trim Statics
Multi-source Least-squares Migration with Topography Dongliang Zhang and Gerard Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Reverse Time Migration of Multiples for OBS Data Dongliang Zhang KAUST.
Locating Trapped Miners Using Time Reversal Mirrors Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping CaoKim McCarter Gerard T. Schuster November 12, 2008.
Local Reverse Time Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Function Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Reverse Time Migration Reverse Time Migration. Outline Outline Finding a Rock Splash at Liberty Park Finding a Rock Splash at Liberty Park ZO Reverse.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Migration and Attenuation of Surface-Related and Interbed Multiple Reflections Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah April 21, 2006.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
LEAST-SQUARES MIGRATION OF BOTH PRIMARIES AND MULTIPLES Ruiqing He, Gerard Schuster University of Utah Oct
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
Migration Deconvolution vs Least Squares Migration Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Imaging Every Bounce in a Multiple G. Schuster, J. Yu, R. He U of Utah.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Demonstration of Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking Properties of Time Reversal Mirrors in Locating Seismic Sources Weiping Cao, Gerard T. Schuster, Ge.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Multisource Least-Squares Migration Multisource Least-Squares Migration of Marine Streamer Data with Frequency-Division Encoding Yunsong Huang and Gerard.
Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope Gerard T. Schuster, Sherif M. Hanafy, and Yunsong Huang.
V.2 Wavepath Migration Overview Overview Kirchhoff migration smears a reflection along a fat ellipsoid, so that most of the reflection energy is placed.
Making the Most from the Least (Squares Migration) G. Dutta, Y. Huang, W. Dai, X. Wang, and Gerard Schuster G. Dutta, Y. Huang, W. Dai, X. Wang, and Gerard.
Overview of Multisource Phase Encoded Seismic Inversion Wei Dai, Ge Zhan, and Gerard Schuster KAUST.
Mitigation of RTM Artifacts with Migration Kernel Decomposition Ge Zhan* and Gerard T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology June.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
Least-squares Migration and Least-squares Migration and Full Waveform Inversion with Multisource Frequency Selection Yunsong Huang Yunsong Huang Sept.
Least Squares Migration of Stacked Supergathers Wei Dai and Gerard Schuster KAUST vs.
Subwavelength Imaging using Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope Field Data Example G. Dutta, A. AlTheyab, S. Hanafy, G. Schuster King Abdullah University.
Theory of Multisource Crosstalk Reduction by Phase-Encoded Statics G. Schuster, X. Wang, Y. Huang, C. Boonyasiriwat King Abdullah University Science &
Prestack Migration Intuitive Least Squares Migration Green’s Theorem.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Multiples Waveform Inversion
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Benefits & Limitations of Least Squares Migration W.Dai,D.Zhang,X.Wang,GTSKAUST RTM Least Squares RTM GOM RTM GOM LSRTM.
Hydro-frac Source Estimation by Time Reversal Mirrors Weiping Cao and Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Feb 7, 2008.
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics Yunsong Huang, Xin Wang, Yunsong Huang, Xin Wang, Gerard T. Schuster KAUST Kirchhoff Migration Kirchhoff+Trim.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Resolution. 0 km 7 km 0 km 3 km m = L d T r = [L L] m 0 km 7 km T.
Enhancing Migration Image Quality by 3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Gerard Schuster Jianhua Yu, Jianxing Hu University of Utah andGXT
Reverse Time Migration
LSM Theory: Overdetermined vs Underdetermined
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Rigorous Derivation of LSM (& FWI)
Reverse Time Migration
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Making the Most from the Least (Squares Migration)
Skeletonized Wave-equation Inversion for Q
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Overview of Multisource Phase Encoded Seismic Inversion
Migration Intuitive Least Squares Migration Green’s Theorem.
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Least-squares Reverse Time Migration with Frequency-selection Encoding for Marine Data Wei Dai, WesternGeco Yunsong Huang and Gerard T. Schuster, King.
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
PS, SSP, PSPI, FFD KM SSP PSPI FFD.
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics
Migration Resolution.
Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry: Theory
Migration Resolution.
Machine Learning and Wave Equation Inversion of Skeletonized Data
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Superresolution Imaging with Resonance Scatterring Gerard Schuster, Yunsong Huang, and Abdullah AlTheyab King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

Question:  x << /2? Migration:  x= z/4L LSM:  x= /2 Non-Linear LSM:  x<< /2 7 km

Outline Summary Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(4N+2) Synthetic Tests vs Field Data Testsvs

Primary Resolution and ZO Migration Where is the Scatterer? T /2=  x Where did this come from? Where did this come from? Where did this come from? Q: How thick is primary donut?  /2 (one roundtip)

2 nd -order multiple Primary Resolution and ZO Migration Where is the Scatterer? T Resonance Resolution and ZO Migration Where is the Scatterer? 1 st -order multiple Assume two interfaces, where we know location of one. ? Q: How thick is 1 st order donut?  /4 (two roundtips) Where is the other? Q: How thick is 2 nd order donut?  /6 (three roundtips) Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(2N+2)

Outline Summary Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(4N+2) Synthetic Tests vs Field Data Testsvs

1-Bounce Migration 3-Bounce Migration 1-Scatterer Model Assume perfect natural multiple migration operator, isolated multiples

6-Scatterer Model 1-Bounce Migration 3-Bounce Migration 0.7 km Assume we know locations Of outer ring of scatterers

Outline Summary Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(4N+2) Synthetic Tests vs Field Data Testsvs

Top of Salt P sea floor top of salt Primary Migration M Resonance Migration Advantage: gain in vertical resolution Superresolution by Resonant Multiples Disadvantage: short-offset data only

Summary kxkx k g + k s  Reconstructed Model Spectrum   x= /(2N+2) N-bounce Resonance vs Slight change in scatterer position  amplified arrival time+Superresolution kzkz vs Primary top of salt Resonance top of salt kzkz kxkx kzkz 1 st -order resonant multiples

Summary Limitations Limited range of resonance Limited range of resonance wavenumbers for specular wavenumbers for specular reflections reflections Resonance can be very weak Separation of different orders of resonance resonance

Summary *

*

Advantage: gain in vertical resolution Examples: Superresolution by Resonant Multiples Top of Salt

Outline Traveltime+waveform Inversion Generalized DSO Inversion ε = ½∑[  m  h] 2 ε = ½∑[  d  ] 2 Motivation Numerical Tests Summary

 Limitations  1. No coherent events in CIGs, then unsuccessful  2. Expensive  3. Infancy, still learning how to walk  4. Low+intermediate wavenumber unless LSM or FWI

Thanks Sponsors of the CSIM (csim.kaust.edu.sa) consortium at KAUST & KAUST HPC

Rayleigh Resolution L D x = min. separation & distinguishable DxDxDxDx z z zL 4 DxDxDxDx

data migration kernel s Skinnier donut=Better resolution e -i  (  sx 1 +  x 1 x 0’ +  x 0’ g ) e i  (  sx 1 +  x 1 x 0 +  x 0 g ) X 0 ’ = trial image point o X’ o g e -i  (  x 1 x 0’ +  x 0’ g -  x 1 x 0 -  x 0 g ) m(x) = ∫ [G(g|x) 1 G(x|s) 1 ]*d(g|s) dg ds 1-Bounce Multiple Scattering e -i  (  x 0’ g -  x 0 x’ 0 g ) Assume x 1 known, x o is to be found XoXo X1X1

Resonance Scattering m(x) = ∫ G(g|x)G(x|s) d(g|s) dg ds data migration kernel d(g|s)= r 2N G(x o |s)G(x o |x 1 ) 2N+1 G(x 1 |g) XoXo X1X1 sg

Numerical Examples Suboffset gathers (Initial) Z (km) X (km) Suboffset gathers Z (km) X (km)

Outline Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(4N+2) Numerical Tests Summary Standard Migration Natural Migration of Resonance Scattering   x<< /2

Primary Scattering m(x) = ∫ G(g|x)G(x|s) d(g|s) dg ds migration kernel data XoXo sg  x= /2 Skinnier donut=Better resolution Where?  x= /2 d(g|s) * *

Primary Scattering m(x) = ∫ G(g|x)G(x|s) d(g|s) dg ds migration kernel XoXo s g X e -i  (  sx +  xg ) e i  (  sx 0 +  x 0 g ) x o is to be foundx = trial image pointdata data migration kernel  x= /2 2-way trip = 2-way trip =

Key Idea: System Amplifies Input Small changes Model  Large changes data Wide-offset Multiples highly sensitive to  bulk properties (i.e., gives better low-wavenumber) Slightly  bulk properties. Can we detect it? Can we detect micro-changes?

Key Idea: System Amplifies Input Small changes Model  Large changes data Slightly  bulk properties. Can we detect it? Can we detect micro-changes? Wide-offset Multiples highly sensitive to  bulk properties (i.e., gives better low-wavenumber) Zero-offset Multiples highly sensitive to  micro properties (i.e., gives better high-wavenumber)

Outline Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(4N+2) Numerical Tests Summary Standard Migration Natural Migration of Resonance Scattering   x<< /2 *  x<< /2

Superresolution by Resonant Multiples Problem: migration of primary, or of primary + multiples of primary + multiples  vertical resolution is limited /2 T t Solution: migration of a multiple only /4 T t zz  t = 4  z / v

XoXo sg Key Idea Resonance Superresolution Small changes X scatterer  Large changes data

XoXo sg  x= /2 I need to travel at least  to get T/2 change in data Can I move  to get T/2 change in data? Key Idea Resonance Superresolution Small changes X scatterer  Large changes data

XoXo sg Can I move  to get T/2 change in data?  x= /6 Key Idea Resonance Superresolution Small changes X scatterer  Large changes data I need to travel at least  to get T/2 change in data

Key Idea Resonance Superresolution Small changes X scatterer  Large changes data XoXo sg Can I move  to get T/2 change in data?  x= /(4N+2) I need to travel at least  to get T/2 change in data

Answer:  x < /2 Standard FWI:  x>> Velocity Model Hybrid FWI:  x< /2 5 km

Outline Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(4N+2) Numerical Tests Summary Standard Migration Natural Migration of Resonance Scattering   x<< /2 *  x<< /2

data migration kernel s e -i  (  sx 1 +  x 1 x 0’ +  x 0’ g ) e i  (  sx 1 +  x 1 x 0 +  x 0 g ) X 0 ’ = trial image point o X’ o g e -i  (  x 1 x 0’ +  x 0’ g -  x 1 x 0 -  x 0 g ) m(x) = ∫ [G(g|x’) 1 G(x’|s) 1 ]*d(g|s) dg ds 1-Bounce Multiple Scattering Assume x 1 known, x o is to be found XoXo X1X1 g  x  c xx T/2=

data migration kernel s e -i  (  sx 1 +  x 1 x 0’ +  x 0’ g ) e i  (  sx 1 +  x 1 x 0 +  x 0 g ) X 0 ’ = trial image point o X’ o g e -i  (  x 1 x 0’ +  x 0’ g -  x 1 x 0 -  x 0 g ) m(x) = ∫ [G(g|x) 1 G(x|s) 1 ]*d(g|s) dg ds 1-Bounce Multiple Scattering Assume x 1 known, x o is to be found XoXo X1X1  x= /2  x  c xx T/2=  x= /2

m(x) = ∫ G(g|x)G(x|s) d(g|s) dg ds migration kernel XoXo X1X1 s o X’ o 3-Bounce Resonance Scattering  x= /6 g e -i  (3  x 1 x 0’ +  x 0’ g - 3  x 1 x 0 -  x 0 g )  x  c  x= /6 T/2=

m(x) = ∫ G(g|x)G(x|s) d(g|s) dg ds migration kernel XoXo X1X1 sg o X’ o N-Bounce Resonance Scattering  x= /(4N+2) Slight change in scatterer position leads to amplified arrival time  Superresolution

Outline Question:  x << /2? Answer:  x= /(4N+2) Numerical Tests Summary Standard Migration Natural Migration of Resonance Scattering   x<< /2 *  x<< /2