DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Gilchriese US ATLAS Pixel Meeting July 18-19, 2002 UC Santa Cruz.
Advertisements

H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
HFT Technical Overview September 26, HFT 2013 TPC FGT 2011 STAR Detectors Fast and Full azimuthal particle identification EMC+EEMC+FMS (-1 ≤ 
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
L. Greiner 1HFT PXL LBNL F2F – March 14, 2012 STAR HFT The STAR-PXL sensor and electronics Progress report for F2F.
DOE/NSF Review of ATLAS, 1 Mar 2000, BNL Muon MDT Front End Electronics (WBS 1.5.9) James Shank DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS Detector (with help from:
US CMS Silicon Tracker : Schedule J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager Fermilab PMG April 9, 2004.
M. Gilchriese Mechanics Labor and Disk Sectors US Pixel Meeting November 2001.
1 ROD US ATLAS FDR, ROD Overview Atlas Wisconsin Group Khang Dao, Damon Fasching, Douglas Ferguson, Owen Hayes, Richard Jared, John Joseph, Krista Marks,
Status Report: January 2005 Silicon Construction ActivitiesWBS 1.1 Silicon M&OWBS 3.1 A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
March 20, 2001M. Garcia-Sciveres - US ATLAS DOE/NSF Review1 M. Garcia-Sciveres LBNL & Module Assembly & Module Assembly WBS Hybrids Hybrids WBS.
July 10, 2003M. Garcia-Sciveres -- Module Assembly & Test1 WBS (& W.B.S & Services) Pixel Module Assembly & Test 1.Technical Status.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
M. Gilchriese Status Report Sectors, Rings, Frame December 2002.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS /March 2001 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Assembly and Robotics August 3, 2007 LBNL.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
PAP Review January 2000 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem M. G. D. Gilchriese (LBNL)
Slide 1 6-Nov-98PHOBOS Review: Cost & Schedule Cost & Schedule S. Steadman, MIT PHOBOS Cost & Schedule Review Technical Advisory Committee BNL November.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
Concluding Summary WBS1.1.2 SCT Subsystem A. Seiden BNL March 2001.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
U.S. ATLAS 21 July 1999 U.S. ATLAS Progress 1. Pictures of equipment constructed in the six detector subsystems in U.S. ATLAS. 2. Current issues:  Rate.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Director’s Review November 6, 2002.
1 US Pixel Mechanics Role Global support structureIntermediate support structureLocal support structure Stave SectorDisk Barrel x (9-11) x5 x (22,40,56)
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
M. Gilchriese Overview of Production Plan for Pixel Global Support and Disk Support Rings M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February.
Muon trigger upgrades, missing since not aimed towards DOE funding PHENIX upgrades: view presented to DOE R&D $3.5M Construction $16.6M Au-Au p-p 200 Si-Si.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS DoE Review May M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group M. Barnett, V. Chang, A. Ciocio, A. Clark, D. Costanzo, S. Dardin, A.Deisher,
M. Gilchriese Sectors, Rings, Frame Assembly and Installation July 18.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS HEPAP March 6, 2003 M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group C. Anderson, M. Barnett, V. Chang, A. Ciocio, A. Clark, D. Costanzo, F. Goozen.
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
2 Silicon pixel part Done and to be written Written! Under way To be done Introduction 1.Hybrid Pixel Assembly Concept 2.Silicon sensor 1.First thinned.
ATLAS PIXEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW M. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 11, 1999.
CMS Si Tracker Project - US CMS Meeting at Riverside – May 19, US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Tim Bolton (for Regina Demina)
1 ATLAS Lehman Review, Silicon ROD Douglas Ferguson, Richard Jared, John Joseph and Lukas Tomasek Wisconsin May 21 to May 23, 2003.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS DoE Review May 7, 2002 M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group F. Goozen J. Richardson M. Barnett, A. Ciocio, D. Costanzo, S. Dardin, K.
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Pixel Upgrade Thoughts on US Role.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
M. Gilchriese Pixel Detector Status ATLAS Collaboration Meeting BNL June 5, 2001.
DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS /March 2001 WBS Pixel Overview and WBS Pixel Mechanics M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
11 June 2015 Thomas Bergauer (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD beam Test SPS 2015 SPS users meeting.
Brenna Flaugher Sept. 24 th Lehman Review1 Run IIB Silicon Upgrade: Cost and Schedule Lehman Review Sept. 24, 2002 Brenna Flaugher Run IIB Silicon Project.
M. Gilchriese Items from Talks U.S. Pixel Meeting Santa Cruz July 2003.
DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS May 21-23, 2003 CSC Mechanics and Electronics Paul O’Connor Tom Muller BNL May 22, 2003.
R. Boyd 1 February  Dr. M. Saleem  D. Jana  M. R. Meera Labbai  R. Boyd.
Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs Cost Schedule.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: April 11-13, Trig. - Estimate to Complete.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
December 1999 Frame and Assembly Planning Status E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese and F. Goozen LBNL W. Miller Hytec, Inc.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Cost and Production Schedule September 2002.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Silicon M&OWBS 3.1 August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Jan 24, 2005Tracking Upgrades Welcome and Agenda Carl Haber 1 US ATLAS: Meeting on SLHC Tracking Upgrades Jan 2005 Lawrence Berkeley Lab Welcome.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS DoE Review February M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group J. Alonso*, M. Barnett, A. Ciocio, A. Clark*, D. Costanzo, S. Dardin, A.
May 2007DC-DC --- US ATLAS Upgrade R&D --- Garcia-Sciveres1 DC-DC converter R&D US ATLAS Upgrade UCSC May 2007.
Executive Committee, Toronto August 3, 2005 TRT Barrel WBS 1.2/3.2 Harold Ogren Indiana University.
M. Gilchriese WBS Pixel System DoE/NSF Review May 2003.
1 Back-Of-Crate : BOC Status Oct, 2002 BOC is the optical fibre interface for the ROD Receives module control data from ROD, performs clock-data encoding,
Steinar Stapnes, LHCC June The ATLAS inner detector TRT endcap A+B TRT endcap C TRT barrel SCT barrel SCT endcap Pixels uWhole ID sits inside bore.
DPF2000 ATLAS Pixel Detector M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory August 2000.
1 FVTX Quarterly/Monthly Report July 2008 Melynda Brooks, Dave Lee.
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
PANDA Muon Group Meeting, Protvino 7 June 2011 G
P. Morettini Towards Pixel TDR PM - ITk Italia - Introduction 8/2/2017.
P. Calafiura, C. Day, C. Leggett, J. Milford, D. Quarrie, C. Tull
Presentation transcript:

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 Organization Institutions SUNY Albany Iowa State University UC Berkeley/LBNL University of New Mexico Ohio State University University of Oklahoma/Langston Univ. UC Santa Cruz University of Wisconsin Management Pixels (Gilchriese) Mechanics/Services (Gilchriese, Anderssen) Sensors (Seidel, Hoeferkamp) Electronics (Einsweiler, Denes) Hybrids (Skubic, Boyd, Gan) Modules (Garcia-Sciveres, Goozen) Silicon Strips (Seiden) IC Electronics (Grillo, Spencer) Hybrids (Ciocio, Senior Techs) Modules (Haber, Senior Techs) RODs (Jared, Joseph) (Physicist, Engineer or Senior Tech) 2

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, Pixel System Center Frame Section (1) Disk Section (2 ) Internal End Cone (2) (Services not shown) Interior Barrel Layers Disks Disk Rings Disk sectors (8)

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, Pixel System Mechanics( ) –Support tube and plugs at end of support tube –Overall pixel support structure(frame) –Disks –Coolant pipes(shared with Europe) –Power and other cables(shared with Europe) –Tooling for final assembly of system(shared with Europe) Sensors( ) –About 20% production procurement and testing Electronics( ) –About 20% production procurement, 50% of testing of front-end ICs –About 50% production procurement and testing of optical ICs –Common test systems for all collaboration for front-end ICs, modules Hybrids( ) –All flex hybrids –Optical components and hybrids for disk region Modules( ) –Thinning, dicing of FE and die sort –Assemble and test about 25% of modules Test Support( ) –About 20% of support for system tests and beam tests at CERN 2-Hit System - US Deliverables (Assumes release of management contingency).

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, Pixels - Overview The pixel system was baselined at the end of FY01 was the first year of baseline funding. Technical progress has been excellent in the last year –Working prototypes of all rad-hard, integrated circuits made and now under test. –Silicon sensor production started. –Mechanics production started. –Module prototypes now in test beam. Schedule –Delay relative to baseline schedule of about 3 months in rad-hard ICs (critical path item). Sensor production and mechanics, expected completion as in baseline. –Very active program for remainder of year to test and qualify modules. –Two more frontend chip submissions planned to optimize design based on test program. 5

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, SCT Module

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, Silicon Strips Overview Also have Responsibility for: Electronics Coordination (from Frontends through Power Supplies). Systems Engineering (Mainly Grounding and Shielding Questions). Deliverables: Baseline was 45% of Frontend Chips. Management contigency released to bring this to 65%. Testing of 50% of all Chips. Chip attachment and testing of Hybrids for 670 Modules. Production and testing of 670 Modules. On or close to baseline schedule. About 35% of chips tested. Qualification process to start module construction to be completed soon. Still need to demonstrate that we can make 3 modules per day. 7

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 Read Out Driver (ROD) ROD (Read Out Driver) data formatter FPGAsreal time data path master DSP & memory controller FPGA boot FPGA program FLASH power suppliesslave DSPs & memories router FPGAs event builder FPGA debug & derandomizing memories ROD bus buffers 8

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, ROD Status Production model RODs (4 ea.) have been fabricated (SCT requires 100 in total). Yield on boards and loading is good. Debugging is complete on four cards, minor upgrades, mostly complete. These upgrades do not require new boards. Cambridge has one production model ROD for system testing and user evaluation, final step needed prior to starting production. Parts and PC cards are in hand to assemble 9 more RODs. Goal is to go into full production in the fall.

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 U.S. ATLAS: High Level Schedule 10

DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4,