April, 2005 Texas Public University Cost Study. April, 2005 Charge To develop a defensible and acceptable “Instruction and Operations Formula” Matrix.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Delaware Study Best Practices for Managing Costs and Productivity Assistant Director Office of Institutional Research University of Delaware Data Manager.

Advertisements

Operating Budget Overview Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009 Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009.

Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Governance Commission Budget, Formula Funding, & Efficiencies September 28, 2011.

Pratt Institute Statistical Presentation.

1 Acquisitions Formula CLIC Spring Workshop Pam Arbeeny Donna Arment Collection Management Librarian Technical Services Librarian Fort Lewis College Durango.

1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.

Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.

1 Overview of NACUBO Cost of College Model January 7, 2004 Presented by: Nancy D. Suttenfield Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration.

University of Colorado Denver Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Rate Proposal Overview F&A PROPOSAL TIMELINE July 1, 2009July 1, 2010December 31, 2010.

Allocations for Temporary FTE and Teaching Assistants: How Do They Work? Presentation to ABA Tuesday, January 12, 2010 Kathy Farrelly Director, Budget.

Budget Office Division of Business and Finance DEVELOPING A UNIVERSITY-WIDE BUDGET An Overview of the External Budget Development Process.

Critical Issues Facing SUNY Community Colleges Open Access Resources Community College Image Transfer and Articulation Growth/Capacity Turnover Accountability.

Trends in Higher Education Series Trends in Higher Education Series 2005, October 18, Distribution of Full-Time Undergraduates.

UCSF HR Billing 1. UCSF HR budget overview  Transformed organizational structure under one AVC comprised of five service centers, an academic specialty.

1 The Ohio State University Budgeting Basics Presented by: John Kuhar, Financial Planning & Analysis Henry Zheng, Office of Academic Affairs.

1 Faculty of Business Administration Budget Submission.

Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget

Presentation at Academic Affairs Faculty Symposium March 27, 2009 Tim Burgess Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration University of Georgia.

Appropriate and Predictable Funding Update Nate Johnson Executive Director, Planning and Analysis June 19, 2008.

Responsibility Centered Management (RCM) Case Study: Engineering and Technology By H. Öner Yurtseven Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis.

Sheri Austin Assistant Vice President, University Budgets Office of the Chief Financial Officer Academic Administrators Seminar Series October 2011.

The State of the School IU School of Liberal Arts at IUPUI Robert W. White 1 October 2004.

Academic Leadership Retreat The Campus Economic and Financial Outlook Chris Cimino August 27, 2014.

© 2006 The Curators of the University of Missouri1 Providing Accountability Through Data and Process – The Program Audit Robert Mullen, Associate Director,

Chop, Dice, Slice, Mince, or Julienne: The Multiple Ways of Measuring Faculty Workload at the Departmental Level Samford University.

  Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense - Auxiliary Exp.   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an.

Florida International University G51 I & R Reporting April 28, 2006.

Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.

Resourcing the University’s Research Mission Robyn Owens With help from Ian Baker, Rob McCormack and Campbell Thomson May 2007.

The University of North Carolina Student Credit Hour Enrollment Change Funding Model January 3, 2003.

Costs of Central Services 1 T HE P AST : T RYING TO LOOK THROUGH DEEPLY TINTED GLASS U NIVERSITY F INANCIAL M ODEL Personnel Costs Endowment Income Actual.

Understanding State Share of Instruction and Resource Analysis Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614)

P AUL L INGENFELTER S HARMILA B ASU C ONGER SHEEO D ENNIS J ONES NCHEMS O CTOBER 13, 2010 SHEEO’s Four-State Cost Study A Webinar of Findings and Applications.

2010 Space Projection Model Methodology November 4, 2004.

Florida International University G51 BUDGET AND FACULTY FUNDING MODEL April 28, 2006.

Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.

Texas State University-San Marcos FY 2008 Budget New Funds Available $ 13,415,296 A member of The Texas State University System.

1 U NIVERSITY F INANCIAL M ODEL UPDATE A UGUST 27, 2014.

Budget Update Presented To: University of Louisiana at Monroe Faculty, Staff and Students August 2002.

Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,

INCENTIVE FUNDING UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Created on 2/17/2016.

Public Senior University Funding Model 1.

Show Me The Money: Funding Mechanisms for Texas Institutions Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board 2009 Leadership Conference Bill Nance Texas State.

Spring 2016 Final Enrollment Report Enrollment Management & Marketing Division of Academic Affairs April 14, 2016.

Faculty Salary Report (CBM008) Uses Average Budgeted Faculty Salaries Salaries reported on fall reports are: doubled, converted to full-time equivalent.

Collective Bargaining Contracts with Performance Metrics A “Success Pool” and ”Faculty Excellence Awards” Kent State University NCSCBHEP 39 th Annual National.

1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 23, 2004.

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN Presenter Mark McGurk, VPBA Funding & Finance Informational May 17, 2016.

Budget Calendar and Mid-Year review Mary Simon, Senior Budget Director March 23, 2016.

Higher Ed Finance and UTPA. Two Big Questions  Where Does the Money Come From? –For Texas –For Higher Ed –For UTPA  Where Does the Money go? –For Texas.

1 Financial Topics Cost of Education Committee 9/04/2009.

Academic Program Viability Report February 2010 Florida Association of Institutional Research 2010 Annual Conference.

Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding

HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017

RCM Nuts, bolts, and questions

Office of Financial Affairs

University Budget and Marginal Cost Components

FY18 Budget Planning Council Orientation

Breakfast for Progress

Rebalancing State Appropriations

Still Seeking Employment

FIVE YEAR TRENDS FALL FALL 2016

Appropriation Allocation Model

Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow

Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location

New Certificate Program

New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program

Faculty R & D Grant Applications: Fall 2016 – Fall 2018

EFTSU, Funding and the RMIT University Budget

Presentation transcript:

April, 2005 Texas Public University Cost Study

April, 2005 Charge To develop a defensible and acceptable “Instruction and Operations Formula” Matrix Table Sub-Charge – Develop discipline and level comparative analysis (i.e. show how much it cost schools to provide different types and levels of education)

April, 2005 Instruction & Operations Formula Funding ~60% of State Appropriation to Universities provided via I&O Formula Current Formula: –Rate ($51.25) * Relative Weight * SCH –Relative Weights & SCH by Level & Discipline Relative Weight are Average Statewide Cost per Level & Discipline –“Relative” to LD-UG Liberal Arts = 1.00

April, 2005 University Cost Study Methodology Devise an acceptable approach to a cost study that would: –Identify appropriate cost categories –Reconcile to the Institutions’ Annual Financial Reports –Allocate costs in a fair and equitable manner back to level and discipline

April, 2005 Five Cost Centers Plus Capital Outlay (All Current Funds) Instruction (aka “Faculty Salaries”) Academic Support Institutional Support Student Services Research (aka “Departmental Operating Expenses”) Annual, undepreciated Capital Expense for each of the five cost centers

April, 2005 Faculty Salaries Every institution provided the following information for each faculty member: –Salary (100%) only for faculty actually teaching (includes TA’s that are teaching) –Teaching Load Credit*, or % of effort, each faculty member receives for each course taught –By Discipline and Level of Course (e.g. Undergraduate Liberal Arts, Master’s in Science, Doctoral Fine Arts, Special Professional in Law) * TLC is Institution-Specific

April, 2005 Academic Support and Capitalized Equipment Includes support services for Instruction & Research, Academic Administration (Deans), Libraries, Museums Reconciled to the institution’s AFR Allocated to Level & Discipline w/ results of Faculty Salary Distribution Include undepreciated capital outlay Use all sources of funds

April, 2005 Institutional Support Includes Central Executive Management (President), Fiscal Operations Reconciled to the institution’s AFR Allocated to Level using Headcount and to Discipline using unweighted SCH Include undepreciated capital outlay Use all sources of funds

April, 2005 Student Services Includes Admissions and Registrars Office Reconciled to the institution’s AFR Allocated to Level using Headcount and to Discipline using unweighted SCH Include undepreciated capital outlay Use all sources of funds

April, 2005 Departmental Operation Expense to Include Research Includes Research Expenses, all elements of Instruction NOT captured in Faculty Salaries Charge to an I&O academic discipline using the institution’s departmental budget designations and institutional judgment Allocation is Institution Specific using SCH, Faculty Salaries, or combination

April, 2005 Summary Using these steps each institution will end up with: –All of their non-infrastructure E&G related operating costs allocated to their academic disciplines and levels of instruction –All their semester credit hours allocated to their academic disciplines

April, 2005 Final Steps Sum the five cost centers by level and discipline for all institutions Divide total costs allocated to each academic discipline and level of instruction by the corresponding SCH to get “Cost per SCH”, which are the calculated weights for the I&O matrix

April, 2005 Discipline and Level Analysis Allows for comparisons between institutions –Total Costs Basis –Discipline Basis –Level Basis