Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higher RMPS Lesson 6 Area 2 Examples.
Advertisements

Higher RMPS Lesson 3 The Euthyphro dilemma. Learning intentions After todays lesson you will be able to: explain the background to the Euthyphro dilemma.
Lesson 2 The divine command theory
What is deontology?.
Morality As Overcoming Self-Interest
Seeing the Light: KANTIAN ETHICS (ch. 2.4)
The Moral Argument for the Existence of God.
Categorical Imperative Universal Maxim Respect of Persons
Moral law and Kant’s imperatives.
Categorical Imperative
Kantian Ethics (Duty and Reason)
ETHICS BOWL kantian ETHICS.
WHAT IS HIS DUTY? Duty - something that one is expected or required to do by moral or legal obligation. Your response:
WHAT IS HIS DUTY? Duty - something that one is expected or required to do by moral or legal obligation. Your response:
Phil 160 Kant.
Recap on Ethical Theory
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
Kant’s deontological ethics
THE RIGHTS APPROACH Jill Stiemsma M, 8:30 Ethical Theories Presentation April 21, 2008.
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Kantian Ethics Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Kant’s Deontological Ethics. The Plan  What is Deontology?  Good Wills and Right Actions  The Categorical Imperative  Examples and Applications.
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
Kantian Ethics Introduction.
The Categorical Imperative Kantian Ethics. Learning Intentions and Outcomes You will: Investigate the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
1. Make a rule that everyone in school should absolutely follow, without exception. 2. Make a rule that everyone in the world should absolutely follow.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
The Sheriff’s Dilemma How to structure your answer.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 3 30 January 2008.
After today’s lesson I will be able to: Explain Kant’s theory on moral ethics Explain the term ‘categorical imperative’ Understand the phrase 'Duty and.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Morality in the Modern World
Objections to Kant’s ethics Michael Lacewing
Absolutism and the Euthyphro dilemma LO: I will know what is meant by absolutism I will attempt to resolve the Euthyphro dilemma Hmk: Come up with some.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Kant and Kantian Ethics: Is it possible for “reason” to supply the absolute principles of morality?
Immanuel Kant: One More Time. The aim yesterday was to be able to.... Explain Kant’s theory on moral ethics Explain the term ‘categorical imperative’
Introduction  Based on something other than the consequences of a person’s actions  Unlike Egoism  People should act in their own self-interest  Unlike.
Kant. The Good Will and Duty Kant did not believe that any outcome was inherently good. Pleasure or happiness could result out of the most evil acts.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) Influenced Secular Moral Thought. Raised in a Protestant Household. No formal Church Structure. Morality ground in reason,
KANTIAN ETHICS Immanuel Kant ( ).
Immanuel Kant Deontology (Duty Ethics). Immanuel Kant  German philosopher “ Morality is not really the doctrine of how to make ourselves.
KANTIANISM AND EUTHANASIA ATTITUDES TO KEY ISSUES.
Immanuel Kant The Categorical Imperative. Part I. The Ethics of Duty More than any other philosopher, Kant emphasized the way in which the moral life.
What is the opposite of Utilitarianism? We are still addressing the question of HOW we should be moral.
“The only thing that can be good, without qualification, is an action performed solely because it is our duty.” (Boatright (2004) p52)
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Kantian principles Starter – 1) Keywords from last lesson
Noddy’s Guide to Kant.
ETHICS BOWL kantian ETHICS.
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Question of the Day! If there was one rule that everyone had to follow all of the time, what rule would you make?
The divine command theory
On your whiteboard: What have you done for RS over the holiday?
Answer these questions on your own.
History of Philosophy Lecture 17 Immanuel Kant’ Ethics
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 2: NORMATIVE THEORIES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Handout # 2 CLO # 2 Explain the rationale behind adoption of normative.
Presentation transcript:

Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics

Learning intentions After today’s lesson you will be able to: explain Kant’s theory on moral ethics explain the term ‘categorical imperative’ evaluate the strength of Kant’s theory.

Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant was a hugely influential philosopher. Kant thought it was possible to develop a system of ethics and morals based on reason.

Kant’s formula for ethics… Kant argued that rational duty was behind ethics and morals. In other words, the motive behind an action is very important. He believed the only truly good thing is goodwill. Every other characteristic, like being helpful, cheerful, kind, loving, etc., could all be used for evil intentions except for goodwill.

Formula a la Kant + % - x / = £ Good = goodwill = duty = / - % £ + x

In other words … A moral decision is not based on a feeling of what is right, or the reward that might be given for doing right, it is based on duty.

Acting on goodwill leads us to do our moral duty purely because it is our moral duty. Let’s consider some examples: A shopkeeper who gives the right change to his customers because it is good for returning business is acting in a morally wrong way because he is not acting out of duty. If he had acted out of moral duty, giving customers the right change because that it is the right thing to do, then his action would be morally acceptable according to Kant.

Or what if… You help an old person carry their shopping across the street. You may have done this because… you felt pity and compassion for the old person 2. the people around you would think good things about you for doing it 3. you would feel better if you helped and didn’t walk on by your parents would be disappointed in you if you didn’t help. According to Kant all of these reasons are not acceptable and do not make the action a moral act because you should help the old person across the road because you have a sense of duty to help the elderly in society.

Motive Motive is very important in Kantian ethics. It means your action can have negative consequences but still be considered a moral act. For example, if you stop to help someone who has been knocked down by a car in the street and by helping them you accidentally kill them, your action would still be considered a moral act because you tried to help because you felt it was your duty to do so.

What is it our moral duty to do? Kant argued that moral actions are not dependant on circumstances. For example, we must always care for our children. This is not dependant on circumstances or particular situations, it is always right and is what Kant called a categorical imperative.

Categorical imperatives Catergorical here means applicable in all situations, an absolute. Imperative means something that must be done, an obligation. In other words, a moral decision that you make must be made because you think it would be good for everyone to do. Are there some things that are absolute rights? Can you think of some examples?

Care for the elderly Consider others Protect children Absolute rights

Kant said … ‘Act as if the maxim from which you were to act were to become through your will a general law’ This has become known as universalisation, which means a rule should apply to everyone.

Treat others as you would like Living by universalisation would prevent anyone wanting to do anything that they would not want everyone else to do. Does this sound familiar? It’s a bit like… Treat others as you would like to be treated

Group Discussion

Is morality really as simple as Kant makes out? Is making moral decisions really this simple? Does Kant’s straightforward formula work in our complicated world? For example, if it is right to always tell the truth and always protect your friends, what do you do if a murderer asks you to tell them where your best friend is so they can murder them? Do you tell the truth and lead the murderer to your friend or do you tell a lie and protect your friend’s life?

Can everyone really agree on what is absolutely right and wrong, what is our duty as humans, all the time? What if someone believes it is our duty to never get involved in violence and someone else believes it is our duty to fight for our human rights? How do we work out the categorical imperative here?

Can we really not help someone because we feel compassion for them? Is there really something wrong with helping an old person carry their shopping because we are compassionate?

Can we really not take consequences into account? What if someone really believes they are doing the right thing while causing harm to others? What if your granny dried your cat in the microwave? Is it ok because she meant well? Is motive really the only thing that is important?

Learning check… Who is Immanuel Kant? 1KU Explain Kant’s theory on ethics. Give two examples to support your answer. 6KU Explain in your own words Kant’s term ‘categorical imperative’. 2KU What does Kant mean when he says we should decide our moral actions based on having the ability to universalise moral law? 3KU 5. Outline two arguments against Kant’s theory of rational. 4AE 6. What are your views on Kant’s theory for ethics? 3AE

Quick recap Kant argued that rational duty was behind ethics and morals. Good = goodwill = duty. Catergorical means applicable in all situations, an absolute. Imperative means something that must be done, an obligation. Universalisation according to Kant is that a rule should apply to everyone.