+ The New Emergency Solutions Grants Program Jenny Helbraun Abramson, Coordinator Sonoma County Continuum of Care Planning Group January 19, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing Coordinated Assessment Under the New CoC Regulations National Alliance to End Homelessness Monday, September 10, 2012.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Georgia Department of Community Affairs Shelter Plus Care Program Overview February 2011.
County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services
Housing First: Where it Works
US DOL-VETS 2007 Competitive Grantees Training Conference` August 7-9, 2007 Cynthia W. High, MSW US Department of Housing and Urban Development Office.
“Untangling the Web: Collaborations Between Housing Agencies and School Districts to Meet HEARTH Act Requirements” October 28, 2012 How one model in Atlanta.
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
Update on Continuum of Care and HMIS Presented by: Ann Oliva Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs U.S. Department of Housing and Urban.
Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-housing Program (HPRP) March 24, 2009 Audio Conference Sponsored by the Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
The HEARTH Act Changes to HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs Norm Suchar October 2009.
1 Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) Overview April 2009.
A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION: Shifting our priorities and programs to end homelessness Denise Neunaber North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness securing.
Jack Peters, Director Office of Community Planning and Development Seattle Regional Office U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development WSCH Annual.
Department of Community Affairs. EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM  “…maintains support for a crisis response system through emergency shelters, but.
A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
1 Help! I Don’t Speak Housing! Mattie Lord, UMOM New Day Centers Jeremy Rosen, National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) NH Department of Health and Human Services.
Continuum of Care (CoC)  Promotes community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness.  Provides funding for efforts by nonprofit providers.
MaineHousing ~ Homeless Initiatives Department NCSHA Conference ~ October 2014.
WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Indiana HPRP Training 1. TRAINERS: ANDREA WHITE & HOWARD BURCHMAN IHCDA STAFF: RODNEY STOCKMENT, KIRK WHEELER, KELLI BARKER &
Project Administration Agreement with the Heart of Florida United Way, Inc. September 22, 2009 Homelessness Prevention & Rapid Re-housing Program (HPRP)
Presentation Outline Background Program Requirements Orange County HPRP Plan HPRP Timeline Action Requested.
Michael Roanhouse January 23, 2014 HUD Homeless Assistance Grants: Overview.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) SSVF Grants: What They are (and Aren’t)
ITEM-332: FY2016 Annual Action Plan for City of San Diego U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Programs. April 28, 2015 Economic Development.
The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program: An Introductory Overview
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Susan Ziff, HUD March 12, 2012 Substantial Amendment Process for Second Allocation of FY 2011 ESG Funds.
Virginia Learning Collaboratives Reducing Family Homelessness in Virginia: A Rapid Re-Housing Approach.
1 Emergency Solutions Grant Substantial Amendment to the FY 2011 Action Plan.
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa Rapid Re-Housing Program (RHP) Presented by Jennielynn Holmes & Tanya Wulff.
HUD’s Homeless Assistance Ann Marie Oliva. Overview of Presentation Update on Status of Regulations FY 2013 and FY 2014 Budgets and Implications Policy.
Laura Skotnicki, Director of Administrative Services January 20, 2012 Housing First: Where it Works Institute for Children, Poverty & Homelessness.
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
Continuum of Care Funding 2011 A Preview for Applicants July 28, 2011.
COSCDA 2011 Annual Training Conference September 20, 2011 Susan Starrett (302)
Establishing Partnerships with HUD & Housing Groups The HOW.
Presentation to HUD Field Offices April 2,
HUD’s role in Ending Family and Youth Homelessness by 2020
Emergency Solutions Grants Program February 2012.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
Changes to the Federal Approach to Homelessness Kentucky Balance of State Frankfort, KY June 21, 2011 ( Slides adapted from presentations at the September.
HUD’s Homeless Assistance Ann Marie Oliva. Overview of Presentation Update on Status of Regulations Achieving the Goals of Opening Doors FY 2012 and FY.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
Adopting a Homeless Preference Catherine Peterson U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
NCDA January 2009 Mark Johnston, DAS for Special Needs Programs Ann Marie Oliva, SNAPS Director Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs Community Planning.
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Michael Roanhouse, HUD March 12, 2012 The Emergency Solutions Grants Program (ESG): An Overview.
Consolidated Homeless Fund Application Workshop Consolidated Homeless Fund Partnership January 2012.
Ending Family Homelessness: The Basics NAEH, February 2008 Betsy Lieberman Building Changes BuildingChanges.org.
Housing Department CITY COUNCIL HUD Continuum of Care 2015 Funding Application Anne Lansing, Project Planner November 2, 2015.
 Award of $923,339  Substantial Amendment › $300,000Homelessness Prevention › $480,000 Rapid Re-housing › $80,000 Housing Relocation and Stabilization.
NCDA WINTER CONFERENCE JANUARY 2016 MICHAEL ROANHOUSE OFFICE OF SPECIAL NEEDS ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS The Role of HUD’s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs.
COSCDA, Des Moines September 21, 2011 CPD Program Updates.
Ann Oliva, Director Brett Gagnon, Program Specialist Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs HEARTH Act: Continuum of Care Program.
Austin/Travis County FY2016 CoC New & PH Bonus Funds MAY 6, 2016.
MI Department of Human Services: HUD Grant Reallocation Transition Plan for DHS CoC Program Grants December 16, 2014 Presented by Michelle Cavanagh, Homeless.
CS/SB 1534 – Housing Assistance Affecting Florida Housing’s State Rental Program Funding Allocation: Mandates Florida Housing reserve a minimum of 5 percent.
Minneapolis/Hennepin County Continuum of Care for the Homeless 2016 Request for Proposals Pre-applications for potential new projects are being solicited.
Homeless Crisis Response System
Eligible Costs – Rental Assistance & Rapid Re-housing (RRH) 24 CFR CFR
Orange County Consolidated Plan One-Year Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice August 2, 2016 BCC.
2017 Continuum of Care: New Project Informational session
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Mountainland Continuum of Care
Austin/Travis County HUD YHDP Bidders Conference FY2016 February 23, 2018 Presentation for Interested Parties Ending Community Homelessness Coalition.
Supportive Housing Update 2019
Jennifer O’Reilly-Jones, Program Coordinator
Presentation transcript:

+ The New Emergency Solutions Grants Program Jenny Helbraun Abramson, Coordinator Sonoma County Continuum of Care Planning Group January 19, 2012

+ Interim Regulations Effective Jan 4 Interim regulation for new ESG program published December 5 Builds on existing Emergency Shelter Grant program Assists people to quickly regain stability in permanent housing after a housing crisis Goal: to prevent people from becoming homeless or assist them to move from homelessness into permanent housing. New activities closely resemble those offered under HPRP (the Recovery Act-funded Homelessness Prevention & Re-Housing Program). New Eligible Activities: Housing relocation Housing stabilization services (case management) Short- and medium-term rental assistance (up to 24 mos.)

+ Two Allocations in FY In the FY 2011 budget, Congress appropriated a 40% increase in ESG funding for the new activities. The first allocation was made and is subject to the old Emergency Shelter Grant program regulations. The second allocation will be made soon: Must exclusively be used for homelessness prevention assistance, rapid re-housing assistance, HMIS, and administration. Jurisdictions must prepare a Substantial Amendment to their Consolidated Plan to receive the second allocation (guidance for this is coming).

+ 2 nd Allocation Allocation #1 Allocation #2 Total FY 2011 Sonoma County $ 86,723$ 48,782$ 135,505 State of California $ 6,900,617$ 3,881,597$ 10,782,214 Sonoma County will receive a second allocation of $48,782 for the new program – technically to serve the Urban County (7 smaller cities plus unincorporated County). State FESG will receive about $3.9 million for the second allocation, to be awarded competitively to programs serving Santa Rosa and Petaluma. Sonoma County programs have regularly won over 10% of available dollars, so we can anticipate bringing in around $390,000 from this allocation.

+ Eligible Activities Under ESG Under the Emergency Solutions Grant program, funds can be used to support these costs: [“Old ESG”:] Street outreach Emergency shelter Administration [“New Program” – continuation of HPRP:] Homelessness prevention Rapid re-housing assistance HMIS

+ Eligible Activities − “old ESG” Street Outreach: Emergency care on the street Emergency Shelter: No limit on staff costs; now allows cost of supplies and the cost of a hotel/motel stay (under certain circumstances) as allowable costs. Hold Harmless provision: Recipient jurisdictions may opt to spend up to 100% of funds on prevention and re-housing. Funding for for street outreach and emergency shelter activities cannot exceed the larger of: 60% of the jurisdiction’s annual grant OR The FY 2010 old ESG funds committed for shelter and outreach.

+ New Eligible Activities Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Short and medium term rental assistance Housing relocation Housing stabilization services Recipient jurisdictions have discretion to determine the type, amount, and duration of rental assistance, as well as the option to provide tenant- based or project-based rental assistance.

+ Rental Assistance Requirements Rental Assistance Lease: Program participants receiving rental assistance must enter into a written lease with a housing owner. Rental Assistance Agreement: The program operator and housing owner must enter into a rental assistance agreement. FMR Requirement for Rental Assistance: Total rent must comply with HUD’s rent reasonableness standards and cannot exceed the Fair Market Rent.

+ Participant Eligibility Housing StatusRapid Re-Housing or Homelessness Prevention? Homeless: 1. Lacking fixed, regular, adequate night-time residence (street, shelter, TH, etc.) Rapid Re-Housing 2. Imminent loss of housingHomelessness Prevention 3. Youth or family with children that are homeless under other Federal statutes (and meet other requirements) Homelessness Prevention 4. Fleeing domestic violenceHomelessness Prevention At Risk of Homelessness: 1. Below 30% AMI + lacking networks/resources + one or more risk factors Homelessness Prevention 2. Child or youth homeless under other Federal statutes Homelessness Prevention

+ Other Requirements The regulations introduce new consultation/coordination requirements between ESG recipient jurisdictions and Continuums of Care. Administration allowance: 7.5% of the recipient’s fiscal year grant may be used for administration (up from 5%) ESG recipients must participate in HMIS. HMIS activities can be charged to a self-standing HMIS budget line. Coordinated/centralized assessment will be required. Programs must have written standards and policies for their ESG program.

+ Other Requirements cont’d. Evaluating client eligibility: Initial evaluation to determine eligibility, amount and type of assistance must be conducted in accordance with the coordinated assessment requirements and written standards above. Re-evaluating eligibility: The participant’s eligibility (and the type and amount of assistance needed) must be re-evaluated at least every three months for prevention assistance, and annually for rapid re-housing assistance. Process for terminating assistance and habitability standards are spelled out in the regulations.

+ Questions? Resources: Interim Rule in Federal Register: Vol. 76, no. 233, p HUD’s Homelessness Resource Exchange ESG page: Webinars at: Sonoma County Prevention Providers meeting: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 12:00 noon-2:00 pm, at Catholic Charities, 987 Airway Court, Santa Rosa.

+ Update on Local Planning Efforts Prevention Planning for the new ESG Rapid Re-Housing program design

+ Prevention Planning for ESG Prevention providers have been meeting since August to discuss Performance measures for their programs Prepare for new ESG opportunities Find ways to work more collaboratively Next meeting: Thursday, February 9, 2012, 12:00 noon-2:00 pm at Catholic Charities, 987 Airway Court, Santa Rosa

+ Key Recommendations for ESG Planning - NAEH 1 Stretch resources: provide smaller amounts of assistance to more people. 2 Target prevention assistance to people who are most likely to become homeless This requires a focused effort: concerns about tenants being able to sustain their housing should be addressed through program design rather than by screening people out of assistance. 3 The evidence for the effectiveness of rapid re-housing is strong and therefore rapid re-housing should be prioritized. Ending homelessness requires a robust, community-wide system of rapid re-housing, and the new ESG funding should be combined with other resources to create that system. 4 Successful prevention and rapid re-housing assistance programs rely on a community-wide performance and outcome measurement process.

+ Local HPRP Outcomes Just 3% of HPRP clients served in 2010 have appeared in shelters to date. The program was clearly effective with those served. Would those served have become homeless without this assistance? This question has been asked across the country. How can we target those most likely to become homeless?

+ Targeting Prevention Services In 2010, three times as many families entered shelter from doubled up situations as from rental housing. But 2/3 of HPRP assistance went to people in rental housing. Only 1 in 10 of those served were doubled up.

+ This is largely because of the heavy documentation burden and haste to implement, which resulted in simply targeting those who completed the documentation. Among single adults, it’s more skewed: people came from doubled up situations four times as often as they did from rental housing. HPRP served people in exactly the reverse proportions.

+ Rapid Re-Housing Plans The HOME TBA program has provided a transitional housing “bridge” while families wait for a Section 8 voucher. HOME TBA partners are exploring how to change the program to a Rapid Re-housing model.

+ Rapid Re-Housing Pilot A 10-unit pilot will begin in February, assisting families with the ability to become self-sufficient within a year to quickly exit shelter. Catholic Charities will provide housing case management for the pilot. For more information, contact: Jennielynn Holmes, Family Support Center OR Sheron Bradley, Sonoma County Housing Authority