P. Mustafić, M. Mrakovčić Faculty of Science, Univ. of Zagreb European Union Twinning Project European Union Twinning Project of the WFD in Croatia Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Environment & Technology August 2011 The Effects of Fly Ash Release from the TVA Kingston Steam Plant on Fish TVA-Kingston Fly Ash Release Environmental.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Implementation of WFD in Hungary - rivers Zoltán Simonffy Hungarian Academy of Sciences Research Group for Water Management Zoltán Simonffy Hungarian Academy.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
CEEWEB Academy III Strengthening civil participation in the implementation of EU nature conservation directives through the experiences gained by the 10.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Evaluation of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Marcellus Shale Region of the Susquehanna River Basin, Luanne Steffy Susquehanna River Basin.
A methodology for defining homogeneous water bodies in transitional and coastal waters S.B. Bricker Gulf of Mexico Alliance Governors’
Updating EU forest types process Marco Marchetti University of Molise-Italian Academy of Forest Science.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
2nd Meeting of the MariFish Bycatch and Discards Scientific Committee Madrid, 5-6th October 2009 Work Package 7: Collaborative Research Programmes Thematic.
ARROW: system for the evaluation of the status of waters in the Czech Republic Jiří Jarkovský 1) Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University,
MESH UK Workshop 19 October 2006 Introduction Dr Paul Gilliland Marine Policy Adviser and MESH Partner Lead Natural England.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
German Guidebook on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive Dr. Harald Irmer Germany.
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements.
Zlatko Mihaljević, Ana Previšić, Igor Stanković Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science, Univ. of Zagreb Development of biological assessment systems for.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
“Lake Peipsi/River Narva basin – working together on the new Eastern border of the EU” Harry Liiv Deputy Secretary General on Environmental Management.
Mats Wallin Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences Dept. of Environmental Assessment Catarina Johansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Development.
Implementation of critical studies necessary to promote better planning and efficient management of hydropower projects in an Int’l River Basin context.
Anthony MAIRE - Jean-Marc BAUDOIN - Christine ARGILLIER
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
RIVER HYDROMORPHOLOGY
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
A methodology for defining homogeneous water bodies in transitional and coastal waters S.B. Bricker A. Newton, J.G. Ferreira, A.M. Nobre, M.T. Simas, M.C.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II and Phase III for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ( Transboundary.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
Austrian Approach for Identification of Water Bodies Workshop on Identification of Surface Water Bodies Brussels, 25/26 September 2003 Birgit Vogel Austrian.
ECOSTAT WG2A meeting 7-8 October 2004 Eutrophication Activity Status report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Harmonisation activity: Proposal for Standard methods Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Defining Good Ecological Potential : Method used in the UK Niall Jones Hydro-morphology senior advisor Environment Agency.
Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) – 3+4 July 2006, Stresa (IT) Eastern Continental GIG Draft final report on the results of.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Principles and Key Issues
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
Feedback on the marine Natura 2000 biogeographical seminar
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
EurAqua 8th Scientific and Technical Review,
Developing a common approach for typology and classification of inland waters in the Nordic region Anders Hobæk Norwegian Institute for Water Research.
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Carolin Meier & Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Draft revised terms of reference Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones conservation issues.
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
A Fish based index of biotic integrity for the Schelde estuary
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
IBI’s: An Introduction
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Pilot River Basin Project for the Szamos/Somes River Basin
Diana M. P. Galassi*, Barbara Fiasca*, Andrea Piermarocchi°
Presentation transcript:

P. Mustafić, M. Mrakovčić Faculty of Science, Univ. of Zagreb European Union Twinning Project European Union Twinning Project of the WFD in Croatia Implementation of the WFD in Croatia Croatian concept for the development of biological assessment systems for rivers and lakes – freshwater fish

Basic principle The development of a fish-based ecological status assessment method was founded on the principle of the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) established in the USA in the early 1980s (Karr, 1981). In the last 2 decades the IBI was adapted to different regional conditions, although the basic principles are the same for all methods. The fundamental assumption is that the composition and structure of fish assemblages change under human pressures in a traceable manner. Fish species have different and in many cases well-known ecological requirements. Thus, they also have a specific sensitivity to human alterations. To account for these particularities, “metrics” are introduced as a measurable part or process of the biological system responding to human influence. Within each metric group considered, species with similar ecological requirements are compiled into functional guilds (e.g. for reproduction, habitat, tolerance, migration, feeding). The original IBI as well as many of the modified fish-based assessment methods were developed based on expert knowledge. In contrast, FAME aimed at establishing a method based on the analysis of a large number of existing sampling data. (FIDES – 12 EU countries. Altogether about 15,000 samples (“fishing occasions”) from some 8000 sites on 2700 rivers are integrated in FIDES.)

Typology Fish-based Assessment Method for the Ecological Status of European Rivers - FAME WFD requires that a water body is placed into one of the regional "types" described by Illies (1978). This classification assumes that the 25 biogeographical regions or ecoregions proposed are relatively homogeneous ecological systems, and the biological communities, e.g. fishes, are correlated with these ecoregions. For fishes this is implicitly untrue.

Typology Ecoregions (2): Pannonian Dinaric 2 subecoregions: –Continental –Mediterranean

Typology River zones, biotopes and biocoenoses (Huet 1949, 1954). Altitude typology: 1.high > 800 m 2.mid-altitude 200 to 800 m 3.lowland < 200 m

Typology The concept of Schumm (1977) offers a scheme where channel size is assumed to increase systematically through a river system as the increasing drainage area contributes larger flows to the trunk channel. The morphological scale of the channel changes accordingly.

Reference conditions Ecological status assessment according to WFD The glossary of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides the following definitions: “Reference Site is a specific locality on a waterbody which is minimally impaired and is representative of the expected ecological integrity of other localities on the same waterbody or nearby waterbodies”. “Reference Condition is a set of selected measurements or conditions of minimally impaired waterbodies characteristic of a waterbody type in a region”.

Reference conditions

Example: Reference conditions on lower parts of Sava, Drava and Danube: SURVEY during one year while we made 73 samples of ichtyofauna on 14 different localities. We recorded 52 fish species with individuals. From this sample we excluded small shoaling species and introduced ones to get the reference sample with 48 species and individuals.

Reference conditions Metric of IBI Sample Value ReferenceSava 4 Total number of fish species Benthic species Water column species Large long-lived species 1073 Intolerant species richness 623 % of Toterant individuals (Rutilus rutilus)24,6316,105 % Omnivorous individuals 56,8035,605 % Invertivorous individuals 1,951,553 % Top carnivorous individuals 15,4112,073 Catch per Unit Effort 333 % Litophilous individuals 26,616,401 % Individuals with anomalies 333 IBI Score38

Reference conditions LocalityIBIWater qualityEFIWater quality Sava 132IV0,42III Sava 228IV0,28IV Sava 326IV0,29III Sava 438III0,26IV Sava 538III0,37III Sava 626IV0,20IV Drava 140III0,36III Drava 226IV0,26IV Drava 336IV0,45II Drava 438III0,43III Dunav 138III0,24IV Dunav 232IV0,25IV Dunav 346III0,25IV Dunav 438III0,28IV Cetina 150II0,59II Cetina 248II0,57II Cetina 342III0,43III Cetina 430IV0,35III Cetina 534IV0,44III Cetina 638III0,46II Cetina 734IV0,52II

Reference conditions Locality Water quality IBIEFI Oxigen regime NutrientsMikrobiology Sava 1IVIII IV Sava 2IV III V Sava 3IVIII IV Sava 4IIIIVIIIIIIV Sava 5III IIIV Sava 6IV IIIIIIV Drava 1III IV Drava 2IV III IV Drava 3IVIIIII Drava 4III Dunav 1IIIIVIII Dunav 2IV III Dunav 3IIIIVIII Dunav 4IIIIVIII Cetina 1II IIIIIIV Cetina 2II IIIIIIV Cetina 3III II IV Cetina 4IVIIIII IV Cetina 5IVIII IIIV Cetina 6IIIIIIIIIIIV Cetina 7IVII IV

Reference conditions Ichthyofauna of Cetina river: 15 fish species from 8 families, with individuals: Anguillidae: Anguilla anguilla Salmonidae: Salmo trutta, Oncorhynchus mikiss Thymallidae: Thymallus thymallus Cobitidae: Cobitis dalmatina Cyprinidae: Aulopyge huegelii, Carassius gibelio, Cyprinus carpio, Leuciscus illyricus, L. ukliva, Pseudorasbora parva Gobiidae: Knipowitschia panizzae, Pomatoschistus canestrinii Mugilidae: Liza aurata Bleniidae: Salaria fluviatilis

Assessment method Several fish sampling methods are currently used in Croatia. The principal methods are electric fishing in wadable streams or rivers, and electric fishing from a boat and gillnetting in large rivers and lakes. In wadable streams, the removal method is usually applied, with 1-3 passages over a river length of m, depending on site characteristics and sampling objectives. One hand-net per anode and 1-3 persons for other activities (transporting fish, electric generator control (Direct Current DC – KW, etc.). In non-wadable or large rivers, electric fishing is performed from a boat with a Pulsating Direct Current (PDC – KW) electric generator, principally in autumn, but also in summer.

Assessment method

EFI+ vs. EFI On January 1st, 2007 the EC-funded research project “Improvement and Spatial Extension of the European Fish Index (EFI+)” was started. EFI+ is a research project designed to gain new knowledge, and to further develop and improve biological assessment methods that meet needs of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). The output of the project will be a standard methodological approach to assess the ecological status of rivers in accordance with the WFD. Therefore, the EFI+ project represents a direct and obligatory contribution to the Water Framework Directive in the further development and implementation of harmonised fish-based assessment tools and standard methods that can be used in EU Member States, as well as in Candidate countries.

EFI+ vs. EFI The overall objective of EFI+ is to overcome existing limitations of the EFI by developing a new, more accurate and pan- European fish index. The scientific and technological objectives are to (1) evaluate the applicability of the existing EFI and make necessary improvements to the existing index in Central-Eastern Europe and Mediterranean ecoregions, (2) extend the scope of the existing EFI to cover very large rivers, (3) analyse relationships between hydromorphological pressures (incl. continuity disruptions) and fish assemblages to increase the accuracy of the EFI, (4) adapt existing software to the requirements of the new EFI to allow calculation of the ecological status for running waters, (5) implement and disseminate the EFI and supporting software by integration of the project results into the CIS activities (Common Implementation Strategy) and ongoing national and international monitoring programmes such as the Joint Danube Survey. These results will be presented in end-user workshops and at an international conference.

Lakes and Reservoirs Still Under construction

Thank you!