Innovative Approach to Evaluating Interventions in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States: The Case of Helmand 2011 IDEAS Global Assembly Session 6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Advertisements

Introduction to Impact Assessment
© 2009 Berman Group. Evidence-based evaluation RNDr. Jan Vozáb, PhD partner, principal consultant Berman Group.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
South Africas MTEF Effective expenditure for development Malawi Poverty Monitoring System Workshop July 2002.
Why and How should we focus on Results? Susan Stout, Manager Results Secretariat OPCS November, 2006.
February Dakar, Senegal
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
The need for gender disaggregated data and its impact on policies, and achieving gender equality goals Hamidan Bibi.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Key Results and Recommendations
1 Learning from Christian Aid Bolivia Impact assessment - climate change advocacy in Bolivia.
A new vision for agriculture and nutrition - Implications for accountability and impact measurement Bibi Giyose, FAO Senior Nutrition Policy and Programme.
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD) CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring.
Group Work  What IEC materials do you use in the community? (type – title)  What is the target audience?  Where is it found?  Which behavior is it.
Management Response to the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function in UN Women in 2014.
Integrated household based agricultural survey methodology applied in Ethiopia, new developments and comments on the Integrated survey frame work.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Integrating Agriculture into National Statistical Systems Section A 1.
Theme III Introducing Greater Impact Orientation at the Institutional Level Group 6.
Impact assessment framework
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
1 Informing a Data Revolution Getting the right data, to the right people, at the right time, on the right format Johannes Jütting, PARIS21 Tunis, 8 Decemeber.
Cultivating Demand Within USAID for Impact Evaluations of Democracy and Governance Assistance Mark Billera USAID Office of Democracy and Governance Perspectives.
1 Quantitative Human Rights Indicators Some Conclusions from a Survey Rajeev Malhotra & Nicolas Fasel.
The National Development Plan, Iraq 6 July 2010 “Developing Objectives & Indicators for Strategic Planning” Khaled Ehsan and Helen Olafsdottir UNDP Iraq.
QUICK OVERVIEW - REDUCING REOFFENDING EVALUATION PACK INTRODUCTION TO A 4 STEP EVALUATION APPROACH.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
Green Paper on National Strategic Planning The Presidency November 2009.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
Learning about learning The GEC approach to M&E UKFIET Conference Joseph Holden & Jason Calvert 15 th September 2015 © PEAS.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
Presented by Madhuriya Kumar Dutta Trade and Investment Facilitation Department Mekong Institute, Thailand 16 May 2012.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
Approach to GEF IW SCS Impact Evaluation Aaron Zazueta Reference Group Meeting Bangkok, Thailand September 27, 2010.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
Is the Accountability, Impact and VFM Debate too Donor Focused? Cathy Shutt November 23 rd INTRAC Workshop.
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 7 – Monitor & Evaluate.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Data Initiatives: The UNECE Gender Database and Website Victoria Velkoff On behalf of.
Measuring Risk, Vulnerability and Impact in Conflict: Doing Better Through Data Collaboration What is DFID doing in Afghanistan?
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Africa Programme on Gender Statistics Status of implementation United Economic Commission for Africa Meeting of Committee of Directors General November.
1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Strategies for making evaluations more influential in supporting program management and informing decision-making Australasian Evaluation Society 2011.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Landscape Heritage Sustainable Development Indicator Assessment using Geographical Information Systems in County Clare Lianda d’Auria Department of Geography,
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
APPG Equalities 29 th October 2014 Fair Financial Decision-Making: Follow up to the Equality & Human Rights Commission’s S31 assessment of the 2010 Spending.
Data, Surveys and Performance Monitoring by Mr Ben Freyer Deputy Director, Regional Support Services, DWSSC 22 November 2012 Ministry of Agriculture, Water.
Twenty Years Later ICPD Beyond 2014 A Briefing on the ICPD Beyond 2014 Review Process 13 February 2012.
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
Presenter:- Mrs. Josette Maxwell-Dalsou Chief Economist Economic Planning Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and National Development.
Proposal and Company Information Document CONTENT About Indagatio Research Our Research Offerings Why Indagatio Research Our Work Process Project Snapshot.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
PRT Helmand. ISAF PRT Mission Statement “Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) will assist the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to extend its authority,
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Session 5. Effective M&E systems for the SDGs
Presentation transcript:

Innovative Approach to Evaluating Interventions in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States: The Case of Helmand 2011 IDEAS Global Assembly Session 6

Contents 1.Introduction 2.Challenges to evaluation in the Helmand context 3.HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution 4.Conclusions: Future prospects for M&E in fragile states

1 - Introduction Economic context Sharpest spending cuts since WW2 Cuts worth around £128 billion over 4 years 30-40% cuts for some Departments DFID… Ring-fenced ! What does that mean for the future ? Extra scrutiny to ensure DFID’s lucky escape is justified Focus on Value for Money for every taxpayer £

1 - Introduction Context for Helmand Extra pressure for results-based M&E Pledges to withdraw forces can only be honored if stabilization successful Everyone is watching closely: General public, Media, MPs, Cabinet Office Need to go beyond outputs to look at outcomes and impacts Need to communicate information to multiple audiences quickly and effectively

2 - Challenges to Evaluation in Helmand Context These fall into 3 main categories: 1.Political 2.Logistical 3.Cultural

2 - Challenges to Evaluation in Helmand Context Political Challenges: Weakness, non-existence or fractured nature of government systems Institutional complexity of the operating environment in Helmand The pre-eminence of political and military considerations Targeted interventions not for universal benefit Pressure to deliver ‘good news stories’

2 - Challenges to Evaluation in Helmand Context Logistical Challenges: Data is almost always patchy and of poor quality Freedom of movement is significantly curtailed Association with ISAF puts enumerators’ lives at risk Negativity about the feasibility of conducting research in Helmand Difficulties in establishing institutional memory

2 - Challenges to Evaluation in Helmand Context Cultural Challenges: Social desirability bias particularly high in Helmand The difficulties associated with reaching women

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Project Background: The Helmand Monitoring & Evaluation Programme Commissioned by DFID and the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in late key outputs –Establish baselines –An operational, up-to-date, user-friendly database and GIS database –New knowledge and recommendations –Improved programming capacity

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Data Collection: Became apparent that discrete primary data collection would be required to populate the indicators developed alongside the logical frameworks. Attention was given to developing quantitative, SMART indicators Data collection methodology was designed taking into account the lessons learned

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Carefully Designed Sampling Strategy : 2004 census data and the Central Statistics Organization’s (CSO) raw data on settlements posed several issues –District boundaries changed over time –Location of CSO settlements contained spatial coordinate errors –Population per settlement from the CSO data did not always reflect what could be seen on the ground through spatial imagery

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Carefully Designed Sampling Strategy : The decision was taken to target males Heads of Households (HOH) Number of 10 people per household was assumed Profiling results from different waves of the same HOH survey will be compared with one another to establish HOH profiles Multi-staged random probability sampling process was used with a random route for selecting households in each sampling point The HOH survey is implemented by an Afghan survey partner

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Robust Sample Sizes at Provincial and District Level : District Estimated number. of residents % of total Province population Estimated number of households per District Target number of interviews Confidence interval at the 95% confidence level Lashkar Gah87,0627%8, /- 5 Nahri-e-Sarraj176,85115%17, /- 5 Musa Qala129,42711%12, /- 5 Naw Zad87,0127%8, /- 5 Nad Ali103,0829%10, /- 5 Nawa-I-Barak Zayi85,4407%8, /- 5 Garmser99,1728%9, /- 5 Sangin60,3245%6, /- 5 Reg (Khanshin)16,1751%1, /- 5 Nad Ali (Marjah)108,6629%10, /- 5 Kajaki113,2289%11, /- 5 TOTAL1,066,61088%106,6614,011+/- 1.5

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Longitudinal Approach Providing Confidence in Time-Series Analysis: Essential to ensure: –Consistent sampling point selection method –Continuity in the questionnaire rolled out each quarter Building a panel proved impossible in Helmand Repeated cross-sections modelling to enable the development of pseudo-panels ?

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Research : Qualitative research to complement the quantitative findings Capture views of women Explore the most puzzling trends resulting from the quantitative research Provide a more in-depth understanding of the ‘story’ and causal factors behind some of the less straightforward trends in perceptions

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Analytical thinking and theory of change

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution

Presentational Features

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Database & Website:

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution GIS Mapping:

3 - HMEP: a cutting-edge M&E solution Intelligent use of information: HMEP supports more intelligent use of information in assessments, planning and daily operations: –look back on a quarterly and annual basis on progress towards strategic goals –look forward in terms of planning and future strategic direction –supports PRT’s daily operations through improved management in the collation and centralisation of relevant data and its storage in a centralised and accessible information management system.

4 - Conclusions: Future prospects for M&E in fragile states HMEP’s specificity lies in its holistic approach to implementing an M&E system in a part of the world where it is crucially needed but difficult to achieve. Before assessing the replicability of the HMEP model, it is essential to understand what made it possible in the first place. Most important factor of success : Presence of a PRT Important to recognise that each province, region and country contains its own, specific set of contextual issues and challenges No Magic formula, but it proves that meaningful and sustainable M&E systems is possible even in the most difficult environments

END