Sequencing Mixed Models & Unpaced Lines Active Learning Module 4 Dr. César O. Malavé Texas A&M University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda of Week X. Layout Capacity planning Process selection Linebalancing Review of week 9 13 Approaches Purposes : Finishing the capacity planning Understanding.
Advertisements

Final Exam Study Guide MIS 373: Basic Operations Management.
Process Selection and Facility Layout
Types of scheduling problems Project scheduling - Chapter 4 Job shop - Chapter 5 (shifting bottle neck) Flow shop - Chapter 5 Flexible assembly - Chapter.
Approaches to Line Balancing COMSOAL & RPW
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT INTEGRATING MANUFACTURING AND SERVICES FIFTH EDITION Mark M. Davis Janelle Heineke Copyright ©2005, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Two-Stage Paced Lines Active Learning – Module 2 Dr. Cesar Malave Texas A & M University.
Introduction to Transfer Lines Active Learning – Module 1
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS Session 13 MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS E. Gutierrez-Miravete Spring 2001.
1 IRWIN  a Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc. company, 1996 Facilities Layout.
Facility Layout 1. General Observations Facility Planning includes planning for: (1) the number of facilities and general facility type, (2) facility.
David O’Sullivan Industrial Automation (IE423 Computer Integrated Manufacturing) (IE215 Design and Make) David O’Sullivan
Chapter 16: Learning Objectives
Computer Integrated Manufacturing CIM
6-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Management, Seventh Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS Session 7 FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS E. Gutierrez-Miravete Spring 2001.
Operations Management
Operational Research & ManagementOperations Scheduling Flow Shop Scheduling 1.Flexible Flow Shop 2.Flexible Assembly Systems (unpaced) 3.Paced Assembly.
Chapter 10 – Facility Layout
Scheduling.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 16 Scheduling.
Dr. Cesar Malave Texas A & M University
Manual Assembly Lines Chapter 4 Sections:
1 Chapter 5 Flow Lines Types Issues in Design and Operation Models of Asynchronous Lines –Infinite or Finite Buffers Models of Synchronous (Indexing) Lines.
Chapter 10 – Facility Layout
Chapter 4 Process Design.
Process Cost Accounting. PROCESS COST ACCOUNTING After studying this chapter, you should be able to: 1 1 Understand who uses process cost systems. 2 2.
Flexible Assembly line Minimum part set(MPS) Suppose there are l product types. Let N l denote the number of jobs for each product type l. If z is the.
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS Session 12 MACHINE SETUP AND OPERATION SEQUENCING E. Gutierrez-Miravete Spring 2001.
Approaches to Line balancing Optimal Solutions Active Learning Module 3 Dr. César O. Malavé Texas A&M University.
Algebraic Simplex Active Learning – Module 4 J. René Villalobos and Gary L. Hogg Arizona State University Paul M. Griffin Georgia Institute of Technology.
Topics To Be Covered 1. Tasks of a Shop Control Manager.
Assembly Lines – Reliable Serial Systems
Assembly Line Balancing
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS Session 8 CELLULAR MANUFACTURING GROUP TECHNOLOGY E. Gutierrez-Miravete Spring 2001.
Assembly Line Balancing Introduction to Industrial Engineering.
Reid & Sanders, Operations Management © Wiley 2002 Facility Layout 10 C H A P T E R.
Approximate Three-Stage Model: Active Learning – Module 3 Dr. Cesar Malave Texas A & M University.
Operational Research & ManagementOperations Scheduling Economic Lot Scheduling 1.Summary Machine Scheduling 2.ELSP (one item, multiple items) 3.Arbitrary.
Slide 0 of 96 Manufacturing Facility Layout. Slide 1 of 96 Basic Layout Forms Process Product Cellular Fixed position Hybrid.
© Wiley Chapter 10 – Facility Layout Operations Management by R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 4th Edition © Wiley 2010.
Facilities design. Main Topics Discrete vs. Continuous Flow and Repetitive Manufacturing Process vs. Product-focused designs and the other currently used.
Operations Fall 2015 Bruce Duggan Providence University College.
Layout and Design Kapitel 4 / 1 (c) Prof. Richard F. Hartl Example – Rule 5 j tjtj PV j (5) Cycle.
Activity Scheduling and Control
Scheduling McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Manufacturing and Service Processes
Problems in Combinatorial Optimization. Linear Programming.
1 Mix Model for Executives FMS 200 Series FBP-FMS288A.
FACILITIES LAYOUTS Facilities layout implies Layout design for equipment, machinery, & furnishings, production, support & personnel areas A layout is affected.
Facility Design Issues. Back to the course objectives... Forecasting Strategic Planning Aggregate Production Planning Disaggregation Production Scheduling.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 8 Facility Layout.
Part 3.
6-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Management, Seventh Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
IE 366 Chapter 9 Organization of Workstations Supplementary Material from: Groover, M.P. (2007). Work Systems and the Methods, Measurement, and Management.
Facility Layout Chapter 10 pages , ,
Process-Flow Analysis
Analytical Tools for Process Analysis and Improvement
The University of Jordan Mechatronics Engineering Department
CHAPTER 8 Operations Scheduling
FACILITY LAYOUT Facility layout means:
Chap 11 Learning Objectives
Chapter 6A Facility Layout 2.
Facilities Planning and Design Course code:
Introduction to Scheduling Chapter 1
8 Job Sequencing & Operations Scheduling CHAPTER Arranged by
Process Layout Chapter 8 L L M M D D D D L L M M L L M M G G L L G G A
Facilities Planning and Design Course code:
Flexible Assembly Systems
“Cellular Manufacturing”
Presentation transcript:

Sequencing Mixed Models & Unpaced Lines Active Learning Module 4 Dr. César O. Malavé Texas A&M University

Background Material Modeling and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems by Ronald G. Askin, Charles R. Standridge, John Wiley & Sons, Manufacturing Systems Engineering by Stanley B. Gershwin, Prentice – Hall,1994, Chapter 2. Any good manufacturing systems textbook which has detailed explanation on mixed models and unpaced lines.

Lecture Objectives At the end of this module, the students would be able to Explain the fundamentals of sequencing mixed models. Explain the basics of unpaced lines. Solve various problems related to these topics.

Time Management 3Assignment 9Unpaced Lines 5Summary 50 MinsTotal Time 10Team Exercise 15Sequencing Mixed Models 5Readiness Assessment Test (RAT) 3Introduction

Readiness Assessment Test (RAT) Discuss the basic features of Group Technology Layout and Just-In-Time Layout

RAT – Solution Group technology (GT) layout – Dissimilar machines are grouped into work centers or cells – Similar to process layout in that cells are designed to perform a specific set of processes –Similar to product layout in that cells are dedicated to a limited range of products Just-in-Time layout – Flow line similar to an assembly line Equipment and workstations arranged in sequence – Job shop or process layout Focus on simplifying material handling

Sequencing Mixed Models Several different products can be assembled simultaneously on the line. Products are generally classified as  Type 1 – Products with constant ratio of item task time to average item task time.  Type 2 – Products with independent station requirements.

Sequencing Mixed Models Let q j → Proportion of product type j, j=1,…,P t ij → Time to perform task I on product type j S k → Set of tasks assigned to workstation k An average feasibility is

For each item ‘j’, Q j items to be produced ‘r’ be the greatest common denominator of all Q j. Cycle repeats for r times to satisfy demand. Repeated cycle consists of N j = Q j / r Bottleneck station k b is the station with maximum total work. k b = argmax k C k X jn be 1 if item j is placed in nth position & 0 otherwise j(n) denotes the type of item placed nth Sequencing Mixed Models

Selecting the nth item to be entered in the line is to optimize the following problem Sequencing Mixed Models Subject to j = 1,.., p……… n = 1,.., N & j = 1,…, P... n = 1,.., N & k = 1,…, K … 0 or

Sequencing Constraints Constraints: 1  Ensures that all the products are produced. 2  Restricts the production rate of each product to be within s1 of its average time at all times. This controls production rate to suitably match utilization. 3  Limits maximum utilization at all times.

Step 0 : Initialization. Create a list of all products to be assigned during the cycle. This is List A Step 1 : Assign a Product. For n = 1,….,N from List A, create a List B of all product types that could be assigned without violating any constraint. From List B select the product type ( j*) that minimizes Add product type j* to the nth position. Remove a product type j* from A and if n < N, go to 1. Sequencing Heuristics

Sequencing Example Bottleneck station is assigned with workload of 68 seconds/cycle. Actual workload by model type for that station is provided in the table. ModelSales%Time Red Z Blue Q Black R RWB American

Example – Solution 1 Red, 1 Blue, 2 Black, 2RWB per cycle. Set s 1 = s 2 = 0.9 StageRed ZBlue QBlack RRWB American Assigned 11/6, 41/6, 01/3, 01/3, 2Black 21/3, 41/3, 0-1/3, 02/3, 2Blue 31/2, 4 - 0, 01, 2RWB 42/3, 2 -1/3, 21/3, 4Red /3, 22/3, 0RWB , 0 -Black

Team Exercise Three products are produced on the same line. One half of the demand is for A, the other half is evenly split between B & C. Find a repeating cycle without building unnecessary inventories or shortages. The following table gives the bottleneck machine times. ModelTime A100 B95 C105

Exercise – Solution Repeating Cycle : N A = 2, N B = 1, N C = 1, N = 4 Let Max Inventory(±) < 1 StageABCCum.Time (Excess) Assignment 1+0.5, , , (0)A 2*+1.0, 0+0.5, , (-5)B 3+0.5, , 0300 (0)C 40, (0)A * Assume A undesirable due to inventory accumulation

Unpaced Lines Let K - number of stations C - Cycle times S k - the sum of task times for tasks assigned to station k. k b - bottleneck machine All the times are deterministic

Unpaced Lines Let us divide the line into 2 lines as 1 to k b & k b +1 to K Station 1 to k-1 work faster than k b Each item has to spend s k b to avoid the inventory pile at each machine Throughput time for Line 2 is sum of all station times. Combining the lines, production time in system is

Unpaced Line - Illustration Let S 1 = 2, S 2 = 4, S 3 = 3 ItemEnter 1Leave 1Enter 2Leave 2Enter 3Leave 3Flow Time

Assignment Find a repeating cycle for entering product onto the mixed model line. Demand and the bottleneck process times are shown below. ProductDemandTime A B50040 C75045 D50050 E25055

Summary Assembly lines have greatly enhanced production because one objective : Producing good product Advances in computational speed makes it possible to find optimal solutions for many problems. Mixed model cases are handled by unpaced lines, has advantage of allowing variability in assembly times. Paced lines avoid need to remove and replace the products on the transport mechanism. Little work has been done on modeling the full range of practical consideration in assembly line design.