ICAL Electronics: Requirements and Challenges B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Ray Test of INO RPC Stack M. Bhuyan 1, V.M. Datar 2, S.D. Kalmani 1, S.M. Lahamge 1, N.K. Mondal 1, P. Nagaraj 1, S. Pal 1, L.V. Reddy, A. Redij.
Advertisements

Status REPORT on ICAL electronics
20/Oct./2000 CF IEEE NSS 2000 at Lyon,France 1 An MWPC Readout Chip for High Rate Environment Introduction ASIC Structure & Fabrication ASIC Evaluation.
Electronics for large LAr TPC’s F. Pietropaolo (ICARUS Collaboration) CRYODET Workshop LNGS, March 2006.
The MAD chip: 4 channel preamplifier + discriminator.
E-link IP for FE ASICs VFAT3/GdSP ASIC design meeting 19/07/2011.
Front-end electronics for Time Projection Chamber I.Konorov Outlook:  TPC requirements  TPC readout options  Options for TPC FE chips  Prototype TPC.
Electronics for the INO ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana Tata Institute of Fundamental Research For INO collaboration.
ICAL Instrumentation Challenges &/ Opportunities B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.
1 VLPC system and Cosmic Ray test results M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
RPC Electronics Status Overall system TDC –Digitizing frequency issue (determine the bin size of the TDC value) Discriminator test result Trigger module.
July 10, 2008 PHENIX RPC review C.Y. Chi 1 RPC Front End Electronics On chamber discriminator  The strips  The CMS discriminator chips  The discriminator.
Hotel Arasan Sapthagiri, Madurai January 23, 2011.
Tracking the tiniest particles
Regulated Cascode based Frontend ASIC Anusparsh for glass Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC) readout in the ICAL detector V.B. Chandratre, Veena Salodia, Menka.
ACES Workshop 3-4 March, 2009 W. Dabrowski Serial power circuitry in the ABC-Next and FE-I4 chips W. Dabrowski Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer.
Status of LAV FEE electronics G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani & M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente.
B.Satyanarayana, For INO Collaboration. B.Satyanarayana, INO INO-KEK Meeting January 28, 2009, TIFR, INDIA2 48.4m 16m 14.5m To study atmospheric neutrinos.
Naba K Mondal, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL ( conceptual) INO Peak at Bodi West Hills Prototype ICAL at VECC 2mX2m RPC Test Stand at TIFR ASIC for RPC designed at.
B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai For and on behalf of ICAL electronics team.
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
Second generation Front-end chip for H-Cal SiPM readout : SPIROC DESY Hamburg – le 13 février 2007 M. Bouchel, F. Dulucq, J. Fleury, C. de La Taille, G.
Calorimeter upgrade meeting - Wednesday, 11 December 2013 LHCb Calorimeter Upgrade : CROC board architecture overview ECAL-HCAL font-end crate  Short.
15th Dec, 2007DAE-SNP07 S.S.Upadhya1 Electronics and Data Acquisition system for prototype INO-ICAL detector A.Behere1, V.B.Chandratre1, S.D.Kalmani2,
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
Dr. B.Satyanarayana ▪ Scientific Officer (G) Department of High Energy Physics ▪ Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road ▪ Colaba ▪ Mumbai.
20/10/2008A. Alici - ALICE TOF Festival1 Electronics and data acquisition of the ALICE TOF detector A.Alici University and INFN, Bologna.
1 Hall D Drift Chamber ElectronicsFJ Barbosa Drift Chamber Review6-8 March 2007 Electronics for CDC and FDC Hall D 1.Motivation 2.ASIC Development 3.Preamp.
K.C.RAVINDRAN,GRAPES-3 EXPERIMENT,OOTY 1 Development of fast electronics for the GRAPES-3 experiment at Ooty K.C. RAVINDRAN On Behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
Commissioning of ICAL prototype detector electronics B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.
India-based Neutrino Collaboration(INO), INDIA1 B.S.Acharya, Sudeshna Banerjee, P.N.Bhat, S.R.Dugad, P.Ghosh, K.S.Gothe, S.K.Gupta, S.D.Kalmani, N. Krishnan,
B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai. Architecture of front-end ASIC INO Collaboration Meeting VECC, Kolkata July 11-13, Amp_out 8:1 Analog Multiplexer.
ICAL electronics and DAQ schemes - 1 B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai For INO Collaboration.
Satyanarayana Bheesette Roll number: Supervisors Prof Raghava Varma, IIT Bombay Prof Naba Mondal, TIFR, Mumbai Department of Physics Indian Institute.
Serial Data Link on Advanced TCA Back Plane M. Nomachi and S. Ajimura Osaka University, Japan CAMAC – FASTBUS – VME / Compact PCI What ’ s next?
B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai * With some updates from ICAL Electronics meeting held on Jan 23 in Madurai.
Status summary of RPC R&D for INO ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai Satyajit Jena, IIT Bombay, Powai For INO Collaboration.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
A. Ranieri / RPC-CMS Pre-loaded profile Synchronization & Control Board (SCB) The RPC electronics will consist of the FE board plus the Synchronization.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
Towards a final design of LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Readout Architecture for MuCh Introduction of MuCh Layout of Much ( proposed several schemes) Read ASIC’s Key features Basic Readout chain ROC Block Diagram.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
B.Satyanarayana Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai,
B.Satyanarayana (For INO collaboration) Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai, 400.
1 19 th January 2009 M. Mager - L. Musa Charge Readout Chip Development & System Level Considerations.
Proposal of a digital-analog RPC front-end for synchronous density particle measure for DHCAL application R.Cardarelli and R.Santonico INFN and University.
CERN PH MIC group P. Jarron 07 November 06 GIGATRACKER Meeting Gigatracker Front end based on ultra fast NINO circuit P. Jarron, G. Anelli, F. Anghinolfi,
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
C.Beigbeder, D.Breton, M.El Berni, J.Maalmi, V.Tocut – LAL/In2p3/CNRS L.Leterrier, S. Drouet - LPC/In2p3/CNRS P. Vallerand - GANIL/CNRS/CEA SuperB -Collaboration.
R & D Status report on INO Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India.
PADME Front-End Electronics
Work on Muon System TDR - in progress Word -> Latex ?
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
KLOE II Inner Tracker FEE
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
TDC at OMEGA I will talk about SPACIROC asic
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
BESIII EMC electronics
RPC Front End Electronics
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

ICAL Electronics: Requirements and Challenges B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai

ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 20102

Factsheet of ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 20103

Cables & services routing B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 20104

Schematic of a basic RPC B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 20105

Signal development in an RPC B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,  Each primary electron produced in the gas gap starts an avalanche until it hits the electrode.  Avalanche development is characterized by two gas parameters, Townsend Coefficient () and Attachment coefficient (η).  Average number of electrons produced at a distance x, n(x) = e ( η)x  Current signal induced on the electrode, i(t) = E w v e 0 N(t) / V w, where E w / V w =  r / (2b + d r ).

Honeycomb pickup panel B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 20107

HMC based preamplifier B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 20108

Post amplifier RPC pulse profile B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 20109

Characteristics of RPC pulse B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Triggered DAQ scheme B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,  Conventional architecture  Dedicated sub- system blocks for performing various data readout tasks  Need for Hardware based on-line trigger system  Trigger latency issues and how do we take care in implementation

Trigger system Physicist’s mind decoded! Autonomous; shares data bus with readout system Distributed architecture For ICAL, trigger system is based only on topology of the event; no other measurement data is used Huge bank of combinatorial circuits Programmability is the key, FPGAs, ASICs are the players B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Trigger-less DAQ scheme B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, Gary Drake & Charlie Nelson  Suitable for low event rate and low background/noise rates  On-off control and V th control to disable noisy channels

Implementing trigger-less scheme B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

DAQ system requirements Information to record on trigger ◦Strip hit (1-bit resolution) ◦Timing (< 500ps) ◦Time Over Threshold (for time-walk correction) Rates ◦Individual strip background rates ~300Hz ◦Event rate ~10Hz On-line monitor ◦RPC parameters (High voltage, current) ◦Ambient parameters (T, P, RH) ◦Services, supplies (Gas systems, magnet, low voltage power supplies, thresholds) B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Front-end specifications No input matching circuit needed, HCP strips give ~50Ω characteristic impedance Avalanche mode, pulse amplitude: mV Gain ( , fixed) depends on the electronic noise obtainable No gain needed if operated in streamer mode, option to by-pass gain stage Rise time: < 500ps Discriminator overhead: 3-4 preferable Variable V th for discriminator ±10mV to ±50mV Pulse shaping (fixed) nS Pulse shaping removes pulse height information; do we need the latter? B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Functional diagram of the FE ASIC B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, Amp_out 8:1 Analog Multiplexer Channel-0 Channel-7 Output Buffer Regulated Cascode Transimpedance Amplifier Differential Amplifier Comparator LVDS output driver Regulated Cascode Transimpedance Amplifier Differential Amplifier Comparator LVDS output driver Common threshold LVDS_out0 LVDS_out7 Ch-0 Ch-7 Ref: Veena Salodia’s presentation

Information on FE ASIC  IC Service: Europractice (MPW), Belgium  Service agent: IMEC, Belgium  Foundry: austriamicrosystems  Process: AMSc35b4c3 (0.35um CMOS)  Input dynamic range:18fC – 1.36pC  Input impedance:  Amplifier gain: 8mV/μA  3-dB Bandwidth: 274MHz  Rise time: 1.2ns  Comparator’s sensitivity: 2mV  LVDS drive: 4mA  Power per channel: < 20mW  Package: CLCC48(48-pin)  Chip area: 13mm 2  Cost: € 11,000 for just 30 pcs! B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Timing devices ASIC chips ◦HPTDC (J.Christiansen, CERN), 32/8 channels,  t : 261/64/48/40/17ps ◦AMT (Yasuo Arai, KEK), 24 channels,  t = 305ps ◦3-stage interpolated TDC ASIC (Ref: Pooja Saxena’s presentation) FPGA based solutions ◦Vernier (Ref: Hari Kolla’s presentation) ◦Differential Delay Line Ref: Sudeshna Dasgupta’s presentation) ◦IITM’s design? B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

RPC strip rate monitoring B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, Temperature Strip noise rate profile Strip noise rate histogram Temperature dependence on noise rate

TPH monitor module B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, Ref: Shekhar Lahamge’s presentation

Back-end issues VME is the ICAL’s backend standard (Ref: Mandar Saraf’s presentation) Global services (trigger, clock etc.), calibration Data collectors and frame transmitters Trigger farms in trigger-less scheme Computer and data archival On-line DAQ software On-line data quality monitors Networking and security issues Remote access protocols to detector sub- systems and data Voice and video communications 22B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11, 2010

Power supplies High voltage for RPCs ◦Voltage: 10kV (nominal) ◦Current: 6mA (approx.) ◦Ramp up/down, on/off, monitoring Low voltage for electronics ◦Voltages and current budgets still not available at this time Commercial and/or semi-commercial solutions DC-DC and DC-HVDC converters; cost considerations B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Other critical issues Power requirement and thermal management ◦25mW/channel → 100KW/detector ◦Magnet power (500KW?) ◦Front-end positioning; use absorber to good use! ◦Do we need forced, water cooled ventilation? ◦UPS, generator power requirements Suggested cavern conditions ◦Temperature: 20±2 o C ◦Relative humidity: 50±5% B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Summary and future outlook Almost all the RPC parameters and requirements understood. Overall electronics and DAQ specifications need to be firmed up. Design and prototyping of well defined sub-systems is already in progress (eg. FE, TDC, ambient parameter monitors etc.). Identification of off-the-shelf solutions (data links, power supplies, even some chips) – both from commercial and research groups should be exploited. Work and responsibilities by the ICAL collaborating institutes and universities. Roll of electronics industries is crucial: ◦Chip fabrication ◦Board design, fabrication, assembly and testing ◦Slow control and monitoring ◦Industries are looking forward to work with INO Truly exciting and challenging opportunities ahead in VLSI design, system integration, data communication, process control, power supplies, on-line software … B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Data size for triggered scheme Assuming 8 channel grouping for Trigger and TDC in each RPC TDC:512nsec range & 100ps resolution, 16Hit ◦Start-Stop delay: Pulse width format ◦16x2x16x16+16x16(Channel identity)=8192bits+256 (worst case) Pickup strip Hit pattern (128 bits) Event arrival time up to 100psec resolution (50bit) RPC identity (16 bit) Event identity(32bit) Packet information(16bit) Event data per RPC ◦Worst case = =8690 bits ◦Typical case = =1010 bits Total data ◦266Mb[16hit TDC] or 31Mb[1 Hit TDC] per event [ All data] or 20% data = 6Mb per event [Non-zero data] ◦Assuming 500Hz trigger rate, Total data = 133 Gbps or 15.5 Gbps 0r 3.1Gbps B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,

Data size for trigger-less scheme Pickup strip rate estimation ◦Assuming Cosmic ray rate of 10K/min/ m 2 ◦For RPC area of 4 m 2, Rate is 40K/min ◦Pick strip rate = 40K/64=10.4Hz Pickup signal data ◦Signal arrival time-stamp up to 100psec resolution (50bit) ◦Pulse width information (10 bit for 100nsec) ◦Channel identity(8 bit for 64 in X and Y planes ) ◦RPC identity (16 bit) ◦Packet information(10bit) ◦Total = 94 … aprox. 100 bit Data rate ◦RPC data = 10x128x100= 128Kbps ◦Detector data = 128Kx30720 = Gbps Trigger rate (Assuming 3/min/m 3 of prototype detector) ◦Trigger rate for whole detector is 500Hz Data collection per second is aprox Gbps Conventional Scheme: ◦Data collection : 133 Gbps(16hit TDC) or 15.5 Gbps (1Hit TDC) 0r 3.1Gbps(Non-zero data) B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL Electronics Meeting, IIT Madras August 9-11,