Selecting a New Handbook: Some Issues to Consider Paul Jude Beauvais August 20, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Selected Institutions decide to examine an online or hybrid course as part of a peer review. Since institutions make a significant investment in.
Advertisements

Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Avoiding the plague of plagiarism: good practice in acknowledging others Adapted for the Centre for Health and Social Care Studies and Service development.
Strategies for Using The Brief Penguin Handbook, third edition Paul Jude Beauvais August 20, 2008.
Academic Writing Book Introduction. Study Plan of Introduction to Academic Writing You have fifteen weeks to study the first six units of the book. You.
What, Why, and How? INTRODUCTION: Behind the Rhetoric.
Information Literacy Embedded in the Curriculum: A Collaborative Process or One way to spend your grant money Jennifer Groome, Reference Librarian Jack.
The Writing Process Purdue OWL staff Brought to you in cooperation with the Purdue Online Writing Lab.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester The Personal Response System (PRS) at the University of Rochester. Frank.
© 2005 John Wiley & Sons PPT1 Midterm Essay – Sharing my comments Negative: 1.The position could be made clearer and more obvious. 2.There are too many.
WEEK 8: REVISION CALEB HUMPHREYS. FREE WRITE / READING (~10 MINUTES) Read the sample Draft 1.1 of the rhetorical analysis in your textbook. Pages
See / Judge / Act Catholic Social Teaching Deepa Patel Deann Nargentino Albert Wingfai Wong Sal Candela Roman Povcher Eric (Man) Wong.
Developing Instructional Strategies
The Writing Center St. Joseph’s Hall, 3 rd Floor, Room
BOOK REVIEW. typically evaluates recently-written works offers a brief description of the text’s key points often provides a short appraisal of the strengths.
Technology for ESL Speaking and Culture Studies Activities and Projects Presenter: Professor Lyra Riabov Southern New Hampshire University Presentation.
Writing Scientific Abstracts
1 Multilingual Writing Students: Opportunities and Challenges Kate Mangelsdorf Evelyn Posey October 20, 2010.
Unit 12 Teaching Writing. Teaching objectives  know how to motive students to write  design writing tasks  A communicative approach and a process approach.
Teaching Writing. 2 Teaching objectives  By the end of this unit, Ss will be able to: 1. know what, why and how we write 2. know the communicative approach.
Call to Write, Third edition Chapter Twelve, The Research Process: Critical Essays and Research Papers.
Information Literacy Embedded in the Curriculum: A Collaborative Process or One way to spend your grant money Jenny Groome, Reference Librarian Jack Dougherty,
1 Bob Bleicher, (Adapted from a PowerPoint by Dr Zulmara Cline) Adopting the CSU Expository Reading and Writing.
Chapter 12 The Research Process: Critical Essays and Research Papers.
Research all the way down How I Learned to Teach Writing Like a Researcher Tracy Hamler Carrick Senior Lecturer, The Knight Institute for Writing in the.
NewTextbook Tools M-Pathways and Ctools. Background Fall 2006: Student concerns about rising textbook costs results in Provost’s Textbook Task Force.
Purdue OWL Staff Brought to you in cooperation with the Purdue Online Writing Lab Teaching Writing to Science Undergraduates: A Workshop for Instructors.
The BCC-UCF Writing Center …because writers need readers.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University.
Online Faculty Development Modules Abstract Utilizing student feedback on effective instructional practices, Online Faculty Development Modules are designed.
Steps to Writing A Research Paper In MLA Format. Writing a Research Paper The key to writing a good research paper or documented essay is to leave yourself.
Aug. 9, 2007Gehringer: Improving Course Materials … Through Peer Review … Expertiza: Improving Course Materials and Learning Outcomes through.
CPN 100 — Writing Studies I Guidelines for Writing Studies I Essays from the essay grading checklists.
Fact-finding Transparencies 1. ©Pearson Education 2009 Objectives When fact-finding techniques are used in the database system development lifecycle.
6TH GRADE English Program 1. COURSE GOALS Mastery of essential writing and language skills Mastery of essential writing and language skills Integrate.
060922Getting the most out of the computer classrooms Getting the most out of the computer classroom “The point is to make the computers disappear from.
Writing, Reflection, and Assessment with ePortfolios Christy Desmet Director of First-year Composition Presented to 2007 Academic Affairs Faculty Symposium.
The Genre of the End Comment: Conventions in Teacher Responses to Writing by Summer Smith.
Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.
Updates to Program Approval Process and Graduate Faculty Nominations Dr. George Hodge Assistant Dean for Program Development.
WRIT 1122 Faculty meeting September 23, Satisfaction with goals and features  The survey results showed that faculty are satisfied overall with.
Critical Thinking Lesson 8
Using Turnitin.com to Eliminate Academic Dishonesty in the Online Classroom Jane E. O’Brien, GAVS English Department Chair Dr. Joe Cozart, GAVS Associate.
Teaching Writing.
Instructional Technology Survey: Highlands School District Shawn Cressler, Summer 2013.
AP English Language & Composition. STRENGTHEN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOUR WRITING THROUGH CLOSE READING AND FREQUENT PRACTICE AT APPLYING RHETORICAL STRATEGIES,
Teaching Portfolios TA Training Session. What is a Teaching Portfolio?  Three types used in academia  The academic portfolio  The teaching portfolio.
Updates to Program Approval Process and Graduate Faculty Nominations Dr. George Hodge Assistant Dean for Program Development.
Mrs. Herrera English Language Arts and Composition.
External Textbook Features Textbook Analysis Project/Paper
Eng 10 Q3 W4 Spring Weekly Standards Reading Informational Texts ( Main ideas, analyze rhetoric) Writing: language use, ideas explained with evidence,
ENGR 1181 College of Engineering Engineering Education Innovation Center Introduction to Technical Communication.
What Is Open? Paul Stacey NANSLO Workshop September 30, 2011.
Presenters: Bill Redwine, Assistant VP Auxiliary Services Cheryl Farmer, General Manager University Bookstore Julie Ferguson, Textbook Manager Textbook.
ENG 121 PAPERS Learn by Doing / eng121papers.com.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT ENG 121 Entire Course ENG 121 Week 1 Diagnostic Essay ENG 121 Week 1 DQ 1 Strengths and Weaknesses in Writing.
Unit 10 Teaching Writing Welcome. 2 Teaching Objectives 1. The purpose of writing class; 2.The nature of writing in reality; 3.A communicative approach.
1. Based on the Course Outcomes, tell me how you think you are doing so far. What outcomes do you think you’ve nailed and why? What outcomes do you think.
Paul Conway Information Adviser Sheffield Hallam University
That teaching philosophy!
Software Documentation
Canvas and Instructional Technology
That teaching philosophy!
Paul Jude Beauvais August 31, 2009
12 mark Question – 2015 Paper Plan; Pick 3 or 4 advantages/ features of Direct Democracy Short Intro and conclusion for Good Practice Refer to at least.
Impact of AB 705 and Guided Pathways on Part-Time Faculty
12 mark Question – 2015 Paper Plan; Pick 3 or 4 advantages/ features of Direct Democracy Short Intro and conclusion for Good Practice Refer to at least.
STUDENT COMMENTS IS EDUCATION
ENG/200 RHETORIC AND RESEARCH The Latest Version // uopcourse.com
ENG/200 ENG/ 200 eng/200 eng/ 200 RHETORIC AND RESEARCH The Latest Version // uopstudy.com
Presentation transcript:

Selecting a New Handbook: Some Issues to Consider Paul Jude Beauvais August 20, 2008

Three Questions What instructional texts (either print or digital) do we need to teach writing well? What computer software or online platforms do we need for course management, file sharing, and peer response in composition classes? How should we obtain the funds to sustain the first-year writing awards?

Three Elements of the Handbook Contract The handbook contract provides three important items for the composition program: an instructional text for writing classes (The Brief Penguin Handbook) An online platform for course management, file sharing, and peer response (MyCompLab) funds for first-year writing awards ($3,000 per year)

Some Details of the Contract The handbook contract stipulates that The Brief Penguin Handbook will be a required text in all first-year composition classes sets the handbook price (to the bookstore) at $39.00 per copy requires that we work with the publisher to provide online resources (such as MyCompLab) provides $3,000 per year, with no restrictions on how the first-year composition program spends it

Questions Concerning Our Strategy Is a contract with a publisher the best way to provide the essential items (texts, software or online platform, and funds)? If so, which publisher provides the best package? If not, what would be better sources for the essential items?

The Handbook The handbook provides information concerning composing processes (audience analysis, invention, arrangement, revision, proofreading) form, style, and mechanics (genres, paragraph patterns, sentence structure) research (techniques and resources) fair usage of sources (documentation)

The Handbook: Some Questions How do faculty members actually use the handbook in their classes? How do students use it in and out of class? Does the department need a common handbook for all sections of first-year composition? Does a common handbook help promote consistent instruction throughout the composition program? Does a handbook eliminate the need to order another instructional text (i.e., a “rhetoric”) in ENG 101? In ENG 102? Are free online resources (e.g., the Purdue OWL materials) sufficient to eliminate the need for a handbook? Would the long-term needs of our students be better met by teaching them to rely on these resources?

The Software MyCompLab provides a course management platform file-sharing resources (to share papers) peer-response resources (to comment on papers) exercises and other ancillary materials

The Software: Some Questions How many faculty members use MyCompLab for course management, file sharing, and peer response? What features of MyCompLab do instructors like? What features do instructors dislike? What other platforms are instructors using for course management, file sharing, and peer response? What are the advantages and disadvantages of these other platforms? Do the advantages of “bundling” features into MyCompLab outweigh the disadvantages? Would the long-term needs of our students be better served by introducing them to readily available free or inexpensive online resources instead of publisher resources?

The First-Year Writing Awards The first-year writing contest offers awards in three categories (personal essay, short argument/exposition, and research report) provides cash prizes totaling approximately $1,000 each year offers a banquet at which the winners are honored provides a publication opportunity (in Red Skies) for students

The First-Year Writing Awards: Some Questions Can the awards be made self sustaining? Are there advantages in keeping a publisher involved in supporting the awards?

The Plan (A Brief Overview) During the academic year, the composition program will conduct surveys and/or focus groups (to determine instructor and student preferences) decide whether to seek a contract with a publisher if we do seek a contract, assemble a short list of books and software/platforms that we would be willing to adopt if we don’t seek a contract, select alternative sources for instructional texts, software/platforms, and funds In either case, attempt to provide the best resources at the lowest cost to students