ATV Rendezvous Mission 1: Jules Verne Brian Rishikof Odyssey Space Research 281-488-7953 March 24, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
LightSail.
Larry Phillips MAY 13th-17th, 2002 Micro Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission: Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Launch Vehicle Information Final Version.
MBD in real-world system… Self-Configuring Systems Meir Kalech Partially based on slides of Brian Williams.
Институт прикладной математики им. М.В.Келдыша РАН Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Russian Vehicle Automated Rendezvous and Docking C. Scott Merkle NASA Johnson Space Center Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Division 5/22-23/2002, AR&C.
The Vision for Space Exploration – Challenge & Opportunity ISS Panel Report Robert D. Cabana ISS Panel Chair March 30, 2005.
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
1 IAC Late-Breaking News Analysis of STS-118 Tile Damage Utilizing the Tools and Techniques Developed Since Return to Flight William H. Gerstenmaier Associate.
Low Energy, Low Cost Swift A design experiment June 2010.
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
1 ESAIL proof of concept mission Juha-Pekka Luntama Pekka Janhunen Petri Toivanen.
C2V2 Technical Requirements and Constraints
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
Controlled Autonomous Proximity Technology with flUx pinning & Reconfiguration Experiments CAPTURE: David Bayard, Laura Jones, and Swati Mohan Jet Propulsion.
Page 1 Presentation title – file name – date From ATV to ATV Evolution February 2004 Hans-Jörg Heidmann Transportation for In-Orbit Infrastructure and.
ISS COTS Interface Requirements Document SSP 50808
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.
-- NRL Presentation -- Rendezvous, Proximity Operations & Capture for ATV and HTV Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Division GN&C Design and Analysis Branch.
Columbus Operations Columbus Control Centre 8 October 2009 Prague ASE XXII Congress Space – Opportunities for all An Overview to Columbus Operations Reinhold.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
October 2006 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Williamsburg, VA October 2006 John Bosworth (661)
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Eric Stoneking Paul Mason May 17, 2002 ACS.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
FIRST/Planck 12 December 2000PT The FIRST Mission Implementation Status and Schedule T. Passvogel The Promise of FIRST.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.
Space Station Will it be accessible for You and Me?
STS-114 Mission Objectives Test and evaluate new inspection and repair techniques Deliver supplies and cargo to the Space Station via the Raffaello MPLM.
Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,
SPHERES Reconfigurable Control Allocation for Autonomous Assembly Swati Mohan, David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
Polar Gateways 2008THEMIS Constellation Operations − Jan 2008 THEMIS Constellation Operations Dr. Manfred Bester University of California at Berkeley.
SFINX Surveying Flying IN-situ eXplorer Old Dominion University
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
The final Space Shuttle has landed… Now what??. The Space Shuttle Since 1981, NASA space shuttles have been rocketing from the Florida coast into Earth.
© 2014 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SPRSA Excess Capacity Panel Carol P. Welsch Orbital Sciences Corporation June 10, Welsch.
Roadmap for Long Term Sustainable Space Exploration and Habitation Defining the Functional Requirements for Early Phase of Space Habitation AIAA 2015-????
SPACE TAXI Marcel Milanes December 14 th, 2010
1 EOS Aqua Mission Status at AMSR Science Team Meeting September 16, 2015 Huntsville, Alabama Bill Guit Aqua/Aura Mission Director - Code 584 phone
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Flygteknik, Oktober -10 FLIGHT RESULTS FROM PRISMA FORMATION FLYING AND RENDEZVOUS DEMONSTRATION MISSION Staffan PerssonSwedish Space Corporation Per BodinSwedish.
ISS Commercial Resupply Services Michael Suffredini ISS Program Manager June 17 th, 2009 Augustine Committee UPDATED: Corrected page 10 (replaced “first.
Need for Commercial Cargo to ISS William Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Space Operations FAA Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Council.
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
1 Columbus Control Center - Teams and Responsibilities - Roland Luettgens ESA Columbus Lead Flight Director Tel:
AAE 450 – Spacecraft Design 1 Solar Power & Docking Options Eric Gustafson 1/18/2005 Power group & docking sub-committee Solar power and autonomous docking.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Attitude and Pointing Concepts for ISS Payload Operations NASA/JSC Marcella Mendoza Attitude & Pointing Office.
Orbital Express: A New Chapter In Space
00:00:00 Standby 3.0L.
Matt Chapin, Nick Wackel, Olon Pierce Preliminary Design Review THF-15
Fault Tolerant Computer for the AUTOMATED TRANSFER VEHICLE
Technical Resource Allocations
The International Space Station (ISS)
GNCDE AS DD&VV ENVIRONMENT FOR ADR MISSIONS GNC
CINEMA Orbit/Attitude? (looking down from top toward earth)
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Week 4 Presentation Thursday, Feb 5, 2009
International Space Station Providers
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

ATV Rendezvous Mission 1: Jules Verne Brian Rishikof Odyssey Space Research March 24, 2004

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research2 Outline ATV (Automated Transfer Vehicle) Program ATV Vehicle ATV Trajectory and GN&C Demonstration ATV (Automated Transfer Vehicle) Program ATV Vehicle ATV Trajectory and GN&C Demonstration

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research3 ATV Program ESA (European Space Agency) –ISS Partner EADS (European Aeronautic Defence & Space) –Flight Segment Prime Contractor CNES (Centre National D’Etudes Spatiales) –Operations Prime Contractor RSC- E (Rocket and Space Corporation - Energia) –ESA Integration Sub-contractor NASA (National Aeronautics & Space Administration) –Prime ISS Integrator RASA (Russian Aviation and Space Agency) –Integrator

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research4 ATV International ATV-CC Toulouse Les Mureaux (Paris) MCC-H Houston Korolev (Moscow) ESTEC Noordwijk (Amsterdam) MCC-M Moscow

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research5 ITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations –ATV has been designated as a “defense article” –Subject to Export Control restrictions –Complicates support Perils of International cooperation

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research6 ATV Mission Dock to ISS Service Module aft Deliver Cargo –Russian Water –Fuel –Gases –Other ISS Propulsion –Reboost –Attitude control –Debris avoidance

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research7 Jules Verne - Launch Date MAY 2005

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research8 Vehicle Configuration Length9794 mm Largest Diameter4480 mm Solar array span22281 mm Mass budget S/C dry mass5320 kg Cargo Carrier dry mass5150 kg Total mass (105%)10990 kg Air /Consumables2094 kg Total ATV mass13084 kg Air /Consumables5150 kg Total Cargo capacity7667 kg Total Mass at Launch20770 kg Waste downmass6500 kg *400 km, 51.6 deg inclination

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research9 Vehicle Comparison ATVProgress M1Apollo CSM Length10.3 m7.4 m11.03 m Max Diam.4.51 m2.70 m3.90 m Launch Mass20750 kg7150 kg30329 kg Press. Volume14 m36.6 m36.17 m3 Engine Thrust1960 N2942 N97860 N

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research10 Vehicle Systems Propulsion(Pressure fed liquid bi-prop) Main (OCS)4 x 490 N thrusters ACS28 x 220 N thrusters Propellant Monomethyl hydrazine fuel + Nitrogen Tetroxide oxidizer PressurizationHe pressurant at 31.4 MPa Communication To GroundS-band via TDRS, Artemis Space-to-SpaceS-band to ISS-RS NavigationGPS Power Solar Arrays 3.8 kW - 6 months in orbit Batteries Rechargeable and non- rechargeable

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research11 Communication

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research12 Rendezvous Safety Rqmnts “1 Fail Op” “2 Fail Safe” 24 hour safe free-drift trajectory Approach Ellipsoid –2 km x 2 km x 4 km Keep Out Sphere (KOS) –200 m sphere

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research13 Rendezvous Constraints Russian Ground Station Visibility ISS attitude and array feathering limits –ATV/ISS: Communication –ATV/ISS: Common GPS satellites and visibility –ISS: Power –ISS configuration dependent Lighting for visual monitoring Lighting for sensors Power

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research14 ATV Trajectory (1/2) MC  ATV-CC computes Mid-Course transfers dV MC11 and dV MC12 S -4  ATV-CC computes dV 3 and dV 4 S -3  ground computes dV 5 and dV 6 S -2  reference point; half orbit after dV 6 S -1  point where 1 st correction (trim) maneuver is initiated; 1 orbit after S -2 S -1/2  phasing targeted point; 1 orbit after S -1 AI 3.5 km V-Bar R-Bar S1S1 S0S0 S2S2 AE KOS S -1 S -2 S -3 S -4 MC S -1/2 Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3 Phase 4Phase 5Phase 6 Fixed Initial Drift ~ 3 hours Variable Phasing Duration hours Fixed Phasing Duration ~ 7.3 hours CAM test 1 >10 min >20 min 0.5 rev dV 1 dV 2 dV MC11 dV MC12 dV 3 dV 4 dV 5 dV 6 S-S Comm

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research15 ATV Trajectory (2/2) V-Bar R-Bar ~5 km AI 3.5 km 250 m 45 min 40 min Directional Space-to-Space Comm Range (~30km) S1S1 S0S0 S2S2 S3S3 S3S3 S 4 20m S -1/2 S 41 12m Decision Point Transition to VDM Transition to VDM Relative Attitude Crew Visual Assessment Start RGPS Navigation Absolute GPS Navigation AE KOS >20 min >10 min Omni-directional Space-to-Space Comm Range (~3km)

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research16 ATV Navigation 2x GPS receivers/antennas –AGPS –RGPS 3x 2-axis accelerometers 4x 2-axis gyros KURS –Range + range rate 2x Videometers –Range (range rate) & LOS –relative attitude 2x Telegoniometers –Range (range rate) & LOS 10 cm1 m10 m100 m1 km10 km100 km DOCKING AGPS RGPS KURS TGM VDM VDM+ Rel Att USOS Cameras SM Camera SENSORS PRIME MONITORING

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research17 ATV Control “Yaw Steering” –For power and communication “Earth Pointing” –Early phasing –LVLH (0,0,0) –Pointing sensors at ISS Relative Attitude –Measurements start at 30 m –Transition occurs at 20 m V S 41 S 4a S 4b

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research18 ATV Control Phasing –Earth Pointed OCS major maneuvers –Otherwise Yaw steering Rendezvous –ACS maneuvers –Yaw steering attitude Final Approach –Earth Pointed (LVLH 0,0,0) –Relative Attitude (0,0,0) –Simultaneous control of CG and docking probe tip

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research19 ATV Guidance

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research20 Safety Tiered Approach –Ground and Crew as additional controls –Crew “in the loop” just prior to docking System/Subsystem FDIR Trajectory Monitoring Coarse State Monitoring PRIMARY FLIGHT Systems BACKUP FLIGHT Systems

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research21 Contingencies ABORT (CAM) –Backup H/W & S/W ESCAPE –Nominal H/W & S/W Also, during Final Approach –HOLD –RETREAT Vehicle/Crew/Ground commands ABORT ?

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research22 Decision Point Distance at which momentum will overcome any propulsive reaction and result in contact –After this point, assumption is continuing is safer than executing “large” maneuver “Decision” made by crew on-board ISS –ATV-CC communication lags result in earlier “ground” decision point

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research23 Crew Monitoring No “Piloting” Prescribed reactionon threshold detection by visual means Single operator with all “critical” information and command access Visual target on ATV –Active illumination Camera on ISS –Prime –Backup (to be installed via EVA)

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research24 Demonstration ATV is Show Safe!

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research25 Demonstration Mission Philosophy –Demonstrate safety critical elements that cannot be fully tested on ground –Demonstrate safety critical elements before they are relied upon during flight for safety

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research26 Demonstration Plan Currently 3 day mission rendezvous mission Progressively test and evaluate Achieve incremental milestones –Demonstrate sensors as they come online (prime and monitoring) –Demonstrate communication and critical commanding –Demonstrate integrated vehicle GN&C performance –Demonstrate ALL contingency actions After ALL demonstration objectives/criteria satisfied + Proceed to Docking attempt –Nominal rendezvous profile

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research27 ATV: For Fun! BUILD YOUR OWN! BUILD YOUR OWN!

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research28 Acknowledgments Jean-François Clervoy/ESA Douglas Yazell/Honeywell AIAA Houston NASA-JSC-EG NASA ATV Team Congratulations to ATV Team

Brian RishikofOdyssey Space Research29 The End