District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District October 18, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
Advertisements

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Hackettstown Public Schools 2014 October Score Report NJASK End of Course Biology HSPA.
Transitioning Graduation Requirements. Current Graduation Requirements English Language ArtsMathematics HSPA Score >=200 or Passing AHSA performance tasks.
Netcong School Student Driven Curriculum & Professional Development Action Plan
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
State Assessment Results October 2014 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Dawn Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction The Warren Hills Regional.
Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October
North Arlington Public Schools NJASK Data Presented by: Dennis Kenny, Nicole C. Russo, Elaine Jaume, Marie Griggs & Jennifer Rodriguez.
Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments Spring 2010 results Presented by: Richard Kirk Assistant Principal Manasquan Elementary School.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Getting Smarter About CAASPP. Overview of CAASPP  English Language Arts: Smarter Balanced Assessment  Math: Smarter Balanced Assessment  Science: California.
Assessment Results Presented by: Anthony Scotto Director of Curriculum and Instruction January 17, 2012.
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments
Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
College and Career Readiness: Measures/Aligning Instructional Materials Dublin Scioto High School March 2012.
1 Student Assessment Report One Goal: Support Student Success West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation August 20, 2013.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Grades 6-8 MONITORING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS DECEMBER 2013.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL Alex Anemone, Ed.D. October 6, 2014 NJ Testing Report Spring 2014.
District Assessment Report Westwood Regional School District February 18, 2010.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Irvington Public Schools Department of Mathematics, Assessment, Data Analysis & Management Matin Adegboyega, Director BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATION OF.
Irvington Public Schools Department of Mathematics, Assessment, Data Analysis & Management Matin Adegboyega, Director BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATION OF.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
MCAS 2007 Grade 10 ELA – Math – Science & Technology.
R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS DATA PRESENTATION P ART I October 2015.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
MOUNT OLIVE TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS 2015 End of Year Academic Achievement Report.
PARCC 2014/ GRADE 3-11 NJASK SCIENCE – GRADE 4 NJASK SCIENCE – GRADE 8 NEW JERSEY BIOLOGY COMPETENCY TEST (2014 AND 2015 RESULTS) PRESENTED BY: OLIVER.
Manasquan High School Testing Report
District Assessment Report School Year.
Student Data Review Title VII Indian Education Parent Meeting March 4, 2013.
Provincial Assessment Results Anglophone West School District November 26, 2015.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
Getting Ready for High School Presented by: Anthony Giaconia, Toby Sorge, Joanne Werner, Carmelo Sortino Christina Korines, Mariluz Ruiz-Norena, and Sherri.
2012 NJASK Results- Garwood Public Schools. NJASK- New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge  Administered in grades 3-8  Language Arts, Mathematics,
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Provincial Assessment Results
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Paulsboro School District
Ridgefield Public Schools data presentation Part I
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Washington Township Public Schools
Meredith cargilL director of curriculum, instruction, and technology
Student Assessment Data and NJ School Performance Report
A Parent Information Presentation
or How to get the school to send you to the movies
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October 2014.
Assessment Report Board of Education 2014
Paulsboro School District
District Assessment Report
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Presentation transcript:

District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District October 18, 2012

Historical Context : substandard scores in many areas of standardized testing Multiple assessment measures for students and parents? NJASK/HSPA action-plans Staff development for general and special education, BSI, ESL teachers Explicit test-preparation (NJASK Primers) Building-based focus Lesson plans & formal observations Incentive programs Cultural change Decrease PP and increase AP Increasing academic rigor = transfer of content knowledge and skills Continued focus on best- practice instructional strategies District Assessment Report “road shows”

Results : Strong growth on the NJASK/HSPA/Advanced Placement tests Jr./Sr. H.S. no longer a SINI Creation of more “authentic” assessments K-12 Alternate Assessment Folders Goal: Sustain and improve Results: Sustained performance or growth in most areas

Language Arts Literacy (09-10) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced GENERAL ED State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WRSD outperformed the DFG

Language Arts Literacy (10-11) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced GENERAL ED State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WRSD outperformed the DFG

Language Arts Literacy (11-12) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced GENERAL ED State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED State LAL Proficient & Advanced DFG LAL Proficient & Advanced Westwood LAL Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WRSD outperformed the DFG

Mathematics (09-10) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced GENERAL ED State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WRSD outperformed the DFG

Mathematics (10-11) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced GENERAL ED State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WRSD outperformed the DFG

Mathematics (11-12) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced GENERAL ED State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED State Math Proficient & Advanced DFG Math Proficient & Advanced Westwood Math Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WRSD outperformed the DFG

Science 4 & 8 (10-11) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) 8 4 GENERAL ED. 8 4 State Science Proficient & Advanced State Science Proficient & Advance DFG Science Proficient & Advanced DFG Science Proficient & Advanced Westwood Science Proficient & Advanced Westwood Science Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED. 8 4 State Science Proficient & Advanced DFG Science Proficient & Advanced Westwood Science Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WWRSD outperformed the DFG TOTAL STUDENTS GENERAL ED. State Biology Proficient & Advanced 57.3 State Biology Proficient & Advance 65.0 DFG Biology Proficient & Advanced 69.3 DFG Biology Proficient & Advanced 76.9 Westwood Biology Proficient & Advanced 79.2 Westwood Biology Proficient & Advanced 87.4 SPECIAL ED.State Biology Proficient & Advanced 20.4 DFG Biology Proficient & Advanced 26.6 Westwood Biology Proficient & Advanced 48.5 Biology Competency Test (10-11)

Science 4 & 8 (11-12) TOTAL STUDENTS (grade level) 8 4 GENERAL ED. 8 4 State Science Proficient & Advanced State Science Proficient & Advance DFG Science Proficient & Advanced DFG Science Proficient & Advanced Westwood Science Proficient & Advanced Westwood Science Proficient & Advanced SPECIAL ED. 8 4 State Science Proficient & Advanced DFG Science Proficient & Advanced Westwood Science Proficient & Advanced *Yellow indicates areas where the WWRSD outperformed the DFG TOTAL STUDENTS GENERAL ED. State Biology Proficient & Advanced 59.2 State Biology Proficient & Advance 66.6 DFG Biology Proficient & Advanced 69.4 DFG Biology Proficient & Advanced 76.5 Westwood Biology Proficient & Advanced 86.7 Westwood Biology Proficient & Advanced 91.3 SPECIAL ED.State Biology Proficient & Advanced 23.6 DFG Biology Proficient & Advanced 29.9 Westwood Biology Proficient & Advanced 50 Biology Competency Test (11-12)

Longitudinal Results (ELA) 11-12PPPAPMean Grade 320.1% (+3.1)73.1%6.8% (+1.6)215.2 (+3.8) Grade 427.5% (+3.7)67.1%5.3% (+.2)210.8 (+2.2) Grade 517.7% (+9.6)72.7%9.6% (+.2)216 (+4.2) Grade 623.1% (+1.9)70.1%6.8% (-1.5)216.3 (+1.4) Grade 722.3% (+5.5)64.4%13.4% (-2)219.5 (+3) Grade 88% (+2.4)69.8%22.2% (+2.3)229.7 (+1.9) Grade 113.3% (+1.2)67.6%29.1% (+2.1)238.1 (+1.1) 10-11PPPAPMean Grade 326.4%65%7.5%212.8 Grade 423.6%67%9.4%213.5 Grade 529.2%66%4.8%210.2 Grade 618.4%71.1%10.4%217.7 Grade 724.5%55.6%19.9%218.2 Grade 87.2%73.8%19%231.2 Grade 114.2%72.3%23.6%235.9

Longitudinal Results (Math) 11-12PPPAPMean Grade 37.3% (+5.5)34.7%58% (+10.4)250 (+8) Grade 411.7% (+2.8)50%38.3% (-3.2)237.8 (-0.6) Grade 57.6% (+2.8)53.3%39% (-7.3)240.6 (-3.1) Grade 613.1% (+1.2)49.4%37.5% (-1.6)234.5 (-2) Grade 722.3% (+5.3)47%30.7% (+1.2)227.8 (+3) Grade 815.6% (+3.3)42.9%41.5% (+2.7)237.6 (+3.7) Grade % (+0.2)57.7%29.7% (-3.6)230.7 (-1.7) 10-11PPPAPMean Grade 36.6%41.8%51.6%246.0 Grade 49.9%52.4%37.7%237.9 Grade 516.4%49.2%34.4%232.2 Grade 612.4%56.2%31.3%232.2 Grade 724.7%47.0%28.4%226.2 Grade 817.2%49.8%33.0%231.3 Grade %55.5%28.3%229.9

HSPA (Special Education) English Language ArtsMathematics

A Few Highlights Jr./Sr. H.S: AP tests – 80.8% to 81.3% (% 3 or higher), 40.7% to 47.5% (% 4 or higher) +10% increase in passing rate for 3 rd graders at Washington School in ELA +12% increase in passing rate for 4 th graders from when they were in 3 rd at George School in ELA +8% increase in advanced proficiency for 3 rd graders at Brookside School in mathematics (58%) +21% increase in passing rate in ELA, 13% in mathematics, and 29% in advanced proficiency in mathematics for 5 th graders at Berkeley School from when they were in 4 th grade WRMS passing rates exceed DFG and State averages again Positive feedback regarding Alternate Assessment Folders and alternate assessments

Next Steps Maintain strong scores through continuation of best-practices Improve in key areas in math and ELA Narrow focus in ELA and math on the Common Core Standards Focus on multiple measures of assessment

What is a True Measure of Authentic Student Achievement? Standardized tests (NJASK, HSPA, SATs, AP tests, etc.) = limitations Reading assessments Internal benchmark assessments Authentic real-world assessments/projects Student performances Student portfolios

Questions If you have questions, please contact Rory McCourt at or please contact your building