EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF COLLABORATIVE PLANNING Carol Mizelle Northeast Leadership Academy Cohort 1 Spring 2012, NCSU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Lesson Study Overview Unlocking Minds Preparing Osceola County Students for a Bright Future Gladys Moreta K-12 Program Specialist Curriculum & Instruction.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
New Teacher Induction Academy Data Collection November 30, 2011
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
MED  Problem of the Day: SEND +MORE MONEY.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Developing District Level Professional Learning Communities Woodford County Schools Jimmy Adams, Candace James and Sam Watkins.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Assessment for teaching Presented at the Black Sea Conference, Batumi, September 12, Patrick Griffin Assessment Research Centre Melbourne Graduate.
Evaluation of STAR Reading Program Kimberly R. Scott North East Leadership Academy Cohort 1 Spring 2012, NCSU.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
HARRISFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL NATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS SCHOOL’S FORUM 2011.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
1 Reading First Action Seminar Los Angeles Unified Schools October 28, 2004.
English Language Arts Program Update Cambrian School District.
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation Ron Ballentine Cindy Cosentino Halton District School Board
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
School Progress Plan Powhatan Elementary
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Presentation of Learning. Phase II Year One  Former members of PLC leadership team conducted a district survey on MyLearningPlan questioning teachers.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
The Art and Science of Teaching Marzano’s principles in action at Wahoo Public Schools John Harris – Wahoo Middle School Principal.
Harvest Ridge School Improvement Plan Update January 17, 2014.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Creating a School-Wide Literacy Plan Richmond Public Schools Assistant Principals Meeting September 28, 2011.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Logic Model: “Xtreme Reading” South Johnston High School.
Collaborative Practice Coaching at ISCA. What is it all about? Also known as; Coaching, Collaborative Practice and Lesson Study. Groups of teachers work.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Using PLCs to support MTSS Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012 Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Professional Learning Communities
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
CCRS Implementation
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF COLLABORATIVE PLANNING Carol Mizelle Northeast Leadership Academy Cohort 1 Spring 2012, NCSU

PROBLEM OF PRACTICE Goals  Develop an effective eighth grade English/Language Arts Professional Learning Team, at Bertie Middle School  Provide the opportunity to meet with other grade level English/Language Arts Professional Learning Teams.  Create a collaborative culture among teachers, which would result in an increase of student achievement.  Develop a schedule for the team to meet at least bi-weekly so that effective lesson strategies would be generated to improve student’s learning.  Meetings will articulate lesson outcomes, review all data sources, alignment of the goals and objectives being taught in the classroom.

Collaborative Planning Logic Model

EVALUATION QUESTIONS/DATA SOURCES Questions  How well do teachers’ lessons adhere to curriculum?  How often do ELA teachers collaboratively meet?  How effectively do teachers work with other teachers?  How well are PLCs implemented to increase collaboration?  Did the team use the collaborative planning time to develop common lessons and assessments?  How often are teachers making adjustments to instruction to better meet students’ needs?  How effective were PLC meetings? Data Sources  AgendasExamples of new strategies used in lesson  Recorded MinutesReflections  Survey Observations  Benchmark Data Common Lessons & Common Assessments

TEACHER SURVEY RESULTS QuestionsResponses 1. How effective do you feel the collaborative process has been for you? T1 (3) Total = T2 (4) T3 (4) 2. How effective do you feel the collaborative process has been to the ELA team? T1 (4) Total = T2 (4) T3 (4) 3. How important is the ELA / PLC planning time?T1 (3) Total = T2 (4) T3 (3) 4. To what extent do you feel the analysis of data has proven effective for your ELA / PLC team? T1 (3) Total = T2 (3) T3 (2) 5. How effective did the use of common assessments help to improve student achievement? T1 (2) Total = T2 (4) T3 (3) 6. How effective did the sharing of student test data help to improve student achievement? T1 (2) Total = T2 (3) T3 (4)

TEACHER SURVEY RESULTS 1 = Strongly Disagree Survey Key2 = Disagree 3 = Neither 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Total Results with the highest effective responses were found in Collaborative Process: 8 -- Agree Total Results with the lowest effective responses were found in Data Sharing: Neither Disagree *Result findings include: Developing a PLC and Collaborating with team was effective meeting process; however, the team did not feel that Data Sharing was an effective process.

EVALUATION RESULTS  Professional Learning Team for ELA was developed  8 th Grade ELA / PLC met collaboratively with other grade level ELA teams  Minutes from meetings were recorded  Lesson plans were developed using “goggle doc” to input data  New strategies were used to develop parts of the lesson  Some resources were common (at least 2 poetry, 2 informational text, and 1 narrative per unit of study)  New strategies were developed for Vocabulary (common vocabulary)  Common Assessments were developed  8 th Grade ELA participated in a school visit to Chowan Middle School

EVALUATION RESULTS OctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchTotal PLC Meetings Classroom Observations Unit Plans& Lessons Developed New Common Strategies Changed Common Assessments And Benchmarks

EVALUATION RESULTS

COMMON BENCHMARK EVALUATION RESULTS Common Benchmark Assessments depict an increase in the following objectives 1.02, 2.01, 3.02, 4.02, 5.01, and =Analyze expressive materials that are read, heard, and/or viewed 2.01 =Analyze and evaluate informational materials that are read, heard, and/or viewed 3.01 =Explore and evaluate argumentative works that are read, heard and/or viewed 3.02 =Continue to explore and analyze the use of the problem-solution process 4.01 =Analyze the purpose of the author or creator and the impact of that purpose 4.02 =Analyze and develop (with limited assistance) and apply appropriate criteria to evaluate the quality of the communication 5.01 =Increase fluency, comprehension, and insight through a meaningful and comprehensive literacy program 5.02 =Study the characteristics of literary genres (fiction, nonfiction, drama, and poetry) 6.01 =Model an understanding of conventional written and spoken expression

TEACHER REFLECTIONS The “collaboration” that occurred in the 8 th grade ELA team this year was not actually full collaboration, but a (somewhat unequal) division of labor. This was not the fault of the facilitator, but rather that of teaching team members who did not have a full understanding of the meaning of collaboration and / or a desire to partake in it. The 8 th grade ELA team has somewhat improve in collaboration; however, we still have a long way to go. We finally achieved being organized and keeping records of our organization, and that really helped me. I felt like I least knew what was going on in the 8 th grade ELA. We became good at looking and resources, but not necessarily sharing everything. The collaboration that I liked was that the 8 th grade team finally made some common assessments. The part I didn’t like was meeting, and I wish we could do what we needed to do without meeting so much.

RECOMMENDATIONS  Train & develop PLC members in true “collaboration.”  All PLC teams should be required to keep a log of the minutes and meeting times.  The principal or assistant principal should periodically meet with the team as a collaborative team member.  The PLC members should set clear goals at the beginning.  The team should take time to develop relationships, and this will help the team be stronger.  At the beginning of the school year, have a requirement for the team to meet at least once a week.  Allow more training for teachers to understand and analyze the data effectively.  Focus on what each team member does well, and use the resources (don’t just talk about). Come to each meeting prepared to input.  Develop more lessons together which are centered around stronger strategies for student improvement.  Focus on the student, and put students first.

FINAL REFLECTIONS  Developing Professional Learning Teams must be a “team” effort, and the team must own the planning in order to have better results. In the beginning of the project I was responsible for the agenda, minutes and facilitating the meeting; therefore, in retrospect, teachers felt that it was “my” meeting and not “their” meeting until they planned the agenda, kept the minutes, and facilitated their own meeting. When they believed we were a team then progress was made to plan collaboratively. Relationships had to be built as the team was built, and I remembered this more accurately as I saw a team transform from not wanting to meet move into building a team that would try to meet more than twice a week. Reflecting on the beginning stages I believe I was trying to force them into developing a collaborative team, and this would not bring about the results needed for improvement in instruction.  The Professional Learning Team meeting emerged into a meeting where everyone brought ideas, strategies, plans, and resources. The team transitioned slowly, and at times one teacher would try to dictate over the others. Once I had presented strategies for effective collaboration, and facilitated some meetings, the eighth grade team took the initiative to develop their own strategies that worked to make a difference for a fairly effective team. Working through the beginning process was the most difficult part because often classroom teachers tend to find themselves in isolation rather that collaboration.