Spring, 2009Phys 521A1 Charged particle tracking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Drift velocity Adding polyatomic molecules (e.g. CH4 or CO2) to noble gases reduces electron instantaneous velocity; this cools electrons to a region where.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Particle interactions and detectors
Detection of Gamma-Rays and Energetic Particles
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Calorimetry: Energy Measurements
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Energy Measurement (Calorimetry) Why measure energy ? I) Not always practical to measure momentum. An important contribution.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
1 Calorimetry - 2 Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007.
Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Beam test results of Tile/fiber EM calorimeter and Simulator construction status 2005/03/05 Detector Niigata University ONO Hiroaki contents.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
How do we detect photons? Kensuke Okada RIKEN BNL Research Center April 20,
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
Ian Ross Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mentor: Dr. Richard Teuscher University of Toronto ATLAS Group ATLAS Calorimetery: Cosmic Ray Commissioning.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
CMS Calorimeter HB- HB+ HE- HE+ HF- HF+ HO-2 HO-1 HO0 HO+1 HO+2
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
HEC Parameters from As-Built knowledge HEC is a homogeneous detector and any mechanical tolerances are well below any significance for physics..... this.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Interactions of Particles with Matter
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
Physics of electron cloud build up Principle of the multi-bunch multipacting. No need to be on resonance, wide ranges of parameters allow for the electron.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
Jamie Boyd CERN CERN Summer Student Lectures 2011 From Raw Data to Physics Results 1.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
R.S. Orr 2009 TRIUMF Summer Institute
Spring, 2009Phys 521A1 Neutrons Neutrons interact only strongly; they also decay, but not quickly; τ(n) ~ 886 s Cross-section depends on energy –slow neutrons.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
On behalf of the LCTPC collaboration -Uwe Renz- University of Freiburg Albert-Ludwigs- University Freiburg Physics Department.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Introduction of my work AYAKO HIEI (AYA) Hiroshima Univ 2008/5/30 me.
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Calorimeters in HEP Add hermiticity CC event - calibration
Experimental Particle Physics
Plans for checking hadronic energy
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
Experimental Particle Physics
Particles going through matter
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

Spring, 2009Phys 521A1 Charged particle tracking

Spring, 2009Phys 521A2 Charged particle tracking Detectors provide position estimates of ionization deposits in either 2D or 3D Need to “connect the dots” to determine particle trajectories (tracks) Measure momentum trans- verse to a uniform magnetic field Detect particle position with a minimum of material (limit interactions, multiple Coulomb scattering) Occupancy, 2-track resolution high point density low point density

Spring, 2009Phys 521A3 Momentum measurement Often put detectors in a magnetic field to allow momentum measurement in the plane transverse to the field: –dp/dt = zevxB from which |p T | = zeRB –For p T in GeV, p T = 0.3zRB, with R in meters, B in Tesla Full momentum requires additional measurement of track angle w.r.t. magnetic field Curvature is measured; for an arc section this corresponds to measuring the sagitta Uncertainty in curvature measurement κ set by detector Uncertainty in p t is then δp t = z B δκ / κ 2 so σ(p t ) = p t 2 [σ(κ) / 0.15 z B], i.e. is proportional to p t 2.

Spring, 2009Phys 521A4 Magnets Resolution criteria for charged particle momentum measurements often require strong (Tesla-scale), uniform magnetic fields over large volumes –Enormous physical forces  robust mechanical structures –Need to contain field  iron return yoke –Now almost always superconducting to reduce power consumption and cooling requirements Geometries: –Fixed target – usually dipole field –Colliding beam – axial (at center), toroidal (at large radii) Material budget: magnet plus cryostat represent “dead” material, degrade resolution of external calorimeters –EM calorimeters often designed to sit inside magnet

Spring, 2009Phys 521A5

Spring, 2009Phys 521A6 Calibration Calibration needs –Electronics (gain, time offsets, noise thresholds) –Geometric (field distortions, mechanical tolerances, wire sag…) –Dedicated system required (e.g. a laser)? –Time variation of calibrations Once and for all (e.g., endplate hole positions, magnetic field mapping…) Continuous (atmospheric pressure, temperature…) Sporadic (changes in gas mixture or HV settings…) Often takes years to get optimum resolution performance, and systematic errors due to calibration can still dominate the measurement of some track parameters (e.g. impact parameter)

Spring, 2009Phys 521A7 Alignment Bootstrapping calibration using real tracks usually needed; implies statistical uncertainty on calibration parameters  systematic uncertainty on hit positions, often correlated between hits Alignment with other detectors also needed (rotations and offsets)

Spring, 2009Phys 521A8 Calorimeters

Spring, 2009Phys 521A9 Electromagnetic calorimeters Calorimeters measure deposited energy; initial particle is destroyed Recall basic features of EM cascades –Bremsstrahlung and pair production in stages –Particle number grows exponentially until (E 0 /N) < E C –Both N and deposited ionization from e ± are proportional to E 0 –Longitudinal development governed by radiation length X 0 –Transverse shower size governed by multiple Coulomb scattering; parameterized using Moliere radius R M Two types of EM calorimeters: –Homogeneous (100% active medium) –Sampling (absorber and active layers interspersed) Physical size dictated by X 0 of medium, so most use high-Z material

Spring, 2009Phys 521A10

Spring, 2009Phys 521A11 Homogeneous calorimeters Not finely segmented Cost is often high Issues with uniformity, surface properties (tot. int. refl.) Measured quantity = light output in ~visible range Two main types: –Inorganic scintillators (e.g. CsI(Tl)) High light yield Slow signal development (100s of ns) –Cherenkov light (e.g. lead glass) Lower yield (<0.1% relative to scintillators) prompt signal

Spring, 2009Phys 521A12 Sampling EM calorimeters High-z absorber interspersed with sensitive element Detect number of shower particles or ionization using scintillating tiles or fibers, MWPC, liquid noble gases, solid state detectors Flexible segmentation allows measurement of both longitudinal and transverse shower development Sampling fraction: Resolution:

Spring, 2009Phys 521A13 Energy resolution Shower energy proportional to detected signal (energy or number of particles)  σ(E)/E = a / √E Contrast with tracking in B field, where σ(p t ) = C p t 2 In addition to statistical behavior, systematic uncertainties enter resolution –Shower leakage (lack of containment), gain calibration, non- linearity of response σ(E)/E = b –Electronic noise: not proportional to detected energy, so from this source σ(E)/E = c / E Statistic fluctuations “Constant term” (calibration, non-linearity, etc Noise, etc

Spring, 2009Phys 521A14 Typical EM energy resolution Homogeneous calorimeters: Sampling calorimeters:

Spring, 2009Phys 521A15 Electromagnetic Shower Development Some considerations on energy resolution Energy leakage Longitudinal leakage More X 0 needed to contain  initiated shower Lateral leakage ~ No energy dependence EGS4 simulations From Mauricio Barbi, TSI’07 lectures

Spring, 2009Phys 521A16

Spring, 2009Phys 521A17 Calorimeter reconstruction Transform ADC counts to energy (next slide) Form clusters from regions of contiguous energy deposit; –Many algorithms available, e.g. simple nσ noise cut, separate cuts for cluster seed, surrounding cells (4/2/0…) –separation or not of local cluster maxima into sub-clusters… –Determine cluster position (energy-weighted sum) Additional corrections based on environment –Charged track pointing to cluster or not? –Cluster size/shape consistent with e /γ?

Spring, 2009Phys 521A18 Calorimeter calibration Electronic calibration – response to known input pulses, determine rms noise (pedestal), gain –Changes in time due to aging of sensors, electronics Absolute energy calibration: ADC counts / MeV, requires calibration source of known energy (can be from data) –Changes in time as active medium ages (radiation, chemical…) Correction for “pile-up” of ionizing radiation –Depends sensitively on response time of detector –Out-of-time energy from previous collisions, cosmic rays, delayed decays of excited nuclei… –In-time multiple interactions (e.g. at LHC)