Longitudinal Dynamics in Linear Non- scaling FFAGs using High-frequency (≥100 MHz) RF Principal Cast of Characters in the U.S./Canada: C. Johnstone, S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linear Non-scaling FFAGs for Rapid Acceleration using High-frequency (≥100 MHz) RF Linear Non-scaling FFAGs for Rapid Acceleration using High-frequency.
Advertisements

EMMA Upgrade: Slow Acceleration with Low-Frequency Cavity J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory 12 March 2010.
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
FODO-based Quadrupole Cooling Channel M. Berz, D. Errede, C. Johnstone, K. Makino, Dave Neuffer, Andy Van Ginneken.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation- Variation and 0ptimization David Neuffer, A. Poklonskiy Fermilab.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
Linear Non-scaling FFAGs for Rapid Acceleration using High-frequency (≥100 MHz) RF Linear Non-scaling FFAGs for Rapid Acceleration using High-frequency.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Poster reference: FR5PFP025 Extending the Energy Range of 50Hz Proton FFAGs S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Magnetic.
Large Dynamic Acceptance and Rapid Acceleration in a Nonscaling FFAG C. Johnstone Fermilab Shane Koscielniak Triumf WG1 NuFact02 July 4 Imperial College,
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field Nonscaling FFAG Lattice Design C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG07 April 12-17, 2007 LPSC, Grenoble,
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
FFAG Hardware development for EMMA Electron Model with Many Applications Electron Model with Muon Applications C. Johnstone, Fermilab NuFact05 INFN, Frascotti,
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Novel Constant-Frequency Acceleration Technique for Nonscaling Muon FFAGs Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, October 2004 Classical scaling FFAGs (MURA) have geometrically.
Bucketless Acceleration in nonscaling FFAG’s & Sketches of muon and electron machines Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada April 2004  Phase.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
FFAG’s Wonderful World of Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamics  Phase space properties of pendula with nonlinear dependence of ‘speed’ on momentum – characterized.
FFAG Tune-stabilized, Linear-field FFAG C. Johnstone, Fermilab S. Koscielniak, TRIUMF FFAG06 Japan f Fermilab.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Part I Optics. FFAG is “Fixed Field Alternating Gradient”. Ordinary synchrotron needs ramping magnets to keep the orbit radius constant. FFAG has Alternating.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
FFAG Acceleration David Neuffer Fermilab FFAG Workshop ‘03.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Crossing transition at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, N.Abreu, M. Brennan, M.Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, R. Lee, S.Tepikian.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
E.Wildner NUFACT09 School 1 Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Elena Wildner.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Hardware development for EMMA
Large Booster and Collider Ring
The Strong RF Focusing:
Multiturn extraction for PS2
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
PHY 554 Fundamentals of Accelerator Physics Lecture 12: Longitudinal Dynamics October 10, 2018 Vladimir N. Litvinenko
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
Presentation transcript:

Longitudinal Dynamics in Linear Non- scaling FFAGs using High-frequency (≥100 MHz) RF Principal Cast of Characters in the U.S./Canada: C. Johnstone, S. Berg, S. Koscielniak, B. Palmer, D. Trbojevic July 08, 2003 FFAG03KEK Tsukuba, Japan

Rapid Acceleration In a fast regime—applicable to unstable particles—where acceleration is completed in a few to a few tens of turns Magnetic field cannot be ramped Magnetic field cannot be ramped RF parameters are fixed—no phase/voltage compensation is feasible RF parameters are fixed—no phase/voltage compensation is feasible operate at or near the rf crest operate at or near the rf crest Fixed-field lattices have been developed which can contain up to a factor of 4 change in energy; typical is a factor of 3 There are two main types of fixed field lattices under development: Scaling FFAG (Fixed Field Alternating Gradient) Linear, nonscaling FFAG

Scaling FFAGs (radial sector): The B field and orbit are constructed such that the B field scales with radius/momentum such that the optics remain constant as a function of momentum. Scaling machines display almost unlimited momentum acceptance, and a somewhat restricted transverse acceptance. KEK, Nufact02, London

Perk of Fast Acceleration Freedom to cross betatron resonances: –optics change slowly with energy –allows lattice to be constructed from linear magnetic elements (dipoles and quadrupoles only) This supplies the basic concept for a linear non-scaling FFAG

Example: a 6-20 GeV (early version) linear nonscaling FFAG; presented at Snowmass01 optics and cell phase advances vary during acceleration cycle Resonances are suppressed Linear magnetic fields imply linear transverse dynamics Correspondingly large transverse dynamic aperture in addition to unlimited momentum acceptance Circumference2041 / 2355 m Poletip field6T / 2T Cell typeFODO Number314 Length6.5 / 7.5 m “F” length0.15 / 0.45 “D” length0.35 / 1.05 Gradient75.9 / 25.3 T-m 6-GeVphase adv./cell 162  20-GeV phase adv./cell 29  6-GeV max orbit disp.-7.5 cm 20-GeV max orbit disp.+7.1 cm

Travails of Rapid Fixed Field Acceleration  A pathology of fixed-field acceleration in recirculating-beam accelerators (for single, not multiple arcs) is that the particle beam transits the radial aperture  The orbit change is significant and leads to non-isochronism, or a lack of synchronism with the accelerating rf  The result is an unavoidable phase slippage of the beam particles relative to the rf waveform and eventual loss of net acceleration with The lattice completely determining the orbit change with momentum = circulation time (for ultra relativistic particles) The lattice completely determining the orbit change with momentum = circulation time (for ultra relativistic particles) The rf frequency and voltage determining the phase slippage which accumulates on a per turn basis: The rf frequency and voltage determining the phase slippage which accumulates on a per turn basis:

Simplifying concepts for longitudinal dynamics no longer apply ► Transition ► Transport of rf buckets ► Phase stability ► Synchrotron oscillations ► Harmonic number ► ….

Orbit Dependency in FFAGs In a scaling FFAG, the orbits are parallel, radially staggered outward as a function of energy, and therefore the pathlength, or  T, as a function of energy or turn is approximately linear. In a scaling FFAG, the orbits are parallel, radially staggered outward as a function of energy, and therefore the pathlength, or  T, as a function of energy or turn is approximately linear. In a nonscaling linear FFAG, the orbital pathlength, or  T, is parabolic with energy. In a nonscaling linear FFAG, the orbital pathlength, or  T, is parabolic with energy.

Longitudinal dynamics during acceleration are completely determined by the nature and location of the fixed points— In the presence of changing orbital conditions, the fixed points are dictated by The choice of rf frequency The choice of rf frequency Motion away about the fixed points is given by Rf voltage (for example the rf bucket height in conventional synchrotron acceleration) Rf voltage (for example the rf bucket height in conventional synchrotron acceleration)

Example: Choice of synchronous orbits In the case of a scaling FFAG, an appropriate choice of rf frequency allows the sign of the phase slip to change once; with the relative phase of the beam crossing the crest of the rf twice In a linear, non-scaling FFAG, the phase-slip can reverse twice with an implied potential for beam’s arrival time to cross the crest three times,

General Formalism for Longitudinal Dynamics of Acceleration Orthodox particle accelerators are predicated on the use of systems which are oscillators for excursions about a fixed reference orbit. The FFAGs, in particular, provide an opportunity to consider reference orbits which are themselves nonlinear oscillators: Where x is the relative arrival time so it follows the orbital pathlength changes and is ultimately associated with the running phase relation to the rf. y  (E - E c ) or the difference energy relative to a defined central energy which is the orbit chosen synchronous with the rf.)

Define Different Modes of Acceleration 1. a=b=0 : acceleration voltage is independent of momentum On-momentum beam is accelerated at the fixed point; (describes conventional synchrotron/cyclotron acceleration) 2. a=b=1: orbital frequency, and phase-slip/turn is linearly dependent on momentum; acceleration profile depends on rf frequency and voltage (describes scaling FFAG acceleration) 3. a=b=2: orbital frequency and phase-slip/turn has a quadratic dependence on momentum; acceleration profile depends on rf frequency and voltage (describes non-scaling FFAG acceleration)

Example: Choice of rf-synchronous orbits In the case of a scaling FFAG, an appropriate choice of rf frequency allows the sign of the phase slip to change once; with the relative phase of the beam crossing the crest of the rf twice In a linear, non-scaling FFAG, the phase-slip can reverse twice with an implied potential for beam’s arrival time to cross the crest three times,

2 nd case: Scaling FFAG Linear Dependence of Pathlength on Momentum  The motion is determined by the location and nature of the (single) fixed points and the contours of constant Hamiltonian as plotted in the following figures.  Although the solution is identical to a conventional synchroton rf bucket (libration above and below and the separatrix and rotation within), it is stationary. Acceleration occurs by injecting at the bottom and extracting at the top (1/2 synchrotron oscillation). Linear oscillator for =1 (top) and =1 (bottom)

Of particular interest: 3 rd case  Is the case a=b=2, which is representative of the quadratic pathlength dependence of the nonscaling FFAG.  For this case there are two stable fixed points x 1,2 = ±(1,1) and two unstable fixed points x 5,6 = ± (- 1,1). The following figures show contours of constant hamiltonian and how the topography changes in response to varying Parabolic oscillator for =1/2

The changes are discontinuous at =1  For 1 there is a sideways/upwards serpentine path and for  1 there is a trapping of two counter-rotating eddies within a background flow stream. Bi-parabolic oscillator: = 1/10 = 1 = 2

Discrete Acceleration  The initial equation is an isolated resonance. It is easiest to first reproduce acceleration in a discrete location or set of lumped cavities: where T c =L c /c represents a choice of “central orbit” at the central energy, E c and  T=  L/c,  L=L-L c, which has a linear or quadratic energy dependence for a scaling or nonscaling FFAG, respectively.  Here you can see 1-x 2 →cos(xπ/2) for both cases and the periodicity of fixed points becomes much richer.

We have for: A linear pathlength dependence: scaling FFAG  Model equations give for a scaling FFAG  Here the changes are continuous, but there is a minimum voltage where “bucket” height must equal the difference between extraction and injection energy Linear pendulum =1 =4

Quadratic pathlength dependence: nonscaling FFAG  Model equations give for a nonscaling FFAG  Here the changes are discontinuous at = 2/3 Quadratic pendulum =1/4 =2/3 =4/3

Two modes of acceleration in a nonscaling FFAG when > 2/3  A bunch can be accelerated about a fixed point, starting at the bottom and ½ a synchrotron oscillation later extracted above the fixed point, over a total possible range in y of 3 units (the crest of the waveform is crossed twice). This is the only mode of acceleration possible in a scaling FFAG with high frequency rf. However,  A serpentine libration flows along y = (-2,+2,-2,+2…) while x increases without limit. This “gutter” feature can be used to augment the range of acceleration, the crest of the waveform is crossed three times giving a greater energy gain of 4 units in y.

Width or phase space acceptance of gutter depends on cavity voltage above the critical value of c =2/3 Quadratic pathlength dependence, or nonscaling FFAG

Characterizing nonlinear acceleration “Bucket” height about fixed point and gutter height, black and red curves, respectively, as a function of / c Particle motion along a gutter

Distributed/Nondistributed rf cavities  Phase advance vs. location criteria allow the cavities to obey this discrete set of equations on an individual cavity basis even when they are not lumped; you could simply space them by 2nπ, for example.  One can now solve for an optimum frequency which applies to any cavity configuration (it is actually synchronous with the orbit at two energies) and minimize with respect to the reference particle in bunch: Linear sum of the phase slip Rms of the phase slip Both stratedgies are “asynchronous”; in the first the initial cavity phases are identical, the second allows the initial phases to vary cavity to cavity.

Fixed Initial Phase: Strategy  In effect you are free to pick L s, ω, and V such that for a single reference particle at each cavity,  φ total =Σδφ turn =0 †, and there is no net phase slip for the reference particle only. This is equivalent to minimizing the phase of the reference particle relative to the crest of the rf. Accumulated phase slip is not zero for off-energy particles and continues to increase on a per turn basis; with the inevitable consequence that more and more particles are lost as a function of number of turns.  If the frequency of the bunch train = the optimal frequency of the rf, a bunch train can be maintained and accelerated with the same longitudinal dynamics. † Optimal frequency under this condition occurs when the reference particle spends equal intervals in time (or energy) in pathlength regions above and below the two points at which the phase slip reverses.

Optimal Choice of rf Frequency Optimizes transmission by correctly positioning injection within the gutter channel

Variable-Phasing of Cavities: Strategy  This approach more closely addresses the phase slippage of a distribution—the beginning phase of each cavity is adjusted to minimize the rms of the phase slip of the reference particle relative to “ideal” acceleration (ideal phasing is where the phase of a cavity is adjusted on a per turn basis to match the arrival time of a reference particle.)  This also implies the rf frequency, in addition to a variable initial phase for each cavity around the ring, can be chosen to minimize the rms phase slippage of the distribution. (Cavity frequencies are not individually varied however).  Minimizes Σ  δφ turn  ; produces slightly better extracted phase space distributions, but does not increase the number of turns.

Ideal Phasing  Even with synchronous phasing because of the nonlinear phase relation of off-energy particles, the centroid energy of the distribution does not concide with the reference particle, which is on-crest at every cavity crossing: Centroid energy versus arrival phase for 5(black), 6(red), 7(green), 8(blue), 12(cyan), 16(magenta), and 20 (coral) turns.

In the following...  over factor - represents the increased rf voltage relative to pure crest acceleration from injection to extraction   E - the relative increase in energy from injection to extraction: this is found to be somewhat variable due to the nonlinear acceleration of the beam centroid.  accept - the emittance effectively accelerated to extraction in eV-sec (0.5 eV-sec has been the nominal longitudinal emittance/bunch of upstream systems)   - the average value of the cosine at the time of cavity crossing which is a measure of efficient usage of cavity voltage  - is of course the nonlinear oscillator parameter defined in the equations

Ideal synchronous phasing: Particle tracking results

Asynchronous rf phasing: Comparison with model

Particle Tracking: Asynchronous rf phasing (fixed initial phase)

Particle Tracking: Asynchronous rf phasing continued (fixed initial phase)

Particle tracking: Asynchronous rf Phasing (variable initial phase/cavity)

Phase distribution: Asynchronous rf

Addition of higher harmonics: asynchronous rf phasing (fixed initial cavity phases)  Increases area and quality of transmitted phase space; does not appreciably increase the number of achievable turns. Fundamental only Addition of 2 nd harmonic Addition of 3 rd harmonic

5-turn, 200 MHz Acceleration--Output Longitudinal Phase Space Output phase space with asynchronous, variable initial phases and 40% overvoltage (left) and with dual harmonic (right) Typical  10% input phase space (left) which corresponds to the output phase space (right) using Synchronous Phases

Asynchronous rf phasing, fixed initial cavity phase

Asynchronous rf phasing: variable initial cavity phasing

Summary: FFAGs and high-frequency rf FFAG03, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan  Limiting number of turns: MHz due to phase slippage  Rf voltage requirements at 200 MHz: ≥2 GV/turn, 8 turns  Improved phase space transmission 5-8 turns asynchronous rf phasing varying starting cavity phase  Addition of higher harmonics 2 nd harmonic almost doubles the transmitted phase space 2 nd and 3 rd improve quality of transmitted phase space  To achieve higher # of turns/lower rf voltage requires Smaller phase slippage: reduce energy range/lattice development Smaller input bunch lengths: higher/lower rf frequency in bunch train/FFAG—bunch at 200 MHz and accelerate at 100 MHz and fill every 2nd buckets in a bunch train? Reduce bunch length, increase momentum spread--need for a phase rotation stage? C. Johnstone, et al