CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM Zagreb, 12 December 2006 Dr. Elisabet.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OSHA’s Revised Hazard Communication Standard
Advertisements

2013 Training Requirements for the Revised OSHA Hazard Communication Standard This presentation (“Employers Hazcom Training Requirements”) summarizes the.
WCAM GHS Training December Introduction  The federal Hazard Communication Standard says that you have a “Right-To-Know” what hazards you face on.
GHS Globally Harmonized System
CLP (Implementation of GHS in Europe) Lars S. Rasmussen, The Wercs 2009 Global User Group June 2009 The Desmond Hotel, Albany, NY.
1. European Commission Status GHS Implementation in the European Community Global Thematic Workshop on Strengthening Capacities to Implement the GHS Johannesburg.
Background – Scope and Development of the GHS as an International System Hazard Classification – Physical Hazards – Health Hazards – Environmental Hazards.
1. European Commission GHS Implementation Status in the European Community FORUM V Budapest UNITAR Side event 27 September 2006 Wolfgang Hehn European.
Hazard Communication & Global Harmonization. Objectives Know basic requirements of OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard Understand the new Global Harmonization.
Hazard Communication 2013 OSHA 29 CFR
 Chemical manufacturers & importers must classify each chemical produced or imported. They must: Determine the appropriate hazard classes & associated.
DATE  Understand Hazard Communication including revisions to GHS  Label Requirements  Safety Data Sheets.
OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Updated- What You Need to Know to be in Compliance Presented By: Heather Stiner, SSPC.
Hazard Communication Standard Updates O Introduction to Globally Harmonized System (GHS) O Label Elements and Safety Data Sheets (SDS)
Hazard Communication Standard Globally Harmonized System (GHS) of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals Kathleen Park Medical Technology Program Austin.
Global Harmonization for Construction Industry Pictograms Michael S. Allen Safety Compliance Manager (434)
MIOSHA Update Hazard Communication Training Including GHS Revisions.
The GHS: Overview Presentation Peter Haynes Regional Workshop on Chemical Hazard Communication and GHS Implementation for Countries of ASEAN 17 October.
OSHA Hazard Communication
Integration of Globally Harmonized System (GHS) into the Army Hazard Communication Program UNCLASSIFIED.
Prepared by Consultation Education & Training (CET) Division Michigan Occupational Safety & Health Administration Michigan Department of Licensing and.
Answers the question “What does OSHA mean by…?”  HazCom 2012 Nomenclature Descriptors The terms used for establishing the organization, the scope, and.
Introduction to the Global Harmonization System, GHS
The GHS: A Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals Andrew Fasey Framing.
Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication
Filename -1. Old Label Definition Any written, printed, or graphic material displayed on or affixed to containers of hazardous chemicals.
8/17/20151 Hazard Communication with Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) Update.
(Organisation for Economic Coopération and Development)
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling (GHS)
Hazcom 2012 – The Right to Understand What is the GHS? The GHS is an acronym for The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication
Dropping the M: From MSDS to SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
REVISED HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD INCLUDING GHS REVISIONS
Chemical labeling is changing to help make it easier for us to understand the products we use so we can continue to be safe. The GHS is an international.
OSHA created the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) to protect workers from injuries and illnesses associated with chemical exposure in the workplace.
Globally Harmonized System Hazard Communication
SSSG 2007 Global Harmonization System. What is GHS ? GHS is an international system designed to standardize the communication of hazardous substances.
The GHS: Overview Presentation George Thomas Thai National GHS Workshop May
CLP Up-date (The classification, labelling and packaging of chemical substances and mixtures) (DIRECTIVE 2008/112/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF.
What is CLP Regulation ? ✔ CLP will completely replace the actual Dangerous Substance Directive until June 2015 ✔ It is the new European Regulation on.
The Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Richard Pont, adapted for 2003 North American Pesticide Applicator Certification.
What does WHMIS mean? W Workplace H Hazardous M Materials I Information S System WHMIS is a Canada wide hazard communication system developed to provide.
OSHA Revised Hazard Communication Standard What you need to know and your responsibility under the new rules.
There is no evaluation associated with this lesson.
Copyright ©2012 Progressive Business Publications 1 Hazard Communication & The Globally Harmonized System.
GHS Hazard Communication
Hazard Communication & The Global Harmonization System.
Safety Symbols and Labels
November 2013 California State University, Northridge Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry.
Rutherford County Government. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard is designed to protect against.
© 2013 WAXIE Sanitary Supply(800) | GHS | TRAINING | LABELS | SDS For Internal Use Only The Globally Harmonized System Employee.
OSHA HAZCOM 2012 (GHS) Training
Purpose, Scope and Application of the GHS 1. The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) is a rational and comprehensive.
The Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Hazard Classification and Labelling Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication, Not Just the City.
GHS and RiskAssess - new developments Phillip Crisp and Eva Crisp.
EU implementation of GHS-CLP Regulation
® ® Striving For Safety Excellence Corporate Environmental, Safety, Risk Management Hazard Communication OSHA Standard Including Globally Harmonized.
GHS Hazard Communication Revised: 01/26/2016. What is GHS? GHS stands for the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources Session Objectives Identify a chemical using its label Interpret the signal word on the label Recognize the.
Classification. Hazard Classification The GHS is designed to identify and classify the “hazards” of the substances or mixtures, and to communicate those.
Hazard Communication & The Global Harmonization System.
Herman Jett Area Manager Cal/OSHA Consultation Services for Los Angeles and Orange Counties 1 Centerpointe Drive Suite 150 La Palma, CA
WHMIS 2015.
Hazard Communication Standard Updates
WHMIS Awareness Training
Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Employee Required Training By December 1, 2013 Train Employees on the new label elements and the Safety Data Sheet (SDS)
Hazard Communication Update
SAFETY IN THE LAB Observe the diagram on the next slide and identify as many safety errors/concerns as possible. Circle the safety concern and number it.
HAZARD COMMUNICATION.
Presentation transcript:

CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM Zagreb, 12 December 2006 Dr. Elisabet Berggren European Chemicals Bureau Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General Joint Research Centre European Commission

A NEW REGULATION IMPLEMENTING THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM (GHS) OF CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING OF CHEMICALS - DRAFT DEVELOPED BY DG ENTR IN COLLABORATION WITH DG ENV AND DG JRC (ECB) - COMMISSION PROPOSAL: DECEMBER 2006 (HOPEFULLY) - POSSIBLE TIMING FOR ENTERING INTO FORCE: 2008 CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIRECTIVE 67/548/EEC

CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM 4. TASKS OF THE ECB 1. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION 2. LABELLING 3. WHO IS DOING CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING AND FOR WHOM

CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM 1. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION 2. LABELLING 4. TASKS OF THE ECB 3. WHO IS DOING CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING AND FOR WHOM

1. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION 1.1 PHYSICAL HAZARDS 1.2 HAZARDS TO HUMAN HEALTH 1.3 HAZARDS TO ENVIRONMENT

1.1 PHYSICAL HAZARDS EXPLOSIVES OXIDISING SUBSTANCES/ PREPARATIONS EXTREMELY FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES / PREPARATIONS HIGHLY FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES / PREPARATIONS REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER SUBSTANCES / PREPARATIONS WITH OTHER PHYSICAL PROPERTIES MAY FORM EXPLOSIVE PEROXIDES FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES / PREPARATIONS

1.1 PHYSICAL HAZARDS EXPLOSIVES OXIDISING GASES FLAMMABLE GASES FLAMMABLE AEROSOLS FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS FLAMMABLE SOLIDS OXIDISING LIQUIDS OXIDISING SOLIDS GASES UNDER PRESSURE SELF-REACTIVES PYROPHORIC LIQUIDS PYROPHORIC SOLIDS SELF-HEATING SUBSTANCES SUBSTANCES WHICH IN CONTACT WITH WATER EMIT FLAMMABLE GASES ORGANIC PEROXIDES CORROSIVE TO METALS

1. 2 HAZARDS TO HUMAN HEALTH CANCEROGENICITY LONG-TERM TOXICITY IRRITATION CORROSION SENSITISATION MUTAGENICITY TOXICITY TO REPRODUCTION ACUTE TOXICITY OTHER TOXIC PROPERTIES TOXICITY VIA LACTATION NARCOTIC EFFECTS

1.2 HAZARDS TO HUMAN HEALTH CANCEROGENICITY RESPIRATORY OR SKIN SENSITISATION SERIOUS EYE DAMAGE/ EYE IRRITATION CORROSION/ IRRITATION SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY – SINGLE EXPOSURE GERM CELL MUTAGENICITY REPRODUCTION TOXICITY ACUTE TOXICITY SPECIFIC TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY – REPEATED EXPOSURE ASPIRATION HAZARD

1.3 HAZARDS TO ENVIRONMENT TOXICITY TO AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT DANGEROUS FOR THE OZONE LAYER VERY TOXIC & LONG-TERM ADVERSE EFFECT TOXIC & LONG-TERM ADVERSE EFFECT HARMFUL & LONG-TERM ADVERSE EFFECT LONG-TERM ADVERSE EFFECT

1.3 HAZARDS TO ENVIRONMENT HAZARDOUS TO THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT HAZARDOUS TO THE OZONE LAYER AQUATIC ACUTE AQUATIC CHRONIC CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 CATEGORY 3 CATEGORY 4 ADDITIONAL EU HAZARD CLASS

CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM 1. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION 2. LABELLING 4. TASKS OF THE ECB 3. WHO IS DOING CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING AND FOR WHOM

2. LABELLING 2.2 WHERE DO WE SEE THESE LABELS? 2.1 HOW DOES IT LOOK LIKE? WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE? WHERE WILL WE SEE THESE LABELS?

2.1 HOW DOES IT LOOK LIKE? LABELLING ELEMENTS: 1.SYMBOLS 2.RISK PHRASES 3.SAFETY PHRASES Very toxic to aquatic organisms This material and its container must be disposed as hazardous waste N

WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE? LABELLING ELEMENTS: 1.PICTOGRAMS 2.SIGNAL WORDS 3.HAZARD STATEMENTS 4.PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Very toxic to aquatic life Avoid release to the environment. Collect spillage. Dispose of contents/container to… WARNING

PHYSICAL CHEMICAL HAZARDS HAZARDS TO HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS TO ENVIRONMENT SYMBOLS

PHYSICAL HAZARDS HAZARDS TO HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS TO ENVIRONMENT SYMBOLS

PHYSICAL HAZARDS HAZARDS TO HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS TO ENVIRONMENT SYMBOLS – TRANSPORT SYMBOLS ON SINGLE PACKAGES

SIGNAL WORDS DANGER WARNING NO SYMBOL

RISK PHRASES – HAZARD STATEMENTS EXPLOSIVES ACUTE TOXIC VERY TOXIC ORAL R2: Risk of explosion by shock, friction, fire other sources of ignition R28: Very toxic if swallowed EXPLOSIVES ACUTE TOXIC CATEGORY 1 ORAL H202: Explosive, severe projection hazard H300: Fatal if swallowed DIVISION 1.2

SAFETY PHRASES – PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS EXPLOSIVES ACUTE TOXIC VERY TOXIC ORAL S2: Keep out of reach of children S36/37: Wear suitable protective clothes and gloves ACUTE TOXIC CATEGORY 1 ORAL P264: Wash…thoroughly EXPLOSIVES P370+P380: In case of fire: evacuate area DIVISION 1.2

2.2 WHERE DO WE SEE THESE LABELS? WHERE WILL WE SEE THESE LABELS? +

CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM 1. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION 2. LABELLING 4. TASKS OF THE ECB 3. WHO IS DOING CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING AND FOR WHOM

3.1 HARMONISED CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING vs SELF- CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING 3.2 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN 3.3 DOWNSTREAM LEGISLATION 3. WHO IS DOING CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING AND FOR WHOM

SUBSTANCES: SOME SUBSTANCES HAVE A COMPLETELY HARMONISED AND LEGALLY BINDING CLASSIFICATION THROUGH ANNEX I TO DIRECTIVE 67/548 SUBSTANCES NOT LISTED IN ANNEX I ARE SUBJECT TO ‘SELF- CLASSIFICATION’ IN ACCORDANCE TO THE SAME CRITERIA 3.1 HARMONISED CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING vs SELF- CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING SUBSTANCES: SOME SUBSTANCES HAVE A COMPLETETLY OR PARTIALLY HARMONISED AND LEGALLY BINDING CLASSIFICATION THROUGH ANNEX VI TO THE NEW REGULATION SUBSTANCES NOT LISTED IN ANNEX VI ARE SUBJECT TO ‘SELF-CLASSIFICATION’ IN ACCORDANCE TO THE SAME CRITERIA AND THESE CLASSIFICATIONS MUST BE REGISTERED IN THE C&L INVENTORY PREPARATIONS: ALL PREPARATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO ‘SELF-CLASSIFICATION’ IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CRITERIA IN DIRECTIVE 67/548 AND ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR PREPARATIONS IN DIRECTIVE 1999/45 MIXTURES: ALL MIXTURES ARE SUBJECT TO ‘SELF- CLASSIFICATION’ IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CRITERIA IN THE NEW REGULATION

THE ONE PLACING THE SUBSTANCE OR MIXTURE ON THE MARKET MUST CLASSIFY AND LABEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIRECTIVE 67/548 ‘PLACING ON THE MARKET’ MEANS MAKING AVAILABLE TO THIRD PARTIES. IMPORTATION INTO THE COMMUNITY CUSTOMS TERRITORY SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE PLACING ON THE MARKET FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS DIRECTIVE. 3.2 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN THE MANUFACTURER, IMPORTER OR DOWNSTREAM USER PLACING THE SUBSTANCE OR MIXTURE ON THE MARKET MUST CLASSIFY AND LABEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW REGULATION THE DISTRIBUTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE LABEL IS CORRECT AND UNCHANGED ON THE FINAL PACKAGE THE DEFINITIONS OF MANUFACTURER, IMPORTER, DOWNSTREAM USER AND DISTRIBUTOR ARE THE SAME AS IN REACH

PREPARATIONS (1999/45/EC) RESTRICTIONS ON MARKETING AND USE (76/769/EEC) WORKPLACE PROTECTION (98/24/EC) SEVESO – MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS (96/82/EC) COSMETICS (2003/15/EC) HAZARDOUS WASTE (91/689/EC) EXPORT-IMPORT (304/2003) PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS (91/414/EEC) BIOCIDES (98/8/EC) … and others 3.3 DOWNSTREAM LEGISLATION ALL PROVISONS UNDER THIS DIRECTIVE ARE INCLUDED UNDER THE NEW REGULATION

CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM 4. TASKS OF THE ECB 1. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION 2. LABELLING 3. WHO IS DOING CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING AND FOR WHOM

4. TASKS OF THE ECB 4.1 PREPARATION OF DISCUSSIONS OF C&L UNDER DIRECTIVE 67/ CHAIRING OF MEETINGS WITH EXPERTS 4.3 FOLLOW-UP 4.4 ASSISTING IN DRAFTING THE NEW REGULATIUON 4.5 RIP PREPARING FOR HANDING OVER TO THE AGENCY

1.SET UP AGENDA AND CALL FOR RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION 2.WRITTEN PROCEDURES AND PREPARATION OF DIUSCUSSION Draft AGENDA Technical Committee on Classification and Labelling of Dangerous Substances Meeting on Health Effects of Plant Protection Products and Biocides Hotel Concorde, Arona November PREPARATION OF DISCUSSIONS OF C&L UNDER DIRECTIVE 67/548

4.2 CHAIRING OF MEETINGS WITH EXPERTS DIFFERENT TYPE OF EXPERTS’ MEETINGS: 1.THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING (TC C&L) 2.AD-HOC MEETINGS, FOR EXAMPLE WITH THE EXPERTS ON PHYSICAL CHEMICAL EXPERTS 3.SPECIALISED EXPERTS MEETINGS ON CANCEROGENICITY, MUTAGENICITY OR REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY

4.3 FOLLOW-UP 1.FOLLOW-UP TO DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 2.DRAFTING DETAILED SUMMARY RECORDS OF DISCUSSIONS AT THE MEETINGS 3.PREPARE DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT TO TECHNICAL PROGRESS TO DIRECTIVE 67/548/EEC AND FORWARD TO DG ENV

DRAFT DEVELOPED BY DG ENTR IN COLLABORATION WITH DG ENV AND DG JRC (ECB), WORK STARTED SEPTEMBER 2005 PUBLIC INTERNET CONSULTATION (21 AUGUST-21 OCTOBER 2006) FINALCOMMISSION PROPOSAL: DECEMBER 2006 (HOPEFULLY) POSSIBLE TIMING FOR ENTERING INTO FORCE: ASSISTING IN DRAFTING THE NEW REGULATIUON

GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY TO BE DEVELOPPED DURING 2007 BASED ON THE NEW REGULATION WITH HELP OF THE EXISTING NET OF EXPERTS CONNECTED TO TC C&L 4.5 RIP 3.6

FROM OCTOBER 2006: NEW CLASSIFICATION PROPOSALS PREPARED BY MEMBER STATES SHALL BE PRESENTED IN ANNEX VI (TO REACH) FORMAT CLASSIFICATION PROPOSALS SHALL BE UPDATED WITH THE TC C&L DISCUSSION AND THEREBY READDY TO HAND OVER TO THE AGENCY TC C&L RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING ARE MADE BOTH IN THE CURRENT AND THE GHS SYSTEM 4.6 PREPARING FOR HANDING OVER TO THE AGENCY

CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM 4. TASKS OF THE ECB 2. LABELLING 3. WHO IS DOING CLASSIFICATION & LABELLING AND FOR WHOM 1. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION In case of any additional questions after today, please contact: