Slide 1 of 30 Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP); Policies and Procedures for Initial Screening International Society of Regulatory Toxicology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the PCT Audit Procedure Background: The Act was passed in November The Act will be fully in force by January.
EDUCATION Directive 2002/14/EC of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community.
Presentation before the Missouri Bar’s Health and Hospital Law Committee November 18, 2011 Markus P. Cicka, J.D., L.L.M. (Health Law) Director – Missouri.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Briefing for Acting EPA Administrator (Your Name Here) Background on the Alar Situation January 2003 Richard Wilson based upon an analysis by John Graham.
Endocrine Screening – Phase 1 TSCA 8(e) and FIFRA 6(a)(2) Requirements A. Michael Kaplan, Ph.D. December 13, 2010 A. Michael Kaplan & Associates, LLC
Conversation on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) and Critical Infrastructure Protection Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information.
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
Washington State Taxpayer Rights and Responsibilities.
Procedure under the Merger Regulation. Procedure – legal documents The Merger Regulation Art. 4 – notification of concentration Art. 7 – suspension of.
New HR Challenges in the Dynamic Environment of Legal Compliance By Teri J. Elkins.
Section 18 Final Rule Overview Presentation originally given by EPA at Emergency Exemption Process Revisions Workshop, revised by Laura Quakenbush.
Version 6.0 Approved by HIPAA Implementation Team April 14, HIPAA Learning Module The following is an educational Powerpoint presentation on the.
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) 2012
1 Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Implementation Business and Legal Considerations Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance EDSP Phase 2 Policies and Procedures Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY AWARENESS.
Chapter 26 Chapter 11: Plan Confirmation. Disclosure Statement Hearing The disclosure statement hearing is the first step in the Chapter 11 reorganization.
Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) September
1 Disclosures © HIPAA Pros 2002 All rights reserved.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Computerized Networking of HIV Providers Workshop Data Security, Privacy and HIPAA: Focus on Privacy Joy L. Pritts, J.D. Assistant Research Professor Health.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Pre-action Procedure for Financial Cases. Pre-action Procedure- Financial Cases  Rule 1.05(1)- each prospective party to the case must comply with the.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance Timing, Procedural and Legal Issues Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Communication in the Supply Chain
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
Practice Management Quality Control
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
1 CITES Compliance Mechanism CITES Secretariat. 2 Compliance mechanism After much deliberation in a inter-sessional working group, the Parties adopted.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2009 Endocrine Workshop The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
EDSP: T IER 1 T ESTING I NFORMATION C OLLECTION ISRTP 2010 Endocrine Workshop EDSP Compliance December 13, 2010 Susan Ferenc, DVM, Ph.D.
Introduction to Session II: Incorporating Existing Data into the EDSP Erik R. Janus Director, Human Health Policy CropLife America.
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. OECD GUIDELINES: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL APPLICATION Collection Limitation Principle There should be limits to the collection.
Briefing for Acting EPA Administrator (Your Name Here) Background on the Alar Situation January 2010 Richard Wilson.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Initiatives Drive Pediatric Drug Development January 30, 2002.
EDSP Implementation: Concerns for the Pesticide Industry ISRTP 2009 Endocrine Workshop: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
Functioning as a Business Associate Under HIPAA William F. Tulloch Director, PCBA March 9, 2004.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Animal Raising Claims in the Labeling of Meat and Poultry Products October 14, 2008 United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection.
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
1 The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Basic Concepts and Member Obligations.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
The Public Tendering and Bidding (招投标) Law of the People's Republic of China Effective since January 1, 2000.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
How to Put Together an IDE Application
E&O Risk Management: Meeting the Challenge of Change
HIPAA Pros - Disclosures
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 of 30 Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP); Policies and Procedures for Initial Screening International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2009 Endocrine Workshop September 10, 2009

Slide 2 of 30 Roadmap for Today’s Presentation  Introduction & Background  Issuing Test Orders  Initial Response  Forming consortia / cost sharing  Satisfaction of testing requirements – compliance  Data compensation & confidentiality

Slide 3 of 30 Introduction & Background

Slide 4 of 30 Legal Authorities  FFDCA §408(p) Authority for EDSP Testing  FFDCA §408(i) Extension of “FIFRA Protection”  FFDCA §408(f) Authority To Require Data  FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) Authority to Require Data  FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) Data Compensation  FIFRA §3(c)(2)(D) “Formulators’ Exemption”  FIFRA §10(b), 10(g)  TSCA §4  SDWA §1457

Slide 5 of 30 Legal Authorities FFDCA §408(p) - Authority for EDSP Testing  Directs EPA to screen all “pesticide chemicals” for potential to affect endocrine systems  EPA may issue “test orders” to require screening and testing  EPA may send FFDCA §408(p) “test orders” to a registrant or to a manufacturer/importer of a pesticide chemical  Allows enforcement (suspension of registrations) if a registrant fails to comply with a FFDCA §408(p) test order If a non-registrant fails to comply, EPA may impose fines

Slide 6 of 30 EPA’s Policy Goals:  Fulfill FFDCA §408(p)(5) directive: “to the extent practicable... “Minimize duplicative testing” Promote “fair and equitable sharing of test costs” Develop “procedures for handling of [CBI]”  Minimize burden to the extent practical by building on existing procedures & infrastructures Internally (EPA) Externally (Affected Entities)  EPA’s Policies & Procedures appear at: 74 Federal Register17560 (April 15, 2009); pandp_frn_ pdf

Overall Process for EDSP Orders Initial Response 1.Determine Response to the Order 2.Submit Initial Response to EPA within 90 days. Issue Order 1. Identify Chemical for EDSP 2. Identify Order Recipients 3. Complete Order 4. AA Signs Order 5. EPA Issues Order Start Agency End Respondent Process Initial Response 1. Document Response 2. Implement Response as appropriate Implement Response Use existing applicable procedures to implement the action as indicated in their response, includes generate data. Submit Data Use existing applicable procedures to submit data. Process Data Submission 1. Document Data Submission 2. Process as appropriate Monitor Responses 1. Act on non- responders 2. Follow-up on Commitments Slide 7 of 30

Slide 8 of 30 Issuing Test Orders

Slide 9 of 30 Who Would Receive the EDSP Test Order?  Pesticide Active Ingredients Send test orders under FFDCA §408(p) & FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) to technical registrants  Inert Ingredients Send test orders under FFDCA §408(p) to manufacturers/importers

Slide 10 of 30 What’s in the Test Order?  A list of the required studies and protocols for conducting the studies  A list of other recipients of the Test Order  A form indicating how the recipient responds to the Test Order

Slide 11 of 30 Initial Response

Slide 12 of 30 What do Recipients Do? (1)Read instructions (2)Plan activities (3)Submit an Initial Response to EPA within 90 days Indicates intentions Uses Initial Response Form (4)Read &, if appropriate, discuss the protocol w/ EPA (5)Generate the data / participate in consortia (6)Compile & review the data for submission (7)Complete paperwork to assemble the submission package. (8)Submit the data (9)Maintain records

Slide 13 of 30 Summary of Basic Response Options (1)I will generate new data. (2)I will enter (or offer to enter) into an agreement to form a Consortium to generate the data. (3)I am citing or submitting existing data [OSRI]. (4)I am not subject to the Test Order. (5)I request Voluntary Cancellation of my registration; I am applying to reformulate my product; or I commit to discontinue all manufacture and importation of the chemical or sale of the chemical as a pesticide inert. (6)I am claiming a Formulators’ Exemption.

Slide 14 of 30 Other Respondent Activities  Order Recipients may also request an extension of the timeframe for submitting data that is specified in the Order.  Order Recipients may request to conduct the required studies according to a different protocol

Slide 15 of 30 FFDCA §408(p)(4) Exemptions  EPA can grant an exemption under FFDCA §408(p)(4) if it determines that a “substance is anticipated not to produce any effect in humans similar to an effect produced by a naturally occurring estrogen.” At this time, EPA has determined that the development of criteria to exempt certain substances or to otherwise identify any pre- determined or blanket exemptions from endocrine disruptor testing is premature. For the initial screening, EPA is not aware of sufficient data that would allow the Agency to confidently determine that a chemical meets the statutory standard for an exemption—i.e., that it is not anticipated to interact with the endocrine system. However, EPA will consider requests for such an exemption on a case-by-case or chemical-by-chemical basis in response to individual submissions. In order for the Agency to make the necessary statutory finding to issue the exemption, the request would need to provide any hazard-related information that would allow EPA to make the necessary statutory determination.

Slide 16 of 30 Contesting a 408(p) Order/Decision  Informal Administrative Review Procedure Recipients will be required by 408(p) order to raise issues to EPA informally  Process for Contesting a Test Order/Pre-enforcement Review Following EPA response, judicial review in appropriate federal district court

Slide 17 of 30 Consortia / Cost Sharing

Slide 18 of 30 Minimizing Duplicative Testing & Promoting Cost Sharing  Active ingredient Who: technical registrants Authority: FIFRA 3(c)(2)(B)  Food use inerts Who: manufacturers & importers Authority: 408(p) & offers to share  Non-food use inerts Who: manufacturers & importers Authority: 408(p) & offers to share (option to team up with a pesticide registrant)

Slide 19 of 30 Pesticide Active Ingredients  Procedures: Send test orders under FFDCA §408(p) & FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) to technical registrants Issue FFDCA §408(f)(1)(C) notices for import tolerances -i.e., unregistered, foreign-produced AIs

Slide 20 of 30 Food-Use Inerts  Procedures: Send test orders under FFDCA §408(p) to manufacturers/importers Issue FFDCA §408(f)(1)(C) notices for import tolerances -i.e., unregistered, foreign-produced inerts Compliance achieved only by: -Generating data or stopping ALL production/importation or by committing not to sell into the pesticide market

Slide 21 of 30 Non-Food-Use Inerts  Procedures: Send test orders under FFDCA §408(p) to manufacturers/importers Allow data generators to partner with a cooperating registrant/agent Allow compliance only by generating data or stopping ALL production/importation or by committing not to sell into the pesticide market

Slide 22 of 30 Forming Consortia  A Test Order recipient must make “an offer to commence negotiations regarding the amount and terms of paying a reasonable share of the cost of testing, and [include] an offer to resolve any dispute of the recipients’ shares of the test costs by submitting the dispute to a neutral third party with authority to bind the parties, (e.g., through binding arbitration).”  If so, EPA will exercise its discretion to treat such an offer as compliance with the Test Order so long as a recipient receiving the offer has committed to generate the required data.

Slide 23 of 30 Satisfaction of Testing Requirements – Compliance

Slide 24 of 30 Data Submission  Submit required progress reports and final data in a timely fashion  NOTE: Order Recipients may request an extension of the timeframe for submitting data that is specified in the Order.  Order Recipients must report adverse effects information according to FIFRA §6(a)(2) and TSCA §8.  Follow the format requirements of PR Notice 86-5

Slide 25 of 30 What are the Consequences of Non- Compliance?  If a registrant fails to comply with the EDSP Order, EPA may suspend any affected registrations.  If a non-registrant (i.e., inert manufacturer/importer) fails to comply, EPA may impose fines under TSCA.

Slide 26 of 30 Data Compensation & Confidentiality

Slide 27 of 30 Data Compensation  Pesticide Actives Established data compensation process under FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) applies  Food Use Inerts “Catch-up” FFDCA §408(p) test orders to be sent to manufacturers/importers who enter the marketplace within 15 years after the data are submitted Under FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) ensure compliance with data compensation as applications arrive; Pesticide Inert Ingredients Data Submitters & Suppliers List (PIIDSSL)  Non-food Use Inerts Allow Test Order recipients to submit with a registrant Send “catch-up” FFDCA §408(p) test orders to manufacturers/importers who enter the marketplace within 15 years after the data are submitted Under FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) ensure compliance with data compensation as applications arrive; PIIDSSL

Slide 28 of 30 Procedures for Handling Confidential Business Information  Active Ingredients FIFRA sec. 10  Food use inerts FFDCA sec. 408(i) & FIFRA sec. 10  Non-food use inerts Trade Secrets Act If data submitted by a registrant, FIFRA sec. 10  Special procedures for Proprietary Mixtures

Summary Chemical Category Order RecipientData Development Cost Sharing/Minimize Duplication Data Compensation by Subsequent Entrants Disclosure Active Ingredients Technical Registrants FFDCA §408(p) FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F)FIFRA §10(b), §10(g) Producers with only import tolerances FFDCA §408(f)(1)(C)FFDCA §408(i) & FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) FFDCA §408(i) & FIFRA §10(b), §10(g) Food Use Inert Ingredients Domestic Manufacturers & Importers FFDCA §408(p)FFDCA §408(i) FFDCA §408(p) “catch up” orders FFDCA §408(i) & FIFRA §10(b), §10(g) Producers with only import tolerances FFDCA §408(f)(1)(C)FFDCA §408(i) & FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) FFDCA §408(i) & FIFRA §10(b), §10(g) Non-Food Use Inert Ingredients Domestic Manufacturers & Importers FFDCA §408(p) “Discretion” (effectively the same rights) FFDCA §408(p) “catch up” orders - Slide 29 of 30

Slide 30 of 30 Questions

Slide 31 of 30 Backpocket Slides

Slide 32 of 30 Legal Authorities FFDCA §408(p) - Authority for EDSP Testing  Directs EPA to screen all “pesticide chemicals” for potential to affect endocrine systems  EPA may issue “test orders” to require screening and testing  EPA may send FFDCA §408(p) “test orders” to a registrant or to a manufacturer/importer of a pesticide chemical  Allows enforcement (suspension of registrations) if a registrant fails to comply with a FFDCA §408(p) test order If a non-registrant fails to comply, EPA may impose fines

Slide 33 of 30 Legal Authorities FFDCA §408(p) - Authority for EDSP Testing  Directs EPA to adopt procedures that: -Minimize duplicative testing -Promote fair and equitable sharing of test costs -Provide for protection of CBI  FFDCA §408(p) does not provide independent authority for EPA procedures

Slide 34 of 30 Legal Authorities FFDCA §408(i) – Extension of “FIFRA Protection”  Provides that data submitted in support of a tolerance action are entitled to protection under: -FIFRA §3 - data compensation provisions -FIFRA §10 - data disclosure provisions

Slide 35 of 30 Legal Authorities FFDCA §408(f) - Authority To Require Data  Authorizes EPA to require data when “reasonably necessary to support the continuation of a tolerance”  Directs EPA to use FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) or TSCA §4 whenever possible Otherwise EPA may publish a FR notice announcing the need for data and setting a deadline for its submission FFDCA §408(f)(1)(C) FFDCA §408(f)(1)(C) FR Notices are directed to everyone  Allows for enforcement if the data requirement issued under FFDCA §408(f) is not satisfied e.g. EPA may revoke the tolerance for a substance  Expressly authorizes the use of FFDCA §408(f) procedures to obtain EDSP data

Slide 36 of 30 Legal Authorities FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) - Authority to Require Data  Authorizes EPA to issue Data Call-In (DCI) notices for additional data necessary to support continued registration  FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) creates procedures that require DCI recipients to share costs of generating data and to use specific procedures to resolve disputes over a fair way to share costs  Requires that all DCI notices be sent to all registrants to whom the data requirement pertains  Allows enforcement (suspension of registrations) if a registrant fails to comply with DCI notice Failures include : -To offer to share costs -To participate in procedures to determine a fair share of costs -To pay a fair share of costs -To generate data),  Data submitted under FIFRA §3(c)(2)(B) becomes compensable under FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F)

Slide 37 of 30 Legal Authorities FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) - Data Compensation  Requires an applicant for registration to provide data to demonstrate safety of the pesticide proposed for registration  Allows an applicant, in certain cases, to cite data submitted by another person as a way of fulfilling the requirement to provide safety data  “Citable” data are either “exclusive use” or “compensable” Data get “exclusive use” protection for 10 years from the date of initial registration of the active ingredient to which the data relate -Applicants may cite “exclusive use” only with the original data submitter’s permission Data are “compensable” for 15 years from the date of submission -Applicants may cite “compensable” data by making an offer to pay reasonable compensation to the original data submitter

Slide 38 of 30 Legal Authorities FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) - Data Compensation  If an applicant and an original data submitter cannot agree on reasonable compensation either may initiate binding arbitration to resolve the dispute Both are bound to accept the arbitrator’s decision  Allows for enforcement if an applicant fails to comply with the FIFRA §3(c)(1)(F) requirements: EPA may deny an application for a registration or may cancel an existing registration if registrant: -Fails to make a required offer to pay -Fails to participate in binding arbitration -Fails to pay required compensation

Slide 39 of 30 Legal Authorities FIFRA §3(c)(2)(D) - “Formulators’ Exemption”  Referred to as the “Generic Data Exemption” or “Formulators’ Exemption”  Exempts an applicant from providing data to the extent that the data would be required to evaluate a registered pesticide product that the applicant buys from another person and uses to make the applicant’s product  EPA administratively determined to extend the “formulators’ exemption” in FIFRA §3(c)(2)(D) to recipients of DCI notices

Slide 40 of 30 Legal Authorities FIFRA §10(b) & FIFRA §10(g)  Prohibits EPA from disclosing to the public trade secret or confidential business information (CBI)  Prohibits EPA from disclosing information submitted by an applicant or registrant to a person working on behalf of a foreign or multinational pesticide producer

Slide 41 of 30 Legal Authorities TSCA §4  Authorizes EPA to require testing of a chemical substance (other than a pesticide) if EPA finds that it either may present an unreasonable risk or may enter the environment in substantial quantities and that the data are needed to assess the risk adequately  Requires EPA to issue a regulation  Persons covered by the test rule are required to develop data jointly  Enforcement: EPA may impose fines on a person who fails to produce the required data or to comply with other aspects of the test rule