Affymetrix CytoScan HD array

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CZ5225 Methods in Computational Biology Lecture 9: Pharmacogenetics and individual variation of drug response CZ5225 Methods in Computational Biology.
Advertisements

Identification of markers linked to Selenium tolerance genes
We processed six samples in triplicate using 11 different array platforms at one or two laboratories. we obtained measures of array signal variability.
Gene Linkage and Genetic Mapping
Linkage and Gene Mapping. Mendel’s Laws: Chromosomes Locus = physical location of a gene on a chromosome Homologous pairs of chromosomes often contain.
Polymorphisms: Clinical Implications By Amr S. Moustafa, M.D.; Ph.D. Assistant Prof. & Consultant, Medical Biochemistry Dept. College of Medicine, KSU.
Agilent CytoGenomics 1.5 For Detection of CNC, LOH and UPD
Bioinformatics lectures at Rice University Li Zhang Lecture 10: Networks and integrative genomic analysis-2 Genome instability and DNA copy number data.
Ingredients for a successful genome-wide association studies: A statistical view Scott Weiss and Christoph Lange Channing Laboratory Pulmonary and Critical.
1.Generate mutants by mutagenesis of seeds Use a genetic background with lots of known polymorphisms compared to other genotypes. Availability of polymorphic.
02_13.jpg Human chromosome 4 02_15.jpg 02_15_2.jpg.
Genomewide Association Studies.  1. History –Linkage vs. Association –Power/Sample Size  2. Human Genetic Variation: SNPs  3. Direct vs. Indirect Association.
Polymorphisms – SNP, InDel, Transposon BMI/IBGP 730 Victor Jin, Ph.D. (Slides from Dr. Kun Huang) Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University.
KinSNP Software for homozygosity mapping of disease genes using SNP microarrays El-Ad David Amir 1, Ofer Bartal 1, Yoni Sheinin 2, Ruti Parvari 2 and Vered.
Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs) By Amr S. Moustafa, M.D.; Ph.D. Assistant Prof. & Consultant, Medical Biochemistry Dept. College of.
Genome Analysis Determine locus & sequence of all the organism’s genes More than 100 genomes have been analysed including humans in the Human Genome Project.
Large-Scale Copy Number Polymorphism in the Human Genome J. Sebat et al. Science, 305:525 Luana Ávila MedG 505 Feb. 24 th /24.
Considerations for Analyzing Targeted NGS Data Introduction Tim Hague, CTO.
Page 1 Mouse Genome CGH Microarray 44A. Page 2 Mouse Genome CGH Microarray Kit 44A Designed for CGH, Validated with samples of known aberrations Designed.
1 Genetic Variability. 2 A population is monomorphic at a locus if there exists only one allele at the locus. A population is polymorphic at a locus if.
Introduction to BST775: Statistical Methods for Genetic Analysis I Course master: Degui Zhi, Ph.D. Assistant professor Section on Statistical Genetics.
Analyzing DNA Differences PHAR 308 March 2009 Dr. Tim Bloom.
Copy Number Variants: detection and analysis Manuel Ferreira & Shaun Purcell Boulder, 2009.
Data Type 1: Microarrays
Conservation of genomic segments (haplotypes): The “HapMap” n In populations, it appears the the linear order of alleles (“haplotype”) is conserved in.
Microarrays and Their Uses Brad Windle, Ph.D
Genetics & Heredity EDFN 645 Reading Notes October 1 st 2008.
A Genome-wide association study of Copy number variation in schizophrenia Andrés Ingason CNS Division, deCODE Genetics. Research Institute of Biological.
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM): What it is & What it can do for you Knowledge Management & Eskind Biomedical Library January 27, 2012 helen.
10cM - Linkage Mapping Set v2 ABI Median intermarker distance: 4.7 Mb Mean intermarker distance: 5.6 Mb Mean genetic gap distance: 8.9 cM Average Heterozygosity.
Genomics Collaboration Senior Scientist
Finnish Genome Center Monday, 16 November Genotyping & Haplotyping.
Copy Number Variation Eleanor Feingold University of Pittsburgh March 2012.
____ __ __ _______Birol et al :: AGBT :: 7 February 2008 A NOVEL APPROACH TO IMPROVE THE NOISE IN DETECTING COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS USING OLIGONUCLEOTIDE.
Molecular markers Non-PCR based 1courtesy of Carol Ritland.
February 20, 2002 UD, Newark, DE SNPs, Haplotypes, Alleles.
In The Name of GOD Genetic Polymorphism M.Dianatpour MLD,PHD.
Analyzing DNA using Microarray and Next Generation Sequencing (1) Background SNP Array Basic design Applications: CNV, LOH, GWAS Deep sequencing Alignment.
Chromosomal Inheritance and Human Heredity. Human Chromosomes Karyotype – a picture of an organism’s chromosomes We take pictures during mitosis when.
Chapter 8 Additional DNA Markers: Amelogenin, Y-Chromosome STRs, mtDNA, SNPs, Alu Repeats ©2002 Academic Press.
 Disclaimer:  The statements in this presentation are those of the author and not of Affymetrix.  CytoScan has not been cleared or evaluated by the.
Global Variation in Copy Number in the Human Genome Speaker: Yao-Ting Huang Nature, Genome Research, Genome Research, 2006.
Different microarray applications Rita Holdhus Introduction to microarrays September 2010 microarray.no Aim of lecture: To get some basic knowledge about.
Global Variation in Copy Number in the Human Genome
Whole-Genome Scanning by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization as a Clinical Tool for Risk Assessment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia  Shelly R. Gunn,
Mosaic Uniparental Disomies and Aneuploidies as Large Structural Variants of the Human Genome  Benjamín Rodríguez-Santiago, Núria Malats, Nathaniel Rothman,
Gene Linkage and Genetic Mapping
Figure 2 Copy-number variations in multiple myeloma
Molecular allelokaryotyping of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemias by high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism oligonucleotide genomic microarray.
Current Applications for Genomic Microarray
By Michael Fraczek and Caden Boyer
Genomic alterations in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231.
Whole-Genome Scanning by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization as a Clinical Tool for Risk Assessment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia  Shelly R. Gunn,
Michael Cullen, Stephen P
Model of segmental duplication Acceptor regions of the genome acquire segments of genomic material that range from 1–200 kb from disparate regions.
Interchromosomal Transfer of Epigenetic States in Ascobolus: Transfer of DNA Methylation Is Mechanistically Related to Homologous Recombination  Vincent.
Microarray Techniques to Analyze Copy-Number Alterations in Genomic DNA: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array 
When and how to use chromosomal microarray (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis
A Gene Mutated in Nephronophthisis and Retinitis Pigmentosa Encodes a Novel Protein, Nephroretinin, Conserved in Evolution  Edgar Otto, Julia Hoefele,
Figure 2 Flowchart for investigation and diagnosis of Beckwith– Wiedemann syndrome Figure 2 | Flowchart for investigation and diagnosis of Beckwith– Wiedemann.
Molecular Inversion Probe Array for the Genetic Evaluation of Stillbirth Using Formalin- Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue  Leslie R. Rowe, Harshwardhan.
Genetics and Heredity Vocabulary
Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays  Nathan R. Treff,
High-Resolution Molecular Characterization of 15q11-q13 Rearrangements by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) with Detection of Gene Dosage 
Kit-Sing Au, Adelaide A. Hebert, E. Steve Roach, Hope Northrup 
Mapping of srt1 by BSA-seq.
High-Resolution Identification of Chromosomal Abnormalities Using Oligonucleotide Arrays Containing 116,204 SNPs  Howard R. Slater, Dione K. Bailey, Hua.
Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis can distinguish different genetic mechanisms that lead to loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Single nucleotide.
Array CGH results: (A) Rearrangement pattern at 22q13: the profile of chromosome 22 shows a terminal deletion of 8.4 Mb at 22q13.2q13.3 (chr23: 42 817 697–51 219 009 bp)
Presentation transcript:

Affymetrix CytoScan HD array

CytoScan HD vs current array Current array (CGH based) patient + reference DNA required (two color) utilizes Cy dyes – ozone sensitive copy number probes only (135 K) CytoScan HD array (not CGH based) patient DNA only (single color) in silico reference based on >300 normal individuals and cell lines utilizes phycoerythrin – not ozone sensitive copy number probes (1.9 million) + SNP (750 K)

Coverage Average marker spacing: ISCA genes – 384 bp OMIM genes – 659 bp X chromosome OMIM genes – 486 bp RefSeq genes – 880 bp Intergenic backbone – 1737 bp

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) ……..ATGC……… Allele A ……..ATAC……… Allele B

Copy number + SNP arrays Non-polymorphic probes SNP SNPs limited to specific locations in genome – SNP only arrays biased due to positional restrictions Non-polymorphic (copy number) probes fill gaps to allow broad coverage

Improvements of CytoScan HD over Affy SNP 6.0 Improved software Much less noise Probes empirically chosen based on performance 20 million probes screened All reagents centrally manufactured and provided as kits Streamlined procedure – only one restriction digest, ~half the steps, less hands-on time

Other potential benefits of CytoScan Affy filing for FDA clearance CytoScan currently has best coverage on single array for both constitutional and neoplastic cases Other large clinical labs switching to CytoScan (LabCorp, ARUP)

Copy number + SNP arrays - detect copy number changes and allele frequencies SNPs can detect uniparental isodisomy, consanguinity more sensitive for detection of mosaicism independent confirmation of copy number findings and better breakpoint determination

Copy number + SNP array Copy # Allele peaks

Deletion Duplication Normal Deletion Normal Duplication AAA AA A AAB BB Deletion Normal Duplication A AAA BBB B AAB ABB

SNP arrays more sensitive for detection of mosaicism Non-mosaic deletion Mosaic deletion

CNC detection vs. reporting Cytoscan software allows differential flagging in known clinically signficant critical regions vs. “backbone” regions Can potentially detect smaller CNCs but doesn’t mean everything should be reported Ex – LabCorp size cut-offs for reporting in backbone regions Postnatal: >500 Kb gain, >200 Kb loss Prenatal: >2 Mb gain, >1 Mb loss

Uniparental disomy Inheritance of two homologous chromosomes from one parent isodisomy: two copies of the same homolog heterodisomy: two different homologs UPD mechanisms meiotic non-disjunction with trisomy or monosomy rescue post-zygotic mitotic recombination Whole chromosome isodisomy vs. hetero/isodisomy

SNPs and consanguinity or UPD Chromosome 2 Small deletion Long continuous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH) with normal copy number

Normal allele homozygosity Homozygous blocks of 1-3 Mb Whole chromosome isodisomy AA BB Copy number = 2

UPD or normal ? Copy # = 2 13.5 Mb

LabCorp study Papenhausen et al. Am J Med Genet. 155A:757-68, 2011 Homozygosity profiling by SNP array is screen for UPD What LCSH size should be used as cut-off for recommending parental f/u for UPD? Determined distribution of LCSH in patient population Retrospectively analyzed eight confirmed UPD cases for LCSH

Distribution of LCSH in 120 consecutive patients

Eight known UPD cases Two whole chromosome homozygosity Six mixture of hetero/isodisomy Single LCSH range: 13.5 – 48.4 Mb One case with two LCSH of 11 and 11.2 Mb Set LCSH UPD cut-off at >13.5 Mb (two LCSH with total of > 15 Mb) *LCSH in more than one chromosome = identity by descent

Prospectively analyzed 13,000 patients by SNP array 92 patients with UPD qualifying LCSH based on cut-offs Parental f/u on 46 cases (mostly imprinted chromosomes) Confirmed UPD in 29 cases 14/30 whole chromosome isoUPD 13/30 mixture of hetero/isoUPD False-positive UPD 17 cases Chromosome 3 and 11 pericentromeric region, 13q21

LabCorp Study – other observations False-positive cases had shorter average LCSH, greater freq near cen, no telomeric LCSH No false-positive cases with qualifying telomeric LCSH Sometimes see evidence of copy # mosaicism in trisomy/monosomy rescue; allele freq mosaicism in segmental UPD Low likehood of false-negatives

LabCorp current cut-offs for UPD (combined hetero/isodisomy or segmental UPD) Single LCSH in one chromosome >20 Mb interstitial or >10 Mb telomeric for non-imprinted chromosomes >15 Mb interstitial or >8 Mb telomeric for known imprinted chromosomes

SNP detection of consanguinity LCSH involving multiple chromosomes (regions of identity by descent)

LabCorp cut-offs for consanguinity LCSH > 10 Mb Degree of Relationship Relationship Coefficient of Inbreeding Theoretical level of LCSH (based on total of 2850 Mb minus X and Y) Empiric Level of LCSH Theoretical Percent LCSH 1ST Degree Siblings/Parent-Child 1/4 712.5 Mb 550-950 Mb 25.0% 2nd Degree Half Siblings/Uncle-Niece/Aunt-Nephew/Double First Cousins 1/8 356.25 Mb 250-635 Mb 12.5% 3rd Degree First Cousins/Half Uncle-Niece/Half Aunt-Nephew 1/16 178.5 Mb 100-300 Mb 6.25% 4th Degree First Cousins Once Removed/Double Second Cousins 1/32 89.0 Mb 30-75 Mb 3.12% 5th Degree Second Cousins 1/64 44.5 Mb >30 Mb 1.56%