A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT 06457-1520 · (860) 632-1485 Revised 03/08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Measurable Annual IEP Goals
Special Education. The purpose of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA 2004) is to assure that all children with disabilities are provided.
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Three: Developing Standards-based Measurable Annual Goals Standards-based IEP State-Directed.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 1 EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN DIVISION.
Least Restrictive Environment: A World of Options and Opportunities Training provided by the Connecticut State Department of Education in cooperation with:
Connecticut State Department of Education
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Accommodations and Modifications Making classroom instruction work for all students.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Preparing Students with Special Needs for College and Career March 26 Educator’s Institute 2012 Lovegren-O’Brien Bass 3/26/12.
An Overview of the Law 1 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Summary of Performance: A New Tool for NC Teachers November 18, 2013 Dr. Valerie L. Mazzotti National Post-School Outcomes Center University of Oregon.
Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial.
Beginning the Process for IEP Development 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) ctserc.org.
PRESENT LEVELS OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE PLAAFP.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Transition Plans A results-oriented process that focuses on improving the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Indicator 13 Assessment Webcast Section 3: Evaluating Transition Plans Complete by November 15, 2011.
Gifted IEP IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education TASN - Technical Assistance System Network Rev. August 2015 IEPs for Gifted.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
State and Local Processes for Monitoring Educational Benefit
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Educational Benefit Review (ED Benefit). Educational Benefit Purpose To determine if the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) was reasonably.
Claremont Graduate University Teacher Education Special Education Seminars Dr. Phyllis B. Harris, Executive Director Oakland Unified School District Programs.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
The Educational Benefit Review Process A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
Post Secondary Transition CANAR, NOVEMBER 12, 2015.
Accessible Educational Materials and the IEP. Introduction to the National Center for Accessible Educational Materials for Learning October 2014 to October.
Assessing the Educational Benefit for Students with IEPs A Sharing of a New Professional Opportunity 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT
The New IDEA in Special Education
Learning About Special Education. Acronyms A word formed from the first letter of several words Example Laugh Out Loud Other Examples?
ALIGNING TRANSITION REQUIREMENTS IN THE IEP PAM HUMPHREY, TRANSITION CONSULTANT.
Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)
Examining IEP s for Educational Benefit East Haven Public Schools March 28, Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860)
Tools for Developing High Quality IEPs Barbara Slone Kimberly Mearman
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Assessing the Educational Benefit for Students with IEPs A Sharing of a New Professional Opportunity 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT
FAPE Free, Appropriate Public Education : the standard for providing services to students with disabilities under I D EA.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
Transition Plan Writing for the School Year.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Staten Island Integrated Service Center 1 VERIFY - NEVER LEAVE BLANK VERIFY Prior to writing on this line, contact your school’s Special Education Liaison.
The Educational Benefit Review Process A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education
Menlo Park City School District Special Education Self-Review (SESR)
Educational Benefit Review
Is Your Child’s IEP Individualized?
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

A Reflective Process Designed by the California Department of Education 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) Revised 03/08

 Describe what constitutes “educational benefit” for a student with a disability; and  Determine if the design of a student’s IEP was reasonably calculated to increase the likelihood of educational benefit. Revised 03/08 SERC

What assurances does a school system maintain in the provision of FAPE for a student with an IEP? Revised 03/08 SERC

Dialogue with your team What does this term mean to you? Revised 03/08 SERC

Supreme Court’s first IDEA case 2-Prong Test Definition of “appropriate”

Rowley’s “ 2 PRONG TEST” 1. Has the Board/State complied with the procedural requirements of IDEA? (Procedural Prong) AND 2. Is the IEP developed through IDEA’s procedures reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefit? (Substantive Prong) Revised 03/08 SERC

The PROCEDURAL Prong (not an exhaustive list)  Procedural requirements of IDEA 2004 ;  Identified needs related to disability & general curriculum;  Goals in each need area; and  Services to support progress toward goals & general curriculum, participation in extracurricular, and education with other disabled & non-disabled children. Revised 03/08 SERC (Drouin, 2004)

The SUBSTANTIVE Prong (not an exhaustive list)  Passing marks;  Advancement from grade to grade;  Progress toward goals and objectives;  Improved scores on district/statewide assessments; and  Passing the high school exit exam. Revised 03/08 SERC Rowley

 Requirements IDEA 90’  Access IDEA 97’  Participation IDEA 04’ Revised 03/08 SERC

Transition  results-oriented process  academic and functional achievement  facilitate movement from school to post- school activities  postsecondary education, training, employment and independent living… Revised 03/08 SERC

 Agency Contacts  Student Involvement  Individualization of Transition IEPs  District Obligations  Appropriateness of Transition Planning/Services Revised 03/08 SERC

The Steps and Protocol

 Reviewing IEPs for a 3- year cycle;  Analyzing the relationship among needs, goals, and services;  Comparing progress across annuals;  Looking for patterns in the planning process; and  Determining if the IEP was reasonably planned to result in educational benefit. Revised 03/08 SERC (Drouin, 2004)

 STEP 1 Record Information  STEP 2 Analyze Relationships  STEP 3 Compare to Prior Year  STEP 4 Discuss Overall Educational Benefit (Youtsey, 2006) Revised 03/08 SERC

What were the patterns to the program planned for the student? Practices to KeepPractices to ChangeNext Steps Questions:Circle One Was the necessary relevant information included in the student's IEP?YN Was there a clear relationship between the identified needs, goals, and services?YN Were subsequent goals and services/placement consistent with progress made?YN Was the student's program reasonably planned to result in educational benefit?YN Revised 03/08 SERC p. 7 Summary of Educational Benefit Review Process (Youtsey, 2006)

Jigsaw the documentation of each IEP  Strengths (under the Present Level) ( p. 3, 4, 5);  Needs ( p. 3, 4, 5);  Goals and objectives ( p. 4&8 / 7&8 );  Accommodations and modifications ( p. 4&8 / 7&8) ;  Services/placement (p. 7, 11); and  Progress (p. 7 ). Revised 03/08 SERC p. 3

 Record what is written on each IEP.  Information must be present in the IEP  Information is verbatim as much as possible  Short-hand and abbreviations are acceptable; but paraphrasing or summarizing are not Revised 03/08 SERC

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: mastered 25 functional site words related to Language Arts WIAT : Reading 48 Lang 64 Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Domain

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: mastered 25 functional site words related to Language Arts WIAT : Reading 48 Lang 64 Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Strengths

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Present Level

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Concerns

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Goals, Objectives, Accommodations, & Modifications

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Service & Placement

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Progress

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education IEP Adjusted?

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education

Is there a clear relationship between the identified needs, goals, and services?  Analyze the relationship and alignment between the identified needs, goals, and services and how they result in progress for annual review in a three-year cycle Revised 03/08 SERC p. 4

 Consider each IEP separately  Determine alignment among the components  Draw circles and arrows to designate alignment Revised 03/08 SERC

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education

Are subsequent goals & services/placement consistent with progress made?  Compare progress to determine if subsequent changes to goals and services were made based on the results of progress  year 1 to year 2  year 2 to year 3 Revised 03/08 SERC p. 5

 Compare for increase or decrease of complexity and progress for each component ▪ Note changes with: 0 = No change + = Increased complexity of goals/objectives, time with non-disabled peers, or progress -= Decreased complexity of goals/objectives, time with non-disabled peers, or lack of progress Revised 03/08 SERC

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Last Year Mastered 20 functional words related to English Language Arts

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Reading and oral language is significantly below grade level

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education ? When in the library, will explore multiple reading formats Given 40 functional pictures, match corresponding functional word When in small groups, select functional words related to task

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education Learning center 3.75 hrs/month

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education SSS

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: Can decode on grade level KTEA Read 3.4 G.E. Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E Comp. is sig. below grade level Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0 Given passage, state 2 details Given passage, answer correctly 5/6 Wh questions Learn. center 3.75 hrs/wk SMS SMS No California Department of Education o No change from prior year + Increased complexity, progress, or time with non-disabled peers - Decreased complexity, progress or time with non-disabled peers

Are there any patterns to the program planned for the student? Was the student's program reasonably planned to result in educational benefit?  Determine if there are any patterns  Decide if the IEP was reasonably planned to result in educational benefit Revised 03/08 SERC p. 6

Revised 03/08 SERC p. 7 What were the patterns to the program planned for the student? Practices to KeepPractices to ChangeNext Steps Questions:Circle One Was the necessary relevant information included in the student's IEP?YN Was there a clear relationship between the identified needs, goals, and services?YN Were subsequent goals and services/placement consistent with progress made?YN Was the student's program reasonably planned to result in educational benefit?YN Summary of Educational Benefit Review Process (Youtsey, 2006)

Revised 03/08 SERC Present Level Need /Con. Goals & Obj./ Accom. & Mod. Serv. /Place. Pr.Adj Academic/ Cognitive Language Arts: mastered 25 functional site words related to Language Arts WIAT : Reading 48 Lang 64 Prefers books on tape and low level, high interest books Reading and oral language is significan tly below grade level When in the library, (bookstore) identify 3 books of interest Given 50 functional pictures, match corresponding functional word When in small groups, select functional words related to task learning center 3.75 hrs/month Community 2 hrs/wk Regular class 90 minute daily English Math History MSS MSS No California Department of Education