SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Advertisements

Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
Marijuana Decriminalization The First Step to Prison Reform.
Goals of Justice Reinvestment Manage growth of the prison population and reduce spending on corrections Increase the cost- effectiveness of existing criminal.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Sponsored by: CCSU’s Women’s Center; Center for Public Policy & Social Research and the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice.
Essential Principles of Criminal Justice Planning In Philadelphia Presentation to the Essential Services Coalition of Philadelphia By Leon A. King II,
Offender Population Forecasting in Virginia. 2 Background - Studies by JLARC in 1980s  Staff of the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (JLARC)
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
Presentation by: Andrew Clark Director of the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice and the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at CCSU Institute.
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
Sentencing and Punishment
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
Chapter 10 Crime and Corrections Policy. Categorizing Crime Crimes have different levels of severity. Punishment varies according to the classification.
Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform : System-wide Criminal Justice Spending June 3, 2015.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2009 General Assembly.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
Corrections Growth: A Long-Term Analysis of Growth in Michigan’s Department of Corrections Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections?
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
Addressing Criminal Behavior-- Types of Punishment.
Offender Population Forecasting in Virginia. 2 Background - Studies by JLARC in 1980s  Staff of the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (JLARC)
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
Harvey J. Reed, Director Linda S. Janes, Assistant Director Presentation and Update to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Criminal Sentencing in N.C.. Structured Sentencing In 2011, N.C. passed the Structured Sentencing law to organize the punishment of criminals. – Sentencing.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Crime and Criminal Justice Trends in Virginia Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission September 21, 2015.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
1 Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2005 Virginia General Assembly.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
Prop. 47 Criminal Sentences. The Question Should the penalties for certain offenders convicted of non-serious, nonviolent crimes be reduced from felonies.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division RBA Report Card – Adult Probation November 10, 2010 Update to the Criminal Justice.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2008 General Assembly.
Criminal Justice Process:
Sentencing Task Force Survey of Priorities Results.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure - Research Proposal.
ARIZONA’S FISCHER REPORT DATA DRIVEN DECISIONS ELIZABETH ORTIZ ARIZONA PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS’ ADVISORY COUNCIL MARCH 5, 2014.
Dealing with Lawbreakers
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
32,154 31,971 SC prison projections, 6/30/01 Actual prison population, 6/30/01 34,129 (33,848) 32, , Projection prison population, and.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Reclassifying Nonviolent, Small Quantity Possession Potential Impact on Alaska’s Budget and Society.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice What is an appropriate punishment or response? What do you expect your response to do for the offender, potential.
Criminal Justice Policy Development and Resource Reinvestment Len Engel, Esq. December 10, 2010 What Works Conference Portland, OR Crime and Justice Institute.
Mass Incarceration: Prospects for Reform American Friends Service Committee, Arizona.
Sentencing A Criminal Justice Issue Area Primer for the National Foundation for Women Legislators.
North Dakota Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Graduate School of Social Work
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Minn. Sentencing Guidelines Commission
Presentation transcript:

SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross

PROBLEMS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM JUDICIAL SENTENCES LOSING MEANING FELONS SERVING ONLY A FRACTION OF SENTENCE

* Sentencing Commission created ** Projected with cap and no new prisons

PROBLEMS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM JUDICIAL SENTENCES LOSING MEANING FELONS SERVING ONLY A FRACTION OF SENTENCE MISDEMEANORS SPINNING THROUGH SYSTEM PROBATION VIOLATIONS ESCALATING OFFENDERS REFUSING ALTERNATIVES TO PRISON PUBLIC CONFIDENCE ERODING

THE FIRST STEP CREATION OF SENTENCING COMMISSION 23 INITIAL MEMBERS LEGISLATIVE DIRECTIVES

CONSTRUCT CORRECTIONAL SIMULATION MODEL CLASSIFY CRIMINAL OFFENSES RECOMMEND STRUCTURE FOR SENTENCING DEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY CORRECTION STRATEGY CONSIDER OTHER POLICY ISSUES

GOALS OF REFORM SET PRIORITIES FOR PRISON SPACE RESTORE TRUTH IN SENTENCING PROVIDE UNDERLYING RATIONALE FOR SENTENCING ENHANCE CONSISTENCY IN SENTENCING ENHANCE CERTAINTY IN SENTENCING MAKE EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES BALANCE SENTENCING POLICIES WITH RESOURCES

FELONY CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA*

SOURCE: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2004/05 Felony Statistical Report Data

(7,511) (3,054) (10,633) (3,168) (1,857) A=0.3% (85) B1=0.6% (146) B2=1.0% (268) C=3.4% (880) D=2.7% (706) E=4.1% (1,083)

SOURCE: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2004/05 Felony Statistical Report Data

*FY 2004/05 Structured Sentencing Data SOURCE: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission and NC Department of Correction 109%

*FY 2004/05 Structured Sentencing Data SOURCE: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

* NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2004/05 Felony Statistical Report Data ** 1993 Pre-Structured Sentencing Data

* Based on CY 1993 data. ** Assumes that felons sentenced under SSA will serve an average of 109% of their minimum sentence. Based on FY 2004/05 Felony Structured Sentencing Simulation data. SOURCE: NC Department of Correction and NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

SOURCE: State Bureau of Investigation, 2004

TRUTH IN SENTENCING RESTORED ANNUAL PROJECTIONS TO HELP PLAN PRISON CAPACITY NO PAROLE FOR OFFENDERS SENTENCED UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING PRISON CAP REPEALED VIOLENT OFFENDERS SERVING LONGER SENTENCES TOUGHER COMMUNITY PUNISHMENTS PUNISHMENT MORE CERTAIN AND CONSISTENT SENTENCING POLICY FORMULATED IN CONSIDERATION OF CORRECTIONAL RESOURCES THE N.C. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TODAY

Note: Prison capacity figures reflect Expanded Operating Capacity. SOURCE: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission and NC Department of Correction

DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECTED PRISON POPULATION BY OFFENSE CLASS FELONIES ONLY SOURCE: NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission, FY 2004/05 Structured Sentencing Simulation Model

ADVANTAGES OF STRUCTURED SENTENCING PROMOTES TRUTH IN SENTENCING SETS PRIORITIES ALLOWS EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES ENHANCES CONSISTENCY AND CERTAINTY IN SENTENCING PROVIDES UNDERLYING RATIONALE FOR SENTENCING BALANCES POLICY WITH RESOURCES