State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11 Pam Farr, Director of Teaching & Learning Gail Straus, Director of ECE & Federal Programs.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.

Advertisements

AYP: Making Adequate Yearly Progress in Washington State Spring 2012.

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.

1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?

No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

1 Shelton School District Title Programs Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services.

Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.

Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.

Tacoma School District - 1 Student Achievement Board Study December 6, 2007 Michael Power Assist. Superintendent Program and Learning Support Tel

OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”

Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.

Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.

SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.

A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.

Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.

Tacoma School District - 1 updated:12/4/2007 Student Achievement Board Study Session December 6, 2007 (Supplement) Dr. Michael Power Assist. Superintendent.

May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.

Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.

SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.

Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.

Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found.

1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.

No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.

Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.

School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Elements School Improvement District.

Annual Student Performance Report September

No Child Left Behind Education Week

No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.

No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.

Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program Presentation to Board of Directors Shelton School District September 8, 2009 Gail Straus, Assistant.

No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.

AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.

American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.

NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program

Shelton School District

Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Evergreen Elementary School

State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11

AYP and Report Card.

State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Shelton School District SY 11-12

Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program

Presentation transcript:

State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY Pam Farr, Director of Teaching & Learning Gail Straus, Director of ECE & Federal Programs

2010 Reading Achievement on MSP/HSPE

2010 Math Achievement on MSP/HSPE

AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress  Cornerstone of the federal Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA) signed into law January 2001 as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act.  Results from state assessment (MSP + HSPE) at grades 3, 8 and 10 are used to determine whether the district as a whole and each school in the district has made AYP.  Separate annual proficiency goals in reading and math, plus “Other indicators” Participation rate (95% of students in each group to be assessed) Graduation rate (high schools): 73% (or 4 percentage point increase if rate is below 70%). Unexcused absences (grades 1-8): 1% (or any decrease)

AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress  Same goal on “state uniform bar” for nine measured groups  Minimum number of students (N) needed for a student group for statistically reliable AYP decisions. N=30 for all groups.  Count only students enrolled for “full academic year” (continuous enrollment from October 1 through entire testing period).  If a group doesn’t meet the proficiency goal, it makes AYP if it has a 10% reduction in those not meeting standard and meets the other indicator (“Safe Harbor”)

Elementary Level Reading & Math (gr. 3-5) District-to-State Comparison - AYP ReadingShelton - DistrictState All StudentsNN American IndianYN Asian/Pacific IslanderN/AY BlackN/AN HispanicNN WhiteNY Limited English (LEP)NN Special EducationNN Low IncomeNN MathShelton - DistrictState All StudentsNN American IndianYN Asian/Pacific IslanderN/AY BlackN/AN HispanicNY WhiteYY Limited English (LEP)NN Special EducationNN Low IncomeNN

Middle Level Reading & Math (gr.6-8) District-to-State Comparison - AYP ReadingShelton - DistrictState All StudentsNY American IndianYN Asian/Pacific IslanderN/AY BlackN/AN HispanicNN WhiteYY Limited English (LEP)N/AN Special EducationYN Low IncomeNN MathShelton - DistrictState All StudentsNN American IndianYN Asian/Pacific IslanderN/AY BlackN/AN HispanicNN WhiteNY Limited English (LEP)N/AN Special EducationYN Low IncomeNN

High School Reading & Math (grade 10) District-to-State Comparison - AYP ReadingShelton - DistrictState All StudentsYY American IndianN/AN Asian/Pacific IslanderN/AY BlackN/AN HispanicN/AN WhiteYY Limited English (LEP)N/AN Special EducationNN Low IncomeYN MathShelton - DistrictState All StudentsNN American IndianN/AN Asian/Pacific IslanderN/AN BlackN/AN HispanicN/AN WhiteNN Limited English (LEP)N/AN Special EducationNN Low IncomeNN

Elementary Level Reading & Math (gr. 3-5) School Results - AYP ReadingBordeauxEvergreenMt. View All StudentsNNN American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black HispanicNY WhiteNYY Limited English (LEP)N Special EducationYNN Low IncomeNNN MathBordeauxEvergreenMt. View All StudentsNNY American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black HispanicNN WhiteYYY Limited English (LEP)N Special EducationYYN Low IncomeNNN

Middle Level Reading & Math (gr. 6-8) School Results - AYP ReadingOlympic Middle SchoolOakland Bay Jr. High All StudentsNY American IndianY Asian/Pacific Islander Black HispanicNY WhiteYY Limited English (LEP) Special EducationYY Low IncomeNY MathOlympic Middle SchoolOakland Bay Jr. High All StudentsNY American IndianN Asian/Pacific Islander Black HispanicNY WhiteNY Limited English (LEP) Special EducationYN Low IncomeNY

High School Reading & Math (grade 10) School Results - AYP ReadingShelton High SchoolCHOICE Alternative All StudentsYY American IndianY Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic WhiteY Limited English (LEP) Special EducationN Low IncomeY MathShelton High SchoolCHOICE Alternative All StudentsNN American IndianN Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic WhiteN Limited English (LEP) Special EducationN Low IncomeN

School Improvement Plan Continue: Public School Choice Continue: Public School Choice Supplemental Continue: Public School Choice Supplemental Services Public School Choice Supplemental Services Corrective Action Plan for Alternative Governance AYP Step Implement Plan For Alternative Governance Step 5 12 AYP AYP TIMELINE FOR SCHOOLS (Consequences apply only to schools receiving Title I funds) Sanctions are a District Responsibility Identified for School Improvement WASL Results WASL Results 12

AYP TIMELINE FOR DISTRICTS (Consequences apply only to districts receiving Title I funds) State Responsibility District Improvement Plan District Improvement Plan State Offers Technical Assistance and MAY take Corrective Action State MUST Take Corrective Action Step AYP Identified for District Improvement WASL Results WASL Results 13

State, school district and individual school information on state test and AYP results can be found at: