Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Advertisements

Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium DemoSat-B Colorado State University Matthew Jui, Ian Patterson, Mark Spowart, Todd Wallis June Colorado Space Grant.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 University A University B Team # Logo 1 Logo 2.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Stevens Institute of Technology - New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Critical Design Review Mike Giglia, Ethan Hayon Robert Hopkins.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.
UPR-R(river) P(rock) University of Puerto Rico Río Piedras Campus October 16, 2010 CoDR Ver 0.1.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
Launch Readiness Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Team Name 1 Team Name 2 Team Name N Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Launch Readiness Review MinnSpec University of Minnesota Bryce Schaefer, Chris Woerhle, Art Graf
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
User notes: –Please use this template to create your Proposal Analysis Review –You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
TREADS Semester Review Dec. 14, Objectives Assess and Communicate Current Design Identify interfaces Approve the System Requirement Specification.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RockSat-C 2013 FMSTR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
RequirementMethodStatus The payload must not exceed a weight of 1.45 Kgm.Design, Test The payload must conform to the WFF “no volt requirement”
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University of Minnesota Alex Richman, Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel, Will Thorson 5/27/2012.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Team Name Preliminary Design Review
Critical Design Review Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Launch Readiness Review
Launch Readiness Review
Structures March 13, 2004.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date

User notes: –This template shall be followed as closely as possible. –Deviations from this template will make it hard to assess your flight readiness. Without an understanding of your level of flight readiness, your chances of being awarded a primary position will be decreased.

Mission Overview –What is your objective? –What do you expect to prove, discover, or learn from your experiment? –Brief overview of underlying science/theory –What other related research/experimentation has been done in the past? Results?

Mission Requirements –What functional requirements must your payload conform to? Scientific requirements Mass, Volume, CG, No-Volt, etc. –Usually presented in matrix form. Matrix can use a color to indicate current compliance with the requirement. –Green: Compliant, Yellow: Partially Compliant, Red: Not Compliant –SEE EXAMPLE ON NEXT SLIDE –Your specific requirements will vary, but they should include the requirements in the RockSat Payload Canister User’s Guide

Example Mission Requirements Matrix RequirementMethodStatus The spacecraft must not exceed a weight of 30 kg.Design, Test The spacecraft must operate on 30W or less.Design, Test The spacecraft’s center of gravity (CG) shall be within 0.25” of the geometric central axis of the ICU. Design, Analysis The allowable static envelope of the spacecraft is a cylindrical right prism with a diameter of 18.7” (47.5 cm) and a height of 18.7” (47.5 cm). Design The spacecraft’s CG shall not lie more than 12” above the satellite interface plane (SIP). Design, Analysis The spacecraft shall have a fundamental frequency above 100 Hz given a fixed-base condition at the SIP. Design, Analysis The spacecraft must be capable of meeting all mission objectives. Design, Test

Concept of Operations –Provide a high level overview of how your payload operates. Diagrams are an excellent way to convey the mechanics without cluttering a slide with lots of words. –Show events such as: launch, G-switch activation, first accelerometer activated, at apogee first accelerometer deactivated and secondary becomes active, etc, etc, etc. Although diagrams are nice, they are not required. A paragraph on operation would also be acceptable.

Functional Block Diagrams -A Functional block diagram of the entire system should be presented here. -It is helpful to box individual subsystems to give reviewers a reference for future presented analysis. -SEE EXAMPLES ON NEXT FEW SLIDES

Example of Good Functional Block Diagram

Example Of Excellent Functional Block Diagram Power 2x9V Supply Batteries G-Switch RBF (Wallops) 5V Regulator X / Y Acceleromet er Z Acceleromet er Temperatur e Sensor AVR Board AirCore Board Flash Memory 6 channel ADC Control Circuit (NPN) AVR Microcontroller ADC Solenoid Valve AirCore Tubing Opening Junction Hand turn ball Valve Data Airflow Power Interface Outside of Rocket Pressure Sensor 3 Pressure Sensor 2 Pressure Sensor 1 2x9 V Supply Temperature Sensor 1 Temperature Sensor 2 Temperature Sensor 3 Notice Electrical Compliance with Wallops

Structural Drawings and Pictures -Solid models -Integrated solid models -Interfaces: -To the can per the user guide requirements -To your shared customer -2D drawings can be reserved for the appendix -SEE EXAMPLES ON NEXT FEW SLIDES

Structural Drawing Examples Cup Cone Aerofin Side Panel IRS To HOP Release

Structural Drawing Examples

Shared Can Logistics Plan Update Chris and I on RSPC sharing logistics since PDR –Pertains to Institutions/Universities sharing a can –Descriptions of interfacing to each other –Descriptions of interfacing to the top and bottom bulkheads

Schematics -Show/prove compliance with Wallop’s No-Volt requirement -Schematics shall be mature and complete at this point -SEE EXAMPLES ON NEXT FEW SLIDES

Schematic Example Wallops Compliance

Subsystems Overview -What subsystems do you have: power, C&DH, thermal, etc. -What top level requirements do you have for each subsystem. -Make requirements as quantifiable as possible. -Power subsystem shall supply 2W to… -Power subsystem shall remain at or above 72 F at all times during the flight. -Which requirements are design drivers? -Where is data stored? -Be sure to include sensor specifications -Any states that your payload may have: -Active, Active/Safe, Idle…

Parts List -MAJOR Components lists -Not at the nut and bolt level… just major hardware that will be purchased or built in house -Lead times can be useful, but are not required (This can make or break a project) -Distributors -Manufacturers -SEE EXAMPLE ON NEXT SLIDE

Example Parts List Parts CompanyModel Low range accelerometers x and y-axis Analog Devices ADXL 203 z-axis ADXL 103 High range accelerometers x and y-axis Analog DevicesADXL 278 z-axis ADXL 78 Microcontroller AtmelATmega 32 ADC Analog Devices AD73360 Pressure Sensor OmegaPX 209 Solenoid valve Parker Temperature sensor National LM50CIM3 Semiconductor Power Regulator Texas InstrumentsM2937IMP Flash memory Atmel AT26DF161A Transistors NMOS

Special Requirements -Some customers have very special needs that shall be addressed in detail (THIS WILL NOT APPLY TO ALL CUSTOMERS) -Schematics (???) -Mechanical Drawings -Demonstrated Need -What can Colorado Space Grant Consortium do to help? -Tools/Special Equipment that you need from Wallops for integration -Torque wrench, argon gas, etc.

RockSat Payload Canister User Guide Compliance Type of RestrictionRestrictionStatus Mass allotment:<= your allotment Volume allotment:<= your allotment The payload’s center of gravity (CG):In 1”X1”X1” envelope of centroid? Wallops No-Volt Requirement Compliance:Yes? Structure mounts:Top and bottom bulkheads. No mounts to sides of cans. Sharing:Fully developed?

Management –Updated Organizational Chart –Updated Schedule –Updated mass/monetary budgets

Test Plans -What type of testing can be performed on your payload pre-flight? -What is required to complete testing?: -Support Hardware -Purchase/produce? -Software -Purchase/in-house? -Potential points of failure -Testing/Troubleshooting/Modifications/Re- Testing Schedule

Conclusions –Issues and concerns –Closing remarks

Appendix –Information and drawings not essential to the presentation, but that could be useful for tough questions Data sheets, 2D drawings, additional schematics/diagrams, any design analysis completed.