LIGO-G070312-00-I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Advertisements

8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford 1 Length and angular control loops in LIGO Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Hanford.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
1 LIGO-G Z Penn State / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2003 March 18 Calibration Testing Patrick Sutton, with Michael Landry, Gabriela Gonzalez,
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
LIGO-G D 1 S3 expectations, S2 calibration M. Landry LHO CW Search Group F2F Milwaukee, Jun
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Calibration of data in the time domain (or how to generate 1800s long SFTs from time domain data) XS, Bruce Allen, Mike Landry, Soumya Mohanty, Malik Rachmanov,
9/23/08G Z Status of the S5 calibration Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee LSC September 2008 Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee.
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
1 Time-Domain Calibration Update Xavier Siemens, Mike Landry, Gaby Gonzalez, Brian O’Reilly, Martin Hewitson, Bruce Allen, Jolien Creighton.
8/18/06Gxxxxxx Introduction to Calibration Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006 Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006.
COMMISSIONING PROGRESS G.LOSURDO – INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
Calibration of LIGO data in the time domain X. Siemens, B. Allen, M. Hewitson, M. Landry.
Advanced VIRGO WG1: Status VIRGO, Cascina Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
Investigation of discrepancies between Photon calibrator, VCO and Official (coil) calibration techniques Evan Goetz, Rick Savage with Justin Garofoli,
6. Results The accompanying histograms show the empirical PDF of z for each interferometer (H1, H2 at Hanford, WA; L1 at Livingston, LA). The green areas.
Stefan Hild 1GWDAW 10, Brownsville, December 2005 Status of GEO 600 Stefan Hild, AEI Hannover for the GEO-team.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
Status of GEO600 Benno Willke for the GEO600 team Aspen Meeting Aspen CO, January 2005 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Hanover LSC Meeting, August 18, 2003 LIGO S2 Calibration Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Representing the calibration.
Loïc Rolland LSC-Virgo, Orsay- June 11th Virgo ‘timing’ calibration Loïc Rolland Note: Timing calibration during VSR1 in the Virgo codifier (VIR-028A-08,
LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.
Preparing GEO600 for Gravitational Wave astronomy (A status report) Martin Hewitson, AEI Hannover for GEO600.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
AOS: Photon Calibrator Technical Status
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
Laser Frequency Stabilization – 2004, May 04 1 Laser Frequency Stabilization François BONDU CNRS – ARTEMIS, Nice VIRGO How it works (Design) Make it work.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.
LIGO-G Z SenseMonitor Updates for S3 Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.
LIGO-G D Online Digital Signal Processing NSF Review, October 23, 2002 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Hanover, October 25, 2007.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Pcal actuation of the TST stage of the DARM servo loop
October 2006, LIGO Hanford Observatory
Analysis of LIGO S2 data for GWs from isolated pulsars
Photon Calibrator Investigations During S6
Calibration of data in the time domain (or how to generate 1800s long SFTs from time domain data) XS, Bruce Allen, Mike Landry, Soumya Mohanty, Malik.
S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Update on LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
h(t): are you experienced?
M Ashley - LSC Meeting – LIGO Hanford, 12 Nov 2003
ALLEGRO calibration for the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
LIGO Photon Calibrators
S3 Performance of the LIGO Interferometers as Measured by SenseMonitor
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Gravitational radiation from known radio pulsars using LIGO data
Preparing GEO600 for Gravitational Wave astronomy (A status report)
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina, Italy

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Talk overview Frequency-domain calibration h(f) »V3 calibration and review, some gory details »Factors  (t),  (t) »Validation work for GRB Time-domain calibration h(t) Photon calibrator High-frequency calibration

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Calibration committee »S. Giampanis, E. Goetz, G. González, M. Hewitson, S. Hild, E. Hirose, P. Kalmus, M. Landry, E. Messaritaki, B. O’Reilly, R. Savage, X. Siemens, M. Sung »Virgo: B. Lieunard, F. Marion, B. Mours, L. Rolland Calibration review committees »Frequency domain: S. Fairhurst, K. Kawabe, V. Mandic, J. Zweizig »Time domain : S. Fairhurst, K. Kawabe, V. Mandic, B. O’Reilly, M. Sung, S. Waldman »High frequency : K. Kawabe, M. Rahkmanov, R. Savage, D. Sigg

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Frequency-domain calibration We model the DARM loop in MATLAB Compare this model to measurements of the open- loop gain, electronics in the Actuation and Sensing chains and DC value of the Actuation. Optical and loop gain are tracked by time-dependent coefficients which are generated on minute or second time scales. These coefficients are used to propagate measurements at t 0 to other times.

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May A(f) D D (f)  (t)C D0 (f) DARM_ERR  + s=h(t)+n(t) DARM_CTRL s res =(L x -L y )/L  + DARM_CTRL_EXC Measure Open-Loop Gain at a reference time t 0 G 0 (f) = A(f)C D0 (f)D D (f) h(f,t) = R DERR (f,t)DERR(f,t) Darm loop

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Frequency-domain status Since last L/V meeting: »V3 calibration released (Nov 4 05 – Jan 22 07) »V3 currently being reviewed » Changes to a machine’s state are reflected in the calibration yielding epochs L1 »3 epochs due to servo changes »Roughly 3, 1/2 and 15 months in duration, respectively H1 »4 epochs due to servo and DARM gain changes »3, 4, 4, and 7 months in duration H2 »3 epochs due to servo changes »3, 8, 6 months in duration

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Open loop gain model/ measurement comparison H1 H2 L1

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May H1 ITM comparison Results of MICH sweeps, corrected for pendulum H1 – Nov H1 – Dec 8 06

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May DC cal histories H1 L1

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Factors at reference time :  (t),  (t) L1 – epoch 3

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Calibration for GRB GRB event ostensibly in M31 on Feb 1, 2007 : H1 and H2 locked in science mode Validate V3 calibration for Feb 1, 2007 »Made V4 calibrations: checked against V3 »Checked Feb 1 IFO configurations against that of V3 reference time »Autocalibration check : check V3 against quasi-independent autocalibrator procedure Conclude V3 calibration acceptable for GRB Technical doc T W, “Validation of the S5 V3 LHO calibrations for GRB070201” written

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May h(t) Description at » S4 review complete Production of V3 h(t) underway »h(t) in LIGO naturally follows on from frequency domain model »Necessary filters created from h(f) V3 DARM model »Lengthy process (~ month) to reprocess S5 data with updated V3 calibration and produce h(t) : data are on tape h(t) now employed by all search groups

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Photon calibrator Intensity modulated radiation pressure excites ETM, approximately sinusoidally, at a chosen frequency. Displacement is estimated with basic physics. Power is deduced from a photo- detector looking at beam pickoff.

LIGO-G I H1 XarmH1 YarmH2 XarmH2 YarmL1 XarmL1 Yarm Pcal/Ocal ratioN/A Date measuredSept. 28, 06Nov. 8, 06 Mar. 16, 07 Ratio of ETM coil calibration factors (m/ct) measured using the photon calibrators to those measured using the official calibration technique (mean of values over the frequency range from 50 to 400 Hz). H1 ETMY coil actuation coefficients determined by the official calibration procedure (blue) and by the photon calibrator (red). The transfer functions have been multiplied by the square of the measurement frequency to flatten the plots. H1 ETMY coil actuation coefficients Actuation coeff. x f^2 Frequency (Hz) Photon calibrator Official calibration

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May High-frequency calibration AS_Q_FAST channels 262kHz sampling rate Signals digitally heterodyned at 1024Hz (AS_Q_0FSR) and kHz (AS_Q_1FSR) at 2048Hz sampling rate Introduction S4 calibration review underway S5 calibration Post-S5 measurements to ensure quality

LIGO-G I Landry - L/V meeting, 22 May Closing S5 calibration issues »Many measurements over a long run: multiple epochs, discrepancies to understand. Complicates data production and calibration validation »What to do with short epochs? Data quality flags or special calibrations? »Events like GRB require confidence in online calibration All calibration flavours will require IFO configuration freezes at the end of S5: suite of measurements, both in control room and on the floor