Rogerian Argument Taken from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers

Origins of this principle Origins of this principle Based on Carl Rogers’ theory that people involved in disputes should not respond to each other until they fully and fairly state the other person’s position.

4 Parts of the Rogerian Argument 1. Introduction 2. Contexts 3. Writer’s position 4. Benefits to opponent

1. Introduction The writer describes an issue well enough to show that he/she fully understands and respects the alternative position. “Let’s meet in the middle.”

2. Contexts The writer describes cases/contexts in which the alternative position may be legitimate. “You may be right sometimes…”

3. Writer’s Position The writer states her/his position and presents circumstances in which it is valid. This is where the writer supports her/his views with evidence. “This is why my position is right.”

4. Benefits to Opponent The writer explains to the opponent how he/she would benefit from adopting the writer’s position. “See what you might gain by agreeing with me?”

Summation Rogerian arguments steer clear of incendiary and stereotypical language. They emphasize how both sides of the argument might benefit by working together. They advocate a win-win outcome.