Lab 11 :Test of Neutrality and Evidence for Selection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPRS workshop Comparative Genomics 18 th -21 st of February 2013 Lecture 4 Positive selection.
Advertisements

Quick Lesson on dN/dS Neutral Selection Codon Degeneracy Synonymous vs. Non-synonymous dN/dS ratios Why Selection? The Problem.
Lab 9: Linkage Disequilibrium. Goals 1.Estimation of LD in terms of D, D’ and r 2. 2.Determine effect of random and non-random mating on LD. 3.Estimate.
Lab 10: Mutation, Selection and Drift
Lab 10: Mutation, Selection and Drift. Goals 1.Effect of mutation on allele frequency. 2.Effect of mutation and selection on allele frequency. 3.Effect.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism And Association Studies Stat 115 Dec 12, 2006.
Lab 3 : Exact tests and Measuring of Genetic Variation.
Lab 3 : Exact tests and Measuring Genetic Variation.
Sampling distributions of alleles under models of neutral evolution.
Plant of the day! Pebble plants, Lithops, dwarf xerophytes Aizoaceae
ATG GAG GAA GAA GAT GAA GAG ATC TTA TCG TCT TCC GAT TGC GAC GAT TCC AGC GAT AGT TAC AAG GAT GAT TCT CAA GAT TCT GAA GGA GAA AAC GAT AAC CCT GAG TGC GAA.
Supplementary Fig.1: oligonucleotide primer sequences.
Atelier INSERM – La Londe Les Maures – Mai 2004
Signatures of Selection
Pattern of similarity between Europeans and Neanderthals Green et al. Science 328, 710 (2010)
Detection of domestication genes and other loci under selection.
Population Genetics. Mendelain populations and the gene pool Inheritance and maintenance of alleles and genes within a population of randomly breeding.
14 Molecular Evolution and Population Genetics
From population genetics to variation among species: Computing the rate of fixations.
Polymorphism Structure of the Human Genome Gabor T. Marth Department of Biology Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA
Bruce Walsh, University of Arizona
Dispersal models Continuous populations Isolation-by-distance Discrete populations Stepping-stone Island model.
Evolutionary Genome Biology Gabor T. Marth, D.Sc. Department of Biology, Boston College Medical Genomics Course – Debrecen, Hungary, May 2006.
Scott Williamson and Carlos Bustamante
Salit Kark Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology The Silberman Institute of Life Sciences The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Conservation Biology.
Adaptive Molecular Evolution Nonsynonymous vs Synonymous.
Hidenki Innan and Yuseob Kim Pattern of Polymorphism After Strong Artificial Selection in a Domestication Event Hidenki Innan and Yuseob Kim A Summary.
Molecular phylogenetics
Lecture 21: Tests for Departures from Neutrality November 9, 2012.
Lab 12. Linkage Disequilibrium November 28, 2012.
HARDY-WEINBERG EQUILIBRIUM
The Evolution of Populations.  Emphasizes the extensive genetic variation within populations and recognizes the importance of quantitative characteristics.
Lecture 22: Signatures of Selection and Introduction to Linkage Disequilibrium November 12, 2012.
Rates and Fitness Effects of Mutations Adam Eyre-Walker (University of Sussex)
Estimating evolutionary parameters for Neisseria meningitidis Based on the Czech MLST dataset.
Lab 7. Estimating Population Structure. Goals 1.Estimate and interpret statistics (AMOVA + Bayesian) that characterize population structure. 2.Demonstrate.
Selectionist view: allele substitution and polymorphism
Population genetics. coalesce 1.To grow together; fuse. 2.To come together so as to form one whole; unite: The rebel units coalesced into one army to.
Lab 9: Linkage Disequilibrium. Goals 1.Estimation of LD in terms of D, D’ and r 2. 2.Determine effect of random and non-random mating on LD. 3.Estimate.
Lecture 20 : Tests of Neutrality
Lab 7. Estimating Population Structure
NEW TOPIC: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION.
By Mireya Diaz Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics for EECS 458.
Molecular evolution Part I: The evolution of macromolecules.
Genomics of Adaptation
Lab 11 :Test of Neutrality and Evidence for Selection
Mutation: Origin of genetic variation sources of new alleles rate and nature of mutations sources of new genes highly repeated functional sequences.
Testing the Neutral Mutation Hypothesis The neutral theory predicts that polymorphism within species is correlated positively with fixed differences between.
Evolutionary Genome Biology Gabor T. Marth, D.Sc. Department of Biology, Boston College
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) By Amira Jhelum Rahul Shweta.
In populations of finite size, sampling of gametes from the gene pool can cause evolution. Incorporating Genetic Drift.
Modelling evolution Gil McVean Department of Statistics TC A G.
Human survivorship Developed Developing Bob May (2007), TREE 22:
BME 130 – Genomes Lecture 20 Population Genomics I.
Lecture 21: Introduction to Phylogenetics November 9, 2015.
Inferences on human demographic history using computational Population Genetic models Gabor T. Marth Department of Biology Boston College Chestnut Hill,
Lecture 3 - Concepts of Marine Ecology and Evolution II 3) Detecting evolution: HW Equilibrium Principle -Calculating allele frequencies, predicting genotypes.
Robert Page Doctoral Student in Dr. Voss’ Lab Population Genetics.
Human survivorship Developed Developing Bob May (2007), TREE 22:
Early changes of hepatitis B virus quasispecies during lamivudine treatment and the correlation with antiviral efficacy. J Hepatol May;50(5):
Fig. 1. Genomic structure of the csd gene in A
A Genetic Analysis of the Local Rana sylvatica Population
Signatures of Selection
Neutrality Test First suggested by Kimura (1968) and King and Jukes (1969) Shift to using neutrality as a null hypothesis in positive selection and selection.
Linkage and Linkage Disequilibrium
The Neutral Theory M. Kimura, 1968
Sequence Alignments—part 2
Diversity and selection of the MHC class II genes in canids
Testing the Neutral Mutation Hypothesis
Molecular evolution: traditional tests of neutrality
Presentation transcript:

Lab 11 :Test of Neutrality and Evidence for Selection

Goals: 1.Calculate exp. # of different allele in a population for different marker. 2.Detect departure from neutrality using- 1.Ewens- Watterson test. 2.Tajima’s D test. 3.HKA test and 4.Synonymous and Nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution test

Infinite Alleles Model (IAM) Each mutation produces a new allele At equilibrium, number of alleles and shape of allele frequency distribution remain constant Lost alleles replaced by new mutations

Ewens -Watterson test Expected homozygosity under mutation-drift equilibrium and assuming IAM: Expected homozygosity under HWE: P-value Balancing selection or recent bottleneck P-value > 0.975: Too uneven -> Directional selection or population growth

Problem 1. Estimates of the long-term effective population size of human populations vary widely, ranging from as low as ~3,000 to as high as ~100,000. To estimate allele frequencies for a forensic identification study, you are genotyping individuals selected at random from a population with an estimated N e = 7,500. You are using one allozyme and one microsatellite marker, with estimated mutation rates  = 0.8  and  = 9.2  10 -2, respectively. How many different alleles do you expect to find for each marker in a sample of: 7 people? 12 people? What assumptions were made for these calculations to be valid?

Tajima’s D Under neutrality, we expect the following: Test of the coalescent model – Assumes neutral alleles and constant population size

Tajima’s D test d =   −  S = 0 Under neutrality D =.

(Hamilton 270)

plantsciences.ucdavis.edu

Problem 2. File aspen_phy.arp (which is already in Arlequin format) contains sequence data from exon 1 of the phytochrome B2 (phyB2) gene of 24 aspen (Populus tremula) trees sampled along a wide latitudinal gradient in Europe. Use Arlequin to: a.Determine the number of polymorphic sites (S) and calculate the nucleotide diversity (  ) based on these sequences. b.Perform the tests of neutrality developed by Ewens- Watterson and Tajima and interpret the results. c. Provide a statistical and a biological interpretation of the results from the two neutrality tests.

Hudson-Kreitman- Aguade(HKA) test (Hamilton 266)

Hudson-Kreitman- Aguade(HKA) test AdhControl locus Polymorphism within species (S/m) Divergence between Species(D/m) Ratio (within/between) χ2χ p-value0.016

FileRegion of tb1Subspecies utr_mays.arp5’ untranslated regionmays utr_par.arp5’ untranslated regionparviglumis exon_mays.arpexonmays exon_par.arpexonparviglumis Test Atb1 5’ untranslated regionAverage of control loci Polymorphism within subspecies Divergence between subspecies χ2χ p-value0.001 Test Btb1 translated regionAverage of control loci Polymorphism within subspecies Divergence between subspecies χ2χ p-value0.26 Problem 3. Files utr_mays.arp, utr_par.arp, exon_mays.arp, and exon_par.arp contain sequence data from the 5’ untranslated region and from an exon of the teosinte branched1(tb1) gene of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and its most likely wild progenitor Zea mays ssp. parviglumis. For each of these regions of tb1 and for each subspecies: Use Arlequin to determine the number of segregating sites (S) and calculate the nucleotide diversity (  ). What can you infer by comparing nucleotide diversity between the two species for each region? Use Arlequin to perform the tests of neutrality developed by Ewens-Watterson and Tajima. Interpret and discuss the results. Interpret and discuss the results from the following 2 HKA tests: GRADUATE STUDENTS ONLY: Download and read the paper describing this study (Wang et al. 1999), which is uploaded on the lab page of the class website, and provide an extended biological interpretation of the results of a) – c).

Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Nucleotide Substitution test dN = Observed # nonsynonymous substitutions/nonsynonymous site dS= Observed # synonymous subsitutions/synonymous site 5’-ATT GTT CAT CGT ACC CAT CGA-3’ 5’-ATT GTT CAT CGC ACC CAA CGA-3’ Synonymous site Synonymous mutation Nonsynonymous site Nonsynonymous mutation

Problem 4. Calculate the ω = d N /d S ratio based on the following 2 DNA sequences: 5’-ATG GTT CAT TTT ACC GGA CGA AGT CGA TTA-3’ 5’-ATG GTT CAC TTG ACC GCA CGA AGT AGA TTA-3’ Seq 1 Codon No. potential synonymous sites (s j ) No. potential nonsynonymous sites (n j ) Seq 2 Codon No. potential synonymous sites (s j ) No. potential nonsynonymo us sites (n j ) ATG03 03 GTT Total