Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board April 11, 2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.

Advertisements

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Requests for Decisions on Panel Membership and Revised Schedule CBP Partnership Management Board September 13,

Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency November 21, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.

Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.

EISWG The Environmental Information Services Working Group of the NOAA Science Advisory Board Raymond J. Ban April 22, 2009.

Engaging Younger Generations in the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Elizabeth Burdick & Adam Thompson.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.

A Report on Progress toward the Strategic Goals Presented to the Valencia District Board of Trustees on behalf of the College Planning Council.

1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.

21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.

Environmental Finance Center Boise State University Working on the “How to Pay” Issues of Watershed Restoration The Environmental Finance Center.

Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on Status of the FCSA July 12, 2013 Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study.

Tag Up Tampa Bay! Tampa Bay Estuary Specialty Tag Sales Dave Moore Program Development Coordinator.

Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.

 Able to meet the needs of its members by being: o Sustainable o Well managed & transparent o Responsive o Proactive  Provide you with the service you.

Biennial Budget Budget Message Presented by Chris Jordan, City Manager April 27, 2009.

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.

Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.

Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.

Financial Subcommittee Report February 15, Identify options for funding new equipment. Tasks include: Identify and evaluate potential sources of.

Activities of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Gail Mallard, USGS NWQMC Meeting Phoenix, AZ, December 10, 2002.

Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.

AzLA Marketing & Advocacy Committee 2013 AzLA Conference.

Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.

Jim Edward EPA, Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC Meeting September 17, 2015.

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT BOARD MEETING MAY 9, 2012 ANNAPOLIS, MD Social Science Action Team: Incorporating Social Science into the.

CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,

SCCA BACKGROUND Recognition throughout the 90s of the need to build a partnership to develop strategies to address cancer. DHEC.

Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.

December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.

Sustainable Pro-poor Financing Modalities for WASH Innovative Water Financing Workshop Mombasa, 9 th November 2011.

EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.

Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.

Critical Issues in Implementing Trading Programs in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed STAC Workshop May 14, 2013 Annapolis, MD.

US Fish and Wildlife Service Focal Species Strategy for Migratory Birds.

Transitional Committee for the Design of the Green Climate Fund – Workstream II Mandate – status of work, and work plan ecbi Seminar, Bonn 12th June 2011.

North Slope Science Initiative Dr. John F. Payne, Executive Director Dr. Denny Lassuy, Acting Deputy Director North Slope Science Initiative

2015 NYSAR 3 Annual Recycling Conference Dan Lilkas-Rain, NYSAR 3 Board Member and Chairman, Re-Clothe NY Campaign Recycling Coordinator, Town of Bethlehem,

More People Working for More Fish Overview of the National Fish Habitat Action Plan.

NOAA Social Science Initiative Rodney Weiher Chief Economist Program Planning and Integration NOAA SAB Washington DC March 16, 2004.

OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.

May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL1 Paint Product Stewardship Initiative Dialogue Meeting Sarasota, FL May 3-4, 2006.

EcoPRO Vision Trained, certified professionals will establish sustainable landscaping as the norm for homes, institutions, and public spaces, thus contributing.

Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.

State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund Program Update Chesapeake Bay Program Citizens Advisory Committee Thursday, February.

Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.

Chesapeake Bay Program Independent Evaluator – GIT 6 Review & Next Steps.

Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller.

Jim Edward, Deputy Director EPA, Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC Meeting May , 2016.

Governance/FACA Committee Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting January

Renaissance Atlanta Midtown

Shadi Eskaf Senior Project Director

CBP Strategic Communications Plan

Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.

SNA Strategic Plan #SNAleadership.

Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014

Active Cumbria Governance Structure

ACLN Strategic Plan Report 2018 AGM.

Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters

Active Cumbria Governance Structure

Strategic Priorities and Actions:

Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters

Management Approaches in CBP Diversity Workplan

Status Update John Wolf November 13, 2018

EPA Funding Opportunities in the LRGV

Active Cumbria Governance Structure

Restoration & Monitoring Prioritization Tool

Presentation transcript:

Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board April 11, 2013

Background On January 10, 2013, the Management Board approved development of a set of options for a finance advisory committee for consideration. Efforts to protect and restore the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed demand significant investments to achieve success. Such investments require financial strategies, tools, coordination, and partnership. The Chesapeake Bay Program sponsored environmental finance workshops and webinars in 2012 and 2013, but greater effort is needed to support Bay Program partners.

Option 1: Status Constitute workgroup as part of existing organization such as EPA EFAB or GIT 6. Establish advisory committee with standing equal to CAC, LGAC, or STAC. Option 2: Scope Focus of new group should be on water quality. Focus of new group should be all goals of the Chesapeake Bay Partnership.

Option 3: Scope Focus of new group should be on either public financing or private financing. Focus of new group should be on both public and private financing. Focus of new group should be on both but place greater emphasis on one or the other. Option 4: Size New group should be open to all potential members willing to serve. New group should be limited in size.

Option 5: Credentials Membership in new group should not be predicated on professional credentials and expertise. Membership in new group should require demonstration of appropriate credentials and expertise. Half the membership should be from entities headquartered outside the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Option 6: Term Duration of membership in new group should not be limited. Duration of membership in new group should be limited to five years. Terms should be staggered with a portion rotating off on a specific frequency.

Option 7: Operations Work plan of new group should be based on issued raised by Chesapeake Bay Program partners. Work plan of new group should be based on issued raised by members of the new group. Work plan of new group should be based on issued raised by Chesapeake Bay Program partners and by members of the new group.

Budget Implications Since FY 2009, CAC and LGAC have each received between $150,000 and $169,000 per year in Chesapeake Bay Program funds. During the same period, STAC has received between $303,000 and $401,000 per year. We expect the new group to conduct much of its business via teleconference and video conference. Due to the broad mandate of the new group, we expect its budget to be between $150,000 and $300,000.