PLANNING OBLIGATIONS Environmental, Housing and Planning Scrutiny Committee 23 rd September 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Advertisements

New Models for Planning & Affordable Housing – HBF conference Planning Agreements – use, abuse and some possible solutions Paul Winter, Eversheds LLP 14.
Section 106 A Strategic Approach Peter Wilkinson Parks Service Manager Bristol Parks.
Strategic Spending of Developers Contributions Bournemouth and Poole Borough Councils Poole  L17 Policy and context  The Green Card system  Scoring.
inter-regional road charging project in Belgium
World Heritage and the Planning System Steve Tyler Spatial Strategy Manager Greenwich Council.
LES and Planning Policy
KINGSTON PARISH COUNCIL COUNCIL MEETING – 10 JANUARY 2011 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE FUTURE MANAGEMENT OF USE OF THE PAVILION A presentation by the Clerk.
Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Gwyn Jones City Growth and Development Manager Sustainable Development Panel Briefing 27 July 2011.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Charging and financial assessment Care Act Outline of content  Introduction Introduction  Conducting the financial assessment Conducting the financial.
The Community Infrastructure Levy – A planning gain? 1 Janet Askew, Adam Sheppard University of the West of England, Bristol Lorraine O’Connor Foot Anstey.
Local government – big business Councils provide more than 700 different functions & services Employ 2.5million people in 400 different occupations Big.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2013 – August 2012.
Development Contributions Planning Agreements Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Part 4, Division 6, Subdivision 2 lindsaytaylorlawyers Level.
Affordable Housing: Policies into Practice Louise Dwelly Housing Strategy & Enabling Manager October 2004.
NEW HOMES BONUS The Government is committed to the provision of incentives for local authorities to deliver sustainable new homes and businesses. At the.
James Aiello PricewaterhouseCoopers Africa Utility Week 06 International Good Practice in Procurement.
Embedding Travel Planning in the Development Process Sarah Cummings Behaviour Change Transport for London.
Presentation to Community Reference Group Thursday 7 February 2013 Patterson Lakes Community Centre.
Children, Young People and Families Early Intervention Fund and Adult Learning and Empowering Communities Fund Application support July/August 2015.
59 ½ Southwark Street London SE1 0AL (UK) ++44 (0) / Land Use Planning and Mobility Management Securing travel.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
How to infringe all the three pillars of the Aarhus Convention? – A quick guide for radwaste storage builders – Implementation of the Aarhus Convention.
HCC’s approach to road adoption Vetti Vettivelu Highways Development Control Service Manager.
WHAT IS JESSICA-1 ?  JESSICA stands for Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas  JESSICA is an optional facility  JESSICA offers.
Planning Obligations & Section 106
Christine James
Section 106 Overview Tony Melia – Section 106 Officer.
The Planning Act 2008 Presentation to local authorities affected by the proposed Navitus Bay Wind Park 22 January 2014 Kay Sully, Senior Case Manager Richard.
Community Response Fund. Supporting the Community Sector Government is developing a fresh approach to funding the community sector over the next 18 months.
Assessment of Benefits Change title? John Paterson (Sheffield, 17 th September) web:
Revenue-Based Development Incentives Property Tax Revenues Bob Rychlicki Kane, McKenna and Associates, Inc.
SECTION 106 AGREEMENTS Martin Hooker Assistant Director (Planning)
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Presented by Ian Robinson How many hats do we wear?
S106, Developer Contributions & Delivering Infrastructure Mike Kiely Director of Planning LB Croydon Chair Planning Officers Society.
CIL : The Spending. Background and Context The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just.
Brockley Assembly Thursday 27 January 2011 Spending the Mayor’s Fund 2010/11 and 2011/12.
Planning Performance Agreements in Islington PAS Pre-Application Services Workshop 19 th June 2014 Victoria Geoghegan Head of Development Management &
CIL – a local authority perspective Jeni Jackson, Woking BC.
PLANNING ADVISORY SERVICE SEMINAR January 2015 SECTION 106 – ISSUES, APPROACHES AND CLAUSES Presented by Shabana Anwar.
1 Scrutiny for Policies and Place Committee 19th April Planning System Reforms Alyn Jones, Interim Director of Economic & Community Infrastructure Operations.
CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.
Introduction to Planning Sarah Platts. A plan-led system Two parts of planning: policy making and determination of planning applications; The planning.
PLANNING & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT City Planning Team PLANNING OBLIGATIONS – BRISTOL’S APPROACH Jim Cliffe Planning Obligations Manager Bristol City Council.
SOCIAL CARE AND HEALTH SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 21 st JANUARY 2003 PRESENTATION ON BUDGET METHODOLOGY AND PROGRESS “A better future for South Tyneside's people”
Community Infrastructure Levy in Islington Eric Manners London Borough of Islington PAS Seminar – ‘Making CIL Work’ 12 January 2016.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 and S278 vs CIL July 2014.
Community Infrastructure Levy – Charging Schedule.
Savills.com CIL Latest Research & Findings Emily Harvey, Associate.
Local Authority Experience Managing an effective S106 process Stephen Pointer Strategic Planning and Housing Manager Harborough District Council.
S106 Agreements Development Control User Panel. s106 agreements What are s106 agreements? How are they managed? The future:Community Infrastructure Levy.
1 Section 106: What they are and where we are DARREN WILDING DCLG.
Initial Budget Proposals 2015/16 Initial Budget Proposals 2015/16 Presentation by Leader of the Council and Portfolio holder for Performance and Efficiency.
SECTION 106 UPDATE DARREN WILDING DCLG. S106 - LEGISLATION Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 restricts the development or use of the.
Community Infrastructure Levy The fundamentals. Response to questions.
Overview Training for Nottingham’s Commissioning Framework Liz Jones Head of Partnership Policy, NCC Nick Weatherall, Commissioning Officer, NCVS.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 vs CIL July 2014.
An Integrated Approach to the Future Role of the RCARO in Support of the RCA Programme.
Place CIL Implementation – the Bristol experience Jim Cliffe (Planning Obligations Manager – Bristol City Council)
Introduction to the planning system for elected members​
AGENDA The current focus on housing Do we need older people’s housing? The role of planning? National Level Local Level Opportunities to influence Planning.
Neighbourhood Planning
Impact fees between the States and Nations
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
CIL In London CIL IN LONDON February 2019.
Presentation transcript:

PLANNING OBLIGATIONS Environmental, Housing and Planning Scrutiny Committee 23 rd September 2005

Introduction What is a planning obligation (s.106 agreement)? Private agreement that is negotiated –How much? what on? spent where? Used to make a development acceptable Planning obligations can be used to: Prescribe the nature of development Compensate for loss or damage created by a development Mitigate a development’s impact Criticisms “opaque”, “slow”, “unfair”, “complex”, “legalistic”

Key Features Planning obligations are not taxes They are negotiated private agreements Governed by fundamental principal that planning permission may not be bought or sold They do not require an open book approach of a developer They do require a clear policy regime as to what is required of a given site based on an objective assessment

Plan-led System General policies – principles and use UDP / Development Plan Documents Detailed policies SPG / Supplementary Planning Documents Standard charges and formulae (e.g. open space)

5 Tests of a Planning Obligation A planning obligation must be: 1.Relevant to Planning 2.Necessary to make the proposed development acceptable in planning terms 3.Directly related to the proposed development 4.Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development 5.Reasonable in all other aspects.

Types of Contribution Financial contributions: Lump sum / phased payments / endowment Maintenance payments May be in perpetuity if predominantly for users of the associated development Where asset intended for wider public use, maintenance costs borne by the authority in which the asset is vested. Pooled contributions Where combined impact of a number of developments creates the need for infrastructure Physical installations

Public Involvement Circular 05/2005 The planning register Heads of terms in Committee (Planning Panel) papers Salford In the context of a private negotiation and probity issues, role of…… –Cabinet / Lead Members –Ward Members –Community Committees

Issues and Uncertainties Has the obligation been triggered? Developers usually have 3 years to commence development Has the contribution been spent? Developers can claw back their contributions if they are not spent on agreed items within 5 years of receipt Appeals relating to planning obligations If the developer and the LPA cannot agree on the inclusion of a planning obligation. Modification or discharge of a planning obligation

Planning Obligations IN Salford City wide Policy context –Open Space (Policies H6/H11 and SPG7) –Infrastructure (Policy T3) Chapel Street Residential: £1000/unit Hotel: £500/bedroom Office: £10/m 2 January 2002 – January planning obligations between January 2002 and January developments commenced Total of £757, 720 received (Over £5.7million in total)

Projects IN Salford Trinity Park, Chapel Street Area Over £30k provided from s.106 monies to provide a children’s play area, street furniture and public art.

Trinity Park

Projects IN Salford Trinity Park, Chapel Street Area Over £30k provided from s.106 monies to provide a children’s play area, street furniture and public art. Bloom Street, Chapel Street Area £114k provided by s.106 monies to improve the paving, lighting and roadway.

Bloom Street

Projects IN Salford Trinity Park, Chapel Street Area Over £30k provided from s.106 monies to provide a children’s play area, street furniture and public art. Bloom Street, Chapel Street Area £114k provided by s.106 monies to improve the paving, lighting and roadway. Victoria Park £24k provided from s.106 monies to provide a children’s play area and a sport’s court.

Victoria Park

Projects IN Salford Trinity Park, Chapel Street Area Over £30k provided from s.106 monies to provide a children’s play area, street furniture and public art. Bloom Street, Chapel Street Area £114k provided by s.106 monies to improve the paving, lighting and roadway. Victoria Park £24k provided from s.106 monies to provide a children’s play area and a sport’s court. Oakwood Park £110K provided from s.106 monies to provide a children’s play area and to improve footpaths in the park

Oakwood Park

Management and Monitoring How does Salford manage planning obligations? Negotiate the legal agreement Check whether the development has commenced Ensure payment is received Identify project and deliver The future of planning obligations in Salford Supplementary Planning Document Priorities for s.106 contributions

Key Issues Planning obligations are negotiated agreements with an appeal process available Contributions are only required when the development has commenced Developers can claw back their contributions if they are not spent within 5 years of receipt A clear and transparent management process needs to be developed which involves the community Capacity problems – the need for a s.106 officer (funded from s.106?)

Summary - Scrutiny questions Criteria for how money is spent Formulae (open space only at present) Who decides how much is spent? When is the money received? The involvement of ward councillors Ongoing maintenance

Coming Soon to an LPA Near You???????……….. Government response to the Barker Review Optional planning charges and “scaled back” planning obligation system? Maybe / Maybe not!!