The US Tox21 Collaboration: Advances Made and Lessons Learned

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drug Discovery Process
Advertisements

The conversion of Saul to St Paul (Michelangelo, 1542) Marcel Leist Doerenkamp-Zbinden Chair For Alternative in vitro Methods, University Konstanz, Konstanz.
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Connecting Innovations in Biological, Exposure and Risk Sciences: Better Information for Better Decisions Charleston Place Hotel United States June 16.
Dosimetry in Risk Assessment and a bit More Mel Andersen McKim Conference QSAR and Aquatic Toxicology & Risk Assessment June 27-29, 2006.
UNEP Advisory Group Meeting Geneva, Switzerland December 12, 2014
Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
National Pesticide Program A New Toxicology Testing Paradigm: Meeting Common Needs Steven Bradbury, Director Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office.
ANIMAL MODELS HIV Cure Research Training Curriculum The HIV CURE training curriculum is a collaborative project aimed at making HIV cure research science.
William H. Farland, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science Office of Research and Development U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Biomarkers:
Peer Assessment of 5-year Performance ARS National Program 301: Plant, Microbial and Insect Genetic Resources, Genomics and Genetic Improvement Summary.
Overview of the NRC Vision for the Future of Toxicity Testing Daniel Krewski, PhD, MHA Professor and Director McLaughlin Centre for Population Heath Risk.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Computational Toxicology April 6, 2010 Exposure-Based Chemical Prioritization Workshop: Exploring.
NIH Brown Bag Lunch SOT 2010 March 9, 2010 Janice Allen, PhD Michael Humble, PhD Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT) National Institute.
Collaboration Workshop for Global Health System Strengthening Triangle Global Health Consortium 02 December 2009 Sally S. Tinkle Senior Science Advisor,
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Discussion Our current results suggest that it is possible to identify susceptibility regions using this methodology. The presented method takes advantage.
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
National Institute on Aging Richard J. Hodes, M.D. Director,NIA/NIH/DHHS ADC Meeting – NIH Roadmap and Budget October 2003.
The Tox21 Program Christopher P. Austin, M.D. Director, NIH Chemical Genomics Center The Future of Chemical Toxicity Testing in the U.S.: Creating a Roadmap.
Evolution of ICCVAM ◊National Toxicology Program Develop and validate improved test methods ◊NIH Revitalization Act: P.L Develop and.
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2009 C. Schwenk, D.K. Padilla, G.S. Bakken, R.J. Full.
Human Genome Project Janice S. Dorman, PhD University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing.
Discovery of new medicines through new models of collaboration Simon Ward Professor of Medicinal Chemistry & Director of Translational Drug Discovery Group.
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
GTL User Facilities Facility II: Whole Proteome Analysis Michelle V. Buchanan.
Criteria for Screens— Review of the EDSTAC Recommendations Presentation to the EDMVS July 23, 2002.
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
Georgia Wiesner, MD CREC June 20, GATACAATGCATCATATG TATCAGATGCAATATATC ATTGTATCATGTATCATG TATCATGTATCATGTATC ATGTATCATGTCTCCAGA TGCTATGGATCTTATGTA.
Integrating Scientific Advances into Regulation: Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacogenetics Janet Woodcock, M.D. Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
ARC Biotechnology Platform: Sequencing for Game Genomics Dr Jasper Rees
Stefan Franzén Introduction to clinical trials.
A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease or as a component of a medication A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment,
Chapter 13. The Impact of Genomics on Antimicrobial Drug Discovery and Toxicology CBBL - Young-sik Sohn-
High Throughput Genotoxicity Profiling of the US EPA ToxCast TM Chemical Library S Little 1, AW Knight 2, L Birrell 2, G Akerman 3, N McCarroll 3, D Dix.
The Center for Medical Genomics facilitates cutting-edge research with state-of-the-art genomic technologies for studying gene expression and genetics,
Biomedical Research Objective 2 Biomedical Research Methods.
Biomedical Research.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance Timing, Procedural and Legal Issues Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
1 Innovative Science To Improve Public Health EDKB: Endocrine Disruptors Knowledge Base at the FDA Huixiao Hong, Ph.D. Center for Bioinformatics Division.
Furan in Food Summary and Charge to the FAC and SCNT Terry C. Troxell, Ph.D. Director Office of Plant and Dairy Foods FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied.
Drug Discovery Process Massimiliano Beltramo, PhD.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level Office of Research and Development.
Quantitative Assessment of Cumulative Impacts: Challenges and Progress Lauren Zeise Cal/EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment CAPCOA Workshop:
Effort 1 – Voluntary Genomics Data Submission (VGDS) FDA Guidance to Industry: Pharmacogenomics data submission (Draft 2003, final publication 2005) –Invite.
Developing medicines for the future and why it is challenging Angela Milne.
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
Background on Furan in Foods Nega Beru, Ph.D. Director, Division of Plant Product Safety Office of Plant and Dairy Foods Center for Food and Applied Nutrition.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
1 1 EPA Nanotechnology Research Program – LCA Considerations Jeff Morris National Program Director for Nanotechnology 5 November 2009.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases November 19, 2007 NCDD Meeting Chair: Daniel K. Podolsky, MD Vice Chair: Eugene B. Chang, MD.
Perspective on the current state-of-knowledge of mode of action as it relates to the dose response assessment of cancer and noncancer toxicity Jennifer.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
1 LS DAM Overview August 7, 2012 Current Core Team: Ian Fore, D.Phil., NCI CBIIT, Robert Freimuth, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Mervi Heiskanen, NCI-CBIIT, Joyce.
Transcriptional Enhancers Looking out for the genes and each other Sridhar Hannenhalli Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics Center for Bioinformatics.
신기술 접목에 의한 신약개발의 발전전망과 전략 LGCI 생명과학 기술원. Confidential LGCI Life Science R&D 새 시대 – Post Genomic Era Genome count ‘The genomes of various species including.
The opportunities and challenges of sharing genomics data with the pharmaceutical industry Shahid Hanif, Head of Health Data & Outcomes, ABPI DNA digest.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Planning for a Team Science Evaluation ∞ NIEHS: Children’s Health Exposure Analysis.
Drug Discovery &Development
Susan Makris U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development
Director, Office of Health Assessment & Translation
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
Drug Design and Drug Discovery
RSESS March 18, 2008 Robert Osterberg
Introduction to Risk Assessment
Presentation transcript:

The US Tox21 Collaboration: Advances Made and Lessons Learned Chairpersons: Linda Birnbaum, NIEHS and NTP Robert Kavlock, US EPA/ORD Monday, March 23, 2015 9:15 am – 12:00 noon CC Ballroom 6E

2004 NTP Vision and Roadmap for the 21st Century 4/23/2017 2004 NTP Vision and Roadmap for the 21st Century To meet the challenges of 21st century toxicology, the 2005 NTP Roadmap included a major initiative to develop a high throughput screening (HTS) program with 3 main goals: To prioritize chemicals for further in-depth toxicological evaluation. To identify mechanisms of toxicity (characterize toxicity pathways, facilitate cross-species extrapolation, provide input to models for low- dose extrapolation). To develop predictive models for in vivo biological response in humans.

Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century 4/23/2017 Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century 2007 National Academy of Science Report Envisions a not-so-distant future in which virtually all routine toxicity testing would be conducted in vitro in human cells or cell lines by evaluating perturbations of cellular responses in a suite of toxicity pathway assays using high throughput robotic assisted methodologies.

Transforming Environmental Health Protection Collins, FS, Gray, GM, Bucher, JR (2008) Transforming Environmental Health Protection. Science 319:906-7.

Formation of the Tox21 Program 5-year Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on “High- Throughput Screening, Toxicity Pathway Profiling, and Biological Interpretation of Findings”. Released on Feb 14, 2008, signed by NHGRI (F.S. Collins), NIEHS/NTP (S.H. Wilson), and EPA (G.M. Gray). Revised 5-year MoU to add FDA signed on July 19, 2010, by NHGRI (E.D. Green), NIEHS/NTP (L.S. Birnbaum), EPA (P.T. Anastas), and FDA (J. Woodcock). Known informally as Tox21 for Toxicology in the 21st Century.

Purpose of Tox21: Bringing a New Era in Toxicology Support the evolution of toxicology from a mostly observational science to a predominantly predictive science focused upon mechanism-based, biological observations using cultured cells, model tissues, and lower organisms.

Tox21 Goals Research, develop, validate, and translate new chemical testing methods that characterize toxicity pathways. Use new technologies to develop models that can be used to more effectively predict how chemicals will affect biological responses. Gain better understanding of the relationship between chemicals and human diseases, in order to: Prioritize compounds for more comprehensive testing. Identify mechanisms of action. Develop predictive models of human disease.

The US Tox21 Collaboration: Advances Made and Lessons Learned Rusty Thomas, US EPA - The US EPA ToxCast Program: Moving from Data Generation to Application. Anton Simeonov, NCATS - Tox21 Phase II: Testing the 10K Library in Quantitative High-Throughput Screening Assays. Rick Paules, DNTP/NIEHS - Tox21 Phase III: Improving on Biological Coverage, Relevance, and Public Outreach. Warren Casey, DNTP/NIEHS - Prioritization and Predictive Toxicology: Estrogen Receptor Active Compounds. Tina Bahadori, US EPA - From Data to Decisions—An End User’s Perspective.

4/23/2017

Tox21’s Unique Capabilities Unique capabilities not currently available elsewhere: Robotics. High throughput screening platform. Compound handling capabilities. Informatics tools. In the past 2 years, NCATS has been screening more than 10,000 compounds chosen jointly by the NTP, NCATS, and EPA against a set of key nuclear receptors and stress response pathways using cell-based assays.   This screening, still in progress, has greatly advanced our understanding of the potential toxicity of many substances of concern.

Tox21’s Next Phase – Improving Coverage & Relevance Increased use of computational models to predict toxicity and metabolism. Increased focus on human cells with known ability to metabolize chemicals  Expand our understanding of biology by developing and implementing a high throughput and low cost approach to measure the expression level of all genes in a cell at once – Toxicogenomics Increase use of stem cells (both embryonic and iPS) to investigate the effects of chemicals on developmental processes Increased focus on genetic variation to understand susceptibilites - Toxicogenetics

NIEHS-NCATS-UNC DREAM Toxicogenetics Challenge An innovative crowdsourced computational challenge launched on June 11, 2013, and closed September 15, 2013. The NIEHS-NCATS-UNC team conducted the largest ever population- based in vitro cytotoxicity study: 1086 cell lines representing 9 distinct geographical populations. 179 drugs and environmental chemicals. https://www.synapse.org/#!Challenges:DREAM8 The challenge asked participants to build models based on data from the toxicogenetics project to predict: The toxic response of individuals to chemicals. How a particular population will respond to certain types of chemicals.

Benzene Inhalation Study with the DO Mouse Diversity outbred (J:DO) male mice selected from 175 breeding pairs Dose levels: 0, 1, 10, 100 ppm benzene, 28 days, 6 hr/day 600 mice total: 2 separate cohorts to assess reproducibility Endpoints for hematotoxicity and genetic damage % reticulocytes and micronucleated reticulocytes in bone marrow and blood Mouse Universal Genotyping Array (7.5K SNPs; MUGA) Mapping & Linkage analysis (QTLRel) Mice showed a 205-fold difference in susceptibility Associated with variable expression of a sulfotransferace detoxification enzyme French JE, et al. 2015. Environ Health Perspect. 123: 237 – 245. 13 Paules_2015

4/23/2017 Milestones of Tox21 Made all Tox21 Phase I and Phase II data collected to date public. Made chemical libraries available to investigators to expand the breadth of toxicological information. Identified artifacts in high throughput screening data that lead to false results. Made progress in data analysis and development of tools for prioritizing chemicals for more extensive testing using traditional methods. Exchanged assays and data with other organizations/efforts (e.g., EU Joint Research Centre, Health Canada, SEURAT, OpenTox). Worked with other NIEHS groups to evaluate Tox21 data for use by regulatory agencies.

Benefits of Tox21 Information and informatics tools from Tox21 will facilitate new drug discovery and promote translational research across NIH by eliminating substances with undesirable effects from further development. This federal multiagency collaboration is realizing a new vision for toxicological testing and contributing to improving public health.