Functional Programming and Lisp. Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. In a functional programming language,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp.
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 1998 by Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Chapter 14 Functional Programming Languages - The design of the imperative languages is based directly.
1 Scheme and Functional Programming Aaron Bloomfield CS 415 Fall 2005.
Lists in Lisp and Scheme a. Lists are Lisp’s fundamental data structures, but there are others – Arrays, characters, strings, etc. – Common Lisp has moved.
Variables, Environments and Closures. Overview We will Touch on the notions of variable extent and scope Introduce the notions of lexical scope and.
CSE 3341/655; Part 4 55 A functional program: Collection of functions A function just computes and returns a value No side-effects In fact: No program.
1 Programming Languages (CS 550) Lecture Summary Functional Programming and Operational Semantics for Scheme Jeremy R. Johnson.
Functional Programming. Pure Functional Programming Computation is largely performed by applying functions to values. The value of an expression depends.
1 Programming Languages and Paradigms Lisp Programming.
Lambda Calculus and Lisp PZ03J. Lambda Calculus The lambda calculus is a model for functional programming like Turing machines are models for imperative.
Chapter 3 Functional Programming. Outline Introduction to functional programming Scheme: an untyped functional programming language.
CS 355 – PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES Dr. X. Apply-to-all A functional form that takes a single function as a parameter and yields a list of values obtained.
1-1 An Introduction to Scheme March Introduction A mid-1970s dialect of LISP, designed to be a cleaner, more modern, and simpler version than.
Lisp – Introduction יעל נצר מערכות נבונות סמסטר ב' תשס"ו.
Functional programming: LISP Originally developed for symbolic computing Main motivation: include recursion (see McCarthy biographical excerpt on web site).
Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages. Copyright © 2007 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1–2 Introduction Design of imperative languages is.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages Mathematical Functions Fundamentals of Functional Programming Languages Introduction to.
Functional programming: LISP Originally developed for symbolic computing First interactive, interpreted language Dynamic typing: values have types, variables.
SchemeCOP Introduction to Scheme. SchemeCOP Scheme Meta-language for coding interpreters –“ clean ” semantics Scheme = LISP + ALGOL –simple.
COMP 205 – Week 11 Dr. Chunbo Chu. Intro Lisp stands for “LISt Process” Invented by John McCarthy (1958) Simple data structure (atoms and lists) Heavy.
LISP 1.5 and beyond A very quick tour. Data Atoms (symbols) including numbers – All types of numbers including Roman! (well, in the early days) – Syntactically.
Slide 1 Vitaly Shmatikov CS 345 Introduction to Scheme.
Functional Programming Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti Adina Magda Florea
1 Lists in Lisp and Scheme. 2 Lists are Lisp’s fundamental data structures. Lists are Lisp’s fundamental data structures. However, it is not the only.
1 Lisp Functions –Built-in functions –Defining functions –Function Evaluation and Special Forms defun, if Control statements –Conditional if, cond –Repetition.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp. Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. You can create them, put.
CS 330 Programming Languages 11 / 21 / 2006 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp.
COP4020 Programming Languages Functional Programming Prof. Xin Yuan.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
LISP Data Types Functional Programming Academic Year Alessandro Cimatti
UMBC CMSC Common Lisp II. UMBC CMSC Input and Output Print is the most primitive output function > (print (list 'foo 'bar)) (FOO BAR) The.
Variables, Environments and Closures. Overview Touch on the notions of variable extent and scope Introduce the notions of lexical scope and dynamic.
Milos Hauskrecht (PDF) Hieu D. Vu (PPT) LISP PROGARMMING LANGUAGE.
Basic Introduction to Lisp
Functional Programming: Lisp MacLennan Chapter 10.
1 FP Foundations, Scheme In Text: Chapter Chapter 14: FP Foundations, Scheme Mathematical Functions Def: A mathematical function is a mapping of.
Forms Writing your own procedures CS 480/680 – Comparative Languages.
C H A P T E R E I G H T Functional Programming Programming Languages – Principles and Paradigms by Allen Tucker, Robert Noonan.
Ch Ch jcmt CSE 3302 Programming Languages CSE3302 Programming Languages (n-n-n-notes) Summer 2003 Dr. Carter Tiernan.
CS314 – Section 5 Recitation 9
Operational Semantics of Scheme
CS314 – Section 5 Recitation 10
Functional Programming Languages
Functional Programming
History of Computing – Lisp
CS 326 Programming Languages, Concepts and Implementation
Introduction to Scheme
Variables, Environments and Closures
Lists in Lisp and Scheme
LISP A brief overview.
Variables, Environments and Closures
FP Foundations, Scheme In Text: Chapter 14.
Functional Programming Languages
Dynamic Scoping Lazy Evaluation
The Metacircular Evaluator
The Metacircular Evaluator (Continued)
6.001 SICP Further Variations on a Scheme
CSCE 314: Programming Languages Dr. Dylan Shell
Streams, Delayed Evaluation and a Normal Order Interpreter
Lisp and Scheme I.
Streams and Lazy Evaluation in Lisp and Scheme
6.001 SICP Variations on a Scheme
Peter Seibel Practical Common Lisp Peter Seibel
Functional Programming: Lisp
topics interpreters meta-linguistic abstraction eval and apply
Common Lisp II.
More Scheme CS 331.
Presentation transcript:

Functional Programming and Lisp

Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. You can create them, put them in data structures, compose them, specialize them, apply the to arguments, etc. You can create them, put them in data structures, compose them, specialize them, apply the to arguments, etc. We’ll look at how functional programming things are done in Lisp We’ll look at how functional programming things are done in Lisp

eval Remember: Lisp code is just an s-expression Remember: Lisp code is just an s-expression You can call Lisp’s evaluation process with the eval function. You can call Lisp’s evaluation process with the eval function.  (define s (list cadr ’ ’(one two three)))  s  (CADR '(ONE TWO THREE)) > (eval s) TWO > (eval (list cdr (car '((quote (a. b)) c)))) B

Apply Apply takes a function and a list of arguments for it, and returns the result of applying the function to the arguments: Apply takes a function and a list of arguments for it, and returns the result of applying the function to the arguments: > (apply + ‘(1 2 3)) 6 It can be given any number of arguments, so long as the last is a list: It can be given any number of arguments, so long as the last is a list: > (apply ‘(3 4 5)) 15 A simple version of apply could be written as A simple version of apply could be written as (define (apply f list) (eval (cons f list)))

Lambda The define special form creates a function and gives it a name. The define special form creates a function and gives it a name. However, functions don’t have to have names, and we don’t need define to define them. However, functions don’t have to have names, and we don’t need define to define them. We can refer to functions literally by using a lambda expression. We can refer to functions literally by using a lambda expression.

Lambda expression A lambda expression is a list containing the symbol lambda, followed by a list of parameters, followed by a body of zero or more expressions: A lambda expression is a list containing the symbol lambda, followed by a list of parameters, followed by a body of zero or more expressions: > (define f (lambda (x) (+ x 2))) > f #<proceedure:f> > (f 100) 102

A lambda expression is a special form A lambda expression is a special form When evaluated, it creates a function and returns a reference to it When evaluated, it creates a function and returns a reference to it The function does not have a name The function does not have a name a lambda expression can be the first element of a function call: a lambda expression can be the first element of a function call: > ( (lambda (x) (+ x 100)) 1) 101 Other languages like python and javascript have adopted the idea Other languages like python and javascript have adopted the idea Lambda expression

define vs. define (define (add2 x) (+ x 2) ) (define add2 (lambda (x) (+ x 2))) (define add2 #f) (set! add2 (lambda (x) (+ x 2))) The define special form comes in two varieties The define special form comes in two varieties The three expressions to the right are entirely equivalent The three expressions to the right are entirely equivalent The first define form is just more familiar and convenient when defining a function The first define form is just more familiar and convenient when defining a function

Mapping functions Common Lisp and Scheme provides several mapping functions. Common Lisp and Scheme provides several mapping functions. map (mapcar in Lisp) is the most frequently used. map (mapcar in Lisp) is the most frequently used. It takes a function and one or more lists, and returns the result of applying the function to elements taken from each list, until one of the lists runs out: It takes a function and one or more lists, and returns the result of applying the function to elements taken from each list, until one of the lists runs out: > (map abs '( )) ( ) > (map cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3)) ((a. 1) (b. 2) (c. 3)) > (map (lambda (x) (+ x 10)) ‘(1 2 3)) > (map (lambda (x) (+ x 10)) ‘(1 2 3)) ( ) > (map list ‘(a b c) ‘( )) map: all lists must have same size; arguments were: # (1 2) (a b c)

Define Lisp’s Every and Some every and some take a predicate and one or more sequences every and some take a predicate and one or more sequences When given just one sequence, they test whether the elements satisfy the predicate: When given just one sequence, they test whether the elements satisfy the predicate:  (every odd? ‘(1 3 5))  #t  (some even? ‘(1 2 3))  #t If given >1 sequences, the predicate must take as many args as there are sequences and args are drawn one at a time from them: If given >1 sequences, the predicate must take as many args as there are sequences and args are drawn one at a time from them:  (every > ‘(1 3 5) ‘(0 2 4))  #t

every (define (every f list) ;; note the use of and ;; note the use of and (if (null? list) (if (null? list) #t #t (and (f (first list)) (and (f (first list)) (every f (rest list))))) (every f (rest list)))))

some (define (some f list) (if (null? list) (if (null? list) #f #f (or (f (first list)) (or (f (first list)) (some f (rest list))))) (some f (rest list)))))

Will this work? (define (some f list) (not (every (lambda (x) (not (f x))) (not (every (lambda (x) (not (f x))) list))) list)))

filter (filter ) returns a list of the elements of for which satisfy the predicate (filter ) returns a list of the elements of for which satisfy the predicate > (filter odd? ‘( )) (1 3 5) > (filter (lambda (x) (> x 98.6)) ‘( )) ( )

Example: filter (define (myfilter list function) ;; returns a list of elements of list for which function is true ;; returns a list of elements of list for which function is true (cond ((null? list) nil) (cond ((null? list) nil) ((function (first list)) ((function (first list)) (cons (first list) (cons (first list) (myfilter (rest list) function))) (myfilter (rest list) function))) (#t (myfilter (rest list) function)))) (#t (myfilter (rest list) function)))) > (filter ‘( ) even?) (2 4 6)

Example: filter Suppose we define INTEGERS as a function that can generate a list of integers between a min and max (define (integers min max) (if (> min max) (if (> min max) ‘( ) ‘( ) (cons min (integers (add1 min) max)))) (cons min (integers (add1 min) max)))) And PRIME? as a predicate that is true of prime numbers and false otherwise > (filter prime? (integers 2 20) ) ( )

Here’s another pattern We often want to do something like sum the elements of a sequence We often want to do something like sum the elements of a sequence (define (sum-list l) (if (null? l) 0 (+ (first l) (sum-list (rest l))))) (+ (first l) (sum-list (rest l))))) And other times we want their product And other times we want their product (define (multiply-list l) (if (null? l) 1 (* (first l) (multiply-list (rest l))))) (* (first l) (multiply-list (rest l)))))

Here’s another pattern We often want to do something like sum the elements of a sequence We often want to do something like sum the elements of a sequence (define (sum-list l) (if (null? l) 0 (+ (first l) (sum-list (rest l))))) (+ (first l) (sum-list (rest l))))) And other times we want their product And other times we want their product (define (multiply-list l) (if (null? l) 1 (* (first l) (multiply-list (rest l))))) (* (first l) (multiply-list (rest l)))))

Example: reduce  Reduce takes (i) a function, (ii) a final value, and (iii) a list  Reduce(+ 0 (v1 v2 v3 … vn)) is just V1 + V2 + V3 + … Vn +0  In Lisp notation: > (reduce + 0 ‘( )) 15 (reduce * 1 ‘( )) 120

Example: reduce (define (reduce function final list) (if (null? list) (if (null? list) final final (function (function (first list) (first list) (reduce function final (rest list))))) (reduce function final (rest list)))))

Using reduce (define (sum-list list) ;; returns the sum of the list elements ;; returns the sum of the list elements (reduce + 0 list)) (reduce + 0 list)) (define (mul-list list) ;; returns the sum of the list elements ;; returns the sum of the list elements (reduce * 1 list)) (reduce * 1 list)) (define (copy-list list) ;; copies the top level of a list ;; copies the top level of a list (reduce cons ‘() list)) (reduce cons ‘() list)) (define (append-list list) ;; appends all of the sublists in a list ;; appends all of the sublists in a list (reduce append ‘() list)) (reduce append ‘() list))

Composing functions > compose #<procedure:compose> > (define (square x) (* x x)) > (define (double x) (* x 2)) > (square (double 10)) 400 > (double (square 10)) 200 > (define sd (compose square double)) > (sd 10) 400 > ((compose double square) 10) 200

Here’s how to define it (define (my-compose f1 f2) (lambda (x) (f1 (f2 x)))) (lambda (x) (f1 (f2 x))))

Variables, free and bound In this function, to what does the variable GOOGOL refer? In this function, to what does the variable GOOGOL refer? (define (big-number? x) ; returns true if x is a really big number ; returns true if x is a really big number (> x GOOGOL)) (> x GOOGOL)) The scope of the variable X is just the body of the function for which it’s a parameter. The scope of the variable X is just the body of the function for which it’s a parameter.

Here, GOOGOL is a global variable > (define GOOGOL (expt )) > GOOGOL > (define (big-number? x) (> x GOOGOL)) > (big-number? (add1 (expt ))) #t

Which X is accessed at the end? > (define GOOGOL (expt )) > GOOGOL > (define x -1) > (define (big-number? x) (> x GOOGOL)) > (big-number? (add1 (expt ))) #t

Variables, free and bound In the body of this function, we say that the variable (or symbol) X is bound and GOOGOL is free. In the body of this function, we say that the variable (or symbol) X is bound and GOOGOL is free. (define (big-number? x) ; returns true if X is a really big number ; returns true if X is a really big number (> X GOOGOL)) (> X GOOGOL)) If it has a value, it has to be bound somewhere else If it has a value, it has to be bound somewhere else

let creates local variables > (let [(pi ) (e )] (e )] (big-number? (expt pi e))) (big-number? (expt pi e)))#f The general form is (let. ) The general form is (let. ) It creates a local environment, binding the variables to their initial values, and evaluates the expressions in It creates a local environment, binding the variables to their initial values, and evaluates the expressions in

Let’s just syntactic sugar for lambda ((lambda (pi e) (big-number? (expt pi e))) ) ) and this is how we did it back before ~1973 and this is how we did it back before ~1973 What happens here: What happens here: (let [ (x 10) (xx (* x 2)) ] (printf “x: ~s, xx: ~s\n” x xx)) (printf “x: ~s, xx: ~s\n” x xx))

let and let* The let special form evaluates all of the expressions that provide the initial values, and then creates a new environment in which the local variables are bound to them The let special form evaluates all of the expressions that provide the initial values, and then creates a new environment in which the local variables are bound to them let* expands to a series of nested lets let* expands to a series of nested lets (let* [(x 100)(xx (* 2 x))] (foo x xx) ) (let* [(x 100)(xx (* 2 x))] (foo x xx) ) (let [(x 100)] (let [(xx (* 2 x))] (foo x xx) ) ) (let [(x 100)] (let [(xx (* 2 x))] (foo x xx) ) )

What happens here? > (define X 10) > (let [(X (* X X))] (printf “X is ~s\n” X) (set! X 1000) (printf “X is ~s\n” X) -1 ) ??? > X ???

What happens here? > (define X 10)  (let [(X (* X X))] (printf “X is ~s\n” X) (set! X 1000) (printf “X is ~s\n” X) -1 ) X is 100 X is 1000 > X 10

What happens here? > (define GOOGOL (expt )) > (define (big-number? x) (> x GOOGOL)) > (let [(GOOGOL (expt ))] (big-number? (add1 (expt )))) (big-number? (add1 (expt ))))???

What happens here? > (define GOOGOL (expt )) > (define (big-number? x) (> x GOOGOL)) > (let [(GOOGOL (expt ))] (big-number? (add1 (expt )))) (big-number? (add1 (expt ))))#t The free variable GOOGOL is looked up in the environment in which the big-number? Function was defined! The free variable GOOGOL is looked up in the environment in which the big-number? Function was defined!

Dynamic vs. Static Scoping Programming languages either use dynamic or static (aka lexical) scoping Programming languages either use dynamic or static (aka lexical) scoping In a statically scoped language, free variables in functions are looked up in the environment in which the function is defined In a statically scoped language, free variables in functions are looked up in the environment in which the function is defined In a dynamically scoped language, free variables are looked up in the environment in which the function is called In a dynamically scoped language, free variables are looked up in the environment in which the function is called

Closures Lisp is a lexically scoped language. Lisp is a lexically scoped language. Free variables referenced in a function those are looked up in the environment in which the function is defined. Free variables referenced in a function those are looked up in the environment in which the function is defined. Free variables are those a function (or block) doesn’t create scope for. A closure is a function that remembers the environment in which it was created A closure is a function that remembers the environment in which it was created An environment is just a collection of variable bindings and their values. An environment is just a collection of variable bindings and their values.

Closure example > (define (make-counter) (let ((count 0)) (lambda () (set! count (add1 count))))) (let ((count 0)) (lambda () (set! count (add1 count))))) > (define c1 (make-counter)) > (define c2 (make-counter)) > (c1) > (c2) ???

A fancier make-counter Write a fancier make-counter function that takes an optional argument that specifies the increment > (define by1 (make-counter)) > (define by2 (make-counter 2)) > (define decrement (make-counter -1)) > (by2) 2(by2)4

Optional arguments in Scheme (define (make-counter. args) ;; args is bound to a list of the actual arguments passed to the function ;; args is bound to a list of the actual arguments passed to the function (let [(count 0) (let [(count 0) (inc (if (null? args) 1 (first args)))] (inc (if (null? args) 1 (first args)))] (lambda ( ) (set! count (+ count inc))))) (lambda ( ) (set! count (+ count inc)))))

Keyword arguments in Scheme Scheme, like Lisp, also has a way to define functions that take keyword arguments Scheme, like Lisp, also has a way to define functions that take keyword arguments (make-counter) (make-counter) (make-counter :initial 100) (make-counter :initial 100) (make-counter :increment -1) (make-counter :increment -1) (make-counter :initial 10 :increment -2) (make-counter :initial 10 :increment -2) Different Scheme dialects have introduced different ways to mix positional arguments, optional arguments, default values, keyword argument, etc. Different Scheme dialects have introduced different ways to mix positional arguments, optional arguments, default values, keyword argument, etc.

Closure tricks We can write several functions that are closed in the same environment, which can then provide a private communication channel (define foo #f) (define bar #f) (let ((secret-msg "none")) (set! foo (lambda (msg) (set! secret-msg msg))) (set! foo (lambda (msg) (set! secret-msg msg))) (set! bar (lambda () secret-msg))) (set! bar (lambda () secret-msg))) (display (bar)) ; prints "none" (newline) (foo ”attack at dawn") (display (bar)) ; prints ”attack at dawn"