CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting clinical trials Rennie (JAMA) urged the.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Katrina Abuabara, MD, MA1 Esther E Freeman MD, PhD2;

Advertisements

Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop.

Dr. S. Manikandan Assistant Professor of Pharmacology JIPMER, Pondicherry. Standard Reporting guidelines: CONSORT and Others.

Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK

 Finding the right information to answer a given question often depends on the source of the information  Searching for evidence that has already been.

Step 2: Locating the Evidence. Table of Contents Evidence Pyramid –Filtered InformationFiltered Information Systematic Reviews/Meta-AnalysesSystematic.

Elements of a clinical trial research protocol

Reporting Guidelines for Trials of Social and Psychological Interventions: CONSORT-SPI EVAN MAYO-WILSON, DPHIL SEAN GRANT, MSC PAUL MONTGOMERY, DPHIL KENNETH.

Statistical Editor, Health & Social Care in the Community

Involving people with learning disability in research – should the net be widened? Lesley Goldsmith School of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of Health University.

Some standard formats of reporting Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

“But WHAT did they actually do?” Poor reporting of interventions: a remediable barrier to research translation Associate Professor Tammy

Chapter 7. Getting Closer: Grading the Literature and Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence.

STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم. Randomised, controlled trial Population Sample Outcome Experimental intervention Control intervention Randomisation Time.

Publication Bias in Medical Informatics evaluation research: Is it an issue or not? Mag. (FH) Christof Machan, M.Sc. Univ-Prof. Elske Ammenwerth Dr. Thomas.

How your submission will be evaluated by European Urology reviewers: Reviewer template and Publication guidelines Jim Catto Associate Editor European Urology.

Authors of manuscripts stemming from either platform and poster presentations are invited to submit an article for publication in the CAC Supplement that.

Main issues Effect-size ratio Development of protocols and improvement of designs Research workforce and stakeholders Reproducibility practices and reward.

Title Name Institute. Background -1 (Main problem)

Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.

Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.

Kirsten Fiest, PhD June 23, CONDUCTING META-ANALYSES IN HEALTH RESEARCH.

Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.

How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger. Academic viva 2 papers 1 hour to read both Viva on both papers Summary-what is the paper about.

Suppl Fig. 1a The clinical protocol is shown schematically.

Professor Phillipa Hay Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine.

116 (27%) 185 (43%) 49 (11%) How to critically appraise a systematic review Igho J. Onakpoya MD MSc University of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter ：呂宥達 Date ： 2005/10/27.

Chapter 2 What is Evidence?. Objectives Discuss the concept of “best available clinical evidence.” Describe the general content and procedural characteristics.

R. Heshmat MD; PhD candidate Systematic Review An Introduction.

Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop 10 October 2012, Freiburg, Germany.

Study Flow Diagram Holvoet P, et al. JAMA 2008;299: The Figure shows the selection of 1889 participants who did not have metabolic syndrome at year.

The Search for Significance: A Practical Guide to

Chapter 4 INTRODUCTION TO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, THIRD CANADIAN EDITION by John Hunsley and Catherine M. Lee.

Flow Diagram of Identification of Randomized Trials for Inclusion Goran Bjelakovic, et al. JAMA. 2007;297:

April Center for Open Fostering openness, integrity, and reproducibility of scientific research.

Reporting in health research Why it matters How to improve Presentation for the Center for Open Science July 10, 2015 April Clyburne-Sherin.

“Reading and commenting papers” (Scientific English) Alexis Descatha INSERM, UMS UVSQ- Unité de pathologie professionnelle, Garches.

Sample Journal Club Your Name Here.

Descriptive Title for Talk

Evaluating the effectiveness of open science practices

Power, Sample Size and Confounding

Reporting guidelines: current status

Paroxetine, Cognitive Therapy or Their Combination in the Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder with and without Avoidant Personality Disorder: A Randomized.

Society for Yoga Research — Health Research Reporting Guidelines —

Materials & Methods what to include and where

increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis

First glance Is this manuscript of interest to readers of the journal?

No. of runs Xo X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Si

STROBE Statement revision

Uses of STROBE in real life Questionnaire results

JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Effect of Oral Voriconazole on Fungal Keratitis Prajna NV, TKrishnan T, Rajaraman R, et al; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment.

What are reporting guidelines The EQUATOR Network workshop

الأستاذ المساعد بقسم المناهج وطرق التدريس

Janna Friedly M.D. Assistant Professor University of Washington

JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Health Outcomes in Youth Fedele DA, Cushing CC, Fritz A, Amaro CM, Ortega.

Writing your manuscript: Results and Discussion

Flow diagram for exclusions of trials identified RCT indicates randomized controlled trial Hulten E, et al. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:

STROBE Statement revision

Flow diagram of sample selection and reduction of subject numbers by application of exclusion criteria. ‡Data from Medical Record; ‡‡Records missing gender.

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram of VRC trial

PRISMA flow diagram for selection of RCTs from leading sports medicine journals for the publication years 2005 and 2015. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items.

RANDOM NUMBERS SET # 1:

Evidence-based Practice in Psychology (EBPP)

MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA

IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy, 28 February - 2 March 2018

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

The JAAD adopts the CONSORT statement

ISSUES RELATED TO PUBLICATION OF health system-based investigations

Presentation transcript:

CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting clinical trials Rennie (JAMA) urged the consolidation of SORT and Asilomar recommendations  Evolving document; latest in 2010  Over 600 journals endorse and use it  Evidence suggest its use improves reporting of randomized trials (Plint et al., Med J 2006, 185:236-7) One of many such sets of recommendations used: STROBE (observational), STARD (diagnostics), PRISMA (Reviews/Meta-Analyses), STREGA (genetic associations), etc.

CONSORT Checklist Content, in part

CONSORT Checklist Content, in part (2)

CONSORT Flow Diagram

Application to Basic Science? False-Positive Psychology : Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant: Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson and Uri Simonsohn, Psychological Science published online 17 October 2011 Researcher degrees of freedom create laxity in design and reporting  EG: gathering more samples to assure significance (participants)  EG: combining or transforming measures (set analysis in advance)  EG: excluded data? On what basis? (inclusion, exclusion criteria) The natural tendency is to report the positive findings, not to report the negative; no one (including researchers) is a good judge of their own conflicts of interest or bias.