OnsiteCAPSD NDL Barbara J. Smith, Senior Program Analyst, USDA-FNS-Child Nutrition Programs Program Monitoring Branch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

IACUC EVALUATIONS Program Reviews & Facility Inspections William R. Parlett, Jr., DVM, DACLAM Compliance Officer (Contractor) Office of Laboratory Animal.
Bad Debt Collection Nutrition Programs Illinois State Board of Education August 20, 2010.
Taking Care of Your Multi-Site Program!. Stand Up if You are Responsible for MORE THAN ONE Center (More than one center under the same CNIPS number) MORE.
VENDED PROGRAMS SFSP FY 05. What is a Food Service Management Company? Any organization (including commercial for profit companies, schools, or private.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
Presenter: Barbara J. Smith Senior Program Analyst April 3, 2014 USDA, FNS, Child Nutrition Programs Program Monitoring Branch.
Serious Deficiency: It’s Not a Joke Serious Deficiencies for Providers.
◦ More than one-third of all providers visited did not have up-to-date records ◦ In 80% of sponsors visited, at least 20% of providers lacked up-to-date.
THE CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM playing a vital and integral role in improving the overall quality of care and daily nutritional health of participants.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
WIA Section 188 Disability Checklist Training Element 9 Corrective Actions and Sanctions.
1 Certification of Compliance with New Meal Pattern Requirements.
Kentucky Administrative Review Training. Reinvention Goals The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 calls for a more effective and efficient review process:
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name,
Administrative Review Requirements September 17, 2014.
Responsibility Overview Upon Enrollment of a New Participant.
Is it really that important?
Guidance for Institutions Participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Recordkeeping.
CNP DIRECTORS’ WORKSHOP Administrative Review Be Prepared! March 14, 2014.
MODULE FIVE Monitoring/Reviews/Record Keeping/Forms and Documents School and Community Nutrition 2013.
Joyce Soroka Supervisor of Field Services. P.L , Section 126 Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of.
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION “OVERVIEW” 6 Cent Certification Rule Presentation 1 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care Performance Improvement and Compliance Branch Compliance Management Program Presentation to the North East Family.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Maine CACFP Website Program Information - by type Resources Forms
New Staff Orientation 1 CMS Role of the State Agency Role of the Surveyor Stephanie Senior, RN Branch Manager, Survey Region 2. New York.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
Administrative Reviews Determining Compliance. Administrative Review Basics Formal “full” reviews – At least once every 3 years – Announced or unannounced.
Administrative Reviews Determining Compliance. Administrative Review Basics Formal “full” reviews – At least once every 3 years – Announced or unannounced.
DOCUMENTATION Missouri Medicaid Audit and Compliance Provider Certification Review Materials.
Procurement and Food Service Contracts Pages
THE CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM playing a vital and integral role in improving the overall quality of care and daily nutritional health of participants.
Training Requirements Virginia Department of Health Summer Food Service Program (SFSP) 2014.
Counting and Claiming Presented by: Linda Stull Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Training and Programs.
2013 Summer Food Service Program March 19, Reviews Part II, Chapter 6 - Pages
Serious Deficiency: It’s Not a Joke Avoiding Serious Deficiency as a Sponsor of Centers.
USDA Update: Shaping the Future of CACFP Tina Fritz Namian USDA, FNS.
Monitoring Requirements for Sponsors of Multiple Sites Pages
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE.
Summer Food Service Program
THE CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM playing a vital and integral role in improving the overall quality of care and daily nutritional health of participants.
Serious Deficiencies for Providers. What is Seriously Deficient? “The status of an institution or day care home that has been determined to be non-compliant.
At-Risk Afterschool Meals Section 122: Expansion of afterschool meals for at risk children Intent: Expands CACFP At-Risk Afterschool Meals to all States.
Child & Adult Care Food Program Serious Deficiency Process & Provider Appeals.
CACFP RECORD KEEPING Is it really that important?.
Presenters: Barbara Smith and Belva Brennan April 12, 2012 USDA, Food and Nutrition Service, Child Nutrition Division Program Analysis and Monitoring Branch.
THE CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM playing a vital and integral role in improving the overall quality of care and daily nutritional health of participants.
1 Virginia Department for the Aging 2004 Financial Management Training Presentation (FY 2003/04 Program/Financial Compliance Review ) Raymond L. Williams,
THE CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM playing a vital and integral role in improving the overall quality of care and daily nutritional health of participants.
DC FARMERS’ GUIDE Season OBJECTIVES 1.ROLE OF FARMERS 2.HOW TO ACCEPT “GET FRESH” CHECKS 3.HOW TO ACCEPT VEGETABLE AND FRUIT CASH- VALUE CHECKS.
RECORDKEEPING & MONITORING. Required Daily Records ◦ Daily attendance rosters or sign-in sheets ◦ Number of at-risk afterschool snacks and/or meals prepared.
Monitoring Family Day Care Home Sponsors. Responsibilities Staffing Frequency Types of reviews During the review Review follow-up.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
OSHA – What to Expect When You’re Inspected (Following Federal Guidelines)
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Administrative Review Requirements.
Monitoring for Sponsors of Family Day Care Homes.
Civil Rights in the Child Care Food Program (CCFP) Updated
Seriously Deficient What Does It Mean? Prepared and Presented By: Suzanne Leggas Rene’ Poitra.
Presenter: Barbara J. Smith Senior Program Analyst April 2, 2014 USDA, FNS, Child Nutrition Programs Program Monitoring Branch.
BRIGHTON TRAINING GROUP CACFP’S ROLE IN HEAD START FISCAL INTREGRITY NCA Conference 2015.
Summer Food Service Program 101.  Child Nutrition Program- administered by CDE OSN  Ensures children receive nutritious meals during the summer  Free.
Welcome sponsors and hearing officers Intro Today we will:
Claiming Children with Special Needs
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Roles and Responsibilities
Administrative Review Requirements
Roles and Responsibilities
in the Child Care Food Program (CCFP)
Presentation transcript:

OnsiteCAPSD NDL Barbara J. Smith, Senior Program Analyst, USDA-FNS-Child Nutrition Programs Program Monitoring Branch

ONSITE SD NDL NOT THIS….

0NSITE CAP NDL SD BUT THIS!

To ensure compliance with Program regulations Meal Pattern Licensing or approval Attendance at training Meal counts Menu and Meal Records Annual updating and content of enrollment forms

To ensure compliance with Program regulations Facilities reviewed 3 times each year At least two of three unannounced At least observation of meal service One review during new facility’s first 4 weeks Not more than six months apart

To ensure compliance with Program regulations Correction of problems previously noted Five-day reconciliation

Recurring areas of non-compliance: Outdated enrollment forms No attendance forms Menus not current Meal counts not current

Recurring areas of non-compliance: Significant number of meals not meeting meal pattern Claiming children not in attendance Provider not at home during meal service times

SO failure to require corrective action Written Corrective Action only required for SDs All areas of non-compliance must be corrected. FNS recommends all corrective actions be in writing.

An Acceptable CAP also answers these questions :  What are the SDs and the procedures that will be implemented to address SDs?  Who will address the SD?

An Acceptable CAP also answers these questions:  When will the procedure be implemented?  Where will the CAP documentation be retained?

An Acceptable CAP also answers these questions:  How everyone be informed of new procedures?  Additional supporting documentation

Failure to require corrective action Unacceptable corrective action -“Try to do a better job keeping my daily records” -Sob story justifications -“Promise not to do it again”

A systematic process to correct serious Program problems and ensure due process Two Outcomes: Correction or Termination and Disqualification

Identify the SD Issue Notice Review CAP for adequacy SIX STEPS

Issue Temporary Deferral or NPTD Provide Appeal Issue Temporary Deferral or NTD SIX STEPS

False or Fraudulent Claims Imminent Threat to Health and Safety SDs Requiring Suspension

Imminent Threat to Health and Safety SDs Requiring Suspension Resolution NOT dependent on Appeal to licensing

Reasons for Declaring SD Serious deficiencies for institutions and facilities are listed in Regs. Listings are NOT all Inclusive

Frequency Occasional or Repetitive Severity minor or major FNS anticipates the use of discretion in determining whether a problem rises to the level of a “SD”.

Discretion CANNOT be used to keep an institution or provider in the Program at all cost. SO may be declared SD for:  the improper use of termination for convenience and  the improper implementation of the SD process.

What is “permanent” corrective action? Definition depends on a number of factors:  Nature of original problem  Amount of time elapsed  Changes in Personnel  Availability of records to document CA

Role of Hearing Official Assess SA or SO action to propose termination  Determine if actions are compliant  Base decision on laws, regulations, policies, etc.

Role of Hearing Official Assess SA or SO action to propose termination  Not interpret the intent or expand meaning of regs  Not validate the SD determination

Role of Hearing Official Assess SA or SO action to propose termination  Not verify is CA submitted is acceptable  Not establish settlement of demands for overpayments

List, maintained by USDA, of institutions, RPIs, and day care home providers who have been disqualified from participation in the Program

NOT A PRIORITY!  For NDL removal, there is no specified form to be submitted.  A written request to be removed from the NDL – not a request to be reinstated to the CACFP

NOT A PRIORITY!  Request MUST contain an acceptable CAP…. and any debt to the Program, with applicable interest, must be repaid.

NOT A PRIORITY! Requires concurrence from: State Agency Regional Office and FNS National Office

NOT A PRIORITY! FNS recommends that SAs establish written policies and procedures

ONSITE SD NDL NOT THIS….

0NSITE CAP NDL SD BUT THIS!

OnsiteCAPSD NDL

OnsiteCAPSD NDL