 Dr. Barbara Hioco  Michael White  Lisa McAndrews  Melanie Highfill  Emilie Gerety  Renee Dauer  Nate Saari.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
P.R.A.I.S.E. & VVC Collaboration + Participation = Accreditation Office of Institutional Effectiveness :: Fall 2011.
ROUNDTABLE SESSION # 4 JANUARY 28, :30 PM OHIO ROOM Planning for Our Future 1.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Assessment of Learning at the Peralta Community Colleges Engaging the College Community in Assessment Opportunities and Transforming the Institutional.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
2011 Strategic Plan Update Presented by Dr. Jothany Blackwood 1.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
State Center Community College District North Centers Duty Day State of the North Centers Report Terry Kershaw, Vice Chancellor January 5, 2012.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.
Annual Plan Database Training October 4, 2006 Annual Plan Database Training October 4, 2006.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
College-wide Partnerships: Integrated Planning. Once upon a time…
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
December 2010 Board of Trustees Overview of the New Accreditation, Accountability, and Assessment Committee Structure.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
CCSF Strategic Planning Update September 23, 2010 General Presentation for the CCSF Community and Board of Trustees.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Planning Definitions 9/25/2015. Components of a Strategic Plan Hinton, K.E. (2012). A Practical Guide to Strategic Planning in Higher Education. Society.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Lisa will read the question. The first person to stand up will be called upon to answer. If they answer the question correctly, they will receive the.
Meeting Accreditation Challenges. WASC Standards Standard I: Evaluation, integrated planning, implementation, and re- evaluation to verify and improve.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Reedley College Accreditation Follow-Up Report August 9, 2012.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
1 District Office Administrative Services Unit Review (ASUR) and Annual Operational Planning November 7, 2013 Presented by Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Updated Strategic Plan Presented to Reedley College Fall Classified Assembly Marilyn Behringer September 28, 2011.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Committee Orientation
Accreditation Self-Study
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Presented To: College Planning Council
Program Review and Accreditation
Presented To: College Planning Council
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
ISER Committee Presentation-College Council
Completing your Program Review
Presented To: College Planning Council
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation follow-up report
Presented To: College Planning Council
STRATEGIC GOAL III Strengthen planning, budgeting and assessment.
Presentation transcript:

 Dr. Barbara Hioco  Michael White  Lisa McAndrews  Melanie Highfill  Emilie Gerety  Renee Dauer  Nate Saari

 Jeopardy – Lisa McAndrews  Welcome – Dr. Hioco and Michael White  What is an Assembly?? – Emilie Gerety  What is Integrated Planning? – Marilyn Behringer  How is Integrated Planning Relevant? – Melanie Highfill  Why do We C.A.R.E.? – Emilie Gerety  Who Wants to be a Millionaire? – Nate Saari  Summary – Michael White MW

 Dialogue within our division!  Addressed concerns and accomplishments  We C.A.R.E.  Reviewed college and department goals  Established division goal of evaluation/improving customer service  Discussion Boards on Blackboard EG

 Requires that institutions “assess progress toward achieving stated goals and make decisions regarding the improvement of institutional effectiveness in an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, resource allocation, implementation and re-evaluation.”  “A college must have a point in its decision-making process whereby it considers all of its plans, determines how to align them and which ones it will commit to, determines the sequence in which they might best be achieved, sets priorities, and allocates resources and responsibilities to achieve the needed changes by determined dates.” Source: ACCJC News, Fall 2009

CommitteesPlans Admin. Structure Evaluation PeopleProducts Development and Revision Process Implementation (Action)Assessment & Improvement

Mission Statement Educational Master Plan Strategic Plan Technology Plan College Committee and Grant Plans Staffing Plan Resource Planning College GoalsFacilities Plan Reedley College Plans

 The college’s Mission describes the college’s intended student population and the services the college promises to provide to the community. As such, this statement is the touchstone for the entire planning process. ↓  The college uses this statement, as well as the goals developed by the Board of Trustees, to assess its current status and anticipate future challenges in a long-term Educational Master Plan. ↓  This long-term plan is then the driver of the college’s three-year Strategic Plans and its annual Program Reviews. The program reviews include a thorough analysis of each academic and student services program and administrative function, as well as programmatic planning at the unit level. The strategic objectives in the Strategic Plan and the unit plans in the Program Reviews also inform the subsequent editions of the Educational Master Plan; the long-term and short-terms plans reciprocally inform one another. ↓  Resources are allocated based on college-wide strategic plans and unit-level plans, thereby ensuring the college’s forward movement on the college’s strategic objectives that were drawn from the recommendations in the Educational Master Plan and articulated in the Strategic Plan. ↓  Following the allocation of resources, the college mobilizes its resources to implement its plans. ↓  The college assesses progress on the strategic objectives and makes adjustments in action steps as needed to continue the college’s forward movement in fulfilling its mission. Assessment of the outcomes as well as assessment of the planning processes itself is embedded throughout the planning efforts.

Mission Statement Educational Master Plan Strategic Plan Technology Plan College Committee and Grant Plans Staffing Plan Resource Planning College GoalsFacilities Plan Reedley College Plans – development responsibilities All Constituent Groups (C.G.’s), Semi-annually College Council, all C.G., years Strategic Planning committee, College Council, 2-3 years TAC, college council, living document Committees, College Council, Yearly What constituent groups? How often? Budget Committee, C.G., yearly. Executive Cabinet, college council, yearly Facilities Committee, All C.G., years

 The College Mission statement is a cornerstone of the Planning Process  The Educational Master Plan provides a look at the current and future long-term goals of the college based on the Mission  Facilities, Technology, and Equipment Replacement Plans  The Strategic Plan and Program Review Process bring planning to the course, program, and service levels for a thorough self-analysis  Resources are allocated based on these plans and move the college forward  Assessment and analysis help measure progress MH

Why don’t people take the opportunity to participate?  Apathetic  Busy  Not committed  Disconnect/disgruntled  Don’t see the need  Core personality (lazy)  Don’t believe  Doesn’t make a difference  Time  Compliant  Not part of the job  Burn out  More valuable to department than college as a whole  Individual vs team players  Peer pressure creates guilt for having to backfill jobs when gone.  Animosity builds when gone  Fear of retribution  Have family obligations  Teaching overload Why do people take the opportunity to participate?  Chance to make a difference  Interest  Type-A  Committed  Special Interest  Advancement  Want to be heard  Don’t want to be at their job  They really care  Influencing direction  Have impact  Be part of decision making  High trust of administration EG

1. Light Switch Messages – Important facts regarding integrated planning will be posted each week near the light switches in Student Services departments. 2. Student Services Weekly – A question will be sent each week with the Students Services Pop Quiz – Student Services managers will travel to the various departments to give a “pop quiz”. 4. Student Services Managers – Managers will be given “assignments” to review with their departments at each SSMC meeting. A quiz will be sent out to everyone. 5. Digital Scavenger Hunt – Points will be given to those who can locate items related to integrated planning on-line. 6. POINTS – Accumulated points will be posted on the RC Student Services Blackboard site. We will have a curriculum plan for the fall and spring semesters! A Fall Grand Champion will be announced in January MW

Why are we worried about Integrated Planning? 1. Dialogue 2. Your own personal “integration” into the campus! (What is my role?) 3. “Myth Busting” 4. Accreditation Date of Accreditation Visit: October 2011