3 He NMR in Aerogel Yu. Bunkov H. Godfrin E. Collin A.S. Chen D. Cousins R. Harakaly S. Triqueneaux J. Sauls J. Parpia W. Halperin Yu. Mukharskiy V. Dmitriev.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Section 1. Kinetic Theory: How particles in matter behave 3 Basic Assumptions of the Kinetic Theory 1.All matter is composed of small particles (atoms,
Advertisements

Pressure and Kinetic Energy
Nanostructures on ultra-clean two-dimensional electron gases T. Ihn, C. Rössler, S. Baer, K. Ensslin C. Reichl and W. Wegscheider.
Observation of a possible Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state in CeCoIn 5 Roman Movshovich Andrea Bianchi Los Alamos National Laboratory, MST-10.
Theory of the pairbreaking superconductor-metal transition in nanowires Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu.
Probing Superconductors using Point Contact Andreev Reflection Pratap Raychaudhuri Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai Collaborators: Gap anisotropy.
Detecting collective excitations of quantum spin liquids Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu.
Size effect in the vortex-matter phase transition in Bi 2 Sr 2 CaCuO 8+  ? B. Kalisky, A. Shaulov and Y. Yeshurun Bar-Ilan University Israel T. Tamegai.
Compound Torsional Oscillator: Frequency Dependence and Hysteresis of Supersolid 4 He (and Search for Superfluid Sound Mode) Harry Kojima Rutgers University.
Chaos and interactions in nano-size metallic grains: the competition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism Yoram Alhassid (Yale) Introduction Universal.
Mesoscopic Anisotropic Magnetoconductance Fluctuations in Ferromagnets Shaffique Adam Cornell University PiTP/Les Houches Summer School on Quantum Magnetism,
Anderson localization in BECs
ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS discontinuous jumps: layering transitions some layering transitions coexistence pressure monolayer condensation bilayer condensation.
Magneto-optical study of InP/InGaAs/InP quantum well B. Karmakar, A.P. Shah, M.R. Gokhale and B.M. Arora Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai,
Rinat Ofer Supervisor: Amit Keren. Outline Motivation. Magnetic resonance for spin 3/2 nuclei. The YBCO compound. Three experimental methods and their.
Quasiparticle anomalies near ferromagnetic instability A. A. Katanin A. P. Kampf V. Yu. Irkhin Stuttgart-Augsburg-Ekaterinburg 2004.
Universal Spin Transport in Strongly Interacting Fermi Gases Ariel Sommer Mark Ku, Giacomo Roati, Martin Zwierlein MIT INT Experimental Symposium May 19,
Valencia Bernd Hüttner Folie 1 New Physics on the Femtosecond Time Scale Bernd Hüttner CphysFInstP DLR Stuttgart.
Pierre Le Doussal (LPTENS) Kay J. Wiese (LPTENS) Florian Kühnel (Universität Bielefeld ) Long-range correlated random field and random anisotropy O(N)
Lecture II Non dissipative traps Evaporative cooling Bose-Einstein condensation.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Investigating the mechanism of High Temperature Superconductivity by Oxygen Isotope Substitution Eran Amit Amit Keren Technion- Israel Institute of Technology.
Yu. Bunkov E. Collin J. Elbs H. Godfrin The status of new Dark Matter project ULTIMA Yuriy M. Bunkov C R T B T – C N R S, Grenoble, France Cosmology in.
Electron coherence in the presence of magnetic impurities
Heat Transport by Liquid Helium through Aerogel James A. Sauls, Northwestern University, DMR Silica Aerogel is very low density glass (SiO 2 )
Topological defects creation at fast transition: Kibble mechanism and Zurek scenario Experiments with neutrons: Vortex creation in 3He+n reaction Dark.
A Portable Ultrasensitive SERF Atomic Magnetometer for Biomagnetic Measurements R Wyllie, 1 Z Li, 2 R Wakai, 3 N Proite, 1 P Cook, 1 T Walker 1 1 – Department.
Quantum Spin Glasses & Spin Liquids.  QUANTUM RELAXATION Ising Magnet in a Transverse Magnetic Field (1) Aging in the Spin Glass (2) Erasing Memories.
Thermal Boundary Resistance of the Superfluid 3 He A-B Phase Interface D.I. Bradley S.N. Fisher A.M. Guénault R.P. Haley H. Martin G.R. Pickett J.E. Roberts.
Dynamics of phase transitions in ion traps A. Retzker, A. Del Campo, M. Plenio, G. Morigi and G. De Chiara Quantum Engineering of States and Devices: Theory.
Fermi-Edge Singularitäten im resonanten Transport durch II-VI Quantenpunkte Universität Würzburg Am Hubland, D Michael Rüth, Anatoliy Slobodskyy,
Broken symmetries in bulk condensed matter systems have implications for the spectrum of Fermionic excitations bound to surfaces and topological defects.The.
Modeling thermoelectric properties of TI materials: a Landauer approach Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Network for Computational Nanotechnology, Electrical.
Normal Fluid Behavior and Superfluid Density of 3 He in axially compressed aerogel Cornell Robert Bennett, Nik Zhelev and Andrew Fefferman Royal Holloway:
Coexistence and Competition of Superconductivity and Magnetism in Ho 1-x Dy x Ni 2 B 2 C Hyeon-Jin Doh, Jae-Hyuk Choi, Heon-Jung Kim, Eun Mi Choi, H. B.
Rotating Superfluid 3 He in Aerogel Takao Mizusaki Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University Collaborators: Kyoto University,
GC, 08/2015 ULT Grenoble group Probing mesoscopic lengthscales in (super)fluid 3 He Funding: E. Collin H. Godfrin, A. Fefferman, O. Maillet, M. Defoort,
Superfluid 3He in aerogel I.A. Fomin, P.L. Kapitza Institute for Physical Problems, Moscow. XV INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL NICOLÁS CABRERA 100 YEARS LIQUID.
Spin Dynamics of Superfluid 3 He in Aerogel Osamu Ishikawa Osaka City University.
Drude weight and optical conductivity of doped graphene Giovanni Vignale, University of Missouri-Columbia, DMR The frequency of long wavelength.
Collaborations: L. Santos (Hannover) Former members: R. Chicireanu, Q. Beaufils, B. Pasquiou, G. Bismut A.de Paz (PhD), A. Sharma (post-doc), A. Chotia.
Our goal is to understand the properties of delocalized vacancies in solid 4 He. Using a triplet of orthogonal diffusion measurements we plan to locate.
Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance High Field (Resolution) NMR: 7.5 T < B < 37 T Study of chemical structures, reactions (only solution) Low Field (Resolution)
Transport in three-dimensional magnetic field: examples from JT-60U and LHD Katsumi Ida and LHD experiment group and JT-60 group 14th IEA-RFP Workshop.
Raman Scattering As a Probe of Unconventional Electron Dynamics in the Cuprates Raman Scattering As a Probe of Unconventional Electron Dynamics in the.
Measurements of the Leggett Frequency in 3 He-B in Aerogel V.V.Dmitriev, V.V. Zavjalov, D.Ye. Zmeev, N.Mulders + University of Delaware, USA Kapitza Institute,
Study of T 1 relaxation time A proposal to test T 1 using a dilution fridge and SQUID NMA at Royal Hollow University,London.
Superconductivity with T c up to 4.5 K 3d 6 3d 5 Crystal field splitting Low-spin state:
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Hideaki Uematsu Department of Physics Yamagata University.
Shear and Bulk Viscosities of Hot Dense Matter Joe Kapusta University of Minnesota New Results from LHC and RHIC, INT, 25 May 2010.
1. What is an NMR Spectrum ? 2. What are the Spectral Features? 3. What are the Spectral Parameters? 4. How much should be known about the NMR Phenomena.
Basics of edge channels in IQHE doing physics with integer edge channels studies of transport in FQHE regime deviations from the ‘accepted’ picture Moty.
Convection Heat Transfer in Manufacturing Processes P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Mode of Heat Transfer due to.
Eutectic Phase Diagram NOTE: at a given overall composition (say: X), both the relative amounts.
Chapter 7 in the textbook Introduction and Survey Current density:
Saturation Roi Levy. Motivation To show the deference between linear and non linear spectroscopy To understand how saturation spectroscopy is been applied.
CLARIDGE CHAPTER 2.2; 3.2.
Applications of the Canonical Ensemble: Simple Models of Paramagnetism
Electrical Properties of Materials
UNIT - 4 HEAT TRANSFER.
Temperature, Heat, and the First Law of Thermodynamics
Introduction to Matter Chapters 1 & 2
Magnetic, structural and electronic properties of LaFeAsO1-xFx
Water and Backbone Dynamics in a Hydrated Protein
all Cooper pairs must behave in the same way
Continuous Change of Landau Renormalization from Heavy Fermion to Mixed Valence in Ce1-xYbxCoIn5 Zhaofeng Ding, J. Zhang, C. Tan, K. Huang, Lei Shu (Fudan.
Spectroscopy of ultracold bosons by periodic lattice modulations
Correlations of Electrons in Magnetic Fields
Temperature, Heat, and the First Law of Thermodynamics
by I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K
Presentation transcript:

3 He NMR in Aerogel Yu. Bunkov H. Godfrin E. Collin A.S. Chen D. Cousins R. Harakaly S. Triqueneaux J. Sauls J. Parpia W. Halperin Yu. Mukharskiy V. Dmitriev Chamrousse, December 2004

Phase diagram “similar” 98 % samples average geometric mfp l a ~ 200 nm structure correlation  a Our measures: NMR on three samples from N. Mulders k F ~ 1 Å << l a, one expects: no effect on Landau parameters restriction of mean free path “confined” Fermi liquid “B-like” superfluid ? supercooled “A-like” ? plus: adsorbed disordered 2D solid HISM and IISM models Parameters l,  a zero field measure P (bar) l a ~  0 of the p-wave pairs suppression of T c

Experimental setup vibrating wire NMR coils magnetic field Stycast cells Ag sinters B // Cell Pt powder Aerogel

Magnetisation M(P,T) = C n n solid (P) M solid (T) + n liquid (P) M liquid (T) M solid (T) = 1 / (T-  W ) 17.5 bar low fields, low powers integrated NMR line M (a.u.) T c,a T c,b  W effective ferromagnetic interaction

Fermi liquid magnetisation effectively: no change in the Landau parameters Bulk Aerogel T F ** (mK) New measures of T F **: 10 % smaller than in textbooks!

Solid contribution M (a.u.)  W (mK) Solid 3 He (in % of liquid at 0 bar) fit from T c,b to the highest temperature densification in the disordered solid ~ 1.5 layers ~ 3 layers from BET surface similar to fluorocarbon, Schuhl, Maegawa, Meisel, Chapellier, Phys. Rev. B 1987

Removing the 3 He solid 17.5 bar M (a.u.)  W (mK) adding 4 He removes the localised 3 He atoms: allows to study the confined liquid properties alone

Transport properties without solid 3 He spin diffusion D  measurement (pulsed NMR, 34 mT) 0.5 bar, G z = 0.25 Gauss/cm ln(H/H 0 ) A = 2/3 D  (  G z ) 2

Spin diffusion l = 130 nm for both fits HISM; consistent with other measures less good at 30 bars… correlations of the aerogel structure ? T (mK) D  (cm 2 /s) 0.5 bar 29.5 bar specific heat Choi, Yawata, Haard, Davis, Gervais, Mulders, Sharma, Sauls, Halperin, PRL 2004 thermal conductivity Fisher, Guénault, Hale, Pickett, JLTP 2001 from Sauls, Bunkov, Collin, Godfrin, Sharma, accepted in Phys. Rev B 2004 T -2

Solid-liquid interaction normal state Width (mT) 12 bar, 37 mT pure 3 He inhomogeneous width ~  b liquid dense solid layer ~  b solid fast exchange: = M liquid  b liquid + M solid  b solid = M liquid  b liquid + M solid  b solid M liquid + M solid ~ b Larmor  b solid ~ 1/T 2,solid >  b liquid similar to Hammel, Richardson, PRL 1984

Solid-liquid interaction normal state fast exchange: = M liquid  b liquid + M solid  b solid M liquid + M solid Width (mT) 17 bar, 37 mT, various amounts of 4 He M (a.u.)

Solid-liquid interaction normal state 17 bar Solid Width (mT) Width (mT) strongly localised atoms Inh. width fast exchange: = M liquid  b liquid + M solid  b solid M liquid + M solid 37 mT

Line shapes normal state Width (mT) 12 bar, pure 3 He 17 bar, 4 He 37 mT

Line shapes normal state Width (mT) 12 bar, pure 3 He 17 bar, 4 He Absorption (a.u.) 4.1 mK, no 3 He solid: Gaussian 37 mT

Line shapes normal state Width (mT) 12 bar, pure 3 He 17 bar, 4 He Absorption (a.u.) 100 mK, 3 He solid: Gaussian 37 mT

Line shapes normal state Width (mT) 12 bar, pure 3 He 17 bar, 4 He Absorption (a.u.) 4.1 mK, 3 He solid: Lorentzian! 37 mT

Line shapes normal state from Lorentzian to Gaussian line shapes 37 mT Shape factor 12 bar, pure 3 He 17 bar, 4 He Gaussian summ of independent lines Shape factor = Second Moment Full Width Half Height fast exchange… need a fast exchange model for the full line

Between T c,b and T c,a “confined” Fermi liquid “B-like” superfluid ? supercooled “A-like” ? zero field measure P (bar) Yuriy’s talk

Superfluid state position of the peak shifts: well defined transition (~50  K) Position (mT) 25 bar, 37 mT Pure 3 He T c,a

Superfluid state position of the peak shifts: well defined transition (~50  K) A phase like supercooling Position (mT) 25 bar, 37 mT Pure 3 He T c,a first studied by Barker, Lee, Polukhina, Osheroff, Hrubesh, Poco, PRL 2000

Superfluid state Consistent with other measures: same l as for spin diffusion  a = 0 nm  a = 40 nm  a = 44 nm 8 % solid 3 He 100 % solid 3 He 0 % solid 3 He Magnetisation similar to Sprague, Haard, Kycia,Rand, Lee, Hamot, Halperin, PRL 1995, Barker, Lee, Polukhina, Osheroff, Hrubesh, Poco, PRL 2000 l = 130 nm P = 17 bar l = 130 nm P = 29.5 bar from Sauls, Bunkov, Collin, Godfrin, Sharma, accepted in Phys. Rev B 2004

Superfluid state Frequency shift With 4 He 1.2 mK 1.4 mK 1.5 mK 1.6 mK 1.8 mK b Larmor 17 bar, 37 mT Absorption (a.u.)

Superfluid state  B   2 2 BB Frequency shift With 4 He Edge =  B,aero F(A  ] Edge ) + Larmor 2 2 Larmor and take F(A  ] Edge ) ~ 0.80 (similar to « flared-out »)  B,Aero 2 (Hz 2 ) 29.5 bar 17.5 bar 19.5 bar Dmitriev, Fomin, JLTP 2004 (scaled for the T c,a ’s) consistent with T c suppression

Superfluid state Frequency shift With 4 He Edge =  B,aero F(A  ] Edge ) + Larmor 2 2 Larmor and 29.5 bar 17.5 bar  =  B,aero + Larmor 2 2 Larmor / F(A  ] Edge ) same texture for both pressures…

Superfluid state assumtions: average position computed from fast exchange expression edge shift taken from the interpolation of 17 bar and 29 bar 29.5 bar 17.5 bar / F(A  ] Edge ) 24.5 bar, pure 3 He Frequency shift With 4 He, compared to pure 3 He 4 He again same texture with/without 4 He…

Superfluid state But… Position (mT for 37 mT) us: 17 bar E2 E3 E4 Haard et al Northwestern: 18 bar B ┴ Cell B // Cell SAME T c,a if the same surface, then …. different textures…. Anisotropy? b Larmor

Superfluid state Lower and lower with the temperature 24.5 bar, 37 mT, pure 3 He Position (mT) b Larmor ? / F(A  ] Edge ) Texture?

Superfluid state Lower and lower with the temperature 24.5 bar, 37 mT pure 3 He Position (mT) b Larmor linear down linear up constant

Superfluid state Lower and lower with the temperature 24.5 bar, 37 mT pure 3 He 17.5 bar, 37 mT with 4 He Absorption (a.u.) redistribution of the spectral weight 3 peaks 3 peaks b Larmor 1.2 mK T/T c,a ~ mK T/T c,a ~0.25

Superfluid state Lower and lower with the temperature 24.5 bar, pure 3 He assumtions: solid still described by Curie-Weiss law fast exchange solid/liquid B phase like superfluid / F(A  ] Edge ) ? sudden reorientation of the texture n ┴ B state? stable texture for B phase in Aerogel n ┴ B, Fomin, to be published

3 He NMR in Aerogel Lots of questions…

Additional slides

Between T c,b and T c,a Absorption (a.u.) 17.5 bar, no solid, 37 mT, 1.8 mK Absorption (a.u.) 29.5 bar, no solid, 37 mT, 1.8 mK Absorption (a.u.) 29.5 bar, no solid, 37 mT, 2.2 mK

Satellite peaks M (a.u.) 17 bar, 37 mT29.5 bar, 37 mT 17 % main NMR signal: 17 % reduction! which goes partially or totally to the measured satellite peaks no 3 He solid 21 % 3 He solid left 8 % 3 He solid left pure 3 He T c,b T c,a

Satellite peaks M sat /M n 29.5 bar, 37 mT 8 % 3 He solid left pure 3 He M sat /M n 17.5 bar, 37 mT no 3 He solid left 73 % 3 He solid left similar, BUT different, on two « identical » samples… similar sample studied in Bunkov et al., PRL 2000

Satellite peaks  B 2 (Hz 2 ) 5.4 bar, 34 mT sample E2 sample E4 fit to bulk-B phase, scaled by 0.6 F(A  ) ~ 0.6 topological defects ? Peak =  B F(A  ) + Larmor 2 2 Larmor

Main NMR line Width (mT) M (a.u.) satellite(s) T c,b ? 8.3 bar, 37 mT

Main NMR line 8.3 bar, 37 mT Width (mT) T c,b Absorption (a.u.) 1 mK, 2 mK, scaled to NMR line area what is the state of the fluid/solid system between T c,b and T c,a ?